J. Taylor Hays

Effects of Varenicline on Smoking Cessation in Patients With Mild to Moderate COPD: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND Smoking is the most important risk factor for COPD and accelerates its progression. Despite the health implications, a large proportion of patients with COPD continue to smoke, so finding effective smoking cessation interventions for this population is paramount. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of varenicline tartrate vs placebo in smokers with mild to moderate COPD. METHODS In a 27-center, double-blind, multinational study, 504 patients with mild to moderate COPD (postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC, <70%; FEV1 percent predicted normal value, ≥50%) and without known psychiatric disturbances were randomized to receive varenicline (n=250) or placebo (n=254) for 12 weeks, with a 40-week nontreatment follow-up. The primary end point was carbon monoxide-confirmed continuous abstinence rate (CAR) for weeks 9 to 12. A secondary end point was CAR for weeks 9 to 52. RESULTS CAR for weeks 9 to 12 was significantly higher for patients in the varenicline group (42.3%) than for those in the placebo group (8.8%) (OR, 8.40; 95% CI, 4.99-14.14; P<.0001). CAR in the patients treated with varenicline remained significantly higher than in those treated with placebo through weeks 9 to 52 (18.6% vs 5.6%) (OR, 4.04; 95% CI, 2.13-7.67; P<.0001). Nausea, abnormal dreams, upper-respiratory tract infection, and insomnia were the most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) for patients in the varenicline group. Serious AEs were infrequent in both treatment groups. Two patients in the varenicline group and one patient in the placebo group died during the study. Reports of psychiatric AEs were similar for both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS Varenicline was more efficacious than placebo for smoking cessation in patients with mild to moderate COPD and demonstrated a safety profile consistent with that observed in previous trials. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00285012; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Response to nicotine dependence treatment in smokers with current and past alcohol problems

Smoking prevalence among alcoholics is high, and evidence indicates that smokers with a history of alcohol abuse may have more difficulty quitting cigarette smoking. This study is a post hoc analysis comparing the smoking cessation rates of smokers with active or past alcohol problems to the rates in smokers with no history of alcohol problems who were participants in a randomized, controlled trial of smoking cessation therapy. Subjects received either 44 mg/24 hour or 22 mg/24 hour nicotine patch for 4 or 6 weeks, respectively, followed by a tapering schedule to complete 8 weeks of therapy and a randomly assigned behavioral intervention (minimal, brief individual counseling, group therapy). The Self-Administered Alcoholism Screening Test (SAAST) score was used to determine alcohol group assignment (no alcohol problems <7; active alcohol problems ≥7 and still drinking; past alcohol problems if not drinking due to a past history of alcohol problems). Among 382 subjects (171 men and 211 women), 281 had no alcohol problems (74%), 53 had past alcohol problems (14%), and 48 had active alcohol problems (13%). Smoking cessation rates assessed at both weeks 4 and 8 were significantly different across groups (p=0.026 and 0.002 at weeks 4 and 8, respectively) with lower rates in the groups with past and active alcohol problems when compared to the “no problem” group. At week 26, subjects with past alcohol problems were less likely to be abstinent from smoking than no problem group subjects, but this was not statistically significant (odds ratio =0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.22→1.08). In the short term, smokers with past or active alcohol problems are less likely to quit smoking compared to those with no alcohol problems when treated with nicotine patch therapy for smoking cessation.

The efficacy and safety of varenicline for smoking cessation using a flexible dosing strategy in adult smokers: a randomized controlled trial.

