Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jackson E. Fowler is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jackson E. Fowler.


Annals of Internal Medicine | 2004

Ciprofloxacin or Tamsulosin in Men with Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

Richard B. Alexander; Kathleen J. Propert; Anthony J. Schaeffer; J. Richard Landis; J. Curtis Nickel; Michael P. O'Leary; Michel A. Pontari; Mary McNaughton-Collins; Daniel A. Shoskes; Craig V. Comiter; Nand S. Datta; Jackson E. Fowler; Robert B. Nadler; Scott I. Zeitlin; Jill S. Knauss; Yanlin Wang; John W. Kusek; Leroy M. Nyberg; Mark S. Litwin

Context Although the cause of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is unknown, physicians sometimes try to treat it with antibiotics or -receptor blockers. Contribution In this multicenter, double-blind factorial trial, 196 men with moderately severe CP/CPPS were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of treatment with ciprofloxacin, tamsulosin, both drugs, or placebo. Neither ciprofloxacin nor tamsulosin substantively reduced symptoms. Implications Ciprofloxacin and tamsulosin were not effective treatments for CP/CPPS. Cautions Patients had long-standing, refractory CP/CPPS and received trial treatments for only 6 weeks. Patients with new diagnoses who are given longer courses of the trial treatments might respond differently. The Editors Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a common disorder and accounts for approximately 2 million visits to physicians annually in the United States (1). The substantial impact of CP/CPPS includes bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms, sexual dysfunction, reduced quality of life (2-5), and increased health care expenditures (6). The syndrome is diagnosed only on the basis of symptoms, principally pain or discomfort in the pelvic region. No objective measures can help define the disease. Although bacteria can infect the prostate, most men with prostatitis have a negative midstream urine culture, indicating that bacteria may not be the cause of their symptoms (2). Such men are classified as having National Institutes of Health (NIH) category III prostatitis, the most common of the clinically defined prostatitis syndromes (7). It is by no means clear that the disease is characterized by inflammation of the prostate or that the prostate is responsible for symptoms in a substantial proportion of patients. Because of this uncertainty, the term CP/CPPS is used. Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome is commonly seen by primary care practitioners, internists, and urologists. In the Olmsted County Study of Urinary Symptoms and Health Status Among Men (8), a population-based study in Olmstead County, Minnesota, the overall prevalence rate of a physician-assigned diagnosis of prostatitis was 9%. Population-based surveys of symptoms have estimated that the prevalence of the syndrome ranges from 9% to 12% among men (9, 10). It is difficult to estimate the proportion of patients with symptoms lasting longer than 3 months whose disorder remains refractory to empirical therapy. These patients are commonly seen by urologists, but whether they represent a minor subpopulation of the overall symptomatic group or make up the majority of patients is unknown. We chose to study these patients because they present with a troubling, long-standing problem and are usually treated with agents of unclear benefit. Even if a relatively large number of men whose symptoms last 3 months or more are cured by standard empirical therapy and the clinical scenario we describe is uncommon, men with refractory symptoms still present a substantial problem to internists and urologists who have little information to guide therapy. Because the cause of CP/CPPS is unknown, affected men receive many empirical therapies. The 2 most common treatments prescribed by physicians are antimicrobial agents and -adrenergic receptor antagonists (2), although there is little objective evidence to support their use (11). Quinolones, such as ciprofloxacin, are commonly used to treat CP/CPPS because of their excellent penetration into the prostate and broad spectrum of coverage for uropathogens and other organisms traditionally believed to be associated with the syndrome (12). Tamsulosin, an -blocker, is an effective treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, and it has been hypothesized that tamsulosin may improve these symptoms in men with CP/CPPS. This randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate whether ciprofloxacin or tamsulosin reduces symptoms of long-standing CP/CPPS of at least moderate severity, typical of the 488 men in our Chronic Prostatitis Cohort Study (2). The primary purpose of the trial was to test the most common prescription treatments given to men with CP/CPPS, who are commonly seen in our referral-based urologic practices. Methods Organization The Chronic Prostatitis Collaborative Research Network, a consortium sponsored by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), conducted the trial. Urologists and their clinical associates recruited patients at 10 sites in the United States and 1 site in Canada. The NIDDK established an independent data and safety monitoring board to review the progress, safety, and final analysis of the trial. The individual