Jacques Lesage

Prepolymers of hexamethylene diisocyanate as a cause of occupational asthma

BACKGROUND Occupational asthma (OA) caused by products that contain hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) has been ascribed to the highly volatile monomer of HDI. Most two-component paints are now made up primarily of nonvolatile prepolymers of HDI (30% to 60%) with only trace amounts (< 0.1%) of the monomer. The respective role of the two chemical forms of HDI in causing OA has never been investigated. METHODS Twenty workers who were consecutively referred for possible OA that resulted from exposure to spray paints underwent inhalation challenges on separate days with pure HDI monomer and the commercial formulation of HDI prepolymers to which they had been exposed at work. RESULTS Specific inhalation challenges elicited a positive asthmatic reaction in 10 of the 20 subjects. Among these subjects, four had positive bronchial reactions (two early, one late, and one dual) to both the monomer and the prepolymers. Four other subjects had asthmatic reactions (two early, one late, and one dual) after exposure to the prepolymers but not after exposure to the monomer. The discordance in bronchial response elicited by the monomer and the prepolymers could not be due to differences in the level of baseline nonspecific bronchial reactivity or in HDI concentrations during the tests. One subject showed an atypical progressive reaction after exposure to the monomer but not after exposure to the prepolymer. In this case, the discordant response could be explained by differences in HDI concentration. CONCLUSION These observations show that, although they are nonvolatile, the prepolymers of HDI can induce OA and that asthmatic reactions as a result of exposure to prepolymers but not the monomer is not a rare occurrence.

Determination of unreacted 2,4-toluene diisocyanate (2,4TDI) and 2,6-toluene diisocyanate (2,6TDI) in foams at ultratrace level by using HPLC-CIS-MS-MS

Isocyanates can cause occupational asthma. By using available HPLC-UVF methods, isocyanates can be quantified only at levels above 1% of the Permissible Exposure Limits (PEL). Once sensitized, workers can react to concentrations below these limits of detection (LOD) making these methods insufficiently sensitive to adequately evaluate trace amounts of isocyanates present in air or in materials at safe levels for sensitized workers. This article describes a novel method for isocyanate analysis allowing the quantification of 2,4TDI and 2,6TDI monomers at very low concentrations using HPLC-CIS-MS-MS. The methods sensitivity increases with a decrease in the alkali radius. The LOD is 0.039 ng mL(-1) for 2,4TDI and 0.100 ng mL(-1) for 2,6TDI in solution when lithium is the alkali adduct, which is 20 times more sensitive than HPLC-UVF method. This new method allows determination in foam at levels of 0.078 ng g(-1) for 2,4TDI and 0.200 ng g(-1) for 2,6TDI respectively, for a 0.5 g foam sample. This is more than 100 times more sensitive than other methods for determining free monomers in solid materials. Analytical reproducibility and precision are better than 92% and 93% for both diisocyanate monomers. The use of HPLC-UVF conventional method failed to detect unreacted isocyanates in foam samples, but TDI monomers were quantified by HPLC-CIS-MS-MS.

Sampling and analytical methodology development for the determination of primary and secondary low molecular weight amines in ambient air

In this project, a sampling device and an analytical method have been developed to simultaneously analyse the most frequently found low molecular weight amines, including aliphatic, aromatic and alcohol amines. These amines are diethanolamine, ethanolamine, methylamine, isopropylamine, morpholine, dimethylamine, and aniline. A sampling device was developed using a 37 mm cassette with glass fibre filters impregnated with sulfuric acid. Immediately after sampling, the filter was transferred to vials containing a solution of dansyl chloride. Dansyl chloride was used for derivatisation because it forms aromatic sulfonamides that are fluorescent and easy to protonate for MS detection. The effect of using an internal standard made with the dansylated derivative of 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazine (MOPIP) on the uncertainty and efficiency of the method was also evaluated. This internal standard was spiked directly onto filters. The coupling of HPLC/ESI-MS was used for the simultaneous analysis of all the derivatives. This method showed detection limits of about 0.03 microg mL(-1) to 0.3 microg mL(-1) of amine with an average expanded uncertainty of 3% to 6% depending on the amine. The methodology recoveries are close to 100% for all the amines, and the overall estimated expanded uncertainties vary between 10% and 13% depending on the amine. This new strategy will be useful in evaluating workplace air since a unique sampling system will be used, independent of the amine to be quantified.

