Jade A. Gehrking

Prospective differentiation of multiple system atrophy from Parkinson disease, with and without autonomic failure.

OBJECTIVE To report preliminary results of a prospective ongoing study of multiple system atrophy (MSA) and Parkinson disease (PD), with a large subset of patients with PD with autonomic failure (25%), to evaluate autonomic indices that distinguish MSA from PD. METHODS We used consensus criteria, detailed autonomic studies (Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale, Composite Autonomic Scoring Scale, thermoregulatory sweat test, and plasma catecholamines), and functional scales (Unified MSA Rating Scale [UMSARS] I-IV and Hoehn-Yahr grading) on a prospective, repeated, and ongoing basis. RESULTS We report the results of a study on 52 patients with MSA (mean [SD], age, 61.1 [7.8] years; body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), 27.2 [4.6]; Hoehn-Yahr grade, 3.2 [0.9]; UMSARS I score, 21.5 [7.4]; and UMSARS II score, 22.7 [9.0]) and 29 patients with PD, including PD with autonomic failure (mean [SD], age, 66.0 [8.1] years; body mass index, 26.6 [5.5]; Hoehn-Yahr grade, 2.2 [0.8]; UMSARS I score, 10.4 [6.1]; and UMSARS II score, 13.0 [5.9]). Autonomic indices were highly significantly more abnormal in MSA than PD (P < .001) for the Composite Autonomic Scoring Scale (5.9 [1.9] vs 3.3 [2.3], respectively), Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale (54.4 [21.8] vs 24.7 [20.5], respectively), and thermoregulatory sweat test (percentage anhidrosis, 57.4% [35.2%] vs 9.9% [17.7%], respectively). These differences were sustained and greater at 1-year follow-up, indicating a greater rate of progression of dysautonomia in MSA than PD. CONCLUSIONS The severity, distribution, and pattern of autonomic deficits at study entry will distinguish MSA from PD, and MSA from PD with autonomic failure. These differences continue and are increased at follow-up. Our ongoing conclusion is that autonomic function tests can separate MSA from PD. Autonomic indices support the notion that the primary lesion in PD is ganglionic and postganglionic, while MSA is preganglionic.

Evaluation of Orthostatic Hypotension: Relationship of a New Self-report Instrument to Laboratory-Based Measures

OBJECTIVE To compare measured autonomic deficits (composite autonomic severity score [CASS]) with a brief self-report scale we developed to measure severity of symptoms of orthostatic hypotension. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were recruited in 2 phases: from August to October 2002 and in April 2004. All patients underwent full evaluation in the autonomic laboratory, from which a CASS of autonomic deficits was derived. Patients also completed the 5-item self-report Orthostatic Grading Scale, which inquires about symptoms of orthostatic intolerance due to orthostatic hypotension (eg, severity, frequency, and interference with daily activities). RESULTS Of 145 patients, 97 (67%) had orthostatic hypotension. The 5-item scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (coefficient alpha=.91). Patients with orthostatic hypotension had significantly higher scores on each questionnaire item and CASS subscores than those without orthostatic hypotension. The scale items correlated significantly with each of the CASS subscores, maximally with the CASS adrenergic subscore. CONCLUSIONS Orthostatic hypotension is not the only cause of reduced orthostatic tolerance, and some patients may have orthostatic hypotension but be asymptomatic. Results of this study indicate that this 5-item questionnaire is a reliable and valid measure of the severity of symptoms of orthostatic hypotension and that it can supplement laboratory-based measures to provide a rapid, more complete clinical assessment. This questionnaire would also be useful as a brief screening device for orthostatic intolerance to aid physicians in identifying patients who may have orthostatic hypotension.

Autopsy confirmed multiple system atrophy cases: Mayo experience and role of autonomic function tests

Background Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a sporadic progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterised by autonomic failure, manifested as orthostatic hypotension or urogenital dysfunction, with combinations of parkinsonism that is poorly responsive to levodopa, cerebellar ataxia and corticospinal dysfunction. Published autopsy confirmed cases have provided reasonable neurological characterisation but have lacked adequate autonomic function testing. Objectives To retrospectively evaluate if the autonomic characterisation of MSA is accurate in autopsy confirmed MSA and if consensus criteria are validated by autopsy confirmation. Methods 29 autopsy confirmed cases of MSA evaluated at the Mayo Clinic who had undergone formalised autonomic testing, including adrenergic, sudomotor and cardiovagal functions and Thermoregulatory Sweat Test (TST), from which the Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS) was derived, were included in the study. Results Patient characteristics: 17 men, 12 women; age of onset 57±8.1 years; disease duration to death 6.5±3.3 years; first symptom autonomic in 18, parkinsonism in seven and cerebellar in two. Clinical phenotype at first visit was MSA-P (predominant parkinsonism) in 18, MSA-C (predominant cerebellar involvement) in eight, pure autonomic failure in two and Parkinsons disease in one. Clinical diagnosis at last visit was MSA for 28 cases. Autonomic failure was severe: CASS was 7.2±2.3 (maximum 10). TST% was 65.6±33.9% and exceeded 30% in 82% of patients. The most common pattern was global anhidrosis. Norepinephrine was normal supine (203.6±112.7) but orthostatic increment of 33.5±23.2% was reduced. Four clinical features (rapid progression, early postural instability, poor levodopa responsiveness and symmetric involvement) were common. Conclusion The pattern of severe and progressive generalised autonomic failure with severe adrenergic and sudomotor failure combined with the clinical phenotype is highly predictive of MSA.

