Jacopo Romagnoli

Extended-Release Tacrolimus Plus Everolimus or Micophenolate Mofetil in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients: 6-Month Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Not all hospital‐wide electronic medical record systems accommodate the specific needs of the transplant center. This month, “The AJT Report” investigates whats missing, and what the transplant team can do about it. Also in this issue, a New York man is convicted of organ trafficking, and UNOS appoints a new director of their Department of Evaluation and Quality.

Rapid conversion to sirolimus for chronic progressive deterioration of the renal function in kidney allograft recipients

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of conversion to sirolimus (SRL) immunosuppression among 19 renal transplant recipients (KTX) with progressive chronic renal allograft dysfunction (CRAD). Conversion to SRL was performed with concomitant sharp withdrawal of the calcineurin inhibitor (CI). SRL was added at a starting dose of 3 mg, then adjusted to obtain SRL target trough blood levels of 8 to 10 ng/mL. CI were stopped the evening before starting SRL. All patients enrolled in the study have now completed 6 months of follow-up: all are alive without acute rejection or major infection following rapid conversion to SRL. No significant change in the 6 months postconversion hematologic and hepatic profile was observed compared with the preconversion values, while significant dyslipidemia was induced. After conversion to SRL, significant amelioration of the renal function was found in 36% of patients, stabilization in 21%, and continuous deterioration in 43%. Patients whose renal function improved were found to have been converted at a significantly lower creatinine: (pre 2.6 +/- 0.9 vs post 1.9 +/- 0.2; P =.038) with respect to those patients who had continuous renal deterioration. In KTX with CRAD, sharp withdrawal of CI with concomitant conversion to SRL is safe, avoiding major infections, acute rejections, and significant side effects. Short-term amelioration of the renal function is best obtained when early conversion is performed. Long-term follow-up will be necessary to confirm these preliminary data.

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus: a case-control analysis of the risk factors

Aim of the present study was to assess, in a pair‐matched analysis design, risk factors for post‐transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) in renal transplant recipients (KTx). The incidence of PTDM was evaluated in 538 consecutive KTx in relation to their baseline immunosuppression. PTDM was defined according to the 2003 American Diabetes Association and World Health Organization experts committee definition. As risk factors for PTDM development were considered: age, family history of diabetes, body mass index (BMI), baseline immunosuppression, doses and blood levels of the immunosuppressive agents used. Baseline immunosuppression consisted of CSA, TAC and SRL + CNI. Thirty‐two pair‐matched controls were identified among the 538 KTx and included in the risk analysis. Significant risk factors for the development of PTDM were identified in the family history of diabetes (P < 0.02) and BMI (P < 0.05). Higher BMI and positive family history for diabetes mellitus were significant risk factors for the development of PTDM, regardless of the immunosuppressive agent used.

Attachment style predict compliance, quality of life and renal function in adult patients after kidney transplant: preliminary results

Abstract Aim: Aim of this study was to evaluate the association between attachment style, compliance, quality of life and renal function in adult patients after kidney transplantation. Methods: A total of 43 adult patients who received a kidney transplant more than 3 months before were enrolled and were asked to complete two Self-Report questionnaires: Attachment Style Questionnaire (ASQ-40) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Also compliance was measured using appropriate questions. Results: Linear regression analysis showed associations between the confidence in relationships (ASQ-40) and compliance [beta = −0.37; B = −0.02; t(41) = −2.51; p = 0.02]; aspects of anxious attachment style (ASQ-40) and creatinine levels [beta = 0.3; B = 0.13; t(41) = 2.03; p = 0.04]; aspects of avoidant attachment style (ASQ-40) and compliance [beta = −0.37; B = −3.15; t(41) = −2.35; p = 0.02]. Patients who exhibited avoidant attachment had a significantly better perception of their own general health than patients with anxious [F(2,37) = 6.8; p < 0.05] or secure attachment; however, they had a worse perception regarding role limitations due to emotional problems, compared to patients with anxious attachment [F(2,37) = 6.4; p < 0.05]. Discussion: The results of this study suggest that the evaluation of the attachment style in adult kidney transplant patients can contribute to plan a goal-directed psychological support program for these patients, in order to increase their compliance. The association between aspects of anxious attachment style and creatinine level needs more investigations.