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine whether self-regulated flexible dosing with varenicline tartrate is safe and effective for smoking cessation. Research design and methods: 320 healthy, motivated-to-quit smokers (≥10 cigarettes/day) aged 18–65 years, entered a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study – conducted between December 26, 2001 and June 24, 2003 – with a 12-week treatment phase and 40-week, double-blind, non-treatment follow-up. Treatment consisted of varenicline or placebo in fixed doses (Week 1: titrated from 0.5 to 1.0 mg/day) followed by a self-regulated flexible schedule (Weeks 2–12: 0.5–2.0 mg/day). Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes included carbon monoxide-confirmed continuous abstinence rate (CAR) from smoking for Weeks 4 through 7, 9 through 12, and 9 through 52. Secondary outcomes included CAR from Weeks 9 through 24, 7-day point prevalence of abstinence, safety assessments, and measures of craving, withdrawal, and smoking reward. Results: Superior CARs were observed in varenicline-treated (n = 157) versus placebo participants (n = 155) for Weeks 4 through 7 (38.2 vs. 11.6%), 9 through 12 (40.1 vs. 11.6%), 9 through 24 (28.0 vs. 9.0%), and 9 through 52 (22.3 vs. 7.7%) (all p < 0.001). Seven-day point prevalence was higher in varenicline-treated than placebo participants at Weeks 12 (46.5 vs. 14.2%; p < 0.001), 24 (32.5 vs. 13.5%; p < 0.001), and 52 (28.0 vs. 13.5%; p = 0.001). Overall, medication compliance was high, although varenicline-treated, but not placebo, participants tended to taper down their dosage over time. Total treatment-emergent AEs were 77.1% (varenicline: 121/157) and 65.8% (placebo: 102/155). Few AEs led to treatment discontinuation (varenicline: 11/157, 7.0% and placebo: 7/155, 4.5%). Participants were primarily healthy Caucasians, so more research is necessary to determine how applicable these findings are to other populations. Conclusions: A self-regulated, flexible dosing regimen of varenicline is well tolerated, with superior effectiveness versus placebo for smoking cessation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00150228.

Varenicline for Tobacco Dependence

A 57-year-old man presents to his primary care provider because he would like to quit smoking. A trial of varenicline, a partial agonist of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor that has been shown to increase rates of smoking abstinence as compared with placebo, is recommended. In light of reports of neuropsychiatric side effects, including suicidal behavior, patients treated with varenicline should be closely monitored for behavioral symptoms.

Varenicline and bupropion sustained-release combination therapy for smoking cessation

INTRODUCTION Varenicline and bupropion sustained release (SR) are both safe and effective for the treatment of tobacco dependence and have different mechanisms of action. Combination pharmacotherapy with these agents may increase long-term smoking abstinence rates above what is observed with single-agent therapy. METHODS We enrolled cigarettes smokers in an open-label, one-arm, Phase II clinical trial to obtain preliminary data on the potential effectiveness and safety of combination therapy with varenicline and bupropion SR for the treatment of tobacco dependence. Eligible subjects received varenicline titrated to 1.0 mg by mouth twice daily and bupropion SR titrated to 150 mg by mouth twice daily for a total of 12 weeks along with behavioral therapy. Self-reported smoking abstinence was biochemically confirmed with expired carbon monoxide. A total of 38 smokers with a mean age of 49.1 years (SD = 12.4) who smoked an average of 19.9 cigarettes/day (SD = 7.8) for 30 years (SD = 12.3) were enrolled. RESULTS Seven-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence rates were 71% (95% CI = 54%-85%) at 3 months and 58% (95% CI = 41%-74%) at 6 months. Mean weight change during the medication phase among smoking-abstinent subjects was 1.6 kg (SD = 2.4). For both medications, 74% of subjects took at least 90% of the prescribed doses. The most common side effects were sleep disturbance (26%) and nausea (24%). No increase in depressive symptoms was observed, and no subjects reported suicidal ideation. DISCUSSION Combination therapy with varenicline and bupropion SR may be effective for increasing smoking abstinence rates above that observed with monotherapy.

