Jacinta Gunjiyal
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jacinta Gunjiyal.
Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured | 2014
B.T. Thanbuana; Nibu Varghese John; Jacinta Gunjiyal; Purva Mathur; Mahesh C. Misra
OBJECTIVES Health care workers (HCWs) face constant risk of exposure to cuts and splashes as occupational hazard. Hence, a prospective observational study was conducted to observe the exposure of HCWs to various sharp injuries and splashes during health care and to work up a baseline injury rate among HCWs for future comparison in trauma care set ups. METHODS A 2 year and 5 month study was conducted among the voluntarily reported exposed HCWs of the APEX trauma centre. Such reported cases were actively followed for 6 months after testing for viral markers and counselled. The outcomes of such exposed HCWs and rate of seroconversion was noted. To form a future reference point, the injury rate in trauma care HCWs based on certain defined parameters along with the rate of under reporting were also analysed in this study. RESULTS In our study, doctors were found to have the highest exposure (129, 36.2%), followed by nurses (52, 14.6%) and hospital waste disposal staff (27, 7.6%). Of the source patients, a high number of them were HBV positive (11, 3.1%), followed by HIV positive patients (8, 2.2%). No seroconversion was seen in any of the exposed HCWs. Injuries by sharps (303, 85.1%) outnumber those due to splashes (53, 14.9%) which were much higher in those working in pressing situations. Underreporting was common, being maximally prevalent in hospital waste disposal staff (182, 51.1%). CONCLUSIONS High rates of exposure to sharp injuries and splashes among HCWs call for proper safety protocols. Proper methods to prevent it, encouraging voluntary reporting and an active surveillance team are the need of the hour.
Journal of Laboratory Physicians | 2014
Vibhor Tak; Purva Mathur; Prince Varghese; Jacinta Gunjiyal; Immaculata Xess; Mahesh C. Misra
Purpose: Candida spp. is a common cause of bloodstream infections. Candidemia is a potentially fatal infection that needs urgent intervention to salvage the patients. Trauma patients are relatively young individuals with very few comorbidities, and the epidemiology of candidemia is relatively unknown in this vulnerable and growing population. In this study, we report the epidemiology of candidemia in a tertiary care Trauma Center of India. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted from January 2009 to July 2012. All patients from whose blood samples a Candida spp. was recovered were included in this study. A detailed history and follow up of the patients was done. The isolates of Candida were identified to the species level. The speciation was done by conventional methods, including morphology on Corn Meal Agar, color development on Triphenyl Tetrazolium Chloride Agar and CHROMagar, and germ tube tests. The VITEK 2 YST ID colorometric card, a fully automated identification system was also used. Antifungal susceptibility was performed using the VITEK 2 system. Results: A total of 212 isolates of the Candida species were recovered from blood samples of 157 patients over the study period. Candida tropicalis, 82 (39%), was the most common, followed by C. parapsilosis, 43 (20%), C. albicans, 29 (14%), C. glabrata, 24 (11%), C. rugosa, 20 (9%), C. hemulonii,; 6 (3%), C. guilliermondii, 4 (2%), C. famata, 3 (1.5%), and C. lusitaniae 1 (0.5%). Out of all the candidemia patients, 68 (43%) had a fatal outcome. Fluconazole and Amphotericin B resistance was seen in seven (3.3%) and seven (3.3%) of the isolates, respectively. Conclusion: Candidemia is a significant cause of mortality in trauma patients in our center, with C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis being the predominant pathogens. Resistance to antifungal drugs is a matter of concern. Better hospital infection control practices and good antibiotic stewardship policies could possibly help in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with candidemia.
American Journal of Infection Control | 2011
Purva Mathur; Neetu Jain; Amit Gupta; Jacinta Gunjiyal; S. Nair; Mahesh C. Misra
1. Kim T, Oh P, Simor A. The economic impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:99-104. 2. Haddadin A, Fappiano S, Lipsett P. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the intensive care unit. Br Med J 2002;78:385. 3. Jarvis W, Schlosser J, Chinn R, Tweeten S, Jackson M. National prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in inpatients at US health care facilities, 2006. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:631-7. 4. Nosrati M, Boroumand M, Tahmasebi S, Sotoudeh M, Sheikhfathollahi M, Goodarzynejad H. Excess costs associated with common healthcare-associated infections in an Iranian cardiac surgical unit. J Hosp Infect 2010;76:304-7. 5. Girou E, Pujade G, Legrand P, Cizeau F, Brun-Buisson C. Selective screening of carriers for control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in high-risk hospital areas with a high level of endemic MRSA. Clin Infect Dis 1998;27:543-50. 6. Cimolai N. The role of healthcare personnel in the maintenance and spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Public Health 2008;1:78-100. 7. RahbarM, BabazadehH, ZarghamiN.Highmethicillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci in Imam Khomeini Hospital of Urmia, Iran. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:194-6. 8. Rahbar M, Yaghoobi M, Kia-Darbandsari B. Prevalence of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and susceptibility of isolates to methicillin and mupirocin among healthcare workers in an Iranian Hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:323-5. 9. AskarianM,ZeinalzadehA, JaponiA,AlborziA,MemishZ. Prevalenceof nasal carriage ofmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its antibiotic susceptibility pattern in healthcare workers at Namazi Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. Int J Infect Dis 2009;13:e241-7. 10. Boyce JM, Cookson B, Christiansen K, Hori S, Vuopio-Varkila J, Kocag€ oz S, et al. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet Infect Dis 2005;5:653-63. 11. Andersen B, Lindemann R, Bergh K, Nesheim B, Syversen G, Solheim N, et al. Spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatal intensive unit associated with understaffing, overcrowding and mixing of patients. J Hosp Infect 2002;50:18-24. 12. Blok H, Troelstra A, Kamp-Hopmans T, Gigengack-Baars A, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C, Weersink A, et al. Role of healthcare workers in outbreaks of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a 10-year evaluation from a Dutch university hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:679-85.
