Jack Anavian

Operative Treatment of Chest Wall Injuries: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes

Most injuries to the chest wall with residual deformity do not result in long-term respiratory dysfunction unless they are associated with pulmonary contusion. Indications for operative fixation include flail chest, reduction of pain and disability, a chest wall deformity or defect, symptomatic nonunion, thoracotomy for other indications, and open fractures. Operative indications for chest wall injuries are rare.

Anterior pelvic external fixator versus subcutaneous internal fixator in the treatment of anterior ring pelvic fractures.

Objectives: To compare the short-term results of anterior pelvic external fixation (APEF) versus anterior pelvic internal fixation (APIF) applied subcutaneously in the context of surgical treatment of pelvic ring injuries. Design: A single center retrospective chart review. Setting: A level 1 trauma center. Methods: A consecutive series of 48 patients who underwent surgical stabilization of their anterior pelvic ring (24 utilizing APIF and 24 utilizing APEF) by 2 surgeons at a single hospital were studied. The choice to use either APEF or APIF was left up to each surgeon, the indications for use are the same. Data collected included surgical or postoperative complications including infection, implant failure, reoperation, documented surgical site pain persisting to clinical follow-up visits, and radiographic union. Measurements on inlet and outlet pelvic radiographs were made immediately postoperation and at all follow-up clinic visits to determine whether there were differences in maintaining pelvic fracture reduction. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to each of these variables. Results: The APIF group was found to have a significantly lower incidence of wound complication (P < 0.05) and a lower occurrence of associated morbidity events as compared with the APEF group. In addition, the APIF group was found to have a significantly lower rate of surgical site pain persisting through all clinical follow-up intervals (P = 0.05). There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of maintenance of pelvic reduction in the early postoperative phase or at final follow-up. No other significant differences were observed between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The present study, which was based on our initial experience with the subcutaneous anterior pelvic fixator, demonstrated encouraging clinical outcomes in terms of a lower wound complication rate and associated morbidity, and surgical site symptoms, although maintaining equivalent reduction. These findings suggest that further analysis of this technique is warranted to determine if it can be definitively recommended for general use. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Surgical and functional outcomes after operative management of complex and displaced intra-articular glenoid fractures

BACKGROUND Operative treatment is indicated for displaced fractures of the glenoid fossa. However, little is known regarding functional outcomes in these patients. This study assesses surgical and functional results after treatment of displaced, high-energy, complex, intra-articular glenoid fractures. METHODS Thirty-three patients with displaced intra-articular fractures of the glenoid were treated surgically between 2002 and 2009. The indications for operative treatment included articular fracture gap or step-off of ≥ 4 mm. Twenty-five patients also had extra-articular scapular involvement. A posterior approach was utilized in twenty-one patients, an anterior approach in seven, and a combined approach in five. Functional outcomes, including Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, shoulder motion and strength, and return to work and/or activities, were obtained for thirty patients (91%). RESULTS At a mean follow-up of twenty-seven months (range, twelve to seventy-three months), all patients had radiographic union of the fracture. The mean DASH score was 10.8 (range, 0 to 42). All mean SF-36 subscores were comparable with those of the normal population. Twenty-six patients (87%) were pain-free at the time of follow-up, and four had mild pain with prolonged activity. Twenty-seven (90%) of thirty patients returned to their preinjury level of work and/or activities. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that surgical treatment for complex, displaced intra-articular glenoid fractures with or without involvement of the scapular neck and body can be associated with good functional outcomes and a low complication rate.

