Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where J. Wenner is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by J. Wenner.


Nature | 2014

Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance

R. Barends; J. Kelly; A. Megrant; A. Veitia; D. Sank; E. Jeffrey; T. White; J. Mutus; Austin G. Fowler; B. Campbell; Y. Chen; Z. Chen; B. Chiaro; A. Dunsworth; C. Neill; P. J. J. O’Malley; P. Roushan; A. Vainsencher; J. Wenner; Alexander N. Korotkov; A. N. Cleland; John M. Martinis

A quantum computer can solve hard problems, such as prime factoring, database searching and quantum simulation, at the cost of needing to protect fragile quantum states from error. Quantum error correction provides this protection by distributing a logical state among many physical quantum bits (qubits) by means of quantum entanglement. Superconductivity is a useful phenomenon in this regard, because it allows the construction of large quantum circuits and is compatible with microfabrication. For superconducting qubits, the surface code approach to quantum computing is a natural choice for error correction, because it uses only nearest-neighbour coupling and rapidly cycled entangling gates. The gate fidelity requirements are modest: the per-step fidelity threshold is only about 99 per cent. Here we demonstrate a universal set of logic gates in a superconducting multi-qubit processor, achieving an average single-qubit gate fidelity of 99.92 per cent and a two-qubit gate fidelity of up to 99.4 per cent. This places Josephson quantum computing at the fault-tolerance threshold for surface code error correction. Our quantum processor is a first step towards the surface code, using five qubits arranged in a linear array with nearest-neighbour coupling. As a further demonstration, we construct a five-qubit Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state using the complete circuit and full set of gates. The results demonstrate that Josephson quantum computing is a high-fidelity technology, with a clear path to scaling up to large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum circuits.A quantum computer can solve hard problems - such as prime factoring, database searching, and quantum simulation - at the cost of needing to protect fragile quantum states from error. Quantum error correction provides this protection, by distributing a logical state among many physical qubits via quantum entanglement. Superconductivity is an appealing platform, as it allows for constructing large quantum circuits, and is compatible with microfabrication. For superconducting qubits the surface code is a natural choice for error correction, as it uses only nearest-neighbour coupling and rapidly-cycled entangling gates. The gate fidelity requirements are modest: The per-step fidelity threshold is only about 99%. Here, we demonstrate a universal set of logic gates in a superconducting multi-qubit processor, achieving an average single-qubit gate fidelity of 99.92% and a two-qubit gate fidelity up to 99.4%. This places Josephson quantum computing at the fault-tolerant threshold for surface code error correction. Our quantum processor is a first step towards the surface code, using five qubits arranged in a linear array with nearest-neighbour coupling. As a further demonstration, we construct a five-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state using the complete circuit and full set of gates. The results demonstrate that Josephson quantum computing is a high-fidelity technology, with a clear path to scaling up to large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum circuits.


Nature | 2014

Logic gates at the surface code threshold: Superconducting qubits poised for fault-tolerant quantum computing

R. Barends; J. Kelly; A. Megrant; A. Veitia; D. Sank; E. Jeffrey; T. White; J. Mutus; Austin G. Fowler; B. Campbell; Y. Chen; Z. Chen; B. Chiaro; A. Dunsworth; C. Neill; P. J. J. O’Malley; P. Roushan; A. Vainsencher; J. Wenner; Alexander N. Korotkov; A. N. Cleland; John M. Martinis

A quantum computer can solve hard problems, such as prime factoring, database searching and quantum simulation, at the cost of needing to protect fragile quantum states from error. Quantum error correction provides this protection by distributing a logical state among many physical quantum bits (qubits) by means of quantum entanglement. Superconductivity is a useful phenomenon in this regard, because it allows the construction of large quantum circuits and is compatible with microfabrication. For superconducting qubits, the surface code approach to quantum computing is a natural choice for error correction, because it uses only nearest-neighbour coupling and rapidly cycled entangling gates. The gate fidelity requirements are modest: the per-step fidelity threshold is only about 99 per cent. Here we demonstrate a universal set of logic gates in a superconducting multi-qubit processor, achieving an average single-qubit gate fidelity of 99.92 per cent and a two-qubit gate fidelity of up to 99.4 per cent. This places Josephson quantum computing at the fault-tolerance threshold for surface code error correction. Our quantum processor is a first step towards the surface code, using five qubits arranged in a linear array with nearest-neighbour coupling. As a further demonstration, we construct a five-qubit Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state using the complete circuit and full set of gates. The results demonstrate that Josephson quantum computing is a high-fidelity technology, with a clear path to scaling up to large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum circuits.A quantum computer can solve hard problems - such as prime factoring, database searching, and quantum simulation - at the cost of needing to protect fragile quantum states from error. Quantum error correction provides this protection, by distributing a logical state among many physical qubits via quantum entanglement. Superconductivity is an appealing platform, as it allows for constructing large quantum circuits, and is compatible with microfabrication. For superconducting qubits the surface code is a natural choice for error correction, as it uses only nearest-neighbour coupling and rapidly-cycled entangling gates. The gate fidelity requirements are modest: The per-step fidelity threshold is only about 99%. Here, we demonstrate a universal set of logic gates in a superconducting multi-qubit processor, achieving an average single-qubit gate fidelity of 99.92% and a two-qubit gate fidelity up to 99.4%. This places Josephson quantum computing at the fault-tolerant threshold for surface code error correction. Our quantum processor is a first step towards the surface code, using five qubits arranged in a linear array with nearest-neighbour coupling. As a further demonstration, we construct a five-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state using the complete circuit and full set of gates. The results demonstrate that Josephson quantum computing is a high-fidelity technology, with a clear path to scaling up to large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum circuits.


Nature | 2015

State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit

J. Kelly; R. Barends; Austin G. Fowler; A. Megrant; E. Jeffrey; T. White; D. Sank; J. Mutus; B. Campbell; Yu Chen; Z. Chen; B. Chiaro; A. Dunsworth; I.-C. Hoi; C. Neill; P. J. J. O’Malley; C. Quintana; P. Roushan; A. Vainsencher; J. Wenner; A. N. Cleland; John M. Martinis

Quantum computing becomes viable when a quantum state can be protected from environment-induced error. If quantum bits (qubits) are sufficiently reliable, errors are sparse and quantum error correction (QEC) is capable of identifying and correcting them. Adding more qubits improves the preservation of states by guaranteeing that increasingly larger clusters of errors will not cause logical failure—a key requirement for large-scale systems. Using QEC to extend the qubit lifetime remains one of the outstanding experimental challenges in quantum computing. Here we report the protection of classical states from environmental bit-flip errors and demonstrate the suppression of these errors with increasing system size. We use a linear array of nine qubits, which is a natural step towards the two-dimensional surface code QEC scheme, and track errors as they occur by repeatedly performing projective quantum non-demolition parity measurements. Relative to a single physical qubit, we reduce the failure rate in retrieving an input state by a factor of 2.7 when using five of our nine qubits and by a factor of 8.5 when using all nine qubits after eight cycles. Additionally, we tomographically verify preservation of the non-classical Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state. The successful suppression of environment-induced errors will motivate further research into the many challenges associated with building a large-scale superconducting quantum computer.


Science | 2011

Implementing the Quantum von Neumann Architecture with Superconducting Circuits

Matteo Mariantoni; H. Wang; T. Yamamoto; M. Neeley; Radoslaw C. Bialczak; Y. Chen; M. Lenander; Erik Lucero; Aaron O'Connell; D. Sank; Martin Weides; J. Wenner; Y. Yin; J. Zhao; Alexander N. Korotkov; A. N. Cleland; John M. Martinis

A quantum version of a central processing unit was created with superconducting circuits and elements. The von Neumann architecture for a classical computer comprises a central processing unit and a memory holding instructions and data. We demonstrate a quantum central processing unit that exchanges data with a quantum random-access memory integrated on a chip, with instructions stored on a classical computer. We test our quantum machine by executing codes that involve seven quantum elements: Two superconducting qubits coupled through a quantum bus, two quantum memories, and two zeroing registers. Two vital algorithms for quantum computing are demonstrated, the quantum Fourier transform, with 66% process fidelity, and the three-qubit Toffoli-class OR phase gate, with 98% phase fidelity. Our results, in combination especially with longer qubit coherence, illustrate a potentially viable approach to factoring numbers and implementing simple quantum error correction codes.


Nature Physics | 2012

Computing prime factors with a Josephson phase qubit quantum processor

Erik Lucero; R. Barends; Y. Chen; J. Kelly; Matteo Mariantoni; A. Megrant; P. J. J. O’Malley; D. Sank; A. Vainsencher; J. Wenner; T. White; Y. Yin; A. N. Cleland; John M. Martinis

Shor’s quantum algorithm factorizes integers, and implementing this is a benchmark test in the early development of quantum processors. Researchers now demonstrate this important test in a solid-state system: a circuit made up of four superconducting qubits factorizes the number 15.


Nature | 2016

Digitized adiabatic quantum computing with a superconducting circuit

R. Barends; Alireza Shabani; Lucas Lamata; J. Kelly; A. Mezzacapo; U. Las Heras; Ryan Babbush; Austin G. Fowler; B. Campbell; Yu Chen; Z. Chen; B. Chiaro; A. Dunsworth; E. Jeffrey; Erik Lucero; A. Megrant; J. Mutus; M. Neeley; C. Neill; P. J. J. O’Malley; C. Quintana; P. Roushan; D. Sank; A. Vainsencher; J. Wenner; T. White; E. Solano; Hartmut Neven; John M. Martinis

Quantum mechanics can help to solve complex problems in physics and chemistry, provided they can be programmed in a physical device. In adiabatic quantum computing, a system is slowly evolved from the ground state of a simple initial Hamiltonian to a final Hamiltonian that encodes a computational problem. The appeal of this approach lies in the combination of simplicity and generality; in principle, any problem can be encoded. In practice, applications are restricted by limited connectivity, available interactions and noise. A complementary approach is digital quantum computing, which enables the construction of arbitrary interactions and is compatible with error correction, but uses quantum circuit algorithms that are problem-specific. Here we combine the advantages of both approaches by implementing digitized adiabatic quantum computing in a superconducting system. We tomographically probe the system during the digitized evolution and explore the scaling of errors with system size. We then let the full system find the solution to random instances of the one-dimensional Ising problem as well as problem Hamiltonians that involve more complex interactions. This digital quantum simulation of the adiabatic algorithm consists of up to nine qubits and up to 1,000 quantum logic gates. The demonstration of digitized adiabatic quantum computing in the solid state opens a path to synthesizing long-range correlations and solving complex computational problems. When combined with fault-tolerance, our approach becomes a general-purpose algorithm that is scalable.


Physical Review Letters | 2014

Qubit Architecture with High Coherence and Fast Tunable Coupling.

Yu Chen; C. Neill; P. Roushan; N. Leung; M. Fang; R. Barends; J. Kelly; B. Campbell; Z. Chen; B. Chiaro; A. Dunsworth; E. Jeffrey; A. Megrant; J. Mutus; P. J. J. O’Malley; C. Quintana; D. Sank; A. Vainsencher; J. Wenner; T. White; Michael R. Geller; A. N. Cleland; John M. Martinis

We introduce a superconducting qubit architecture that combines high-coherence qubits and tunable qubit-qubit coupling. With the ability to set the coupling to zero, we demonstrate that this architecture is protected from the frequency crowding problems that arise from fixed coupling. More importantly, the coupling can be tuned dynamically with nanosecond resolution, making this architecture a versatile platform with applications ranging from quantum logic gates to quantum simulation. We illustrate the advantages of dynamical coupling by implementing a novel adiabatic controlled-z gate, with a speed approaching that of single-qubit gates. Integrating coherence and scalable control, the introduced qubit architecture provides a promising path towards large-scale quantum computation and simulation.


