J. van Baaren

How does heat shock affect the life history traits of adults and progeny of the aphid parasitoid Aphidius avenae (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae)?

Because insects are ectotherms, their physiology, behaviour and fitness are influenced by the ambient temperature. Any changes in environmental temperatures may impact the fitness and life history traits of insects and, thus, affect population dynamics. Here, we experimentally tested the impact of heat shock on the fitness and life history traits of adults of the aphid parasitoid Aphidius avenae and on the later repercussions for their progeny. Our results show that short exposure (1 h) to an elevated temperature (36 degrees C), which is frequently experienced by parasitoids during the summer, resulted in high mortality rates in a parasitoid population and strongly affected the fitness of survivors by drastically reducing reproductive output and triggering a sex-dependent effect on lifespan. Heat stress resulted in greater longevity in surviving females and in shorter longevity in surviving males in comparison with untreated individuals. Viability and the developmental rates of progeny were also affected in a sex-dependent manner. These results underline the ecological importance of the thermal stress response of parasitoid species, not only for survival, but also for maintaining reproductive activities.

Intraspecific hyperparasitism in a primary hymenopteran parasitoid

In solitary parasitoids, in which only one individual can emerge per host, the adaptive value of conspecific superparasitism is a function of the survival probability of the egg laid by the superparasitizing female. In the few cases which these probabilities are compared, the oldest immature has an advantage over the other individuals. We measured the acceptance rate of parasitized hosts and survival rate of supernumerary larvae in Anaphes victus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in relation to the interval between ovipositions. When this interval was 5–7 days, the first immature was at the prepupa and pupa stage respectively, and female Anaphes victus changed their oviposition behavior markedly. They killed the developing parasitoid of their own species before ovipositing in it. The progeny of these females, which are normally primary parasitoids, developed thereafter as hyperparasitoids. Indeed, in contrast with other species, the survival of the second females progeny increased with the time interval between ovipositions. This type of facultative intraspecific hyperparasitism is different from autoparasitism in Aphelinidae and has never been mentioned in other parasitoids; it would be adaptive if females of this short-lived species encounter low-quality patches.

Comparison of oviposition behavior of a solitary and a gregarious parasitoid (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae)

Anaphes victus Huber andAnaphes listronoti Huber (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) are respectively solitary and gregarious egg parasitoids of the carrot weevil,Listronotus oregonensis (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). We made detailed ethograms of the oviposition behavior on unparasitized and parasitized hosts for the two species. We then compared the behavior of virgin and mated females for the oviposition of male and female progenies. The two species did not always oviposit after insertion of the ovipositor, but these punctures without oviposition could be readily differentiated from oviposition.A. victus oviposited only once by puncture, whileA. listronoti deposited one to three eggs during the same sequence. The variability of the duration of the various components was generally lower for a given female than between females. Two components, the abdominal vibrations and the pause, were significantly shorter in ovipositions that resulted in male progency for the two species. However, an important overlap in duration prevents using these differences to sex the progeny at oviposition. Virgin females of both species, although capable of producing only males, exhibited both behaviors. Parasitized hosts were recognized through internal and external markings that were used in host discrimination.

Playing the hare or the tortoise in parasitoids: could different oviposition strategies have an influence in host partitioning in two Aphidius species?

In this paper, we compare the host selection behaviours of two parasitoids, Aphidius rhopalosiphi and Aphidius picipes, in order to analyse whether behavioural adaptations to the defensive behaviour of their host (the grain aphid Sitobion avenae) could, in part, be responsible for the simultaneous presence of both species in cereal fields. The oviposition behaviour of A. picipes differed from that of A. rhopalosiphi by including a number of ‘fluttering wings’ sequences followed by immobility. It resulted in a 44 times longer host-handling time for A. picipes than for A. rhopalosiphi. Hosts attacked by A. picipes exhibited fewer defensive behaviours than hosts attacked by A. rhopalosiphi. A. picipes and A. rhopalosiphi rejected respectively 0% and 53% of unparasitized hosts presenting cornicle secretions, one of the defensive means of aphids. Furthermore, A. picipes females rejected 100% of the hosts that were already parasitized, whereas A. rhopalosiphi was previously described to reject only 20 to 40% of such hosts. Such differences could be explained by the way the two species deal with the aphid defensive behaviour. Field analyses, showed that A. rhopalosiphi was already present in wheat fields in early April whereas A. picipes appeared later and only achieved a low level of parasitism. However, when both species were present simultaneously, they shared the same resource.