institutional review boards at each of the 10 participating clinical centers approved the study, and all men gave written informed consent. Participants The design of this trial has been described in detail previously (13). Participating urologists recruited both newly referred patients and patients with established CP/CPPS from their referral-based clinical practices at 10 tertiary medical centers in North America. Trial referrals came from primary care providers, internists, and other urologists. The primary diagnostic criterion was pain or discomfort in the pelvic region for at least 3 months in the previous 6 months. Severity of symptoms was assessed by using the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) (14, 15). This instrument is a validated questionnaire, completed by the patient, consisting of 4 questions about pain, 3 about voiding symptoms, and 2 about quality of life. The scores in these 3 individual domains (pain, voiding, and quality of life) are combined without weighting to yield the NIH-CPSI total score. Eligible men were required to have at least moderate symptoms, defined as an NIH-CPSI score of at least 15 of 43 possible points, at the time of randomization. We excluded men who had a documented urinary tract infection (midstream urine culture > 100000 colonies/mL) within the past 3 months, a history of active genital herpes within the previous year, a history of genitourinary cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, active urethral stricture, prostate or bladder surgery, or neurologic disease affecting the bladder. We used ligase chain reaction to screen for Chlamydia in urethral urine samples and excluded men whose tests yielded positive results. Previous treatment with antimicrobial agents or -adrenergic receptor blockers, including the study drugs, had to be completed at least 4 weeks before eligibility screening. Additional details of the eligibility criteria are available elsewhere (13). Study Design and Interventions Men were randomly assigned in equal proportions within a 2 2 factorial design to receive placebo; ciprofloxacin alone, 500 mg twice daily; tamsulosin alone, 0.4 mg once daily; or a combination of both drugs (Table 1). Patients were treated for 6 weeks, at which time the primary end point was assessed. Symptoms at 9 and 12 weeks after randomization (6 weeks after completion of treatment) were also assessed to evaluate longer-term treatment response. The 2 baseline screening contacts and the primary end point contact at 6 weeks were clinic visits; interim contacts at 3, 9, and 12 weeks were conducted by telephone. Table 1. Study Design Each patient was randomly assigned by computer. A permuted block randomization schedule with varying block sizes was used, stratified by clinical site. The research pharmacist at each site provided the blinded study drugs in 2 tamper-evident bottles. All clinical investigators, research nurses, and patients were blinded to treatment assignments until all patients had completed follow-up. Outcomes The primary outcome was the change in the NIH-CPSI total score from baseline to 6 weeks. The NIH-CPSI was administered at each of the 2 baseline screening visits, 1 to 3 weeks apart, and every 3 weeks thereafter until 12 weeks. The average of the 2 scores before randomization was used as the baseline score. Evaluation of the responsiveness of the NIH-CPSI indicates that a 4-point change on a scale of 0 to 43 points represents a difference detectable by the patient. Secondary outcomes included changes in the pain, voiding, and quality-of-life subscales of the NIH-CPSI; physical and mental summary scores on the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (16); and a 7-point patient-reported global response assessment. Responders for the global response assessment were defined as men reporting that they were markedly improved or moderately improved at 6 weeks compared with baseline. Men for whom the global response assessment was missing were considered nonresponders and were included in the denominator for the assessment of response rates. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (ctep.cancer.gov/reporting/ctc.html). Patients were asked at each contact to report any adverse events that had occurred since the previous contact. The questions were open-ended, and researchers did not ask about any specific categories of adverse events. All events, regardless of whether they were expected reactions to the study drugs, were recorded. Attribution to treatment was also assessed. However, because it was difficult to determine whether certain adverse events, such as pain, were related to treatment or to CP/CPPS, all events were analyzed. Statistical Analysis For each of the 2 primary treatment comparisons, the recruitment goal of 184 patients provided 80% power, at a 2-sided significance level of 5%, to detect a 4-point treatment difference in the NIH-CPSI total score between baseline and 6 weeks. We recognized that although patients could detect this difference, most might not perceive it as a major improvement. However, we did not want to miss even a minor change in


The Journal of Urology | 2002

LEUKOCYTE AND BACTERIAL COUNTS DO NOT CORRELATE WITH SEVERITY OF SYMPTOMS IN MEN WITH CHRONIC PROSTATITIS: THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CHRONIC PROSTATITIS COHORT STUDY

