Jacek T. Mika

Macromolecule diffusion and confinement in prokaryotic cells

We review recent observations on the mobility of macromolecules and their spatial organization in live bacterial cells. We outline the major fluorescence microscopy-based methods to determine the mobility and thus the diffusion coefficients (D) of molecules, which is not trivial in small cells. The extremely high macromolecule crowding of prokaryotes is used to rationalize the reported lower diffusion coefficients as compared to eukaryotes, and we speculate on the nature of the barriers for diffusion observed for proteins (and mRNAs) in vivo. Building on in vitro experiments and modeling studies, we evaluate the size dependence of diffusion coefficients for macromolecules in vivo, in case of both water-soluble and integral membrane proteins. We comment on the possibilities of anomalous diffusion and provide examples where the macromolecule mobility may be limiting biological processes.

On the Mechanism of Pore Formation by Melittin

The mechanism of pore formation of lytic peptides, such as melittin from bee venom, is thought to involve binding to the membrane surface, followed by insertion at threshold levels of bound peptide. We show that in membranes composed of zwitterionic lipids, i.e. phosphatidylcholine, melittin not only forms pores but also inhibits pore formation. We propose that these two modes of action are the result of two competing reactions: direct insertion into the membrane and binding parallel to the membrane surface. The direct insertion of melittin leads to pore formation, whereas the parallel conformation is inactive and prevents other melittin molecules from inserting, hence preventing pore formation.

Molecular sieving properties of the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli and consequences of osmotic stress

We determined the diffusion coefficients (D) of (macro)molecules of different sizes (from ∼0.5 to 600 kDa) in the cytoplasm of live Escherichia coli cells under normal osmotic conditions and osmotic upshift. D values decreased with increasing molecular weight of the molecules. Upon osmotic upshift, the decrease in D of NBD‐glucose was much smaller than that of macromolecules. Barriers for diffusion were found in osmotically challenged cells only for GFP and larger proteins. These barriers are likely formed by the nucleoid and crowding of the cytoplasm. The cytoplasm of E. coli appears as a meshwork allowing the free passage of small molecules while restricting the diffusion of bigger ones.

The Molecular Basis for Antimicrobial Activity of Pore-Forming Cyclic Peptides

The mechanism of action of antimicrobial peptides is, to our knowledge, still poorly understood. To probe the biophysical characteristics that confer activity, we present here a molecular-dynamics and biophysical study of a cyclic antimicrobial peptide and its inactive linear analog. In the simulations, the cyclic peptide caused large perturbations in the bilayer and cooperatively opened a disordered toroidal pore, 1-2 nm in diameter. Electrophysiology measurements confirm discrete poration events of comparable size. We also show that lysine residues aligning parallel to each other in the cyclic but not linear peptide are crucial for function. By employing dual-color fluorescence burst analysis, we show that both peptides are able to fuse/aggregate liposomes but only the cyclic peptide is able to porate them. The results provide detailed insight on the molecular basis of activity of cyclic antimicrobial peptides.

Structural basis for the enhanced activity of cyclic antimicrobial peptides: the case of BPC194.

We report the molecular basis for the differences in activity of cyclic and linear antimicrobial peptides. We iteratively performed atomistic molecular dynamics simulations and biophysical measurements to probe the interaction of a cyclic antimicrobial peptide and its inactive linear analogue with model membranes. We establish that, relative to the linear peptide, the cyclic one binds stronger to negatively charged membranes. We show that only the cyclic peptide folds at the membrane interface and adopts a β-sheet structure characterised by two turns. Subsequently, the cyclic peptide penetrates deeper into the bilayer while the linear peptide remains essentially at the surface. Finally, based on our comparative study, we propose a model characterising the mode of action of cyclic antimicrobial peptides. The results provide a chemical rationale for enhanced activity in certain cyclic antimicrobial peptides and can be used as a guideline for design of novel antimicrobial peptides.

Dual-color fluorescence-burst analysis to study pore formation and protein-protein interactions

Dual-color fluorescence-burst analysis (DCBFA) enables to study leakage of fluorescently labeled (macro) molecules from liposomes that are labeled with a second, spectrally non-overlapping fluorophore. The fluorescent bursts that reside from the liposomes diffusing through the focal volume of a confocal microscope will coincide with those from the encapsulated size-marker molecules. The internal concentration of size-marker molecules can be quantitatively calculated from the fluorescence bursts at a single liposome level. DCFBA has been successfully used to study the effective pore-size of the mechanosensitive channel of large-conductance MscL and the pore-forming mechanism of the antimicrobial peptide melittin from bee venom. In addition, DCFBA can be used to quantitatively measure the binding of proteins to liposomes and to membrane proteins. In this paper, we provide an overview of the method and discuss the experimental details of DCFBA.