Radiographic follow-up of 84 operatively treated scapula neck and body fractures

BACKGROUND Certain scapula fractures may warrant surgical management to restore shoulder anatomy and promote optimal function. The purpose of this study is to determine the early radiographic follow-up of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for displaced, scapular fractures involving the glenoid neck and body. METHODS Eighty-four patients with a scapula body or neck fracture (with or without articular involvement) underwent ORIF between 2002 and 2010 at a single level I trauma centre. This study represents a retrospective review of data prospectively collected into a dedicated scapula fracture database. All patients met at least one of the following operative criteria: ≥20 mm medial/lateral (M/L) displacement (lateral border offset), ≥45° of angular deformity on a scapular-Y X-ray, the combination of angulation ≥30° plus M/L displacement ≥15 mm, double disruptions of the superior shoulder suspensory complex both displaced ≥10 mm, glenopolar angle (GPA) ≤22° and open fractures. Eighty-eight percent (74/84) had sufficient follow-up defined as at least 6 months. Measured outcomes included rates of scapula union and malunion, as well as surgical complications and re-operations. RESULTS All fractures were caused by high-energy trauma with 24 (29%) resulting from motor-vehicle collisions. Associated injuries occurred in 94% of patients, most commonly involving the chest (70%) and ipsilateral shoulder girdle (43%). Forty-eight patients had M/L displacement as an operative indication with a mean displacement of 25.7 mm (range=20-40). Thirty-eight (45%) had ≥2 operative indications. A single surgeon performed ORIF in all patients using a posterior approach. Five patients also required an anterior (deltopectoral) approach. The fixation strategy included lateral and vertebral border stabilisation with dynamic compression and reconstruction plates, respectively. Union was achieved in all cases. There were three cases of malunion based on a GPA difference >10° from the uninjured shoulder. Re-operations included removal of hardware (seven patients) and manipulation under anaesthesia (three patients). There were no infections or wound dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS ORIF for displaced scapula fractures is a relatively safe and effective procedure for restoration of anatomy and promotion of union. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level IV.

Extra-articular malunions of the scapula: a comparison of functional outcome before and after reconstruction.

Objective: To assess surgical and functional results after corrective reconstruction of malunited, scapula neck or body fractures in patients who presented with chronic pain, limited range of motion, weakness, and gross deformity of the shoulder. Design: Case series. Setting: Level I teaching trauma center. Patients: Between 2000 and 2008, five patients (mean age, 44 years) underwent operative reconstruction of a malunited, scapula neck and/or body fracture. Mean time from injury to surgery was 15 months (range, 8–41 months). All patients presented with debilitating pain and weakness and were unable to return to work. When measured on three-dimensional computed tomographic scan, mean preoperative fracture deformity included 3.0 cm (range, 1.7–4.2 cm) of medial/lateral displacement, 25° (range, 10°–40°) of angular deformity, and a 25° (range, 19°–29°) glenopolar angle. Intervention: Surgical osteotomy and reorientation of scapula neck and/or body, with fixation using 2.7- or 3.5-mm implants and autogenous graft, through a posterior Judet approach. Main Outcomes Measures: Pre- and postoperative functional measures of range of motion and strength testing and patient-based outcome scores (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Short Form-36). Results: Mean follow-up was 39 months (range, 18–101 months). All patients united radiographically, were pain-free with regard to the shoulder, and expressed satisfaction with their result. Four of five patients returned to their original occupation and activities. Mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score improved from 39 (range, 27–58) preoperatively to 10 (range, 0–35) postoperatively. There were no complications. Conclusions: Malunion after nonoperative treatment of a displaced scapula fracture may be associated with poor functional and cosmetic outcomes. Operative reconstruction can yield good surgical and functional results.

Progressive displacement of clavicular fractures in the early postinjury period

BACKGROUND Historically, minimally to moderately displaced clavicular fractures have been managed nonoperatively. However, there is no clear evidence on whether clavicular fractures can progressively displace following injury and whether such displacement might influence decisions for surgery. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data on 56 patients who received operative treatment for clavicular fractures at our institution from February 2002 to February 2007 and identified those patients who were initially managed nonoperatively based on radiographic evaluation (<2 cm displacement) and then subsequently went on to meet operative indications (≥2 cm displacement) as a result of progressive displacement. Standardized radiographic measurements for horizontal shortening (medial-lateral displacement) and vertical translation (cephalad-caudad displacement) were developed and used. RESULTS Fifteen patients with clavicle fractures initially displaced less than 2 cm and treated nonoperatively underwent later surgery because of progressive displacement (14 diaphyseal and 1 lateral). Radiographs performed during the injury workup and at a mean of 14.8 days postinjury demonstrated that progressive deformity had taken place. Ten of 15 patients (67%) displayed progressive horizontal shortening. Average change in horizontal shortening between that of the injury radiographs and the repeat radiographs in this group was 14.3 mm (5.9-29 mm). Thirteen of 15 patients (87%) displayed progressive vertical translation. Eight of 15 patients (53%) displayed both progressive horizontal shortening and vertical translation. CONCLUSION We have demonstrated that a significant proportion of clavicle fractures (27% of our operative cases over a 5-year period) are minimally displaced at presentation, but are unstable and demonstrate progressive deformity during the first few weeks after injury. Because of this experience, we recommend close monitoring of nonoperatively managed clavicular fractures in the early postinjury period. A prudent policy is to obtain serial radiographic evaluation for 3 weeks, even for initially, minimally displaced clavicle fractures.

