J. T. Brouwer

The role of mycophenolate mofetil in the management of autoimmune hepatitis and overlap syndromes

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34: 335–343

Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of autoimmune hepatitis in the Netherlands

Abstract Background and aims. Epidemiological data on autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are scarce. In this study, we determined the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of AIH patients in the Netherlands (16.7 million inhabitants). Methods. Clinical characteristics were collected from 1313 AIH patients (78% females) from 31 centers, including all eight academic centers in the Netherlands. Additional data on ethnicity, family history and symptoms were obtained by the use of a questionnaire. Results. The prevalence of AIH was 18.3 (95% confidential interval [CI]: 17.3–19.4) per 100,000 with an annual incidence of 1.1 (95% CI: 0.5–2) in adults. An incidence peak was found in middle-aged women. At diagnosis, 56% of patients had fibrosis and 12% cirrhosis in liver biopsy. Overall, 1% of patients developed HCC and 3% of patients underwent liver transplantation. Overlap with primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis was found in 9% and 6%, respectively. The clinical course did not differ between Caucasian and non-Caucasian patients. Other autoimmune diseases were found in 26% of patients. Half of the patients reported persistent AIH-related symptoms despite treatment with a median treatment period of 8 years (range 1–44 years). Familial occurrence was reported in three cases. Conclusion. This is the largest epidemiological study of AIH in a geographically defined region and demonstrates that the prevalence of AIH in the Netherlands is uncommon. Although familial occurrence of AIH is extremely rare, our twin data may point towards a genetic predisposition. The high percentage of patients with cirrhosis or fibrosis at diagnosis urges the need of more awareness for AIH.

Mycophenolate mofetil: role in autoimmune hepatitis and overlap syndromes.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34: 335–343

γ‐Glutamyltransferase and rapid virological response as predictors of successful treatment with experimental or standard peginterferon‐α‐2b in chronic hepatitis C non‐responders

Background: High‐dose peginterferon‐α (PegIFN‐α) induction and prolongation of therapy may be an option to improve sustained virological response (SVR) rates among hepatitis C virus (HCV) non‐responders, although a higher and a longer dosing of PegIFN‐α may intensify side effects.

HLA-DRB1*03:01 and HLA-DRB1*04:01 modify the presentation and outcome in autoimmune hepatitis type-1

The classical human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB1*03:01 and HLA-DRB1*04:01 alleles are established autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) risk alleles. To study the immune-modifying effect of these alleles, we imputed the genotypes from genome-wide association data in 649 Dutch AIH type-1 patients. We therefore compared the international AIH group (IAIHG) diagnostic scores as well as the underlying clinical characteristics between patients positive and negative for these HLA alleles. Seventy-five percent of the AIH patients were HLA-DRB1*03:01/HLA-DRB1*04:01 positive. HLA-DRB1*03:01/HLA-DRB1*04:01-positive patients had a higher median IAIHG score than HLA-DRB1*03:01/HLA-DRB1*04:01-negative patients (P<0.001). We did not observe associations between HLA alleles and alanine transaminase levels (HLA-DRB1*03:01: P=0.2; HLA-DRB1*04:01; P=0.5); however, HLA-DRB1*03:01 was independently associated with higher immunoglobulin G levels (P=0.04). The HLA-DRB1*04:01 allele was independently associated with presentation at older age (P=0.03) and a female predominance (P=0.04). HLA-DRB1*03:01-positive patients received immunosuppressive medication and liver transplantation. In conclusion, the HLA-DRB1*03:01 and HLA-DRB1*04:01 alleles are both independently associated with the aggregate diagnostic IAIHG score in type-1 AIH patients, but are not essential for AIH development. HLA-DRB1*03:01 is the strongest genetic modifier of disease severity in AIH.

Benchmarking patient experiences in colonoscopy using the Global Rating Scale.

INTRODUCTIONnThe Global Rating Scale (GRS) is a quality assurance program that was developed in England to assess patient-centered care in endoscopy. The aim of the current study was to evaluate patient experiences of colonoscopy using the GRS in order to compare different departments and to provide benchmarks. The study also evaluated factors associated with patient satisfaction.nnnMETHODSnA GRS questionnaire was used both before and after the procedure in outpatients undergoing colonoscopy. The questionnaire assessed the processes associated with the colonoscopy, from making the appointment up until discharge. Mean values and ranges of 12 endoscopy departments were calculated together with P values in order to assess heterogeneity.nnnRESULTSnIn total, 1904 pre-procedure and 1532 (80 %) post-procedure questionnaires were returned from 12 endoscopy departments. The mean time patients had to wait for their procedure was 4.3 weeks (range 3.1 - 5.8 weeks), and 54 % (range 35 - 64 %; P < 0.001) reported being given a choice of appointment dates/times. Discomfort during colonoscopy was reported by 20 % (range 8 - 40 %; P < 0.001). Recovery room privacy was satisfactory for 76 % of patients (range 66 - 90 %; P < 0.05). The majority of patients reported being sufficiently informed about what to do in case of problems after discharge (79 %, range 43 - 98 %; P < 0.001), and 85 % of individuals stated that they would be willing to repeat the colonoscopy procedure (range 72 - 92 %; P < 0.001). Factors associated with a decreased willingness to return were the burdensome bowel preparation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.25; P < 0.001), rushing staff attitude (OR = 0.57; P < 0.05), low acceptance of the procedure (OR = 0.42; P < 0.01), and more discomfort than expected (OR = 0.54; P < 0.05).nnnCONCLUSIONnOverall patient experiences with colonoscopy were satisfactory, but they also showed considerable variation. This study shows that use of a GRS patient questionnaire is feasible in the Dutch endoscopy setting for the assessment of patient experience. The significant variability between endoscopy units can be used to benchmark services and enable shortcomings to be identified.

