J W Byng

Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images

Mammographic parcnchymal patterns are among the strongest indicators of the risk of developing breast cancer. Risk evaluation through breast patterns may have an important role in studies of the aetiology of breast cancer and for monitoring changes in the breast in evaluating potential risk-modifying interventions. Typically, patterns are assessed by an experienced radiologist according to Wolfe grade, or on a coarse quantitative scale according to percent density. Parenchymal characterization methods, to overcome variability of classification by human observer, are under investigation. These include image segmentation using semi-automatic thresholding and automatic classification through textural and density measures. An important practical question relates to the extent to which information about mammographic pattern is carried by any one of the four views obtained in a typical examination. Specifically, variations of right-left breast symmetry and variations between the two standard views of each breast were tested. The mammograms of 30 premenopausal women, comprising 90 images [30 each of the right cranial-caudal (RCC), left cranialcaudal (LCC) and right medial-lateral oblique (RMLO)] were evaluated. Parameters included both subjective (radiologist classification and interactive image thresholding) and objective (fractal and skewness indices) quantitative measurements of parenchymal pattern. For the parameters tested, a high degree of correlation was observed for measurements on the RCC, LCC and RMLO views. Pearson correlation coefficients between 0.86-0.96 were found for the comparisons of quantitative parameters. The strong correlations suggest that, in the study and application of mammographic density classification, representative information is provided in a single view.

Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk

There is considerable evidence that one of the strongest risk factors for breast carcinoma can be assessed from the mammographic appearance of the breast. However, the magnitude of the risk factor and the reliability of the prediction depend on the method of classification. Subjective classification requires specialized observer training and suffers from inter‐ and intraobserver variability. Furthermore, the categoric scales make it difficult to distinguish small differences in mammographic appearance. To address these limitations, automated analysis techniques that characterize mammographic density on a continuous scale have been considered, but as yet, these have been evaluated only for their ability to reproduce subjective classifications of mammographic parenchyma.

Mammographic Densities and Breast Cancer Risk

The radiological appearance of the female breast varies among individuals because of differences in the relative amounts and X-ray attenuation characteristics of fat and epithelial and stromal tissues. Fat is radiolucent and appears dark on a mammogram, and epithelium and stroma are radiodense and appear light. We review here the evidence that these variations, known as mammographic parenchymal patterns, are related to risk of breast cancer. Studies that used quantitative measurement to classify mammographic patterns have consistently found that women with dense tissue in more than 60-75% of the breast are at four to six times greater risk of breast cancer than those with no densities. These risk estimates are independent of the effects of other risk factors and have been shown to persist over at least 10 years of follow up. Estimates of attributable risk suggest that this risk factor may account for as many as 30% of breast cancer cases. Mammographically dense breast tissue is associated both with epithelial proliferation and with stromal fibrosis. The relationship between these histological features and risk of breast cancer may by explained by the known actions of growth factors that are thought to play important roles in breast development and carcinogenesis. Mammographically dense tissue differs from most other breast cancer risk factors in the strength of the associated relative and attributable risks for breast cancer, and because it can be changed by hormonal and dietary interventions. This risk factor may be most useful as a means of investigating the etiology of breast cancer and of testing hypotheses about potential preventive strategies.

Breast cancer risk and measured mammographic density.

It has been well established that there is a positive correlation between the dense appearance of breast stroma and parenchyma on a mammogram and the risk of breast cancer. Subjective assessment by radiologists indicated relative risks on the order of 4 to 6 for the group of women whose mammograms showed a density of over 75% or more of the projected area compared to those with an absence of density. In order to obtain a more quantitative, continuous and reproducible means of estimating breast density, which is sensitive to small changes, we have developed quantitative methods for the analysis of mammographic density, which can be applied to digitized mammograms. These techniques have been validated in a nested case-control study on 708 women aged 40–59 years(on entry) who participated in a national mammographic screening study. An interactive image segmentation method and two completely automated techniques based on image texture and grey scale histogram measures have been developed and evaluated. While our methods all show statistically significant risk factors for dense breasts, the interactive method currently provides the highest risk values (relative risk 4.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.12–7.56) compared to a measure based on the shape of the image histogram (relative risk 3.35, 95% CI = 1.57–7.12) or the fractal dimension of the mammogram (relative risk 2.54, 95% CI = 1.14–5.68), All methods were highly consistent between images of the left and right breast and between the two standard views (cranio-caudal and medio-lateral oblique) of each breast, so that studies can be done by sampling only one of the four views per examination. There is a large number of factors in addition to breast density which affect the appearance of the mammogram. In particular, the assessment of density is made difficult where the breast is not uniformly compressed, e.g. at the periphery. We have designed and are currently evaluating an image processing algorithm that effectively corrects for this problem and have considered methods for controlling some of the variables of image acquisition in prospective studies. Measurements of breast density may be helpful in assigning risk groups to women. Such measurements might guide the frequency of mammographic screening, aid the study of breast cancer aetiology, and be useful in monitoring possible risk-modifying interventions. Using our techniques, we have been able to show that reduction of the proportion of fat in the diet can result in reductions of breast density, although the direct connection to risk has not yet been made. The relationship between breast density and hormone-related and genetic factors is also of great interest. It is often not possible or ethical to obtain mammograms on some groups of women for whom information on density would be very useful. This includes younger women as well as groups in which it would be desirable to obtain such information at frequent intervals. For this reason, we are exploring the use of imaging approaches such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, which do not require ionizing radiation, to make measurements analogous to those now being performed by using X-ray mammograms.