Combination Varenicline and Bupropion SR for Tobacco Dependence Treatment in Cigarette Smokers: A Randomized Trial

IMPORTANCE Combining pharmacotherapies for tobacco-dependence treatment may increase smoking abstinence. OBJECTIVE To determine efficacy and safety of varenicline and bupropion sustained-release (SR; combination therapy) compared with varenicline (monotherapy) in cigarette smokers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial with a 12-week treatment period and follow-up through week 52 conducted between October 2009 and April 2013 at 3 midwestern clinical research sites. Five hundred six adult (≥18 years) cigarette smokers were randomly assigned and 315 (62%) completed the study. INTERVENTIONS Twelve weeks of varenicline and bupropion SR or varenicline and placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome was abstinence rates at week 12, defined as prolonged (no smoking from 2 weeks after the target quit date) abstinence and 7-day point-prevalence (no smoking past 7 days) abstinence. Secondary outcomes were prolonged and point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at weeks 26 and 52. Outcomes were biochemically confirmed. RESULTS At 12 weeks, 53.0% of the combination therapy group achieved prolonged smoking abstinence and 56.2% achieved 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence compared with 43.2% and 48.6% in varenicline monotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.05-2.12; P = .03 and OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.95-1.93; P = .09, respectively). At 26 weeks, 36.6% of the combination therapy group achieved prolonged and 38.2% achieved 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence compared with 27.6% and 31.9% in varenicline monotherapy (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04-2.22; P = .03 and OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.91-1.91; P = .14, respectively). At 52 weeks, 30.9% of the combination therapy group achieved prolonged and 36.6% achieved 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence compared with 24.5% and 29.2% in varenicline monotherapy (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.93-2.07; P = .11 and OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.96-2.05; P = .08, respectively). Participants receiving combination therapy reported more anxiety (7.2% vs 3.1%; P = .04) and depressive symptoms (3.6% vs 0.8%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among cigarette smokers, combined use of varenicline and bupropion, compared with varenicline alone, increased prolonged abstinence but not 7-day point prevalence at 12 and 26 weeks. Neither outcome was significantly different at 52 weeks. Further research is required to determine the role of combination therapy in smoking cessation. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00935818.

Effects of gender on relapse prevention in smokers treated with bupropion SR

BACKGROUND Recent data suggest that women smokers respond differently than men to cessation pharmacotherapies, particularly nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Lower abstinence and higher relapse rates are often reported for women treated with NRT. Gender effects for those treated with non-nicotinic, bupropion-hydrochloride sustained release for relapse prevention have not been studied. METHODS Data from a multicenter relapse-prevention (RP) trial of bupropion (November 1995-June 1998) were analyzed for gender differences. Men and women smokers (N=784) were treated with open-label bupropion for 7 weeks. Those abstinent at Week 7 (n=432) were enrolled in the double-blind relapse-prevention phase and randomized to placebo or continued bupropion for 45 additional weeks. RESULTS Differences in point-prevalence abstinence rates between men (61.8%) and women (55.6%) in open-label bupropion (Week 7) were not significant. In the RP-phase Week 52, continuous abstinence rates for men and women were 37.8% and 36.4% (bupropion) and 36.6% and 29.9% (placebo), respectively; point-prevalence abstinence rates for men and women were 54.1% and 55.9% (bupropion) and 42.9% and 41.3% (placebo), respectively. Abstinence rates and time to relapse were superior for both men and women who received longer treatment. Gender differences within treatment groups were not significant. Median time to relapse was equal for men and women within each treatment group: Week 32 for bupropion and Week 20 for placebo. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that bupropion is a promising pharmacotherapy for preventing relapse, particularly for women.

Combination treatment with varenicline and nicotine replacement therapy

INTRODUCTION A paucity of data exists regarding the safety and effectiveness of combination treatment with varenicline and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). METHODS We reviewed the clinical experience of two groups of cigarette smokers enrolled in a residential tobacco treatment program: (a) patients receiving combination treatment with varenicline and NRT (N = 104) and (b) usual-care patients receiving treatment before the release of varenicline (N = 135). RESULTS Demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. Among smokers receiving varenicline and NRT, 71% used the nicotine patch with a mean dose of 32 mg/day (SD = 14) and 73% used at least two types of NRT. Adverse events were experienced by 39% (95% CI = 31%-49%) of patients receiving varenicline and NRT and by 59% (95% CI = 51%-67%) of usual-care patients during the residential program. A total of five patients (5%) discontinued varenicline due to adverse events, compared with one patient in the usual-care group. We did not observe a significant difference in the 30-day point prevalence smoking abstinence rate at 6 months between patients treated with varenicline and NRT (54%; 95% CI = 44%-64%) and usual-care patients (59%; 95% CI = 50%-66%). DISCUSSION Our findings suggest that combination therapy with varenicline and NRT is safe and well tolerated among patients in a residential tobacco treatment program.