Nature Communications | 2015

Digital quantum simulation of fermionic models with a superconducting circuit

R. Barends; L. Lamata; J. Kelly; L. García-Álvarez; Austin G. Fowler; A. Megrant; E. Jeffrey; T. White; D. Sank; J. Mutus; B. Campbell; Yu Chen; Z. Chen; B. Chiaro; A. Dunsworth; I.-C. Hoi; C. Neill; P. O'Malley; C. Quintana; P. Roushan; A. Vainsencher; J. Wenner; E. Solano; John M. Martinis

One of the key applications of quantum information is simulating nature. Fermions are ubiquitous in nature, appearing in condensed matter systems, chemistry and high energy physics. However, universally simulating their interactions is arguably one of the largest challenges, because of the difficulties arising from anticommutativity. Here we use digital methods to construct the required arbitrary interactions, and perform quantum simulation of up to four fermionic modes with a superconducting quantum circuit. We employ in excess of 300 quantum logic gates, and reach fidelities that are consistent with a simple model of uncorrelated errors. The presented approach is in principle scalable to a larger number of modes, and arbitrary spatial dimensions.


Applied Physics Letters | 2011

Minimizing quasiparticle generation from stray infrared light in superconducting quantum circuits

R. Barends; J. Wenner; M. Lenander; Y. Chen; Radoslaw C. Bialczak; J. Kelly; Erik Lucero; P. J. J. O’Malley; Matteo Mariantoni; D. Sank; H. Wang; T. White; Y. Yin; J. Zhao; A. N. Cleland; John M. Martinis; J. J. A. Baselmans

We find that quasiparticle generation from stray infrared light creates a significant loss mechanism in superconducting resonators and qubits. We show that resonator quality factors and qubit energy relaxation times are limited by a quasiparticle density of approximately 200 μm−3, induced by 4 K blackbody radiation from the environment. We demonstrate how this influence can be fully removed by isolating the devices from the radiative environment using multistage shielding.R. Barends, J. Wenner, M. Lenander, Y. Chen, R. C. Bialczak, J. Kelly, E. Lucero, P. O’Malley, M. Mariantoni, D. Sank, H. Wang, T. C. White, Y. Yin, J. Zhao, A. N. Cleland, John M. Martinis, and J. J. A. Baselmans Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands (Dated: January 25, 2013)


Physical Review X | 2016

Scalable Quantum Simulation of Molecular Energies

P. O'Malley; Ryan Babbush; Ian D. Kivlichan; Jonathan Romero; Jarrod McClean; R. Barends; J. Kelly; P. Roushan; Andrew Tranter; Nan Ding; B. Campbell; Yu Chen; Z. Chen; Ben Chiaro; A. Dunsworth; Austin G. Fowler; E. Jeffrey; A. Megrant; Josh Mutus; Charles Neil; Chris Quintana; D. Sank; T. White; J. Wenner; A. Vainsencher; Peter V. Coveney; Peter Love; Hartmut Neven; Alán Aspuru-Guzik; John M. Martinis

We report the first electronic structure calculation performed on a quantum computer without exponentially costly precompilation. We use a programmable array of superconducting qubits to compute the energy surface of molecular hydrogen using two distinct quantum algorithms. First, we experimentally execute the unitary coupled cluster method using the variational quantum eigensolver. Our efficient implementation predicts the correct dissociation energy to within chemical accuracy of the numerically exact result. Second, we experimentally demonstrate the canonical quantum algorithm for chemistry, which consists of Trotterization and quantum phase estimation. We compare the experimental performance of these approaches to show clear evidence that the variational quantum eigensolver is robust to certain errors. This error tolerance inspires hope that variational quantum simulations of classically intractable molecules may be viable in the near future.

Collaboration


Dive into the J. Wenner's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Sank

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Neill

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. White

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. N. Cleland

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Megrant

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Vainsencher

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B. Chiaro

University of California

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge