Jacob T. Gutsche

Who should care for intensive care unit patients

The question of who should direct the care of critically ill patients is both multifaceted and timely. Currently, only about 30% of critical care units in the United States are staffed by dedicated intensivists. This number is likely to increase as groups such as Leapfrog financially reward hospitals that have dedicated intensivists around the clock. The problem, however, is that the supply of intensivists by training is not projected to increase, whereas the demand for health care, by all accounts, will significantly increase in the near future. There is an increasing body of literature suggesting not only morbidity and mortality benefits but decreased length of stay and profound cost savings when a team directed by critical care physicians cares for patients in the intensive care unit. Despite this, many have argued that a consultant-based unit (so called open unit) is less alienating to a patients primary care physician or surgeon and promotes continuity of care. In addition, although much of the literature has suggested purported benefit derived from a dedicated intensivist staffing model, little has been published regarding optimal intensivist/patient ratios. If dedicated critical care teams decrease complications in the intensive care unit, one may logically reason that as the intensivist/patient ratio decreases, morbidity or mortality, or both, might increase. This, however, has not yet been shown. This article will address many of these issues, discuss the history of critical care medicine in the United States, and review the pertinent literature. With the projected shortage of critical care-trained physicians and an increasingly aging population, it is imperative that health professionals evaluate this issue sooner rather than later.

Rationale, development, implementation, and initial results of a fast track protocol for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

The care pathway for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), particularly in the US, was initially based on open surgical techniques and often includes general anesthesia, transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring, and cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Whether a subgroup of patients could benefit from early extubation, fewer days in the ICU, and early ambulation in terms of both cost and effectiveness is unknown.

Trends in U.S. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use and Outcomes: 2002-2012

This study evaluates contemporary trends in the use and outcomes of adult patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in U.S. hospitals. All adult discharges in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database during the years 2002-2012 that included ECMO were used to estimate the total number of U.S. ECMO hospitalizations (n = 12,407). Diagnostic codes were used to group patients by indication for ECMO use into postcardiotomy, heart transplant, lung transplant, cardiogenic shock, respiratory failure, and cardiopulmonary failure. A Mann-Kendall test was used to examine trends over time using standard statistical techniques for survey data. We found that ECMO use increased significantly from 2002-2012 (P = 0.003), whereas in-hospital mortality rate fluctuated without a significant difference in trend over time. No significant trend was observed in overall ECMO use from 2002-2007, but the use did demonstrate a statistically significant increase from 2007-2012 (P = 0.0028). The highest in-hospital mortality rates were found in the postcardiotomy (57.2%) and respiratory failure (59.2%) groups. Lung and heart transplant groups had the lowest in-hospital mortality rates (44.10% and 45.31%, respectively). The proportion of ECMO use for postcardiotomy decreased from 56.9% in 2002 to 37.9% in 2012 (P = 0.026) and increased for cardiopulmonary failure from 3.9% to 11.1% (P = 0.026). We concluded that ECMO use in the United States increased between 2002 and 2012, driven primarily by increase in national ECMO use beginning in 2007. Mortality rates remained high but stable during this time period. Though there were shifts in relative ECMO use among patient groups, absolute ECMO use increased for all indications over the study period.

Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: Clinical Update on Mechanisms and Prophylactic Strategies

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AF) is a common complication after cardiac surgery and is associated with increased cost, morbidity, and mortality. Minimally invasive surgical techniques such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have not substantially reduced the risk of developing AF. The development of AF after cardiac surgery remains common and significantly increases mortality, morbidity, and total hospital costs, including readmission. In an effort to reduce these adverse consequences of this complication, considerable research recently has focused on identifying prophylactic strategies for AF after cardiac surgery. A thorough understanding of the mechanisms underlying the genesis of AF in this setting may aid in designing preventative paradigms and standardizing treatment. The purpose of this expert review is to highlight the incidence, pathogenesis, and preventative strategies for AF after cardiac surgery.

Clinical Update in Liver Transplantation

There has been considerable recent progress liver transplantation (LTX). The postreperfusion syndrome has clearly defined and typically responds to vasopressin and/or methylene blue when refractory to catecholamine therapy. Diastolic dysfunction and cirrhotic cardiomyopathy are prevalent and important in LTX recipients. The high cardiovascular risk and the increasing medical complexity of the current liver transplant recipient have stimulated the publication of guidelines for cardiovascular assessment before LTX. Cardiac surgery is increasingly more successful in patients with cirrhosis, including simultaneous heart-liver transplantation. Cardiopulmonary bypass in LTX is indicated for hemodynamic rescue and, at some centers, serves as the hemodynamic platform for liver implantation. Although acute renal injury is common after LTX, early diagnosis is now possible with novel biomarkers. Earlier detection of postoperative renal dysfunction may prompt intervention for renal rescue. The metabolic milieu in LTX remains critical. Regular insulin therapy may be more effective than infrequent large bolus therapy for potassium homeostasis. Careful titration of insulin therapy may improve freedom from severe hyperglycemia to decrease morbidity. Since the organization of dedicated anesthesia care teams for LTX improves perioperative outcome, this aspect of perioperative care is receiving systematic attention to optimize safety and quality. The specialty of LTX is likely to continue to flourish even more, given these pervasive advances.