Effects of switching from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus formulation on quality of life, anxiety, and transplant benefit perception after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE This study investigated whether switching from the twice-daily (Prograf; TAC) to the once-daily formulation of tacrolimus with extended release (Advagraf; XL) affected quality of life, anxiety, and transplant benefit perception after allogeneic kidney transplantation. METHODS After local Institutional Review Board approval, 78 adult patients prescribed twice-daily tacrolimus for ≥1 year after kidney transplantation were asked to participate in this study. All patients were evaluated at T0 (before the switch), and the 49 who accepted the change were reassessed after 6 months (T1). The following tests were used: (State and Trait Anxiety Inventories Y1 and Y2, (Psychologic General Well-Being Index), and modified Transplant Effect Questionnaire for posttransplantation symptoms. Blood samples for laboratory profiles and determinations of drug concentrations were obtained throughout the study period. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the psychologic variables at T0 among patients who switched from TAC to XL (n=49) versus those who did not participate (n=29). Eight of the 49 patients who accepted the drug conversion were reswitched to TAC because of adverse events. At T1, the remaining switched patients (n=41) showed an increase in the disclosure of having undergone transplantation (P<.05) versus nonswitched patients; whereas reswitched patients (n=8) showed less positivity and well-being (P<.05) compared with those who remained in the switched regimen. CONCLUSION The findings suggested increased disclosure of having undergone transplantation among patients who decided to switch from TAC to XL.

One-shot versus multidose perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis after kidney transplantation: A randomized, controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND There is no consensus on the optimal perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis regimen for renal transplant recipients. Some studies have reported that irrigation of the wound at the time of closure without systemic antibiotics may suffice to minimize the risk for surgical site infection (SSI), but many centers still use long-term, multidose regimens in which antibiotics are administered until removal of foreign bodies occur, such as the urethral catheter, drain and central line. METHODS We designed a prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled trial to compare a single dose versus a multidose regimen of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in adult, nondiabetic, non-morbidly obese patients undergoing renal transplantation. The primary endpoint was the incidence of SSI; the assessment of other infection in the first postoperative month was the secondary endpoint. RESULTS Two hundred five patients were enrolled and randomized to receive either a single (n = 103) or multidose antibiotic regimen (n = 102) for prophylaxis. The incidences of SSI and urinary tract infection were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION As the dramatic increase in antibiotic resistance has mandated the implementation of global programs to optimize the use of antibiotic agents in humans, we believe that the single dose regimen is preferred, at least in nondiabetic, non-morbidly obese, adult renal transplant recipients.

Expanding the Living Donor Pool, “Ist Act”: Analysis of the Causes of Exclusion of Potential Kidney Donors

BACKGROUND The evaluation of a potential living kidney donor (LKD) leads to exclusion of at least 50% of candidates. The aim of this study was to analyze the reasons for exclusion of potential LKDs referred to our center. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed historic and clinical data of all potential LKDs who were evaluated over 7 years from January 2005 to March 2012. Data were obtained by review of an electronic database. RESULTS Among 79 (50 female, 29 male) candidates, 24 (30.3%) successfully donated, comprising 22 related and 2 unrelated donors. We excluded 45 (56.9%), and 10 (12.6%) are actively undergoing evaluation. Reasons for exclusion were medical (n = 14; 31%), nonmedical (n = 18; 40%), positive cross-match (n = l7.7%), pregnancy (n = 2; 4.4%), and other reasons (n = 3; 6.6%). Of the 14 donors excluded for medical reasons, 75.8% were due to diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, or obesity and 21.5% to inadequate renal function, malignancy, or liver disease. Of the 18 (40%) excluded for nonmedical reasons, 6 (33.3%) were because the intended recipient received a deceased-donor transplantation before the evaluation could be completed, 5 (27.7%) because the recipient was no longer a candidate for transplantation, 5 (27.7%) because of donor withdrawal, and 2 (11.1%) for other reasons. CONCLUSIONS Positive cross-match and deceased-donor transplantation during the evaluation process were the 2 most common reasons for LKD exclusion. Evaluation of potential LKDs is time consuming, requiring a remarkable amount of human and material resources. A dedicated pathway for the diagnostic work-up of LKDs may speed- the evaluation process and improve its efficiency, use of ABO-incompatible or paired-exchange donations may increase the yield of donor organs.

