J. Zweegers
Radboud University Nijmegen
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. Zweegers.
British Journal of Dermatology | 2014
J.M.P.A. van den Reek; J. Zweegers; Wietske Kievit; M.E. Otero; P.P.M. van Lümig; R.J.B. Driessen; P.M. Ossenkoppele; M.D. Njoo; J.M. Mommers; M.I.A. Koetsier; W.P. Arnold; B.A.M. Sybrandy-Fleuren; A.L.A. Kuijpers; M.P.M. Andriessen; P.C.M. van de Kerkhof; M.M.B. Seyger; E.M.G.J. de Jong
Drug survival is a marker for treatment success. To date, no analyses relating dermatological quality‐of‐life measures to drug survival have been published.
Journal of The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology | 2015
J.M.P.A. van den Reek; Marcia Tummers; J. Zweegers; M.M.B. Seyger; P.P.M. van Lümig; R.J.B. Driessen; P.C.M. van de Kerkhof; Wietske Kievit; E.M.G.J. de Jong
Drug survival is an indicator for treatment success; insight in predictors associated with drug survival is important.
Journal of Investigative Dermatology | 2015
Juul M.P.A. van den Reek; Wietske Kievit; Robert Gniadecki; Jelle J. Goeman; J. Zweegers; Peter C.M. van de Kerkhof; M.M.B. Seyger; Elke M. G. J. de Jong
introduction With rising health-care costs and a growth of pharmaceutical options, health professionals are continuously looking for better and more comprehensive methods to evaluate treatments. In recent years, the term “drug survival” (DS) has made its way through the field of dermatology. This methodological approach, which is based on regular Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, has its roots in rheumatology, where it was first described in 1991 (Wijnands et al., 1991). The method of DS has only relatively recently emerged in dermatology, with most publications limited to biological treatments for psoriasis. In addition, different synonyms have been used to describe DS, such as “drug retention,” “drug longevity” or the incorrectly used “drug adherence.” For these reasons, not all dermatologists may be familiar with this topic. Our aim here is to provide an overview of the principles, purposes, and pitfalls of DS analysis to guide physicians in reading and interpreting DS studies.
JAMA Dermatology | 2014
Celine Busard; J. Zweegers; Jacqueline Limpens; Miranda W. Langendam; Phyllis I. Spuls
IMPORTANCE Combined use of systemic agents may be necessary to achieve disease control in therapy-resistant patients. However, to our knowledge, an overview of evidence, including quality assessments, is not yet available, and no guidance on monitoring, contraindications, and interactions exists. OBJECTIVES To summarize and critically appraise the evidence on efficacy and safety of combination therapy with systemic agents in plaque-type psoriasis. EVIDENCE REVIEW Through March 2013, an electronic search limited to randomized clinical trials was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and ongoing trial registers. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. FINDINGS The initial search retrieved 2583 records, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies favored combination therapy, albeit with low significance and low quality of evidence. Etanercept plus methotrexate was the only combination therapy investigated with an adequate sample size (n = 478). In the short term, this combination had superior efficacy with a moderate quality of evidence compared with etanercept monotherapy (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, 75; relative risk, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14-1.45). Although this finding coincided with an increase in adverse events (relative risk, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.10-1.42), the overall safety profile remained acceptable. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview on the validity of different systemic combination therapies. For most combinations, insufficient evidence is available. Initial results indicate that combined therapy with etanercept plus methotrexate may be beneficial in patients that are therapy resistant under intensive follow-up. Dose reductions should be taken into account to minimize adverse effects.
British Journal of Dermatology | 2017
J. Zweegers; J.M.M. Groenewoud; J.M.P.A. van den Reek; M.E. Otero; P.C.M. van de Kerkhof; R.J.B. Driessen; P.P.M. van Lümig; M.D. Njoo; P.M. Ossenkoppele; J.M. Mommers; M.I.A. Koetsier; W.P. Arnold; M.P.M. Andriessen; A.L.A. Kuijpers; M.A.M. Berends; Wietske Kievit; E.M.G.J. de Jong
The efficacy of etanercept and ustekinumab in psoriasis has been compared in one randomized controlled trial. Comparison of the long‐term effectiveness of biologics in daily‐practice psoriasis treatment is currently lacking.
