J. Stephen Scott

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Totally Intra-abdominal Approach--Technique and Preliminary Report

Background: Previous descriptions of a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, using a circular stapler to perform the gastrojejunal anastomosis, have employed the esophagus as a conduit to introduce the anvil of the stapling device into the stomach. The authors believe that the risk of injury to the esophagus, as well as the difficulty in maneuvering the anvil from the pharynx to the proximal part of the stomach, make this technique less than optimal. In other descriptions (in a porcine model) the anvil has been guided into position through a distal gastrotomy by attaching it to a Prolene suture on a straight needle and directing the needle toward a chosen site. Although the authors prefer this method because it avoids potential esophageal injury, they sought a technique that would be even more precise in anvil placement and would avoid pushing a needle across gastric mucosa. Methods: The authors have developed a method that is totally intra-abdominal and does not risk injury to the esophagus. The circular stapler is still used, thus giving a consistent, small opening through the gastrojejunal anastomosis. Results: Over a 1-year period, 49 (of 50) patients underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with the described method. The average body mass index dropped from 42.63 to 34.12 over the first post- operative 3 months, with an average loss in excess body weight of 38.5%. The length of hospitalization following the procedure averaged 3.8 days, and the time to return to work (where applicable) was 11.9 days. Conclusion: This totally intra-abdominal laparoscopic technique is feasible and advantageous.

Laparoscopic revisional surgery after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND Failure of primary bariatric surgery is frequently due to weight recidivism, intractable gastric reflux, gastrojejunal strictures, fistulas, and malnutrition. Of these patients, 10-60% will undergo reoperative bariatric surgery, depending on the primary procedure performed. Open reoperative approaches for revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) have traditionally been advocated secondary to the perceived difficulty and safety with laparoscopic techniques. Few studies have addressed revisions after RYGB. The aim of the present study was to provide our experience regarding the safety, efficacy, and weight loss results of laparoscopic revisional surgery after previous RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy procedures. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery for complications after previous RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy from November 2005 to May 2007 was performed. Technical revisions included isolation and transection of gastrogastric fistulas with partial gastrectomy, sleeve gastrectomy conversion to RYGB, and revision of RYGB. The data collected included the pre- and postoperative body mass index, operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS A total of 26 patients underwent laparoscopic revisional surgery. The primary operations had consisted of RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy. The complications from primary operations included gastrogastric fistulas, refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease, weight recidivism, and gastric outlet obstruction. The mean prerevision body mass index was 42 ± 10 kg/m(2). The average follow-up was 240 days (range 11-476). The average body mass index during follow-up was 37 ± 8 kg/m(2). Laparoscopic revision was successful in all but 1 patient, who required conversion to laparotomy for staple line leak. The average operating room time and estimated blood loss was 131 ± 66 minutes and 70 mL, respectively. The average hospital stay was 6 days. Three patients required surgical exploration for hemorrhage, staple line leak, and an incarcerated hernia. The overall complication rate was 23%, with a major complication rate of 11.5%. No patients died. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery after previous RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy is technically challenging but compared well in safety and efficacy with the results from open revisional procedures. Intraoperative endoscopy is a key component in performing these procedures.

Management of anastomotic leaks after Roux-en-Y bypass using self-expanding polyester stents

BACKGROUND To analyze the outcomes of a series of endoscopically placed polyester self-expanding polyflex stents (SEPSs) for the management of anastomotic leaks after Roux-en-Y bypass. Anastomotic leaks after gastric bypass cause significant morbidity and mortality. Covered polyester SEPSs might have a role in the treatment of these leaks. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed from January 2006 to November 2006 that included all acute and chronic leaks treated with SEPSs. RESULTS A total of 6 patients were treated with stents, with a mean procedure time of 22 minutes. Of these 6 patients, 5 had acute postoperative leaks and 1 had a chronic fistula. Five patients started oral intake 1-6 days after their procedure. All acute leaks had complete healing at a median of 44 days. The patient with a chronic gastrocutaneous fistula required revisional surgery for fistula closure. In addition, 5 patients had stent migration, and 3 required stent replacement. CONCLUSION An endoscopically placed SEPS provides a less-invasive alternative to treat acute anastomotic leaks after Roux-en-Y bypass while simultaneously allowing oral intake. The results of this case series have demonstrated this treatment to be safe and effective.

A suture-based liver retraction method for laparoscopic bariatric procedures: results from a large case series.

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic bariatric surgery requires retraction of the left lobe of the liver to provide adequate operative view and working space. Conventional approaches utilize a mechanical retractor and require additional incision(s), and at times an assistant. OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a suture-based method of liver retraction in a large series of patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. This method eliminates the need for a subxiphoid incision for mechanical retraction of the liver. SETTING Two hospitals in the Midwest with a high volume of laparoscopic bariatric cases. METHODS Retrospective chart review identified all patients undergoing bariatric surgery for whom suture-based liver retraction was selected. The left lobe of the liver is lifted, and sutures are placed across the right crus of the diaphragm and were either anchored on the abdominal wall or intraperitoneally to provide static retraction of the left lobe of the liver. RESULTS In all, 487 cases were identified. Patients had a high rate of morbid obesity (83% with body mass index >40 kg/m(2)) and diabetes (34.3%). The most common bariatric procedures were Roux-en-Y gastric banding (39%) and sleeve gastrectomy (24.6%). Overall, 6 injuries to the liver were noted, only 2 of which were related to the suture-based retraction technique. Both injuries involved minor bleeding and were successfully managed during the procedure. The mean number of incisions required was 4.6. CONCLUSIONS Suture-based liver retraction was found to be safe and effective in this large case series of morbidly obese patients. The rate of complications involving the technique was extremely low (.4%).