Jacqueline P. Duncan

Retention of parallel-sided titanium posts cemented with six luting agents: An in vitro study

PURPOSE This in vitro study compared the effectiveness of 6 luting systems on the retention of prefabricated titanium posts. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 120 single-rooted teeth were sectioned at the cementoenamel junction and treated endodontically. Roots were mounted in copper cylinders, and prefabricated, parallel-sided titanium posts were cemented according to the manufacturers instructions. Two resin-ionomer hybrid cements and 2 resin cements were tested with corresponding dentin bonding agents. A glass ionomer cement was also tested, and zinc-phosphate cement served as the control. Samples were tested in an Instron universal testing machine to catastrophic tensile failure. RESULTS Advance cement with Prime and Bond systems was found to be statistically more retentive than all other groups tested (P < .05). Cement It with Bond It and Permalute with Permalute Primers A and B systems demonstrated significantly greater retention than Ketac Cem cement, Resinomer with One-Step system and zinc-phosphate cement (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference among Ketac Cem cement, Resinomer with One-Step system, and zinc-phosphate cement.