What is the minimum duration of head-up tilt necessary to detect orthostatic hypotension?

ObjectiveThere is uncertainty as to the minimum duration of head-up tilt (HUT) needed to detect orthostatic hypotension (OH). The orthostatic duration has variably been recommended to be 1, 2, 3, and 5 minutes. The purpose of the current study was 1) to determine the minimum duration of HUT necessary to detect OH and 2) to identify different patterns of orthostatic blood pressure (BP) response in patients with OH.Design/methodsWe evaluated the medical records of 66 consecutive patients (mean age 70.0±10.1 years; 64% male) seen at Mayo Clinic-Rochester from 2000–2001 who fulfilled the criteria for OH (systolic blood pressure [SBP] reduction ≥ 20mm Hg within 3 minutes of HUT) during routine clinical autonomic studies. All patients completed an autonomic reflex screen with continuous monitoring of heart rate and BP during supine rest and 5 minutes of 70 degree HUT. Severity of autonomic deficits was quantified with the Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS).ResultsOverall, BP was the lowest at 1 minute with gradual and partial recovery over the following 4 minutes. Eighty-eight percent of patients (N=58) developed OH by 1 minute of HUT, with an additional 11% (N=7) developing OH by 2 minutes and the remaining 1% (N=1) developing OH by 3 minutes. We identified two broad patterns of SBP response to HUT. Forty-eight percent (N=32) of patients demonstrated an initial drop in SBP (≥ 20 mm Hg),which remained stable until tilt-back. Thirty-six percent (N=24) demonstrated an initial drop (≥ 20mm Hg) followed by a progressive decline in SBP until tilt-back. Repeated measures analysis of variance confirmed that the SBP change in response to HUT differed significantly among patients with a stable vs. progressive pattern [F(3,32)=25.1, p<0.001). Patients with the progressive pattern also had more severe adrenergic impairment on the CASS (p=0.03) and were more likely to have their tilt test terminated early (prior to 5minutes) due to presyncope (p<0.0001) than patients with the stable pattern.ConclusionsOne minute of HUT will detect OH in the great majority (88%) of patients and three minutes will detect the balance. Orthostatic stress beyond 2 minutes is necessary to detect the pattern of progressive OH. Since this group has more severe adrenergic deficits than the group with stable OH, we suggest that the progressive pattern is due to greater impairment of compensatory reflexes. Recognition of the group with progressive fall in BP is important since this group may be at greater risk of orthostatic syncope.

A prospective, 1-year follow-up study of postural tachycardia syndrome.

OBJECTIVE To prospectively evaluate patients who met standard criteria for postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), at baseline and 1-year follow-up, using standard clinical and laboratory methods to assess autonomic function. METHODS Fifty-eight patients met the study criteria (orthostatic symptoms and a heart rate increment of ≥ 30 beats/min on head-up tilt) and completed 12 months of follow-up. All patients were enrolled and completed the study from January 16, 2006, through April 15, 2009. Patients underwent standardized autonomic testing, including head-up tilt, clinical assessment, and validated questionnaires designed to determine the severity of autonomic symptoms. RESULTS Patients were predominantly young females (n=49, 84%), with 20 patients (34%) reporting an antecedent viral infection before onset of symptoms. More than one-third (37%) no longer fulfilled tilt criteria for POTS on follow-up, although heart rate increment on head-up tilt did not differ significantly at 1 year (33.8 ± 15.1 beats/min) compared with baseline (37.8 ± 14.6 beats/min) for the entire cohort. Orthostatic symptoms improved in most patients. Autonomic dysfunction was mild as defined by a Composite Autonomic Severity Score of 3 or less in 55 patients (95%) at baseline and 48 patients (92%) at 1 year. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study of the clinical outcomes of patients with POTS. Orthostatic symptoms improved in our patients, with more than one-third of patients no longer fulfilling tilt criteria for POTS, although the overall group change in heart rate increment was modest. Our data are in keeping with a relatively favorable prognosis in most patients with POTS.

Effect of position on valsalva maneuver: supine versus 20 degree position.