Behaviours promoting grouping or dispersal of mother and neonates in ovoviviparous cockroaches

Summary. The nature of early relationships between mother and nymphs and among siblings was compared in four cockroach species belonging to the same ovoviviparous family (Zetoborinae) in order to characterise the behavioural interactions favouring dispersal or maintenance of the group of neonates. Behavioural interactions between mothers and their new-born nymphs and between two sibling neonates were video recorded and analysed with flow charts on factorial maps. In the solitary species Thanatophyllum akinetum, nymphs dispersed a few hours after birth without aggressiveness between siblings or between mother and offspring. In contrast females of Schultesia lampyridiformis displayed a behaviour never previously observed in cockroaches: aggression towards their own neonate nymphs, which could contribute to their dispersal. In Phortioeca nimbata and Lanxoblatta emarginata, nymphs stayed with their mother for 10 days, but social interactions differed between the two sp ecies: P. nimbata mothers actively searched for their nymphs, this behaviour being favoured by an active search for mutual contact by the nymphs themselves, while L. emarginata nymphs sought more actively the proximity of their mother but less contact between themselves. Thus, different species of Zetoborinae presented two types of dispersal of the young and two types of maintenance of the birth group, both achieved by specific behavioural interactions. The relevance of behavioural interactions for the characterisation of early gregarism and parental care is discussed.

The male and female first instar larvae of Anaphes victus and A. listronoti (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae)

Abstract Anaphes victus and A. listronoti are two closely related species, respectively solitary and gregarious parasitoids of eggs of the carrot weevil Listronotus oregonensis (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Both species are sympatric, and the regulation of super- and multiparasitism that occurs regularly in this host is done by larval fights between the mymariform first instar larvae. The morphology of both male and female first instar larvae of A. victus and A. listronoti is described using scanning electron microscopy. Both species have first instar larvae of the mymariform type and present sexual dimorphism. The main difference between the two species is that larvae of A. victus are clearly segmented while larvae of A. listronoti show no visible segmentation. Male larvae of both species have two types of perioral hooks, longer and less dense dorsal setae than females and developed undertail spines. Female larvae of both species have short abdominal setae. These morphological differences are discussed in the context of intra- and interspecific larval competition.

Factors involved in host discrimination by Epidinocarsis lopezi and Leptomastix dactylopii (Hym., Encyrtidae)

The factors involved in host discrimination by two Encyrtid Hymenoptera, Epidinocarsis lopezi and Leptomastix dactylopii, parasitoids of the mealybugs Phenacoccus manihoti and Planococcus citri (Pseudococcidae) respectively, were compared in a behavioural study. Females of both species can discriminate between unparasitized and parasitized hosts whatever the time elapsed since first oviposition. Discrimination is based on several stimuli which act either simultaneously or successively. In E. lopezi, the rejection of parasitized hosts occurred either after a simple antennal contact, as a result of the defense behaviour of the parasitized host, or after the insertion of the ovipositor. In the latter the parasitoid probably detects a modification in the composition of the haemolymph due to the presence of the developing parasitoid. In L. dactylopii, parasitized hosts were rejected mainly after antennal palpation, the possible markers identified being either an external pheromone or the physical marker provided by the egg stalk emerging from the surface of the parasitized host. After 3 days of infestation, the use of the ovipositor is sometimes necessary.