J. R. B. Farias

Modeling nitrogen accumulation and use by soybean

Abstract Simulation of soybean growth and yield requires an accurate representation of nitrogen accumulation and distribution in the developing crop. Approaches to simulate nitrogen accumulation by soybean have been complicated by the need to account for both soil nitrate uptake and symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Past approaches to simulating soybean have generally been empirical requiring ‘calibration’ for each new environment. Recently, Jamieson and Semonov [Field Crops Res. 68 (2000) 21] proposed a relatively simple approach for simulating nitrogen accumulation by wheat based on the nitrogen demand imposed separately by the development of leaf area and the growth of stems. This paper assesses this approach for soybean. This approach was further simplified by assuming that nitrogen availability to the plant was limited only by soil moisture conditions and a maximum uptake rate and that it was not necessary to distinguish between nitrate uptake and symbiotic nitrogen fixation. The simplified model generally resulted in simulations that corresponded to experimental observations on nitrogen and mass accumulation through the growing season, and on yield over a number of years. Sensitivity analysis of the model indicated that storage of nitrogen in the stem might be a key trait in increasing soybean yield potential.

Soybean physiology and gene expression during drought.

Soybean genotypes MG/BR46 (Conquista) and BR16, drought-tolerant and -sensitive, respectively, were compared in terms of morphophysiological and gene-expression responses to water stress during two stages of development. Gene-expression analysis showed differential responses in Gmdreb1a and Gmpip1b mRNA expression within 30 days of water-deficit initiation in MG/BR46 (Conquista) plants. Within 45 days of initiating stress, Gmp5cs and Gmpip1b had relatively higher expression. Initially, BR16 showed increased expression only for Gmdreb1a, and later (45 days) for Gmp5cs, Gmdefensin and Gmpip1b. Only BR16 presented down-regulated expression of genes, such as Gmp5cs and Gmpip1b, 30 days after the onset of moisture stress, and Gmgols after 45 days of stress. The faster perception of water stress in MG/BR46 (Conquista) and the better maintenance of up-regulated gene expression than in the sensitive BR16 genotype imply mechanisms by which the former is better adapted to tolerate moisture deficiency.

Transcription factors expressed in soybean roots under drought stress

To gain insight into stress-responsive gene regulation in soybean plants, we identified consensus sequences that could categorize the transcription factors MYBJ7, BZIP50, C2H2, and NAC2 as members of the gene families myb, bzip, c2h2, and nac, respectively. We also investigated the evolutionary relationship of these transcription factors and analyzed their expression levels under drought stress. The NCBI software was used to find the predicted amino acid sequences of the transcription factors, and the Clustal X software was used to align soybean and other plant species sequences. Phylogenetic trees were built using the Mega 4.1 software by neighbor joining and the degree of confidence test by Bootstrap. Expression level studies were carried out using hydroponic culture; the experiments were designed in completely randomized blocks with three repetitions. The blocks consisted of two genotypes, MG/BR46 Conquista (drought-tolerant) and BR16 (drought-sensitive) and the treatments consisted of increasingly long dehydration periods (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 min). The transcription factors presented domains and/or conserved regions that characterized them as belonging to the bzip, c2h2, myb, and nac families. Based on the phylogenetic trees, it was found that the myb, bzip and nac genes are closely related to myb78, bzip48 and nac2 of soybean and that c2h2 is closely related to c2h2 of Brassica napus. Expression of all genes was in general increased under drought stress in both genotypes. Major differences between genotypes were due to the lowering of the expression of the mybj7 and c2h2 genes in the drought-tolerant variety at some times. Over-expression or silencing of some of these genes has the potential to increase stress tolerance.

Cloning and quantitative expression analysis of drought-induced genes in soybean.

We determined the expression levels of DREB transcription factor (Gmdreb1) and of the genes Gmgols, Gmpip1b, Gmereb, and Gmdefensin in drought-tolerant (MG/BR46-Conquista) and drought-sensitive (BR16) genotypes of soybean, during drought. The trial was carried out in a controlled-environment chamber, set up to provide drought conditions. Sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana DREB-family proteins were used to build a phylogenetic tree through the alignment of the conserved regions near the AP2 domain. We found that Gmdreb1 is similar to Atrap2.1, which is located near the AtDREB1 and AtDREB2 families. The amplified fragment was cloned and sequenced; alignment with the sequence available at Genbank showed total similarity. Expression analysis showed that under drought: a) Gmdreb1 expression increased in leaves and roots of both genotypes and expression level changes occurred that were correlated with the length of the water-deficit period; b) there were increased expression levels of Gmdefensin in roots of MG/BR46; c) expression of Gmgols increased in leaves and roots of the two genotypes; d) Gmpip1b expression generally increased, except in roots of BR16, and e) the same was found for Gmereb, except in roots of MG/BR46.

Morpho-anatomical and micromorphometrical evaluations in soybean genotypes during water stress.

In a greenhouse experiment, morpho-anatomical and micromorphometrical analyses of two soybean cultivars, MG/BR46 (Conquista) and BR16-tolerant and sensitive to drought, respectively-were used to study their water-deficit-tolerance strategies. Drought treatments were applied at reproductive stages from R2 to R7, where evaluations were conducted at 30 days and 45 days after stress started, respectively. The total length of Conquista plants (shoot + root) was greater than of BR16 plants. Pod dry weight was adversely affected due to the lack of moisture, decreasing productivity even of Conquista plants. Both the cultivars had normal development of root hairs; however, it was observed a decrease in the cortex:central cylinder ratio in BR16 stressed for 30 days, and they also showed similar leaflet thickness and stomata distribution. Differences in drought tolerance observed between the two cultivars seemed to be related to factors other than morphological traits since this species has a short lifecycle.