New frontiers in aortic therapy: focus on current trials and devices in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

The first decade of clinical experience with transcatheter aortic valve replacement since 2002 saw the development of 2 main valve systems, namely the Edwards Sapien balloon-expandable valve series and the Medtronic self-expanding CoreValve. These 2 valve platforms now have achieved commercial approval and application worldwide in patients with severe aortic stenosis whose perioperative risk for surgical intervention is high or extreme. In the second decade of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, clinical experience and refinements in valve design have resulted in clinical drift towards lower patient risk cohorts. There are currently 2 major trials, PARTNER II and SURTAVI, that are both evaluating the role of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patient cohorts. The results from these landmark trials may usher in a new clinical paradigm for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in its second decade.

Combined Heart and Liver Transplantation Can Be Safely Performed With Excellent Short- and Long-Term Results

BACKGROUND Heart transplant has become the gold standard therapy for end-stage heart failure. Short- and long-term outcomes after orthotopic heart transplant have been excellent. Many patients with heart failure manifest hepatic failure as a result of a chronically elevated central venous pressure. Concomitant hepatic failure has been a contraindication to heart transplant in most centers. A few select institutions are currently performing combined heart-liver transplantation to treat dual organ failure. The outcomes after dual organ transplant are largely unknown, with limited data from a few select centers. We undertook this study to analyze our large experience with combined heart-liver transplant and determine the short-term and long-term outcomes associated with this procedure. METHODS We have performed 1,050 heart transplants at our center to date. Of these patients, 26 underwent combined heart and liver transplant (largest single-center experience). We reviewed demographic, perioperative, and short- and long-term outcomes after this combined procedure. RESULTS All 26 patients underwent successful dual organ transplant, without any episodes of primary graft dysfunction. Average length of intensive care unit stay was 10 ± 5 days, and average hospital stay was 25 ± 11 days. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated excellent short-term survival (1 year, 87% ± 7%) and long-term survival (5 years, 83% ± 8%). Interestingly, only 3 patients (11%) demonstrated any evidence of rejection long-term by myocardial biopsy, suggesting that concomitant hepatic transplantation may provide immunologic protection for the cardiac allograft. CONCLUSIONS We present the largest single-center series of combined heart and liver transplant. This dual organ strategy is highly feasible, with excellent long-term survival. Concomitant liver transplant may confer immunologic protection for the cardiac allograft.

Moderate Versus Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest for Elective Aortic Transverse Hemiarch Reconstruction

BACKGROUND Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) with retrograde cerebral perfusion (DHCA group) has traditionally been the cerebral protection strategy during transverse hemiarch aortic reconstruction. Recently, we have adopted moderate hypothermic (≥ 25 °C) circulatory arrest (MHCA) with antegrade cerebral perfusion (MHCA group). We compared the outcomes for these two circulatory arrest management strategies. METHODS From 2008 to 2012, in a concurrent series of 376 patients (DHCA, 301; MHCA, 75) undergoing transverse hemiarch for aortic aneurysm disease, incidences of concomitant root replacement (44% vs 47%, p = 0.8), and aortic valve replacement (29% vs 21%, p = 0.3) were similar, although atherosclerotic aneurysm pathology was present in patients in the MHCA group (71% vs 33%, p < 0.01). Antegrade cerebral perfusion was established via axillary artery or direct innominate artery cannulation. A database was prospectively maintained. RESULTS MHCA group patients were older (66 ± 11 vs 60 ± 14 years; p < 0.01). Other demographics were similar. Aortic cross-clamp (128 ± 46 vs 163 ± 57 minutes, p < 0.01) and cardiopulmonary bypass (167 ± 49 vs 222 ± 61 minutes, p < 0.01) times were lower in the MHCA group. Transfusion requirements were significantly reduced with MHCA (38% vs 61%, p < 0.01), especially use of fresh frozen plasma and cryoprecipitate. Direct innominate artery cannulation did not result in any vascular or neurologic complication. Postoperative outcomes were similar. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was 1% in both groups. Stroke (0% vs 2%) and hemodialysis rates (0% vs 1%) were also similar. CONCLUSIONS MHCA with antegrade cerebral perfusion yields excellent and equivalent outcomes to DHCA for elective aortic hemiarch reconstruction. MHCA significantly improves intraoperative times and, importantly, reduces transfusion requirements compared with DHCA with a retrograde cerebral perfusion strategy.

Comparison of local versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is typically performed under general anesthesia (GA). However, there is increasing data supporting the safety of performing TAVR under local anesthesia/conscious sedation (LA). We performed a meta‐analysis to gain better understanding of the safety and efficacy of LA versus GA in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR.

The Functional Aortic Annulus in the 3D Era: Focus on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for the Perioperative Echocardiographer

The functional aortic annulus represents a sound clinical framework for understanding the components of the aortic root complex. Recent three-dimensional imaging analysis has demonstrated that the aortic annulus frequently is elliptical rather than circular. Comprehensive three-dimensional quantification of this aortic annular geometry by transesophageal echocardiography and/or multidetector computed tomography is essential to guide precise prosthesis sizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement to minimize paravalvular leak for optimal clinical outcome. Furthermore, three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography accurately can quantify additional parameters of the functional aortic annulus such as coronary height for complete sizing profiles for all valve types in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Although it is maturing rapidly as a clinical imaging modality, its role in transcatheter aortic valve replacement is seen best as complementary to multidetector computed tomography in a multidisciplinary heart team model.