Anthony J. Schaeffer; Jill S. Knauss; J. Richard Landis; Kathleen J. Propert; Richard B. Alexander; Mark S. Litwin; J. Curtis Nickel; Michael P. O’Leary; Robert Nadler; Michel A. Pontari; Daniel A. Shoskes; Scott I. Zeitlin; Jackson E. Fowler; Carissa A. Mazurick; John W. Kusek; Leroy M. Nyberg

PURPOSE We examine whether leukocytes and bacteria correlate with symptom severity in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS All 488 men screened into the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Cohort Study before close of recruitment on August 22, 2001 were selected for analysis. The National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index, including subscores, were used to measure symptoms. Urethral inflammation was defined as white blood cell (WBC) counts of 1 or more (1+) in the first voided urine. Participants were classified as category IIIa based on WBC counts of 5 or more, or 10 or more (5+, 10+) in the expressed prostatic secretion, or 1+ or 5+ either in the post-expressed prostatic secretion urine (voided urine 3) or semen. Uropathogens were classified as localizing if the designated bacterial species were absent in voided urine 1 and voided urine 2 but present in expressed prostatic secretion, voided urine 3 or semen, or present in expressed prostatic secretion, voided urine 3 or semen at 2 log concentrations higher than at voided urine 1 or 2. Associations between symptoms, and inflammation and infection were investigated using generalized Mantel-Haenszel methods. RESULTS Of all participants 50% had urethral leukocytes and of 397 with expressed prostatic secretion samples 194 (49%) and 122 (31%) had 5+ or 10+ WBCs in expressed prostatic secretion, respectively. The prevalence of category IIIa ranged from 90% to 54%, depending on the composite set of cut points. None of the index measures were statistically different (p >0.10) for selected leukocytosis subgroups. Based on prostate and semen cultures, 37 of 488 men (8%) had at least 1 localizing uropathogen. None of the index measures were statistically different (p >0.10) for selected bacterial culture subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Although men with chronic prostatitis routinely receive anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial therapy, we found that leukocytes and bacterial counts as we defined them do not correlate with severity of symptoms. These findings suggest that factors other than leukocytes and bacteria also contribute to symptoms associated with chronic pelvic pain syndrome.


The Journal of Urology | 2006

How Does the Pre-Massage and Post-Massage 2-Glass Test Compare to the Meares-Stamey 4-Glass Test in Men With Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome?

J. Curtis Nickel; Daniel A. Shoskes; Yanlin Wang; Richard B. Alexander; Jackson E. Fowler; Scott I. Zeitlin; Michael P. O’Leary; Michel A. Pontari; Anthony J. Schaeffer; J. Richard Landis; Leroy M. Nyberg; John W. Kusek; Kathleen J. Propert

PURPOSE The Meares-Stamey 4-glass test is the standard method of assessing inflammation and the presence of bacteria in the lower urinary tract in men presenting with the chronic prostatitis syndrome. However, most urologists do not use it in daily practice because of the time and difficulty in performing it, as well as the additional expense. We evaluated a simpler test, the 2-glass pre-massage and post-massage test, and compared it with the Meares-Stamey 4-glass test to detect inflammation and bacteria in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study population included 353 men enrolled in the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Cohort study with baseline leukocyte counts and 2-day bacterial cultures on specimens obtained from a standard 4-glass test (VB1, VB2, expressed prostatic secretions, VB3). The chi-square test was performed to assess associations of white blood cell counts in expressed prostatic secretions and VB3. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to determine the optimal cut point of white blood cells in VB3 in predicting white blood cells in expressed prostatic secretions. Sensitivity and specificity of VB3 cultures predicting expressed prostatic secretions and positive Meares-Stamey results were calculated from 2 x 2 contingency tables. RESULTS Analysis of binary leukocyte outcomes (no white blood cells vs any white blood cells) suggests that white blood cells tend to be present in expressed prostatic secretions when there are any white blood cells in VB3, p <0.0001, the optimal cut point being white blood cell counts of 3 in VB3 (best predictive ability with area under ROC 0.771) to predict 5+ in expressed prostatic secretions with a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 70%. The optimal cut point of white blood cells in VB3 to predict 10 white blood cells in expressed prostatic secretions was 4 (62% sensitivity and 75% specificity). Uropathogens localizing to expressed prostatic secretions or VB3 confirms a positive 4-glass Meares-Stamey localization test. The sensitivity and specificity of a VB3 localizing culture only in predicting a positive Meares-Stamey 4-glass test result for any uropathogen were 44% to 54% (depending on definition) and 100%, respectively. The pre-massage and post-massage test predicted a correct diagnosis in more than 96% of subjects. CONCLUSIONS The value of localizing leukocytes and uropathogens to prostate specific specimens remains controversial in chronic heavily pretreated patients, but these data may help direct therapy (anti-inflammatory or antimicrobial) when obtained at first presentation. The pre-massage and post-massage test has strong concordance with the 4-glass test and is a reasonable alternative when expressed prostatic secretions are not obtained.