Significant improvement in patient survival after renal transplantation in the last decade.

INTRODUCTION The extremely good results of renal transplantation have favored the use of pre-emptive procedures for treatment of patients with end-stage renal disease before entering dialysis, but still some concerns exist about patient survival. The aim of this study was to analyze the evolution of death rates and the causes of mortality among recipients of procedures performed between 1970 and 2007. METHODS We examined the outcomes at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years follow-up of 793 adults who underwent primary or repeat renal transplantation from living or deceased donors between January 1, 1970 and December 31, 2007. To evaluate the impact of immunosuppressive regimens on patient survivals, we considered 3 time intervals: the precyclosporine era, the cyclosporine era, and the postcyclosporine era. RESULTS During follow-up 115/793 (14.5%) renal transplant recipients died. There was a significant decrease in the overall mortality rate over the years. Patients who underwent transplantation more recently in the postcyclosporine era (1997-2007) showed a mortality rate of 1.8% (7/394) at 1 year and 3.3% (13/394) at 5 years, significantly lower than in previous periods. There was no significant change in the most frequent causes of death: cardiovascular diseases and sepsis. CONCLUSION Our data indicated a significant improvement in patient survival after renal transplantation over the last decade. These data are significantly better than those reported for dialysis treatment thus supporting the strategy of pre-emptive transplantation for end-stage renal disease.

Tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil vs. cyclosporine plus everolimus in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients: three-yr results of a single-center prospective clinical trial.

We compared in kidney transplantation two immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (TAC) and everolimus plus low‐dose cyclosporine (EVE). Sixty consecutive patients received TAC (30 patients) or EVE (30 patients) as immunosuppressive regimen; all subjects also received induction with basiliximab and corticosteroids. After three‐yr follow‐up, no difference was found in patient and graft survival (PTS: TAC: 97% vs. EVE: 100%; GS: TAC: 93% vs. EVE: 93%). The incidence of acute rejection was higher in the EVE group but the difference was not statistically significant (17% vs. 23%, p = ns). Patients in EVE showed higher serum cholesterol (205 ± 41 vs. 235 ± 41 mg/dL, p = 0.0012) and lower hemoglobin concentration (13.6 ± 1.4 vs. 12.4 ± 1.9, p = 0.01). Renal function was not significantly different in the two groups (3 Y creatinine: TAC 1.4 ± 0.8 vs. EVE 1.6 ± 0.8 mg/dL, p = ns). Treatment discontinuation was higher in the EVE group (TAC 17 vs. EVE 36%, p = ns). Our data show that in the middle‐term follow‐up, an immunosuppressive regimen with tacrolimus plus MMF has a similar efficacy and safety profile in comparison with the combination of low‐exposure cyclosporine plus everolimus. Further follow up could evidence the benefits related to the anti‐proliferative effects of everolimus.

Once Daily Everolimus Is Safe and Effective in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: Six-Month Results of a Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION The half-life of everolimus is approximately 28 hours, but everolimus is normally administered twice a day. The aim of this prospective, single-center, exploratory study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a once a day (OD) everolimus regimen versus the standard twice a day regimen (BID) for immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation. METHODS Forty de novo renal transplant recipients prospectively assigned to OD (n = 21) or BID (n = 19) were followed for 6 months. In the OD group, everolimus was given orally once a day to target a trough blood level of 2-6 ng/mL. In the BID, group everolimus was given twice a day to target a trough blood level of 3-12 ng/mL. All patients also received induction treatment with basiliximab and low-dose calcineurin inhibitors. RESULTS At 6 months follow-up, patient and graft survivals were 100%; renal function and acute rejection rates were similar between the 2 regimens. Patients in the OD group showed significantly lower cholesterol and triglyceride levels compared with those in the BID group, namely, total cholesterol level, OD 212 +/- 54 versus BID 249 +/- 59 mg/dL (P < .05), and serum triglycerides, OD 162 +/- 72 versus BID 245 +/- 133 mg/dL (P < .02). DISCUSSION This study showed that OD administration of everolimus provided excellent patient and graft survivals and good renal function without an increased incidence of acute rejection episodes. The lipid profile was significantly better among patients receiving everolimus OD. These findings suggested that everolimus can be safely administered once a day.