J. Paul Willging

Clinical practice guideline: Hoarseness (Dysphonia)

Objective: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on managing hoarseness (dysphonia), defined as a disorder characterized by altered vocal quality, pitch, loudness, or vocal effort that impairs communication or reduces voice-related quality of life (QOL). Hoarseness affects nearly one-third of the population at some point in their lives. This guideline applies to all age groups evaluated in a setting where hoarseness would be identified or managed. It is intended for all clinicians who are likely to diagnose and manage patients with hoarseness. Purpose: The primary purpose of this guideline is to improve diagnostic accuracy for hoarseness (dysphonia), reduce inappropriate antibiotic use, reduce inappropriate steroid use, reduce inappropriate use of anti-reflux medications, reduce inappropriate use of radiographic imaging, and promote appropriate use of laryngoscopy, voice therapy, and surgery. In creating this guideline the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation selected a panel representing the fields of neurology, speech-language pathology, professional voice teaching, family medicine, pulmonology, geriatric medicine, nursing, internal medicine, otolaryngology–head and neck surgery, pediatrics, and consumers. Results The panel made strong recommendations that 1) the clinician should not routinely prescribe antibiotics to treat hoarseness and 2) the clinician should advocate voice therapy for patients diagnosed with hoarseness that reduces voice-related QOL. The panel made recommendations that 1) the clinician should diagnose hoarseness (dysphonia) in a patient with altered voice quality, pitch, loudness, or vocal effort that impairs communication or reduces voice-related QOL; 2) the clinician should assess the patient with hoarseness by history and/or physical examination for factors that modify management, such as one or more of the following: recent surgical procedures involving the neck or affecting the recurrent laryngeal nerve, recent endotracheal intubation, radiation treatment to the neck, a history of tobacco abuse, and occupation as a singer or vocal performer; 3) the clinician should visualize the patients larynx, or refer the patient to a clinician who can visualize the larynx, when hoarseness fails to resolve by a maximum of three months after onset, or irrespective of duration if a serious underlying cause is suspected; 4) the clinician should not obtain computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the patient with a primary complaint of hoarseness prior to visualizing the larynx; 5) the clinician should not prescribe anti-reflux medications for patients with hoarseness without signs or symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease; 6) the clinician should not routinely prescribe oral corticosteroids to treat hoarseness; 7) the clinician should visualize the larynx before prescribing voice therapy and document/communicate the results to the speech-language pathologist; and 8) the clinician should prescribe, or refer the patient to a clinician who can prescribe, botulinum toxin injections for the treatment of hoarseness caused by adductor spasmodic dysphonia. The panel offered as options that 1) the clinician may perform laryngoscopy at any time in a patient with hoarseness, or may refer the patient to a clinician who can visualize the larynx; 2) the clinician may prescribe anti-reflux medication for patients with hoarseness and signs of chronic laryngitis; and 3) the clinician may educate/counsel patients with hoarseness about control/preventive measures. Disclaimer: This clinical practice guideline is not intended as a sole source of guidance in managing hoarseness (dysphonia). Rather, it is designed to assist clinicians by providing an evidence-based framework for decision-making strategies. The guideline is not intended to replace clinical judgment or establish a protocol for all individuals with this condition, and may not provide the only appropriate approach to diagnosing and managing this problem.

Pediatric laryngopharyngeal sensory testing during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: feasible and correlative.

Laryngopharyngeal sensory testing can predict aspiration risk in adult patients. Its feasibility and potential role in the evaluation of pediatric swallowing is undetermined. The goals of this study were to determine the feasibility of performing laryngopharyngeal sensory testing in awake pediatric patients and to assess whether the sensory testing results correlated with aspiration during a feeding assessment or correlated with a history of pneumonia. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing was performed in 100 pediatric patients who were evaluated for feeding and swallowing disorders. The swallowing function parameters evaluated were pooled secretions, laryngeal penetration, and aspiration. The laryngopharyngeal sensory tests were performed by delivering a pressure-controlled and duration-controlled air pulse to the aryepiglottic fold through a flexible laryngoscope to induce the laryngeal adductor response (LAR). The air pulse stimulus ranged in intensity from 3 to 10 mm Hg. The patients tested ranged from 1 month to 24 years of age, with a median age of 2.7 years. Sensory testing was completed in 92% of patients. Patients who had an LAR at less than 4 mm Hg rarely if ever had episodes of laryngeal penetration or aspiration. Those with an LAR at 4 to 10 mm Hg had variable amounts of aspiration and laryngeal penetration. The LAR could not be elicited at the maximum level of intensity (10 mm Hg) in 22 patients, who demonstrated severe laryngeal penetration and/or aspiration. Elevated laryngopharyngeal sensory thresholds correlated positively with previous clinical diagnoses of recurrent pneumonia, neurologic disorders, and gastroesophageal reflux, and correlated positively with findings of pooled secretions, laryngeal penetration, and aspiration. Laryngopharyngeal sensory testing in children is feasible and correlative.

