Jacques Lemelin

Cost savings associated with improving appropriate and reducing inappropriate preventive care: cost-consequences analysis

BackgroundOutreach facilitation has been proven successful in improving the adoption of clinical preventive care guidelines in primary care practice. The net costs and savings of delivering such an intensive intervention need to be understood. We wanted to estimate the proportion of a facilitation intervention cost that is offset and the potential for savings by reducing inappropriate screening tests and increasing appropriate screening tests in 22 intervention primary care practices affecting a population of 90,283 patients.MethodsA cost-consequences analysis of one successful outreach facilitation intervention was done, taking into account the estimated cost savings to the health system of reducing five inappropriate tests and increasing seven appropriate tests. Multiple data sources were used to calculate costs and cost savings to the government. The cost of the intervention and costs of performing appropriate testing were calculated. Costs averted were calculated by multiplying the number of tests not performed as a result of the intervention. Further downstream cost savings were determined by calculating the direct costs associated with the number of false positive test follow-ups avoided. Treatment costs averted as a result of increasing appropriate testing were similarly calculated.ResultsThe total cost of the intervention over 12 months was

Beyond Fighting Fires and Chasing Tails? Chronic Illness Care Plans in Ontario, Canada

238,388 and the cost of increasing the delivery of appropriate care was

Building capacity for medical education research in family medicine: the Program for Innovation in Medical Education (PIME)

192,912 for a total cost of

Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease With Laboratory Reporting of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and an Educational Program

431,300. The savings from reduction in inappropriate testing were

Evidence to action: a tailored multifaceted approach to changing family physician practice patterns and improving preventive care

148,568 and from avoiding treatment costs as a result of appropriate testing were

Telehomecare for patients with multiple chronic illnesses: Pilot study.

455,464 for a total savings of

Randomized controlled trial of Anticipatory and Preventive multidisciplinary Team Care For complex patients in a community-based primary care setting

604,032. On a yearly basis the net cost saving to the government is

Improving prevention in primary care: Evaluating the sustainability of outreach facilitation

191,733 per year (2003

Improving prevention in primary care: evaluating the effectiveness of outreach facilitation

Can) equating to

Effect of nurse practitioner and pharmacist counseling on inappropriate medication use in family practice

3,687 per physician or