Summary: Blood pressure changes in response to the Valsalva maneuver (VM), which reflect the integrity of the baroreflex that regulates blood pressure. Performing this maneuver in the standard supine position often prevents adequate venous preload reduction, resulting in a rise rather than a fall in blood pressure, the “flat-top” Valsalva response. We determined whether performing the VM at a 20 degree angle of head-up tilt (20°) improves preload reduction, thereby reducing the frequency of flat-top responses, improving reflex vasoconstriction, and increasing the Valsalva ratio. One hundred thirty patients were evaluated in a prospective study. Each patient performed the VM in both supine and 20° positions. Flat-top responses were present in 18% of subjects when supine. Twenty degree angle of head-up tilt position reduced the flat-top response by 87%. The components of the response that are dependent on preload reduction (Valsalva ratio and phases II_E, II_L, and IV) also showed significant improvement with 20°. A 20 degree angle of tilt is sufficient to reduce venous preload, decreasing flat-top response rate and improving the Valsalva ratio and the morphology of the VM. We recommend this modification for laboratory evaluation of the VM, whenever a flat-top response is seen.

Effects of Patient-Controlled Abdominal Compression on Standing Systolic Blood Pressure in Adults With Orthostatic Hypotension

OBJECTIVE To assess the effects of patient-controlled abdominal compression on postural changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) associated with orthostatic hypotension (OH). Secondary variables included subject assessments of their preferences and the ease-of-use. DESIGN Randomized crossover trial. SETTING Clinical research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS Adults with neurogenic OH (N=13). INTERVENTIONS Four maneuvers were performed: moving from supine to standing without abdominal compression; moving from supine to standing with either a conventional or an adjustable abdominal binder in place; application of subject-determined maximal tolerable abdominal compression while standing; and while still erect, subsequent reduction of abdominal compression to a level the subject believed would be tolerable for a prolonged period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome variable included postural changes in SBP. Secondary outcome variables included subject assessments of their preferences and ease of use. RESULTS Baseline median SBP in the supine position was not affected by mild (10mmHg) abdominal compression prior to rising (without abdominal compression: 146mmHg; interquartile range, 124-164mmHg; with the conventional binder: 145mmHg; interquartile range, 129-167mmHg; with the adjustable binder: 153mmHg, interquartile range, 129-160mmHg; P=.85). Standing without a binder was associated with an -57mmHg (interquartile range, -40 to -76mmHg) SBP decrease. Levels of compression of 10mmHg applied prior to rising with the conventional and adjustable binders blunted these drops to -50mmHg (interquartile range, -33 to -70mmHg; P=.03) and -46mmHg (interquartile range, -34 to -75mmHg; P=.01), respectively. Increasing compression to subject-selected maximal tolerance while standing did not provide additional benefit and was associated with drops of -53mmHg (interquartile range, -26 to -71mmHg; P=.64) and -59mmHg (interquartile range, -49 to -76mmHg; P=.52) for the conventional and adjustable binders, respectively. Subsequent reduction of compression to more tolerable levels tended to worsen OH with both the conventional (-61mmHg; interquartile range, -33 to -80mmHg; P=.64) and adjustable (-67mmHg; interquartile range, -61 to -84mmHg; P=.79) binders. Subjects reported no differences in preferences between the binders in terms of preference or ease of use. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that mild (10mmHg) abdominal compression prior to rising can ameliorate OH, but further compression once standing does not result in additional benefit.

DECREASED ORTHOSTATIC ADRENERGIC REACTIVITY IN NON-DIPPING POSTURAL TACHYCARDIA SYNDROME

Whether non-dipping - the loss of the physiologic nocturnal drop in blood pressure - among patients with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is secondary to autonomic neuropathy, a hyperadrenergic state, or other factors remains to be determined. In 51 patients with POTS (44 females), we retrospectively analyzed 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure recordings, laboratory indices of autonomic function, orthostatic norepinephrine response, 24-hour natriuresis and peak exercise oxygen consumption. Non-dipping (<10% day-night drop in systolic blood pressure) was found in 55% (n=28). Dippers and non-dippers did not differ in: 1) baseline characteristics including demographic and clinical profile, sleep duration, daytime blood pressure, 24-hour natriuresis, and peak exercise oxygen consumption; 2) severity of laboratory autonomic deficits (sudomotor, cardiovagal and adrenergic); 3) frequency of autonomic neuropathy (7/23 vs. 8/28, P=0.885); 4) supine resting heart rate (75.3±14.0bpm vs. 74.0±13.8bpm, P=0.532); or 5) supine plasma norepinephrine level (250.0±94.9pg/ml vs. 207.0±86.8pg/ml, P=0.08). However, dippers differed significantly from non-dippers in that they had significantly greater orthostatic heart rate increment (43±16bpm vs. 35±10bpm, P=0.007) and significantly greater orthostatic plasma norepinephrine increase (293±136.6pg/ml vs. 209±91.1pg/ml, P=0.028). Our data indicate that in patients with POTS, a non-dipping blood pressure profile is associated with a reduced orthostatic sympathetic reactivity not accounted for by autonomic neuropathy.