Comparison of Sampling Methods for Monomer and Polyisocyanates of 1,6-Hexamethylene Diisocyanate During Spray Finishing Operations

A comparison study of isocyanate sampling methods for 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) monomer and HDI-based polyisocyanates was conducted in spray painting environments. This study compared the performance of the Iso-chek sampler against existing and proposed National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) monitoring methods for HDI-based isocyanates. Six methods for monitoring HDI monomer and polyisocyanate levels were compared. Fifty-eight sampling sets were collected during spray painting of aircraft and aircraft parts at four U.S. Air Force bases. Impinger and cassette samplers were mounted side-by-side on a mannequin located in paint overspray areas. For HDI monomer sampling results, there were no significant differences between NIOSH 5521, NIOSH 5522, OSHA 42, MAP (the proposed NIOSH method), and the Iso-Chek. For HDI-based polyisocyanates, NIOSH 5522, NIOSH 5521, Iso-Chek, and the Total Aerosol Mass Method (TAMM) were significantly different from one another. There was no significant difference between MAP and the NIOSH 5522 polyisocyanate sampling results. This study suggests the Iso-Chek and MAP sampling methods compare favorably with established methods for monitoring in HDI spray painting environments and the Total Aerosol Mass Method provides a reasonable upper boundary for estimating HDI polyisocyanate concentrations. The results also reemphasize aerosol sampling physics and sampler geometries must be carefully considered and appropriate samplers used when measuring exposures in spray paint environments where particulates are of the inhalable size.

Quantitative determination of hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), 2,4-toluene diisocyanate (2,4-TDI) and 2,6-toluene diisocyanate (2,6-TDI) monomers at ppt levels in air by alkaline adduct coordination ionspray tandem mass spectrometry

Occupational exposures to isocyanates can lead to occupational asthma. Once sensitized, some workers could react to isocyanate monomers at concentrations below 1% of the Permissible Exposure Limit of 5 ppb in air. Currently available methods are not sufficiently sensitive to adequately evaluate isocyanates present at these levels in workplace air. This article describes a novel method for isocyanate determination allowing the ultratrace quantification in workplace air of hexamethylene diisocyanate, 2,4-toluene diisocyanate and 2,6-toluene diisocyanate monomers. Sampling is performed during a complete workshift at a flow rate of 1 L min(-1) with a cassette containing a 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazine-impregnated 25 mm filter. Analysis is performed using liquid chromatography hyphenated with coordination ionspray tandem mass spectrometry. The analytical methods linearity was measured for a concentration range varying from the limit of detection of 0.04-0.13 ng mL(-1), depending on the monomer, up to approximately 32 ng mL(-1) for every isocyanate monomer, all with correlation coefficients (R(2)) greater than 0.999. The analytical methods lower limit of quantification combined with an adapted sampling strategy allow the quantification of isocyanate monomers down to 0.04 ppt for an 8 h work shift when a lithium adduct is used, which is more than 300 times lower than the most sensitive method currently available. This novel method can be used to confirm the very low level of isocyanate monomers for the safe reassignment of sensitized workers and it is also useful for charting the isocyanate dispersion tail in workplace environments.

