Jacqueline Conard

Hormonal contraception in women at risk of vascular and metabolic disorders: guidelines of the French Society of Endocrinology.

Hormonal contraceptive methods are widely used in France, including not only oral estrogen-progestin combinations but also non-oral estrogen-progestin delivery methods (patches, vaginal rings), as well as oral forms, implants and intra-uterine devices that deliver only a progestin. Hormonal contraception has only a modest impact on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, but estrogen-progestin contraceptives have been linked to a variety of vascular risks. Overall, the risk of venous thrombosis is multiplied by a factor of about 4, depending on age, the compounds used, and other risk factors (including biological thrombophilia and a personal history of thrombosis), whereas the risk of arterial events is only increased in women with risk factors. Available data suggest there is no excess risk with progestin-based contraceptives, but far fewer studies have been conducted. At the initiative of the French Society of Endocrinology, an expert group met in 2010 in order to reach a consensus on the use of hormonal contraceptive methods in women with vascular or metabolic risk factors, based on available data and international guidelines published by WHO in 2009 and subsequently adapted to the United States context. The following text, intentionally limited to hormonal contraception, is intended to serve as a guide when prescribing in specific clinical situations, such as a family or personal history of arterial or venous thromboembolism, or the existence of cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, smoking, diabetes, dyslipidemia, obesity).

Should women suffering from migraine with aura be screened for biological thrombophilia?: Results from a cross-sectional French study

INTRODUCTIONnMigraine, particularly migraine with aura (MA), is associated with a higher risk for ischemic stroke (IS). A procoagulant state may predispose to IS. Whether inherited biological thrombophilia are associated with migraine risk remains controversial.nnnOBJECTIVEnTo assess the risk of migraine without or with aura related to inherited biological thrombophilia adjusted for the main potential confounders.nnnMATERIAL AND METHODSnA cross-sectional study was conducted in 1456 French women aged 18 to 56years, referred for biological coagulation check-up because of personal or familial venous thrombosis history. Between April 2007 and December 2008, all women answered a self-administered questionnaire to determine whether they had headache.nnnRESULTSnThere were 294 (20%) migrainous sufferers (including 71 [5%] with MA), 975 (67%) non migrainous women and 187 (13%) non migrainous headache women. Inherited thrombophilia were detected in 576 (40%) women, including 389 (40%) non migrainous women, 90 (40%) migraine without aura (MWA), 33 (46%) MA women and 64 (34%) non migrainous headache women. Factor V Leiden (FVL) i.e. F5rs6025 or Factor II G20210A (FIIL) i.e. F2rs1799963 mutation was detected in 296 (30%) non migrainous women and in 100 (34%) migrainous women of which 27 had MA. There was a significant association between MA and FVL or FIIL mutations (adjusted OR=1.76 [95% CI 1.02-3.06] p=0.04) whereas this association in MWA and in non migrainous headache women was not significant. There was no significant association between migraine and other biological thrombophilia.nnnCONCLUSIONnFVL or FIIL mutations were more likely among patients suffering from MA. Whether biological thrombophilia screening should be systematically performed in women suffering from MA remains to be determined.

Thrombose et assistance médicale à la procréation (AMP)

Assisted reproductive techniques (ART) concern procedures designed to increase fertility of couples: artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization (IVF), either classical or after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), transfer of frozen embryos, or gamete intrafallopian transfer. Their use has greatly increased these last years. They may be associated with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and one possible major complication is venous or arterial thrombosis. Thromboses are rare but potentially serious with important sequellae. They are mostly observed in unusual sites such as head and neck vessels and the mechanism is still unknown although hypotheses have been proposed. This review is an update of our knowledge and an attempt to consider guidelines for the prevention and treatment of ART-associated thromboses, which frequently occur when the woman is pregnant. Prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation by appropriate stimulation procedures, detection of women at risk of hyperstimulation and of women at high risk of thrombosis should allow reduction of the risk of thrombosis, possibly by administration of a thromboprophylaxis at a timing and dose which can be only determined by extrapolation.

Combined Hormonal Contraceptives and First Venous Thrombosis in Young French Women: Impact of Thrombotic Family History

Context: In UK and French, but not World Health Organization (WHO), guidelines for combined hormonal contraception (CHC), family history of a venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a condition for which the theoretical risks usually outweigh the advantages of using CHC. Objective: We estimated the prevalence of inappropriate prescriptions of CHC according to several international guidelines and their impact on VTE. Design: A single-center observational study. Setting: Hemostasis unit outpatient clinic (Paris, France). Population: A total of 2088 French CHC users of childbearing age with a first documented VTE who were referred to our unit between 2000 and 2009. Methods: Data were collected by a standardized questionnaire during a medical consultation. Family history of VTE was analyzed according to definitions from international recommendations (VTE before age 45 years, United Kingdom; before age 50 years, France). A CHC prescription was considered inappropriate for women with vascular contraindications and/or a family history of VTE. Cross-sectional analysis of the clinical and biological characteristics was performed. Main Outcome Measures: Prevalence of inappropriate prescription of CHC and potentially preventable events were estimated. Results: According to the WHO, UK, or French guidelines, 8.8%, 18.9%, and 25.9%, respectively, of CHC prescriptions were considered inappropriate. Compliance with these guidelines could reduce the corresponding number of VTEs by 6.3%, 13.5%, and 18.5%, respectively. Characteristics of the women were similar. Conclusion: Our results suggest inappropriate CHC prescriptions are prevalent among CHC users with first VTE. The appropriate way to take family history of VTE into account should be further clarified.