The Journal of Urology | 1996

CO-MORBIDITIES AND SURVIVAL OF MEN WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER TREATED WITH SURGERY OR RADIATION THERAPY

Jackson E. Fowler; Freddie L. Terrell; Land D. Renfroe

PURPOSE We determined the impact of preexisting co-morbidities on survival of men with clinical stages T1b and T2NXM0 prostate cancer treated with surgery or radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A weighted co-morbidity score was determined for 276 consecutive men treated with surgery (138) or radiation therapy (138) at a Veterans Affairs medical center and was correlated with actuarial freedom from death due to co-morbid disease. RESULTS After a median potential followup of 7.0 years 91 patients (33%) died of co-morbid disease and 20 (7%) died of cancer related causes. There were highly significant correlations between actuarial survival and weighted co-morbidity (p < 0.000001), and the 10-year actuarial survivals in men with no or severe co-morbidities were 66 and 9%, respectively. Associations between patient age and co-morbidity score were highly significant (p < 0.0001). The age adjusted risk of co-morbid death was 5.7 times greater in men with severe compared to no co-morbidities. There were also significant correlations between actuarial survival and weighted co-morbidity among patients treated with surgery (p = 0.02) and radiation therapy (p = 0.0002). Patient age and severity of co-morbidities were significantly greater among men treated with radiation therapy compared to surgery, and age adjusted risk of co-morbid death among men with a co-morbidity score of 1 was 3.8 times greater among men treated with radiation therapy (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS Cancer related deaths are unusual within 5 to 10 years after surgery or radiation therapy in men with stages T1b and 2 prostate cancer. The risk of death during this interval is directly related to the severity of co-morbid conditions, which should be factored in an individual when assessing the advisability of therapeutic intervention. Since patient co-morbidities impact all cause survival, quantitative assessment of co-morbidities using validated instruments offers a method to control partially for the variabilities of health status among men receiving different treatments for localized prostate cancer.


The Journal of Urology | 2000

PREDICTORS OF FIRST REPEAT BIOPSY CANCER DETECTION WITH SUSPECTED LOCAL STAGE PROSTATE CANCER

Jackson E. Fowler; Steven A. Bigler; Derek Miles; Denis A. Yalkut

PURPOSE We determine demographic and tumor related predictors of repeat biopsy cancer detection in men with suspected stage T1c-2 prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study population included 298 consecutive men with suspected stage T1c-2 prostate cancer who had a benign prostate biopsy at 1 institution between January 1, 1992 and April 1, 1999 and underwent 1 repeat biopsy. Mean age plus or minus standard deviation was 66.8+/-6.7 years for 133 black (55%) and 165 white (45%) patients. Clinical measures included determination of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in benign biopsy specimens, Gleason score of malignant biopsy specimens, prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, annualized interbiopsy PSA change, percent free PSA (201 cases) and PSA velocity (171). RESULTS Cancer was detected on repeat biopsy in 80 cases (27%). Significant differences between patients with benign and malignant repeat biopsies included age (p = 0.001), PSA density (p = 0.0001), percent free PSA (p = 0.0001) and PSA velocity (p = 0.009). High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in an initial benign biopsy was not predictive of cancer in repeat biopsy (p = 0.12). Multiple logistic regression analysis of all cases showed that age (p = 0.002) and PSA density (p = 0.0002) were independent predictors of cancer. Subset multiple logistic regression analysis modeled with age, PSA density and percent free PSA demonstrated that age (p = 0.002) and percent free PSA (p = 0.0001) were significant independent predictors of malignancy. Subset multiple logistic regression analysis modeled with age, PSA density, percent free PSA and PSA velocity revealed that age (p = 0.02) and percent free PSA (p = 0.0003) were significant independent predictors of cancer. There were no significant differences between the Gleason scores of cancers detected on repeat biopsy compared to 587 stage T1c-2 cancers detected on initial biopsy during the study period (p = 0.09). PSA, PSA density, percent free PSA and PSA velocity were not significantly different among men without a cancer diagnosis who had high grade neoplasia in 1 or 2 benign biopsies. CONCLUSIONS Greater than 25% of this population of select patients with suspected stage T1c-2 prostate cancer had malignancy detected on repeat biopsy. Percent free PSA was the most powerful predictor of cancer. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was not a predictor of repeat biopsy cancer detection and PSA functions were similar among men without cancer who did and did not have high grade neoplasia in 1 or more benign biopsies. This finding suggests that high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia may not be a reliable indicator of clinically significant existing prostate cancer.


