Jaan Kuht
Estonian University of Life Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jaan Kuht.
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-soil and Plant Science | 2009
Enola Reintam; Katrin Trükmann; Jaan Kuht; Edvin Nugis; Liina Edesi; Alar Astover; Merrit Noormets; Karin Kauer; Kadri Krebstein; Kaire Rannik
Abstract The weight of the tractor is not the only factor affecting soil compaction. Soil-management practices, such as the use of fertilizers and pesticides, also affect soil properties through an increased number of overriding. The aim of the current study was to investigate compaction effects on soil physical properties, such as dry bulk density and penetration resistance, and the growth of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) as a monoculture. The five-year experiment was conducted on the Estonian University of Life Sciences’ research field at Eerika, near Tartu in 2001–2005. The soil of the experimental site is sandy loam Stagnic Luvisol. The treatments included were no compaction, one pass, three passes, and six passes. All passes were track-by-track. Measurements of soil and plant were made in the earing phase of barley and measurements of yield in the maturity phase of barley. The compaction treatment was conducted using an MTZ-82 tractor (total weight 4.84 Mg). Neither fertilizers nor herbicides were used. 5 years after compaction distinguishable subsoil and topsoil compaction was detected. Soil deformation increases with the number of passes; in the case of six passes soil bulk density increased by 0.15 Mg m−3 and penetration resistance by 3 MPa. However, there were no significant differences in the soil bulk density and penetration resistance between treatments compacted with one and three passes. The effect of compaction on soil bulk density was higher when the soil was compacted under wet conditions. Compaction decreased the quantity of barley shoots, their phytomass, and grain yield by more than 80%. In the second year of the experiment the dry weight of above ground biomass decreased by almost three times and shoots’ density by 1.5 times, compared with the first year results. In the third year of the experiment the biomass, plant density, and grain yield of barley were stabilized and no further decreases were detected in the following two experimental years. The results from the experiment revealed that even a low weight tractor can induce subsoil compaction and a high decrease of plant productivity by repeated passes over time.
Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science | 2006
Endla Reintam; Jaan Kuht; Katrin Trükmann; Walter Leal Filho
Abstract The aim of the investigation presented in this paper was to identify the suitable and less energy-demanding methods to loose the subsoil compaction instead of mechanical subsoil loosening. The experiments with lupines (Lupinus luteus L. and Lupinus angustifolius L.) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) were made on the sandy loam Stagnic Luvisol. The field was compacted by tractors MTZ-82 (total weight 4.84 megagram Mg) characterized by multiple tyre-to-tyre passing. Parameters such as plants biomass (shoots and roots) and the changes in soil physical properties, the bulk density and penetration resistance, were measured. The best results showed yellow lupine on six times compacted soil where the penetration resistance was 1 MPa lower than on sites planted with barley or narrow-leafed lupine and decreased also soil bulk density on 3- and 6-times compacted soil by 0.1 and 0.05 Mg m−3, respectively. At the same time, lupine growth increased soil penetration resistance on uncompacted fields. As the positive effect of ameliorative plants growing occurs mostly in the following year, when roots are decayed and biopores are formed, further investigations with lupines are needed.
Archive | 2012
Endla Reintam; Jaan Kuht
Soil compaction first affects physical properties, as compaction occurs when soil particles are pressed together, reducing pore space between them and increasing the soil bulk density (Lipiec & Hatano, 2003; Raper, 2005; Reintam, 2006; Reintam et al., 2009). Soil compaction also influences chemical and biological processes, such as decreasing organic carbon (C) and N mineralization, the concentration of CO2 in the soil (Conlin & Driessche, 2000), nitrification and denitrification, and activity of earthworms and other soil organisms (Ferrero et al., 2002). At high soil moisture, the difference in soil resistance between noncompacted and compacted soil is low and may be smaller than the value that limits root growth (>2 MPa). But as the soil dries, soil compaction is more observable (Hamza & Anderson, 2005). Further soil compaction effects are decreased root size, retarded root penetration, smaller rooting depth (Unger, and Kaspar, 1994), decreased plant nutrient availability and uptake (Kuchenbuch & Ingram, 2003; Reintam, 2006), and greater plant stress (Reintam et al., 2003), which are among the major reasons for reduced plant productivity and yield (Arvidsson, 1999; Reintam et al., 2009).
Zemdirbyste-agriculture | 2012
Liina Edesi; Malle Järvan; Ando Adamson; Enn Lauringson; Jaan Kuht
Agronomy research | 2008
Katrin Trükmann; Endla Reintam; Jaan Kuht; E. Nugis; L. Edesi
Agronomy research | 2012
Jaan Kuht; Endla Reintam; L. Edesi; E. Nugis
Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Agriculture | 2014
E. Nugis; L. Lüüs; Jaan Kuht
Agronomy research | 2013
Jaan Kuht; T. Tõrra; A. Makke; J. Kilgi; E. Nugis
Agronomy research | 2005
Endla Reintam; Jaan Kuht; H. Loogus; E. Nugis; Katrin Trükmann
Agronomy research | 2003
Jaan Kuht; Endla Reintam; H. Loogus; E. Nugis