J.S. Azagra

Current status of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: A literature review to highlight studies limits *

BACKGROUND Gastric cancer represents a great challenge for health care providers and requires a multidisciplinary approach in which surgery plays the main role. Minimally invasive surgery has been progressively developed, first with the advent of laparoscopy and more recently with the spread of robotic surgery, but a number of issues are currently being investigate, including the limitations in performing effective extended lymph node dissections and, in this context, the real advantages of using robotic systems, the possible role for advanced Gastric Cancer, the reproducibility of completely intracorporeal techniques and the oncological results achievable during follow-up. METHOD Searches of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were performed to identify articles published until April 2014 which reported outcomes of surgical treatment for gastric cancer and that used minimally invasive surgical technology. Articles that deal with endoscopic technology were excluded. RESULTS A total of 362 articles were evaluated. After the review process, data in 115 articles were analyzed. CONCLUSION A multicenter study with a large number of patients is now needed to further investigate the safety and efficacy as well as long-term outcomes of robotic surgery, traditional laparoscopy and the open approach.

Right colectomy: Value of the totally laparoscopic approach

UNLABELLED The role of laparoscopy for right colectomy remains controversial - largely because of a lack of standardization of the operative procedure, including a diversity of techniques including laparoscopy-assisted cases with extra-corporeal anastomosis and totally laparoscopic procedures with intra-corporeal anastomosis. METHODS The charts of all patients who underwent right colectomy by a totally laparoscopic approach in our service since 2004 were reviewed and pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were collected. RESULTS Eighty-two patients underwent totally laparoscopic right colectomy; of these, 32 had a BMI greater than 20 kg/m2 (39%). The mean operative duration was 113 minutes. In most cases, the operative specimen was extracted through a supra-pubic Pfannenstiel incision measuring 4-6 cm in length. Three cases were converted to a laparoscopy-assisted technique (in order to control the ileo-cecal vascular pedicle because of extensive nodal invasion in two cases, and to evaluate a hepatic flexure polyp in the third case). Overall morbidity was 29.3% and parietal morbidity was only 9.8%; there was no difference in morbidity between obese patients (BMI>30 kg/m2) and non-obese patients (BMI<30 kg/m2). The mean duration of hospitalization was 9 days and two patients developed ventral hernia in the extraction incision in long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION These satisfactory results show that the totally laparoscopic approach to right colectomy is technically feasible and safe, even in obese patients. In addition, the very low rate of parietal complications is an argument in favor of this approach.

Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery

AIM To investigate the role of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer and determine surgical, clinical, and oncological outcomes. METHODS This is a propensity score-matched case-control study, comparing three treatment arms: robotic gastrectomy (RG), laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), open gastrectomy (OG). Data collection started after sharing a specific study protocol. Data were recorded through a tailored and protected web-based system. Primary outcomes: harvested lymph nodes, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, complications rate. Among the secondary outcomes, there are: operative time, R0 resections, POD of mobilization, POD of starting liquid diet and soft solid diet. The analysis includes the evaluation of type and grade of postoperative complications. Detailed information of anastomotic leakages is also provided. RESULTS The present analysis was carried out of 1026 gastrectomies. To guarantee homogenous distribution of cases, patients in the RG, LG and OG groups were 1:1:2 matched using a propensity score analysis with a caliper = 0.2. The successful matching resulted in a total sample of 604 patients (RG = 151; LG = 151; OG = 302). The three groups showed no differences in all baseline patients characteristics, type of surgery (P = 0.42) and stage of the disease (P = 0.16). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the LG (95.93 ± 119.22) and RG (117.91 ± 68.11) groups compared to the OG (127.26 ± 79.50, P = 0.002). The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was similar between the RG (27.78 ± 11.45), LG (24.58 ± 13.56) and OG (25.82 ± 12.07) approach. A benefit in favor of the minimally invasive approaches was found in the length of hospital stay (P < 0.0001). A similar complications rate was found (P = 0.13). The leakage rate was not different (P = 0.78) between groups. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic and robotic surgery can be safely performed and proposed as possible alternative to open surgery. The main highlighted benefit is a faster postoperative functional recovery.

Robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for gastric cancer compared on surgical, clinical and oncological outcomes: a multi-institutional chart review. A study protocol of the International study group on Minimally Invasive surgery for GASTRIc Cancer-IMIGASTRIC.

Introduction Gastric cancer represents a great challenge for healthcare providers and requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach in which surgery plays a major role. Minimally invasive surgery has been progressively developed, first with the advent of laparoscopy and recently with the spread of robotic surgery, but a number of issues are currently being debated, including the limitations in performing an effective extended lymph node dissection, the real advantages of robotic systems, the role of laparoscopy for Advanced Gastric Cancer, the reproducibility of a total intracorporeal technique and the oncological results achievable during long-term follow-up. Methods and analysis A multi-institutional international database will be established to evaluate the role of robotic, laparoscopic and open approaches in gastric cancer, comprising of information regarding surgical, clinical and oncological features. A chart review will be conducted to enter data of participants with gastric cancer, previously treated at the participating institutions. The database is the first of its kind, through an international electronic submission system and a HIPPA protected real time data repository from high volume gastric cancer centres. Ethics and dissemination This study is conducted in compliance with ethical principles originating from the Helsinki Declaration, within the guidelines of Good Clinical Practice and relevant laws/regulations. A multicentre study with a large number of patients will permit further investigation of the safety and efficacy as well as the long-term outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic and open approaches for the management of gastric cancer. Trial registration number NCT02325453; Pre-results.

Simultaneous laparoscopic and transanal approach to rectal tumors.

To the Edi tor--We read with great interest the recent article by De Gennare and Lescher (Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:327-328). As described in the literature, the size of rectal tumors is one of the most important criterions of malignant changes, and the rate of malignancy rises with an increase in tumor size. Nevertheless, even small tumors have been demonstrated to show invasive evolution, which implies the necessity of complete surgical removal. Because rectal tumors frequently extend microscopically beyond the visible margin, the major risk of local treatment is to leave tumoral tissue in place. In the same way as in larger tumors or tumors situated in the mid rectum, technical problems may be encountered when performing surgery to correct prolapse of the tumor. For these reasons, we are performing, simultaneously, a laparoscopic and transanal approach to rectal tumors. This allows us to realize a complete overstaging of the lesion: invasion of the perirectal tissue, lymph node metastases, and liver metastases. According to these features, one can decide whether to choose radical or minimally invasive treatment. In the latter, a laparoscopic dissection of the retrorectal space is performed. Dissection is started at the right margin of the rectosigmoid mesentery and is continued to the presacral region until the inferior limit of the coccyx. It is a particularly anatomic dissection with a perfect visualization and preservation of all important structures. By a rectal touch, the inferior limit of the tumor is determined and the liberation pushed beyond. The facility to prolapse the tumor through the anal canal and the false pedicle created by traction allows us to perform complete resection of the tumor by application of 2 or 3 MULTIFIRE ENDO GIA | (U. S. Surgical Corp., Norwalk, CT).