British Journal of Dermatology | 2016
J. Zweegers; J.M.P.A. van den Reek; P.C.M. van de Kerkhof; M.E. Otero; A.L.A. Kuijpers; M.I.A. Koetsier; W.P. Arnold; M.A.M. Berends; L. Weppner-Parren; P.M. Ossenkoppele; M.D. Njoo; J.M. Mommers; P.P.M. van Lümig; R.J.B. Driessen; Wietske Kievit; E.M.G.J. de Jong
Predictors for successful treatment are important for personalized medicine. Predictors for drug survival of biologics in psoriasis have been assessed, but not split for different biologics or for the reason of discontinuation.
Acta Dermato-venereologica | 2016
J. Zweegers; M.E. Otero; J.M.P.A. van den Reek; P.P.M. van Lümig; R.J.B. Driessen; Wietske Kievit; M.M.B. Seyger; P.C.M. van de Kerkhof; E.M.G.J. de Jong
The efficacy of biologic or conventional systemic therapies for psoriasis has been shown in randomized controlled trials. Effectiveness, however, has been studied in daily practice cohorts, and no aggregation of effectiveness data is available. This systematic review searched PubMed and EMBASE and summarized the real-world evidence on effectiveness of biologics (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab and ustekinumab) and conventional systemic therapies (acitretin, cyclosporine, fumarates and methotrexate) for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in adults. Thirty-two studies were included. Few data were available on infliximab, ustekinumab and conventional systemics. Results show that biologics and conventional systemics were effective in real-life treatment of psoriasis, with large ranges in the percentage of patients reaching 75% improvement in psoriasis area and severity index score compared with baseline, especially for etanercept and adalimumab treatment. Combination therapies of biologics with conventional systemics, and dose adjustments of biologics were frequently applied strategies and may explain the large range in improvements between cohorts.
British Journal of Dermatology | 2014
J. Zweegers; J.M.P.A. van den Reek; P.C.M. van de Kerkhof; M.E. Otero; P.M. Ossenkoppele; M.D. Njoo; J.M. Mommers; M.I.A. Koetsier; W.P. Arnold; B.A.M. Sybrandy-Fleuren; A.L.A. Kuijpers; M.P.M. Andriessen; Wietske Kievit; E.M.G.J. de Jong
Treatment goals have been developed to optimize daily clinical practice psoriasis care, but have not yet been studied in real life.
British Journal of Dermatology | 2017
J.M.P.A. van den Reek; Marieke J. H. Coenen; M van de L'Isle Arias; J. Zweegers; Diana Rodijk-Olthuis; Joost Schalkwijk; Sita H. Vermeulen; Irma Joosten; P.C.M. van de Kerkhof; M.M.B. Seyger; Patrick L.J.M. Zeeuwen; E.M.G.J. de Jong
The effectiveness of biologics for psoriasis shows heterogeneity among patients. With pharmacogenetic markers, it might be possible to predict treatment response.
British Journal of Dermatology | 2014
J.M.P.A. van den Reek; P.P.M. van Lümig; M.E. Kooijmans; J. Zweegers; P.C.M. van de Kerkhof; P.M. Ossenkoppele; Njoo; J.M. Mommers; M.I.A. Koetsier; W.P. Arnold; B.A.M. Sybrandy-Fleuren; A.L.A. Kuijpers; M.P.M. Andriessen; M.M.B. Seyger; Wietske Kievit; E.M.G.J. de Jong
Although the effectiveness of biologics for psoriasis has been measured extensively with objective outcome measures, studies based on subjective, patient‐reported outcome measures remain scarce.