Surgical management of coracoid fractures: technical tricks and clinical experience.

The coracoid process plays a pivotal role in the foundation of the coracoacromial arch and in cases of displaced fractures; surgical management may be warranted to avoid functional compromise or impingement. A direct approach through Langers lines allows for easy exposure and direct visualization for an anatomic reduction of simple fractures through the shaft or base of the coracoid. An anterior approach for fractures that extend into the superior glenoid fossa allows for direct exposure to obtain an anatomic articular reduction and indirect reduction of the coracoid fracture. In cases where a complex glenoid or scapula neck/body fracture is being addressed simultaneously either a posterior Judet approach can be used with an indirect reduction method or a separate anterior approach must be combined to address it if not in continuity with the superior scapular segment. Implant selection, primarily interfragmentary screws or a buttress plate, should be based on the size of the fragment, the degree of comminution, and the degree of articular involvement to ensure adequate stabilization. The purpose of this manuscript was to describe a stepwise approach to the surgical management of displaced coracoid fractures, describe surgical tips and techniques, and to present the clinical outcomes in 22 patients after surgical treatment with this approach.

Surgical management of isolated acromion fractures: technical tricks and clinical experience.

SUMMARY Acromion fractures of the scapula are rare and most often occur with concomitant fractures of the ipsilateral glenoid, neck and body of the scapula as sequelae of high-energy injuries. Indications for operative management include symptomatic nonunion, displaced fractures, or acromion fractures associated with other lesions of the superior shoulder suspensory complex. Less displaced acromion fractures resulting in decreased subacromial space may also warrant surgery. Although surgical indications have been reported, the literature regarding surgical approaches and fixation techniques for management of these factures is limited. Acromion fractures can generally be addressed with a direct posterior approach using either tension band or low-profile plating in combination with cortical lag screws to obtain a stable construct. This technique is both effective in achieving fracture union and safe to the patient. When associated with a more complex fracture of the glenoid and/or scapula body, the surgical approach and fixation strategy should be dictated by the optimal approach to other displaced elements of a scapula fracture. The purpose of this study was to describe a step-wise approach to the surgical management of isolated acromion fractures, describe surgical tips and techniques, and to present the early clinical outcomes in 13 patients after surgical treatment with this approach.

The assessment of scapular radiographs: Analysis of anteroposterior radiographs of the shoulder and the effect of rotational offset on the glenopolar angle

The glenopolar angle assesses the rotational alignment of the glenoid and may provide prognostic information and aid the management of scapula fractures. We have analysed the effect of the anteroposterior (AP) shoulder radiograph rotational offset on the glenopolar angle in a laboratory setting and used this to assess the accuracy of shoulder imaging employed in routine clinical practice. Fluoroscopic imaging was performed on 25 non-paired scapulae tagged with 2 mm steel spheres to determine the orientation of true AP views. The glenopolar angle was measured on all the bony specimens rotated at 10° increments. The mean glenopolar angle measured on the bone specimens in rotations between 0° and 20° and thereafter was found to be significantly different (p < 0.001). We also obtained the AP radiographs of the uninjured shoulder of 30 patients treated for fractures at our centre and found that none fitted the criteria of a true AP shoulder radiograph. The mean angular offset from the true AP view was 38° (10° to 65°) for this cohort. Radiological AP shoulder views may not fully project the normal anatomy of the scapular body and the measured glenopolar angle. The absence of a true AP view may compromise the clinical management of a scapular fracture.

Surgical Management of Isolated Greater Tuberosity Fractures of the Proximal Humerus

Because the greater tuberosity is the insertion site of the posterior superior rotator cuff, fractures can have a substantial impact on functional outcome. Isolated fractures should not inadvertently be trivialized. Thorough patient evaluation is required to make an appropriate treatment decision. In most cases surgical management is considered when there is displacement of 5 mm or greater. Although reduction of displaced greater tuberosity fractures has traditionally been performed with open techniques, arthroscopic techniques are now available. The most reliable techniques of fixation of the greater tuberosity incorporate the rotator cuff tendon bone junction rather than direct bone-to-bone fixation.