Journal of Laboratory Physicians | 2014
Purva Mathur; Prince Varghese; V Tak; Jacinta Gunjiyal; Sanjeev Lalwani; Subodh Kumar; Mahesh C. Misra
Purpose: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are one of the major life-threatening infections in hospitals. They are responsible for prolonged hospital stays, high healthcare costs, and significant mortality. The epidemiology of BSIs varies between hospitals necessitating analysis of local trends. Few studies are available on trauma patients, who are predisposed due to the presence of multiple invasive devices. Materials and Methods: A prospective surveillance of all BSIs was done at a level 1 trauma center from April, 2011 to March, 2012. All patients admitted to the different trauma intensive care units (ICUs) were monitored daily by attending physicians for subsequent development of nosocomial BSI. An episode of BSI was identified when patients presented with one or more of the following signs/symptoms, that is, fever, hypothermia, chills, or hypotension and at least one or more blood culture samples demonstrated growth of pathogenic bacteria. BSIs were further divided into primary and secondary BSIs as per the definitions of Center for Disease Control and Prevention. All patients developing nosocomial BSIs were followed till their final outcome. Results: A total of 296 episodes of nosocomial BSIs were observed in 240 patients. A source of BSI was identified in 155 (52%) episodes. Ventilator-associated pneumonia was the most common source of secondary BSI. The most common organism was Acinetobacter sp. (21.5%). Candida sp. accounted for 12% of all blood stream organisms. A high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance was observed in Gram-negative and-positive pathogens. Conclusions: Trauma patients had a high prevalence of BSIs. Since secondary bacteremia was more common, a targeted approach to prevention of individual infections would help in reducing the burden of BSIs.
Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR | 2015
Purva Mathur; Jacinta Gunjiyal; Mahesh C. Misra
BACKGROUND Occupational exposure to sharps and splashes pose a major hazard among health care workers (HCWs); so knowledge and awareness regarding sharps/splashes by blood and potentially infectious body fluids (BBF) is a must. Hence, the study was done to assess the extent of knowledge of the staff and using awareness classes and hands on practice as a model to increase awareness as well as prevention. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective interventional cohort study, using before - after trial, was conducted in a Level I trauma care centre. All cadres of HCWs were enrolled randomly into 5 different groups of 15 each. This study was conducted in 2 phases - interactive classes and hands on practice (Phase I) and questionnaire assessment and work area observation (phase II). This was repeated twice and the final outcome was analysed. A systematic level of grading was used to assess the improvement. RESULTS It was observed that Group 1 (doctors) and group 2 (nurses) had the maximum knowledge about such exposures and its prevention compared to the other groups (groups 3, 4 and 5) during the initial assessment (Phase I). The remaining groups showed a major improvement after the 2(nd) assessment, though their knowledge was poor in the beginning. Groups 1and 2 showed 32% and remaining groups showed a 25% improvement in voluntary reporting after the second assessment (Phase II). CONCLUSION Awareness classes and hands on practice are indeed useful in generating knowledge about sharps/ splashes. Certain incentives given at right time can improve it further.
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology | 2016
Kumkum Sharma; B.T. Thanbuana; Anubhav Gupta; Nonika Rajkumari; Purva Mathur; Jacinta Gunjiyal; Mahesh C. Misra
Background and Aim: To study the rate of wound infections in the post-discharged patient population and to assess the usefulness of post-discharge surveillance. Methods: A prospective surveillance of all the post-discharged trauma patients was done during a period of 6 months. Discharge instructions were given to all the patients regarding identification of the signs and symptoms of wound infections. They were telephonically followed up after a week to enquire about the wound condition and followed up in the outpatient department (OPD). Microbiology culture samples of those showing any signs and symptoms of infections were sent and their antimicrobial therapy, any change in the treatment schedule and the length of their hospital stay were noted. Factors such as wound class, type of surgeries and readmissions were noted. Results: A total of 281 postdischarge patients were enrolled, of which 101 were completely followed up for wound infections. Males were predominant (89%). Of the 101 patients, 42 (41.6%) patients wound showed infection during the intense follow-up in the OPD. However, 59 patients (59/101, 58.4%) showed wound swab culture positivity before discharge. These 42 patients developed signs and symptoms of infection post-discharge; 23 (22.7%) of them had change of antibiotic therapy during the follow-up period due to culture positivity. Acinetobacter sp., Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the predominant organisms isolated in the study. A total of 45 patients (44.5%) had to be readmitted due to wound site infections. Conclusions: Wound infections are common after discharge among trauma patients highlighting the importance of active surveillance and participation of patients.
Journal of Hospital Infection | 2011
Jacinta Gunjiyal; Shiny Thomas; Anubhav Gupta; B.S. Sharma; Purva Mathur; Babita Gupta; C. Sawhney; Mahesh C. Misra
Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control | 2015
Amit Gupta; Priyam Batra; Purva Mathur; Alphina Karoung; B.T. Thanbuana; Shiny Thomas; M. Balamurugan; Jacinta Gunjiyal; Mahesh C. Misra
Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control | 2015
S. Nair; Jacinta Gunjiyal; B.T. Thanbuana; Nibu Varghese John; Purva Mathur; N. Rastogi
Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control | 2015
Jacinta Gunjiyal; S. Nair; Amit Gupta; B.T. Thanbuana; Prince Varghese; Nibu Varghese John; Alphina Karoung; Shiny Thomas; M. Balamurugan; Purva Mathur