Validation of a Solvent-Free Sampler for the Determination of Low Molecular Weight Aliphatic Isocyanates Under Thermal Degradation Conditions

During the thermal degradation of 1,6-hexamethylenediiso- cyanate-based (HDI) car paint, the eight most abundant isocyanates generated are isocyanic acid, methyl isocyanate, ethyl isocyanate, propyl isocyanate, butyl isocyanate, pentyl isocyanate, hexyl isocyanate, and 1,6-hexamethylenediisocyanate. For the first time, a method using solvent-free samplers is proposed and validated for the simultaneous sampling of all these isocyanates. The sampling efficiency during thermal degradation of car paint can be affected by the formation of dust and aerosols and by the emission of many chemicals, such as isocyanic acid, anhydrides, amines, and alcohols that consume the reagent or interfere in the derivatization procedure. Sampling was performed using cassettes containing two 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazine (MOPIP)-coated glass fiber filters (MFs) (∼4.9 mg per filter) and compared with bubblers containing 15 mL of MOPIP solution in toluene (1.0 mg/mL−1) and with bubblers backed with MFs. A DIN 53436 laboratory scale furnace was used to generate the isocyanates under thermal degradation conditions. For an aliphatic isocyanate concentration of approximately 42 μ g(NCO) m−3, no significant difference in sampling efficiency was observed between the three techniques studied, thus confirming the sampling efficiency of the MFs. The samples were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray/tandem mass spectrometry. Quantification was performed in daughter mode monitoring (MOPIP+H)+ fragments. For concentrations between 0.013 μ g(NCO) mL−1 and 0.52 μ g(NCO) mL−1 for the monoisocyanates, and between 0.026 μg(NCO) mL−1 and 1.04 μg(NCO) mL−1 for the HDI, the correlation coefficients were in the 0.9974–0.9996 range (n = 18). Analytical reproducibility and precision were better than 95.4% and 94.9%, respectively, for all the isocyanates. The instrumental detection limits, defined as three times the standard deviation measured at the lowest point on the calibration curve were in the 1.8–3.0 ng(NCO) mL−1 range (n = 8), which corresponds to about 0.37–0.60 μg(NCO) m−3 for a 15-L air sample when the filters are desorbed in 3 mL.

A Comparison of Solid Sampler Methods for the Determination of Hexamethylene-Based Isocyanates in Spray-Painting Operations

A polyurethane foam sponge impregnated with 1-(2-methoxyphenyl) piperazine in dimethylsulfoxide was mounted in both cassette and inhalable organic monitor samplers and these were then compared with a dual-filter cassette. The samplers were used for the collection of hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) monomer and oligomers during actual spray-painting operations. The dual filter cassettes were positioned on a mannequin. The polyurethane foam cassette (PUF CAS) and polyurethane foam inhalable organic monitor (PUF IOM) samplers were positioned on a cart in the same maximum overspray area. Data from this pilot study suggest that there is no significant difference (P < 0.05, n = 6) in the amount of HDI monomer obtained with the PUF IOM sampler when compared with the amount obtained from the dual filter cassette. The data also suggest that the PUF IOM sampler yields a higher amount of HDI oligomer than either the dual filter cassette or the PUF CAS sampler, neither of which exhibited a significant difference (P < 0.05, n = 6) from each other.

Development of a quantification method for quartz in various bulk materials by X-ray diffraction and the Rietveld method

Crystalline silica is known for its health hazards, and since 1997 has been listed as Group 1, Carcinogenic to Humans, by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. This issue is particularly important in the industrial environment, and there is still no method that allows quantification of the different polymorphs of crystalline silica. Many analytical methods have been proposed, and the major problem in almost all cases is attributable to the very large variety of matrixes encountered. This study evaluates the potential of X-ray diffraction techniques and an automated Rietveld analysis in order to overcome this problem and to adapt the quantitative analysis of quartz, the most prevalent crystalline silica polymorph, to routine analysis in the health and safety environment. Matrix simulations are done and many parameters are optimized. Sample preparation, the acquisition program, pattern treatment, and Rietveld refinement are evaluated, and a general procedure is determined. Automation of Rietveld refinement leads to a significant reduction in analysis time, but cannot be applied to every type of sample.