Efficacy and Safety of Varenicline for Smoking Cessation

Effective treatment of nicotine addiction is essential for reducing the substantial current and predicted morbidity and mortality associated with tobacco smoking. Despite the availability of effective treatments for smoking cessation, such as nicotine replacement therapy and bupropion sustained-release (SR), abstinence rates remain less than optimal. Varenicline is the first in a new class of agents for smoking cessation, the alpha(4)beta(2) nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) partial agonists. Nicotine addiction is mediated by stimulation of central alpha(4)beta(2) nAChRs by nicotine, which causes the release of dopamine, ultimately leading to the pleasurable effects of smoking. As a nAChR partial agonist, varenicline attenuates the craving and withdrawal symptoms that occur with abstinence from nicotine and also reduces the rewarding effects of nicotine obtained from smoking in patients who lapse. Thus, varenicline offers a new therapeutic option for the treatment of nicotine addiction. Clinical trials have demonstrated superior efficacy of this agent over placebo and bupropion-SR for achieving abstinence from smoking, and varenicline has also been shown to significantly delay smoking relapse. As the newest agent approved for smoking cessation, the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety of varenicline.

Adverse effects and tolerability of medications for the treatment of tobacco use and dependence

Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death and disability in the world. Although gradually declining in most developed countries, the prevalence of tobacco use has increased among developing countries. Treatment for tobacco use and dependence is effective, although long-term abstinence rates remain disappointingly low. In response, new treatments continue to be developed. In addition, many of the pharmacotherapies that have been available for years have found new applications with the use of medication combinations, higher doses and a longer duration of therapy for approved medications.There are now seven medications (nicotine patch, nicotine gum, nicotine lozenge, nicotine inhaler, nicotine nasal spray, bupropion sustained release and varenicline) approved for tobacco dependence treatment in most countries, and many national and professional society practice guidelines recommend their use. Although each of the medications used for tobacco dependence treatment has been rigorously tested for efficacy and safety, broader experience in clinical trials and in observational population-based studies suggests that adverse events associated with these medications are relatively common. Since 2008, two of the medications (varenicline and bupropion) have come under increasing scrutiny because of reports of unexplained serious adverse events (SAEs), including behaviour change, depression, self-injurious thoughts and suicidal behaviour. To date, this association has not been shown to be caused by these medications, but concerns about medication safety continue. Prescribers require a working knowledge of the common adverse effects for all of these medications as well as a more detailed knowledge of the SAE potential.Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) has been rigorously tested in clinical trials for over 30 years. A number of adverse effects are commonly associated with NRT use, although SAEs are rare. The adverse effects associated with NRT are due to the pharmacological action of nicotine as well as the mode and site of the NRT application. Bupropion has been tested in over 40 controlled clinical trials and has been associated with higher rates of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events than NRTs. A number of SAEs are associated with bupropion and new warnings were recently added to bupropion prescribing information because of observed neuropsychiatric symptoms including suicidal thoughts and behaviours. Varenicline is the most recently approved medication for tobacco dependence treatment and, although proven safe in clinical testing, new safety concerns have arisen based on postmarketing reports. Warnings have been added to the prescribing information for varenicline because of neuropsychiatric symptoms also including suicidal thoughts and behaviours.Informed decision making regarding the use of pharmacotherapy for the treatment of tobacco dependence requires knowledge about the risks of drug treatment that is weighed against the risks of continued tobacco use and the benefits of treatment. Over half of all long-term smokers will die of a tobaccorelated disease and the risk of a serious or life-threatening adverse event with tobacco cessation pharmacotherapy is vanishingly small. Pharmacotherapy for tobacco dependence is also among the most cost-effective preventive health interventions. Given these factors, the benefit: risk ratio is strongly in favour of pharmacotherapy for tobacco dependence treatment in virtually all smokers who are motivated to quit.