On the role of individual subunits in MscL gating: "all for one, one for all?".

The mechanosensitive channel of large conductance (MscL) is a homopentameric membrane protein that protects bacteria from hypoosmotic stress. Its mechanics are coupled to structural changes in the membrane, yet the molecular mechanism of the transition from closed to open states and the cooperation between subunits are poorly understood. To determine the early stages of channel activation, we have created a chemically addressable heteropentameric MscL, which allows us to selectively trigger only one subunit in the pentameric protein assembly. By employing a liposome leakage assay developed in house, we measured the size‐exclusion limits of MscL (G22C5 homopentamer and WT4G22C1 heteropentamer). Patch‐clamp, single‐channel conductance recordings were used to electrically characterize the various channel substates. We show that a decrease in the hydrophobicity of a pore residue in only one subunit breaks the energy barrier for gating and increases the pore diameter up to 10 Å. A further decrease on the hydrophobicity of the same pore residue in other subunits opens the channel further, up to a diameter of 25 Å. However, it is not sufficient for full opening of the channel. This suggests the presence of supplementary mechanisms other than only the hydrophobic gate for MscL opening and closing and/or insufficient expansion of the channel by hydrophobic gating in the absence of applied membrane tension.—Mika, J. T., Birkner, J. P., Poolman, B., Koçer, A. On the role of individual subunits in MscL gating: “All for one, one for all?” FASEB J. 27, 882–892 (2013). www.fasebj.org

Measuring the Viscosity of the Escherichia coli Plasma Membrane Using Molecular Rotors

The viscosity is a highly important parameter within the cell membrane, affecting the diffusion of small molecules and, hence, controlling the rates of intracellular reactions. There is significant interest in the direct, quantitative assessment of membrane viscosity. Here we report the use of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy of the molecular rotor BODIPY C10 in the membranes of live Escherichia coli bacteria to permit direct quantification of the viscosity. Using this approach, we investigated the viscosity in live E. coli cells, spheroplasts, and liposomes made from E. coli membrane extracts. For live cells and spheroplasts, the viscosity was measured at both room temperature (23°C) and the E. coli growth temperature (37°C), while the membrane extract liposomes were studied over a range of measurement temperatures (5–40°C). At 37°C, we recorded a membrane viscosity in live E. coli cells of 950 cP, which is considerably higher than that previously observed in other live cell membranes (e.g., eukaryotic cells, membranes of Bacillus vegetative cells). Interestingly, this indicates that E. coli cells exhibit a high degree of lipid ordering within their liquid-phase plasma membranes.

Evaluation of Pulsed-FRAP and Conventional-FRAP for Determination of Protein Mobility in Prokaryotic Cells

Background Macromolecule mobility is often quantified with Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP). Throughout literature a wide range of diffusion coefficients for GFP in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli (3 to 14 µm2/s) is reported using FRAP-based approaches. In this study, we have evaluated two of these methods: pulsed-FRAP and “conventional”-FRAP. Principal Findings To address the question whether the apparent discrepancy in the diffusion data stems from methodological differences or biological variation, we have implemented and compared the two techniques on bacteria grown and handled in the same way. The GFP diffusion coefficients obtained under normal osmotic conditions and upon osmotic upshift were very similar for the different techniques. Conclusions Our analyses indicate that the wide range of values reported for the diffusion coefficient of GFP in live cells are due to experimental conditions and/or biological variation rather than methodological differences.

Impact of osmotic stress on protein diffusion in Lactococcus lactis

We measured translational diffusion of proteins in the cytoplasm and plasma membrane of the Gram‐positive bacterium Lactococcus lactis and probed the effect of osmotic upshift. For cells in standard growth medium the diffusion coefficients for cytosolic proteins (27 and 582 kDa) and 12‐transmembrane helix membrane proteins are similar to those in Escherichia coli. The translational diffusion of GFP in L. lactis drops by two orders of magnitude when the medium osmolality is increased by ∼ 1.9 Osm, and the decrease in mobility is partly reversed in the presence of osmoprotectants. We find a large spread in diffusion coefficients over the full population of cells but a smaller spread if only sister cells are compared. While in general the diffusion coefficients we measure under normal osmotic conditions in L. lactis are similar to those reported in E. coli, the decrease in translational diffusion upon osmotic challenge in L. lactis is smaller than in E. coli. An even more striking difference is that in L. lactis the GFP diffusion coefficient drops much more rapidly with volume than in E. coli. We discuss these findings in the light of differences in turgor, cell volume, crowding and cytoplasmic structure of Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria.