J. U. Gutterman
University of Texas System
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. U. Gutterman.
Advances in internal medicine | 1977
Evan M. Hersh; J. U. Gutterman; G. M. Mavligit
The efficacy of the conventional modalities of cancer treatment—surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy—has been reasonably well defined. There is also sufficient experience to permit one to predict the nature of future improvements in efficacy for these conventional modalities. For surgery, it is likely that the limit of efficacy has been reached, and while surgery can effectively cure a proportion of patients with apparent local disease, it is clear that disseminated, microscopic tumor deposits are present in at least half the operable cases at the time of surgery, ultimately eventuating in metastatic disease. A limited but important additional role for surgery will be the debulking of metastatic disease in an attempt to reduce the tumor burden and thus to improve the efficacy of subsequent systemic treatment with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and other possible approaches.
Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology | 1977
Uri H. Lewinski; G. M. Mavligit; J. U. Gutterman; Evan M. Hersh
Abstract The effect of skin testing with recall antigens on lymphocyte blastogenesis in vitro was studied in 50 patients with carcinoma. Significant enhancement of lymphocyte blastogenesis to different mitogens was observed following the application of a skin test battery of recall antigens. No additional increments in blastogenesis were observed subsequently with repeated skin testing using a single recall antigen (dermatophytin). These results emphasized the possibility of a combined effect resulting from multiple factors on studies of lymphocyte blastogenesis.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | 1976
J. P. Cotropia; J. U. Gutterman; Evan M. Hersh; C.H. Granatek; G. M. Mavligit
It is well accepted that most human tumor cells express antigens that can evoke a cell-associated and/or humoral immune response. Antitumor antibodies reacting with human tumor antigens have been demonstrated in the sera of cancer patients by a variety of in vitro techniques. A major factor in understanding the host-tumor relationship has been the recent demonstration that many tumor cells also appear to be coated in vivo with immunoglobulin, particularly IgG. Indeed, most human and animal tumor cells tested thus far have been found to be coated in vivo with immunoglobulin.R* 13* 45-64* 56-57 , in Although the immunoglobulins have been eluted from human and animal tumors 1.89 IS. by many investigators, the intactness and immunological reactivity of these immunoglobulins have not been clearly established. The immunoglobulin coat may consist of specific antitumor antibodies bound to their target antigens, o r may be 61-61. 69 or both. The biological role of bound immunoglobulin is unclear. Most of the data supported the concept that bound immunoglobulins may decrease immunogenicity or antigenicity of the coated cell. Indeed, allo-antibodies to tumors can block lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro6-7. l2 and acid-eluted IgG can enhance tumor growth in
Advances in Immunopharmacology#R##N#Proceedings of the First International Conference on Immunopharmacology, July 1980, Brighton, England | 1981
Evan M. Hersh; J. U. Gutterman; G. M. Mavligit; S. Murphy
ABSTRACT Human cancer immunotherapy has been investigated for approximately 10 years. During that time, numerous clinical trials have been done with arbitrarily selected doses of BCG, C. parvum, MER, tumor cell vaccines, and levamisole. Smaller numbers of clinical trials have been done with other modalities of immunotherapy which fall into the categories of active specific immunotherapy, active nonspecific immunotherapy, adoptive immunotherapy, etc. While conflicting results in many of these trials are evident, immunotherapy does seem to have some clinical activity in a variety of human neoplasms. The most effective forms of immunotherapy at present are local regional immunotherapy and possibly immunotherapy with the immunorestorative agent, levamisole. The development of interferon for clinical trials and the preliminary results indicating activity in breast cancer, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma has opened the broad area of biological response modifier therapy to clinical investigation. The prospects for biological response modifier therapy with better defined and characterized agents, the doses and schedules of administration of which have been scientifically selected, offer the hope that biological therapy of cancer will develop as the fourth major modality of cancer treatment.
Archive | 1978
G. M. Mavligit; J. U. Gutterman; Evan M. Hersh
Colorectal cancer appears to be an ever-growing epidemic with an all-time high incidence of approximately 100,000 new cases estimated in the United States during 1977. This disease, which seems to affect males and females equally, has been subjected to numerous surgical therapeutic approaches during the past two decades. Unfortunately, these exhaustive conventional approaches have failed to improve the overall prognosis (Donaldson and Welch, 1974).
European Journal of Cancer | 1977
C.H. Granatek; Evan M. Hersh; J. U. Gutterman; G. M. Mavligit
Abstract A modified spleen colony assay was employed to evaluate the effect of various tumor-related factors upon the in vivo effectiveness of anti-fetal immunity. Reduction of fetal liver (hemopoietic) colony formation by in vitro incubation of fetal liver cells with lymph node cells sensitized to syngeneic fetal liver or plasma cell tumor was blocked by (1) solubilized fetal antigen, (2) serum from mice recently immunized with syngeneic fetal liver and (3) serum from patients with metastatic colon cancer. In the latter, the degree of blocking correlated with plasma CEA levels. Both humoral and cell-mediated mechanisms of anti-fetal immunity were blocked in plasma cell tumor-bearing mice, suggesting in vivo suppression of the immune response via circulating tumor-associated fetal antigen.
The Lancet | 1976
G. M. Mavligit; MichaelA. Burgess; G. Burton Seibert; AndreV. Jubert; CharlesM. Mcbride; EdmundA. Gehan; J. U. Gutterman; Nayerh Khankhanian; JohnF. Speer; RichardC. Martin; EdwardM. Copeland; EvanM. Hersh
The Lancet | 1983
StevenA. Rich; TimothyR. Owens; LeeE. Bartholomew; J. U. Gutterman
Medical Clinics of North America | 1976
J. U. Gutterman; G. M. Mavligit; Evan M. Hersh
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy | 1979
D. L. Morris; Evan M. Hersh; J. U. Gutterman; M. Marshall; Giora M. Mavligit