J Moons

Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma

Objective:To determine the impact of esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy on staging, disease-free survival, and 5-year survival in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Background:Esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy is mainly performed in Japan. Data from Western experience with 3-field lymphadenectomy are scarce and dealing with relatively small numbers. As a result, its role in the surgical practice of cancer of the esophagus and GEJ remains controversial. Methods:Between 1991 and 1999, primary surgery with 3-field lymphadenectomy was performed in 192 patients, of whom a cohort of 174 R0 resections was used for further analysis. Results:Hospital mortality of the whole series was 1.2%. Overall morbidity was 58%. Pulmonary complications occurred in 32.8%, cardiac dysrhythmias in 10.9%, and persistent recurrent nerve problems in 2.6%. pTNM staging was as follows: stage 0, 0.6%; stage I, 9.2%; stage II, 27.6%; stage III, 28.7%; and stage IV, 33.9%. Overall 3- and 5-year survival was 51% and 41.9%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival was 51.4% and 46.3%, respectively. Locoregional lymph node recurrence was 5.2%; no patient developed an isolated cervical lymph node recurrence. Five-year survival for node-negative patients was 80.2% versus 24.5% for node-positive patients. Five-year survival by stage was 100% in stages 0 and I, 59.1% in stage II, 36.8% in stage III, and 13.3% in stage IV. Twenty-three percent of the patients with adenocarcinoma (25.8% distal third and 17.6% GEJ) and 25% of the patients with squamous cell carcinoma (26.2% middle third) had positive cervical nodes resulting in a change of pTNM staging specifically related to the unforeseen cervical lymph node involvement in 12%. Cervical lymph node involvement was unforeseen in 75.6% of patients with cervical nodes at pathologic examinations. Five-year survival for patients with positive cervical nodes was 27.7% for middle third squamous cell carcinoma. For distal third adenocarcinomas, 4-year survival was 35.7% and 5-year survival 11.9%. No GEJ adenocarcinoma with positive cervical nodes survived for 5 years. Conclusions:Esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection can be performed with low mortality and acceptable morbidity. The prevalence of involved cervical nodes is high, regardless of the type and location of tumor resulting in a change of final staging specifically related to the cervical field in 12% of this series. Overall 5-year and disease-free survival after R0 resection of 41.9% and 46.3%, respectively, may indicate a real survival benefit. A 5-year survival of 27.2% in patients with positive cervical nodes in middle third carcinomas indicates that these nodes should be considered as regional (N1) rather than distant metastasis (M1b) in middle third carcinomas. These patients seem to benefit from a 3-field lymphadenectomy. The role of 3-field lymphadenectomy in distal third adenocarcinoma remains investigational.

Extracapsular lymph node involvement is a negative prognostic factor in T3 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.

OBJECTIVE To assess prognosis according to whether lymph node involvement is intracapsular or with extracapsular breakthrough in adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Materials and methods One hundred ninety-five consecutive patients with T3 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction between 1990 and 1999 were studied. All patients underwent primary R0 esophagectomy. The mean number of resected nodes per patient was 36.9. Survival was analyzed according to intracapsular and extracapsular involvement. RESULTS In N0 patients 5-year survival was 57% and 9-year survival was 38.7%. In patients with positive nodes these figures were 26.2% and 18.1%, respectively (P =.0069). Intracapsular and extracapsular node involvement showed 5- and 10-year survival of 40.9% and 21.7% versus 18% and 15.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference in 5- and 10-year survival between N0 and intracapsular node involvement (P =.43). However, there was a significant difference in survival between N0 and extracapsular node involvement (P =.002) and between intracapsular and extracapsular node involvement (P =.0001). CONCLUSIONS This study shows a significant difference in survival according to whether lymph node involvement was intracapsular or extracapsular. Patients with intracapsular lymph node involvement have similar survival rates as N0 patients. Extracapsular lymph node involvement is a bad prognostic factor, independent of the number of involved lymph nodes. The number of involved lymph nodes has an additive negative effect. These data may have an impact on treatment strategies.

Survival after Trimodality Treatment for Superior Sulcus and Central T4 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: For sulcus superior tumors and central cT4 tumors, low resectability and poor long-term survival rates are obtained with single-modality treatment. Methods: Analysis of all consecutive patients in our prospective database, who had potentially resectable superior sulcus (cT3–T4) and central cT4 tumors and were treated with induction chemoradiotherapy (two courses of cisplatin-etoposide) and concomitant radiotherapy (45 Gy/1.8 Gy) after multidisciplinary discussion. Surgery with attempted complete resection was performed in patients showing response or stable disease on computed tomography. Results: Between April 2002 and February 2008, 32 consecutive patients were enrolled. Two patients did not complete the induction chemoradiotherapy. Thirty patients were reassessed after induction, 28 had response or stable disease by conventional imaging. Twenty-seven patients were surgically explored since one patient became medically inoperable during induction treatment. The overall complete resectability was 78% (25/32). Resection was microscopically incomplete (R1) in two patients. In 11 patients (41%), a pneumonectomy was performed, and in 14 patients (52%), a chest wall resection was necessary. In 74% of the resected patients, there was a complete pathologic response or minimal residual microscopic disease. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 9.2 days with no hospital mortality and no bronchopleural fistula. With a median follow-up of 26.5 months, 5-year survival rates are 74% in the intent-to-treat population (n = 32) and 77% in completely resected patients (n = 25), with no statistically significant difference between sulcus superior tumors and centrally located T4 tumors. Conclusion: In patients with sulcus superior tumors and in selected patients with centrally located T4 tumors, trimodality treatment is feasible with acceptable morbidity and mortality. The complete resectability is high, and long-term survival is promising.

Morbidity and Mortality after Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery in IIIa-N2 non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the frequency and risk of postoperative complications and mortality in patients with IIIa-N2 non small cell lung cancer after induction chemotherapy and surgery. Methods: In a surgical database records from ninety two patients, operated between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2006 were reviewed. Univariate analysis was used to identify predictors of postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality. Results: All cases were histologically confirmed stage IIIa-N2. All patients received preoperative platinum based chemotherapy without radiotherapy. Pneumonectomy was performed in 20 cases (23.5%), from which 9 right sided. (Bi)lobectomy was performed in 53 cases (62.4%) and sleeve lobectomy in 11 cases (17.2%). One wedge resection was performed (1.2%). In 7 cases (7.6%) only an exploration was done. Complications developed in 35 patients (38%). Major complications in 15 patients (16%). No bronchopleural fistulae were observed. Analysis identified increased age and high physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) as a risk factor to develop complications, and a high simplified comorbidity score as a risk factor to develop a major complication. Higher age, Charlson comorbidity index, simplified comorbidity score and POSSUM were a risk factor for developing pneumonia. Conclusion: Although surgery after induction therapy for IIIa-N2 NSCLC can be done with a morbidity and mortality comparable to surgery alone, it remains a high risk operation. It should therefore be performed in a center with experience. Bronchial stump protection should be used whenever there is an increased risk for developing a bronchopleural fistula. In deciding whether to do surgery or radiotherapy one should keep in mind the feasibility of performing a complete resection together with a preoperative assessment to predict complications and mortality. For the preoperative assessment several scoring systems can be used from which we find the simplified comorbidity score most useful.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment followed by surgery for esophageal cancer: there is much more than the mandard tumor regression score

Abstract Objective: Tumor regression grading (TRG) systems categorize residual tumor volume on the primary tumor after neoadjuvant treatment. Aim was to evaluate the impact of Mandard TRG, residual tumor depth (ypT) and residual lymph node status (ypN) and extent (ELNI) i.e. intracapsular versus extracapsular involvement on overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in esophageal carcinoma. Methods: Between 2005 and 2014, 344 patients receiving R0-esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) were selected. Mandard TRG, ypTN and ELNI were prospectively recorded. Results: Mandard TRG1 was found in 110 (32%); TRG2 in 120 (35%); TRG3 in 53 (15%); TRG4 in 54 (16%) and TRG5 in 7 (2%) patients. Both OS and DFS showed no significant difference between TRG1 and 2 (p = 0.059 and 0.105, respectively). Therefore, TRG1/2 was classified together as ‘major response’, TRG3/4 as ‘minor response’ and TRG5 as ‘no response’. Multivariate analysis showed two independent prognosticators for OS (tumor regression response (TRR) and number of positive lymph nodes) and three independent prognosticators for DFS (TRR, ypT and ELNI). Conclusion: After nCRT followed by surgery for esophageal carcinoma, number of residual positive lymph nodes as well as TRR are prognosticators for OS. Minor TRR, ypT and extracapsular lymph node invasion are prognosticators for recurrence.