Mycophenolate mofetil for patients with autoimmune hepatitis and overlap syndromes : authors' reply

SIRS, Garcia-Buey and Moreno-Otero nicely summarise the literature on mycophenolate mofetil (MM) in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and overlap syndromes. The Dutch Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (DAHG) shows that second-line MM induces remission in 67% of patients with AIH and intolerance to azathioprine (AZA). In AIH and AZA nonresponse, remission was achieved with MMF in only 13%, and all deaths, liver transplantations and decompensations of cirrhosis occurred in this group. Therefore, in AIH and AZA-nonresponse other options, including liver transplantation, seem more appropriate. This is consistent with the findings of Hennes et al. nFor all patients with overlap syndromes, MM appears a valuable treatment option. In the DAHG cohort, MM induced remission in 63% and 57%, and nresponse in 15% and 14% after AZA intolerance and nonresponse respectively. Recently, adding MM and budesonide appeared beneficial in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) with insufficient response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Further investigations of MM in PBC and overlap seem warranted. nAs first-line therapy for AIH, one randomised controlled study indicates that budesonide with AZA induces more remission with less side-effects than prednisolone with AZA. However, despite the one prospective cohort with MM as first-line therapy in AIH, and the limitations of earlier studies, most evidence for first-line therapy in AIH still is with AZA and prednisolone. We therefore still consider prednisolone with AZA the first-line treatment in AIH and overlap nsyndromes until further randomised studies prove otherwise. In case of steroid side-effects, in the absence of cirrhosis, budesonide could be considered, although a prospective maintenance study against prednisolone is still lacking. nAs second-line therapy in case of AZA-intolerance in AIH, or for all overlap nsyndrome patients, MM with prednisolone appears useful, but not for AIH with AZA nonresponse. In contrast to AZA, MM is contraindicated in pregnancy.

Mycophenolate mofetil for patients with autoimmune hepatitis and overlap syndromes: authors’ reply: Letters to the Editors

SIRS, Garcia-Buey and Moreno-Otero nicely summarise the literature on mycophenolate mofetil (MM) in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and overlap syndromes. The Dutch Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (DAHG) shows that second-line MM induces remission in 67% of patients with AIH and intolerance to azathioprine (AZA). In AIH and AZA nonresponse, remission was achieved with MMF in only 13%, and all deaths, liver transplantations and decompensations of cirrhosis occurred in this group. Therefore, in AIH and AZA-nonresponse other options, including liver transplantation, seem more appropriate. This is consistent with the findings of Hennes et al. nFor all patients with overlap syndromes, MM appears a valuable treatment option. In the DAHG cohort, MM induced remission in 63% and 57%, and nresponse in 15% and 14% after AZA intolerance and nonresponse respectively. Recently, adding MM and budesonide appeared beneficial in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) with insufficient response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Further investigations of MM in PBC and overlap seem warranted. nAs first-line therapy for AIH, one randomised controlled study indicates that budesonide with AZA induces more remission with less side-effects than prednisolone with AZA. However, despite the one prospective cohort with MM as first-line therapy in AIH, and the limitations of earlier studies, most evidence for first-line therapy in AIH still is with AZA and prednisolone. We therefore still consider prednisolone with AZA the first-line treatment in AIH and overlap nsyndromes until further randomised studies prove otherwise. In case of steroid side-effects, in the absence of cirrhosis, budesonide could be considered, although a prospective maintenance study against prednisolone is still lacking. nAs second-line therapy in case of AZA-intolerance in AIH, or for all overlap nsyndrome patients, MM with prednisolone appears useful, but not for AIH with AZA nonresponse. In contrast to AZA, MM is contraindicated in pregnancy.

Mycophenolate mofetil for patients with autoimmune hepatitis and overlap syndromes

SIRS, Garcia-Buey and Moreno-Otero nicely summarise the literature on mycophenolate mofetil (MM) in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and overlap syndromes. The Dutch Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (DAHG) shows that second-line MM induces remission in 67% of patients with AIH and intolerance to azathioprine (AZA). In AIH and AZA nonresponse, remission was achieved with MMF in only 13%, and all deaths, liver transplantations and decompensations of cirrhosis occurred in this group. Therefore, in AIH and AZA-nonresponse other options, including liver transplantation, seem more appropriate. This is consistent with the findings of Hennes et al. nFor all patients with overlap syndromes, MM appears a valuable treatment option. In the DAHG cohort, MM induced remission in 63% and 57%, and nresponse in 15% and 14% after AZA intolerance and nonresponse respectively. Recently, adding MM and budesonide appeared beneficial in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) with insufficient response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Further investigations of MM in PBC and overlap seem warranted. nAs first-line therapy for AIH, one randomised controlled study indicates that budesonide with AZA induces more remission with less side-effects than prednisolone with AZA. However, despite the one prospective cohort with MM as first-line therapy in AIH, and the limitations of earlier studies, most evidence for first-line therapy in AIH still is with AZA and prednisolone. We therefore still consider prednisolone with AZA the first-line treatment in AIH and overlap nsyndromes until further randomised studies prove otherwise. In case of steroid side-effects, in the absence of cirrhosis, budesonide could be considered, although a prospective maintenance study against prednisolone is still lacking. nAs second-line therapy in case of AZA-intolerance in AIH, or for all overlap nsyndrome patients, MM with prednisolone appears useful, but not for AIH with AZA nonresponse. In contrast to AZA, MM is contraindicated in pregnancy.