The Journal of Urology | 1995

Prostate specific antigen after gonadal androgen withdrawal and deferred flutamide treatment.

Jackson E. Fowler; Prabhakar Pandey; Linda E. Seaver; Tony P. Feliz

PURPOSE We assess the impact of deferred flutamide treatment on the serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level in patients with localized or metastatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included 45 patients with localized cancer and 50 with metastatic cancer with an increasing (87) or stable (8) PSA level after gonadal androgen withdrawal. RESULTS Of 40 evaluable patients with localized cancer and 50 with metastatic cancer 32 (80%) and 27 (54%), respectively, had a PSA decrease of 50% or more of baseline during flutamide treatment (p = 0.014). Among patients with localized cancer actuarial analysis of freedom from PSA elevation during flutamide treatment favored those with a 50% or greater PSA decrease (p = 0.006) but in patients with metastatic cancer the analysis revealed no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS The relative density of tumor cells that are dependent on adrenal androgen after gonadal androgen withdrawal may be greater in patients with localized cancer and deferred flutamide treatment may enhance cancer control in those with localized disease.


Urology | 1999

Effect of finasteride on bother and other health-related quality of life aspects associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia☆

Reginald C. Bruskewitz; Cynthia J. Girman; Jackson E. Fowler; Odell F. Rigby; Michael J. Sullivan; R. Bruce Bracken; Harold A. Fusilier; Douglas Kozlowski; Scott D. Kantor; Edward Lee Johnson; Daniel Z. Wang; Joanne Waldstreicher

OBJECTIVES To investigate the long-term effects of finasteride on bother and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHODS A large prospective 4-year placebo-controlled trial (PLESS) of 3040 men with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms and an enlarged prostate was performed that included self-administered questionnaires assessing HRQOL. RESULTS Significantly greater reductions in bother score were seen for finasteride compared with placebo at every time point after 4 months. Analysis of bother scores by baseline serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), as it is highly correlated with prostate volume, suggested greater differences from placebo for men with PSA 1.4 ng/mL or greater, primarily due to worsening after the first-year improvement in the placebo group. An activity interference domain score was significantly improved for finasteride over placebo at each time point (P<0.01), with greater treatment differences in men with higher baseline PSA levels. Comparable results were seen for worry at each time point and embarrassment due to urinary symptoms in the last 2 years of the trial. Mean changes in sexual interest and satisfaction were somewhat better for the placebo group overall, as has been previously reported, but little difference between treatments was found in sexual satisfaction measures for men with PSA 1.4 ng/mL or greater. CONCLUSIONS Compared with placebo, men receiving finasteride had significantly less bother, activity interference, and worry due to urinary symptoms, with more pronounced differences for men with baseline PSA 1.4 ng/mL or greater. As expected, sexual satisfaction and sexual drive were slightly worse for finasteride overall, but little difference in sexual satisfaction measures was found for men with a higher baseline PSA. Thus, HRQOL was improved for finasteride compared with placebo, especially for men with a baseline PSA 1.4 ng/mL or greater.