Electrocautery versus curette adenoidectomy: comparison of postoperative results

OBJECTIVE Identify differences in adenoidectomy performed by curettage versus electrocautery ablation. DESIGN To receive adenoidectomy by curettage or electrocautery ablation 38 patients undergoing adenoidectomy or adenotonsillectomy were prospectively randomized. The study was completed by 24 patients. All tonsillectomy patients received electrocautery dissection of the tonsils. Preoperative and at least 1 month postoperative video-nasopharyngoscopy was performed. Video tapes were reviewed by the authors blinded to patient identity and procedure to evaluate choanal obstruction. Preoperative and postoperative lateral neck radiographs were obtained. Blood loss and postoperative complications were recorded. SETTING A single, tertiary care pediatric facility. INTERVENTIONS Electrocautery ablation of the adenoid was performed with suction cautery. Curettage was performed with standard adenoid curettes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURED A grading system for adenoid size was developed using radiographs and endoscopic parameters. The grade of preoperative and postoperative adenoid tissue was compared between the curettage and electrocautery ablation groups. Operative blood loss was compared between the groups. The postoperative course and complications were compared. RESULTS The preoperative grade of choanal obstruction in both groups was the same. No differences could be found in the postoperative grade between the curettage and the electrocautery ablation groups. No postoperative complications were recorded in either group. The estimated blood loss in the curettage group was 54.5 ml (S.D. 50.7) while the electrocautery ablation group averaged 3.75 ml (S.D. 6.4; p = 0.0053). CONCLUSION There are no differences in the postoperative results of adenoidectomy performed by electrocautery ablation or curettage. There are no complications recorded in either group. Estimated blood loss was lower in the electrocautery ablation group. Decreased blood loss during the procedure makes the electrocautery ablation method of adenoidectomy attractive.

Surgery for Pediatric Subglottic Stenosis: Disease-Specific Outcomes

To set the foundation to develop a disease-based, operation-specific model to predict the outcome of pediatric airway reconstruction surgery, we performed a retrospective database review of children operated on at a single, tertiary-care childrens hospital. Over the 12-year period 1988 to 2000, a total of 1,296 airway reconstruction procedures were performed. Out of these, charts were identified for 199 children who underwent laryngotracheal reconstruction for a sole diagnosis of subglottic stenosis. Children were excluded from the study if their disorder included supraglottic, glottic, or upper tracheal disease. The main outcome measures were Myer-Cotton grade-specific decannulation and extubation rates, including both operation-specific and overall results. There were 101 children who underwent double-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction. The operation-specific decannulation rates for Myer-Cotton grades 2, 3, and 4 were 85% (18/21), 37% (23/61), and 50% (7/14) (χ2 analysis, p =.0007). The overall decannulation rates were 95% (20/21), 74% (45/61), and 86% (12/14) (χ2 analysis, p =.04). There were 98 children who underwent single-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction. The operation-specific extubation rates for Myer-Cotton grades 2, 3, and 4 were 82% (37/45), 79% (34/43), and 67% (2/3) (χ2 analysis, p =.63). The overall extubation rates were 100% (45/45), 86% (37/43), and 100% (3/3) (χ2 analysis, p =.03). Logistic regression analysis showed no effect of age (less than or greater than 2 years of age) on operation-specific or overall outcome parameters. We conclude that laryngotracheal reconstruction for pediatric subglottic stenosis remains a challenging set of procedures in which multiple operations may be required to achieve eventual extubation or decannulation. Children with Myer-Cotton grade 3 or 4 disease continue to represent a significant challenge, and refinements of techniques are being examined to address this subset of children. Disease-based, operation-specific outcome statistics are the first step in the development of a meaningful predictive model.

Harmonic Scalpel for Tonsillectomy

Objective To describe the Harmonic scalpel and review recent studies comparing its use in tonsillectomy with standard dissection and electrocautery.

Airway Management in Pierre Robin Sequence

There is a great deal of controversy regarding the long-term management of airway obstruction in children with Pierre Robin sequence. All 23 pediatric otolaryngology fellowship programs were surveyed to determine their current practice patterns. Issues that were addressed included methods of evaluation of airway obstruction, including polysomnography, choices for home care in children in whom observation and positioning treatment failed, and complications of the various treatment modalities. The lack of unanimity among the respondents mirrors the controversy found in the literature. Though tracheotomy appears to be favored as the method of long-term management, responses from those surveyed often were based on emotions as much as on scientific data. This report details those findings and offers suggestions to clinicians involved with the management of patients with Pierre Robin sequence with airway compromise. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;118:630–5.)

Harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy in children: A randomized prospective study

OBJECTIVE: In this randomized prospective study, we evaluated postoperative morbidity after use of the Harmonic Scalpel (HS), an ultrasonic dissector coagulator (Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc, Cincinnati, OH), or conventional electrocautery (EC) during tonsillectomy. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Pediatric subjects at 2 sites were randomized and underwent tonsillectomy. Intraoperative blood loss and operation duration were recorded. Postoperative parameters and complications were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen subjects completed the study. For the HS group, mean operative time was significantly longer (P < 0.001), but intraoperative blood loss was equivalent (P = 1.000). HS subjects slept soundly on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 14 (P = 0.041, 0.013, 0.022, and 0.038, respectively, compared with EC group). Mean postoperative pain scores trended lower for HS subjects on postoperative days 2, 3, and 4. CONCLUSION: The use of the HS in pediatric tonsillectomy showed no increase in intraoperative or postoperative blood loss compared with the use of EC, and HS provided possible clinical advantages over EC in patient comfort. SIGNIFICANCE: Tonsillectomy subjects in the HS group showed a statistically significant ability to sleep soundly, suggesting that the subjects experienced less pain. These data correlate with the observed decrease in pain scores.

Surgery for Pediatric Vocal Cord Paralysis: A Retrospective Review

To determine the outcome of surgical procedures for bilateral vocal cord paralysis in children, we performed a retrospective review of children under 18 years of age with bilateral vocal cord paralysis and a previous tracheotomy who underwent a primary procedure at a single tertiary care institution with an aim of decannulation. The primary outcome measure was the operation-specific decannulation rate (OSDR). The overall decannulation rates, as well as morbidity rates, were also recorded. Fifty-two children met the inclusion criteria (mean age at time of primary surgery, 6.2 years; SD, 5 years). Vocal cord lateralization procedures combined with a partial arytenoidectomy achieved the highest OSDR (17/24 or 71%). This OSDR was statistically higher than the OSDRs for CO2 laser cordotomy or arytenoidectomy procedures (OSDR, 5/17 or 29%, p = .008), for isolated arytenoidopexy procedures (OSDR, 1/4 or 25%, p = .000004), or for posterior costal cartilage graft procedures (OSDR, 3/5 or 60%, p = .0004). Neither of the 2 children who underwent isolated arytenoidectomy achieved primary decannulation. The incidence of aspiration following posterior cartilage graft procedures was 15% (2/15). Subanalysis by age failed to reveal differences in OSDR. We conclude that vocal cord lateralization procedures with partial arytenoidectomy afford the highest OSDR among primary procedures for pediatric vocal cord paralysis. The CO2 laser procedures, while having limited success as a primary procedure, are effective for revision.

Role of laryngoscopy, dual pH probe monitoring, and laryngeal mucosal biopsy in the diagnosis of pharyngoesophageal reflux

There is no standard for determining significant pharyngoesophageal reflux. This prospective blind comparison study compared dual pH probe studies, direct laryngoscopy, and mucosal biopsy in children without symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux who underwent airway evaluation. Significant reflux to the lower esophageal probe did not correlate with statistical significance with reflux to the upper probe. In this group of asymptomatic patients, a positive lower pH probe finding did not correlate with upper or lower esophageal mucosal inflammation. Eosinophilia in the esophageal mucosa is diagnostic of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and was seen in 5 of the laryngeal biopsies. A weak correlation was seen between positive findings at laryngoscopy and positive posterior cricoid biopsy in this group. There may be no consistent way to predict significant pharyngoesophageal reflux in asymptomatic patients. Single-probe pH testing will not predict significant pharyngoesophageal reflux with mucosal changes. Laryngoscopy and upper pH probe findings only weakly correlate with significant histologic findings. Laryngeal and posterior cricoid biopsy may be the only sensitive test for mucosal injury. Clinical trials of empiric antireflux therapy should be used to determine whether the laryngeal changes seen in these patients are reversible.

Pediatric fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.

Pediatric dysphagia is the presenting feature of many underlying diagnoses. Between July 1993 and July 1999, 643 fiberoptic endoscopic evaluations of swallowing (FEES) were performed on 568 patients. The median age of the population was 2.5 years (range, 3 days to 21 years). The principal medical and surgical diagnoses of the patients at the time of presentation to the FEES clinic were prospectively recorded: 36% of the patients presented with a diagnosis of structural abnormalities of the upper aerodigestive tract or airway; 26% with neurologic diagnoses; 12% with gastroenterological disorders; 8% with genetic syndromes; 7% with pulmonary dysfunction; 5% with prematurity; 3% with cardiovascular anomalies; and 2% with metabolic problems. The patients were classified according to the following feeding regimens: 9% normally fed; 38% orally fed with limitations; 13% orally fed, but with required supplemental tube feedings; and 40% prohibited from taking nutrition orally. The FEES enabled the following classification of feeding abnormalities: 15% had normal feeding; 56% exhibited behavioral abnormalities, including sensory-based feeding disorders; 15% exhibited structural abnormalities; 16% exhibited neurologic abnormalities; 1.5% exhibited metabolic abnormalities; and 0.5% exhibited cardiorespiratory abnormalities. The unique aspects of pediatric dysphagia are highlighted, and the role of FEES in the workup of this challenging aspect of pediatric otolaryngology is discussed.