The Journal of Urology | 1995

Original Articles: Prostate Cancer: Variable Histology of Anastomotic Biopsies With Detectable Prostate Specific Antigen After Radical Prostatectomy

Jackson E. Fowler; Jay P. Brooks; Prabhakar Pandey; Linda E. Seaver

ABSTRACTProgressive elevation of the prostate specific antigen (PSA) level after radical prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma is generally considered as irrefutable evidence of recurrent tumor. We assessed the results of 62 biopsies of the vesicourethral anastomosis in 41 men who had 3 or more consecutive PSA levels of 0.4 ng./ml. or greater after radical prostatectomy and no evidence of metastatic disease. The median PSA at the time of the first biopsy was 2.2 ng./ml. (range 0.4 to 50). Histological confirmation of recurrent cancer was established after 1 biopsy procedure in 39% of the patients and after 1 or more biopsy procedures in 59%. Biopsy was positive in 78% of 23 patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination, 40% of 5 with an abnormal transrectal ultrasound only, and 23% of 13 with a normal digital rectal examination and ultrasound. Among the patients with and without biopsy proved tumor recurrence there were no significant differences between the pathological stage or histological grade of t...


BJUI | 2007

Psychosocial variables affect the quality of life of men diagnosed with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome

J. Curtis Nickel; Dean A. Tripp; Shannon Chuai; Mark S. Litwin; Mary McNaughton-Collins; J. Richard Landis; Richard B. Alexander; Anthony J. Schaeffer; Michael P. O'Leary; Michel A. Pontari; Paige White; Christopher Mullins; Leroy M. Nyberg; John W. Kusek; Charles L. Bennett; Wade Bushman; Elizabeth A. Calhoun; Alisa E. Koch; Robert B. Nadler; Mary Healy; Marylin Dopona; Mary Buntin; Darlene S. Marko; James L. Duncan; Debra Rhodes; Judith Spolarich-Kroll; Alex Adler; Cindy Williams; Michael J. Barry; Dale Ardern

To examine interactions between demographic, pain, urinary, psychological and environmental predictors of quality of life (QOL) in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS).


The Journal of Urology | 2000

RACE AND CAUSE SPECIFIC SURVIVAL WITH PROSTATE CANCER: INFLUENCE OF CLINICAL STAGE, GLEASON SCORE, AGE AND TREATMENT

Jackson E. Fowler; Steven A. Bigler; Gail Bowman; Nirmal K. Kilambi

PURPOSE We assess the influence of race on stage stratified cause specific survival of men with prostate cancer, and Gleason score, age at diagnosis and treatment on potential racial differences in survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 524 black and 396 white men were diagnosed with prostate cancer at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center between January 1982 and December 1992. Clinical stage was determined by retrospective review of the medical records and Gleason score of biopsy material as assigned by a single uropathologist. Of 611 patients who died the cause of death was determined by retrospective or prospective review of hospital records in 493 and by review of the death certificates in 102. In 16 cases the cause of death was indeterminate. Median potential followup was 112 months (range 60 to 182) and median period of observation was 61 months (range 1 to 182). RESULTS Cause specific survival with stage T1b-2 cancer was lower in 231 black than in 264 white men of all ages (p = 0.02) and lower in 110 black than in 170 white men younger than in 70 years at diagnosis (p = 0.04). Gleason 7 to 10 cancer, which was associated with a less favorable cause specific survival compared to Gleason 2 to 6 cancer (p <0.0001), was more common in black than in white men with stage T1b-2 cancer of all ages (p = 0.01) and younger than 70 years at diagnosis (p = 0.04). No or unknown treatment status, which was associated with a less favorable cause specific survival compared to treatment (p = 0.05), was more common in black than in white men with stage T1b-2 cancer of all ages (p = 0.0005) but not significantly different when stratified by age. In men of all ages racial differences in cause specific survival were not significant when adjusted for age and Gleason score (p = 0.14) or age, Gleason score and treatment status (p = 0.17). In men younger than 70 years racial differences in cause specific survival were not significant when adjusted for age and Gleason score (p = 0.22). There were no significant racial differences in overall or age stratified all cause survival of men with stage T1b-2 cancer. There were no significant differences in overall or age stratified cause specific or all cause survival of 112 black and 58 white men with stage T3-4 cancer, or 181 and 74, respectively, with metastatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that local stage prostate cancer is more lethal in black than in white men and the difference is most pronounced in men younger than 70 years. The survival disadvantage of black men with local stage cancer is due in part to a propensity for development of less differentiated and more aggressive malignancies.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jackson E. Fowler's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Richard Landis

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Linda E. Seaver

University of Mississippi Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark S. Litwin

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Prabhakar Pandey

University of Mississippi Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John W. Kusek

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge