Jaime Kulisevsky

Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Scale Presentation and Clinimetric Testing Results

We present a clinimetric assessment of the Movement Disorder Society (MDS)‐sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS). The MDS‐UDPRS Task Force revised and expanded the UPDRS using recommendations from a published critique. The MDS‐UPDRS has four parts, namely, I: Non‐motor Experiences of Daily Living; II: Motor Experiences of Daily Living; III: Motor Examination; IV: Motor Complications. Twenty questions are completed by the patient/caregiver. Item‐specific instructions and an appendix of complementary additional scales are provided. Movement disorder specialists and study coordinators administered the UPDRS (55 items) and MDS‐UPDRS (65 items) to 877 English speaking (78% non‐Latino Caucasian) patients with Parkinsons disease from 39 sites. We compared the two scales using correlative techniques and factor analysis. The MDS‐UPDRS showed high internal consistency (Cronbachs alpha = 0.79–0.93 across parts) and correlated with the original UPDRS (ρ = 0.96). MDS‐UPDRS across‐part correlations ranged from 0.22 to 0.66. Reliable factor structures for each part were obtained (comparative fit index > 0.90 for each part), which support the use of sum scores for each part in preference to a total score of all parts. The combined clinimetric results of this study support the validity of the MDS‐UPDRS for rating PD.

Diagnostic Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson’s Disease: Movement Disorder Society Task Force Guidelines

Mild cognitive impairment is common in nondemented Parkinsons disease (PD) patients and may be a harbinger of dementia. In view of its importance, the Movement Disorder Society commissioned a task force to delineate diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment in PD. The proposed diagnostic criteria are based on a literature review and expert consensus. This article provides guidelines to characterize the clinical syndrome and methods for its diagnosis. The criteria will require validation, and possibly refinement, as additional research improves our understanding of the epidemiology, presentation, neurobiology, assessment, and long‐term course of this clinical syndrome. These diagnostic criteria will support future research efforts to identify at the earliest stage those PD patients at increased risk of progressive cognitive decline and dementia who may benefit from clinical interventions at a predementia stage.

Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Process, format, and clinimetric testing plan.

This article presents the revision process, major innovations, and clinimetric testing program for the Movement Disorder Society (MDS)–sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), known as the MDS‐UPDRS. The UPDRS is the most widely used scale for the clinical study of Parkinsons disease (PD). The MDS previously organized a critique of the UPDRS, which cited many strengths, but recommended revision of the scale to accommodate new advances and to resolve problematic areas. An MDS‐UPDRS committee prepared the revision using the recommendations of the published critique of the scale. Subcommittees developed new material that was reviewed by the entire committee. A 1‐day face‐to‐face committee meeting was organized to resolve areas of debate and to arrive at a working draft ready for clinimetric testing. The MDS‐UPDRS retains the UPDRS structure of four parts with a total summed score, but the parts have been modified to provide a section that integrates nonmotor elements of PD: I, Nonmotor Experiences of Daily Living; II, Motor Experiences of Daily Living; III, Motor Examination; and IV, Motor Complications. All items have five response options with uniform anchors of 0 = normal, 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Several questions in Part I and all of Part II are written as a patient/caregiver questionnaire, so that the total rater time should remain approximately 30 minutes. Detailed instructions for testing and data acquisition accompany the MDS‐UPDRS in order to increase uniform usage. Multiple language editions are planned. A three‐part clinimetric program will provide testing of reliability, validity, and responsiveness to interventions. Although the MDS‐UPDRS will not be published until it has successfully passed clinimetric testing, explanation of the process, key changes, and clinimetric programs allow clinicians and researchers to understand and participate in the revision process.

MDS Task Force on Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson’s disease: Critical Review of PD-MCI

There is controversy regarding the definition and characteristics of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinsons disease. The Movement Disorder Society commissioned a Task Force to critically evaluate the literature and determine the frequency and characteristics of Parkinsons disease–mild cognitive impairment and its association with dementia. A comprehensive PubMed literature review was conducted using systematic inclusion and exclusion criteria. A mean of 26.7% (range, 18.9%–38.2%) of nondemented patients with Parkinsons disease have mild cognitive impairment. The frequency of Parkinsons disease–mild cognitive impairment increases with age, disease duration, and disease severity. Impairments occur in a range of cognitive domains, but single domain impairment is more common than multiple domain impairment, and within single domain impairment, nonamnestic is more common than amnestic impairment. A high proportion of patients with Parkinsons disease–mild cognitive impairment progress to dementia in a relatively short period of time. The primary conclusions of the Task Force are that: (1) Parkinsons disease–mild cognitive impairment is common, (2) there is significant heterogeneity within Parkinsons disease–mild cognitive impairment in the number and types of cognitive domain impairments, (3) Parkinsons disease–mild cognitive impairment appears to place patients at risk of progressing to dementia, and (4) formal diagnostic criteria for Parkinsons disease–mild cognitive impairment are needed.

Long-term results of a multicenter study on subthalamic and pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease†

We report the 5 to 6 year follow‐up of a multicenter study of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in advanced Parkinsons disease (PD) patients. Thirty‐five STN patients and 16 GPi patients were assessed at 5 to 6 years after DBS surgery. Primary outcome measure was the stimulation effect on the motor Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) assessed with a prospective cross‐over double‐blind assessment without medications (stimulation was randomly switched on or off). Secondary outcomes were motor UPDRS changes with unblinded assessments in off‐ and on‐medication states with and without stimulation, activities of daily living (ADL), anti‐PD medications, and dyskinesias. In double‐blind assessment, both STN and GPi DBS were significantly effective in improving the motor UPDRS scores (STN, P < 0.0001, 45.4%; GPi, P = 0.008, 20.0%) compared with off‐stimulation, regardless of the sequence of stimulation. In open assessment, both STN‐ and GPi‐DBS significantly improved the off‐medication motor UPDRS when compared with before surgery (STN, P < 0.001, 50.5%; GPi, P = 0.002, 35.6%). Dyskinesias and ADL were significantly improved in both groups. Anti‐PD medications were significantly reduced only in the STN group. Adverse events were more frequent in the STN group. These results confirm the long‐term efficacy of STN and GPi DBS in advanced PD. Although the surgical targets were not randomized, there was a trend to a better outcome of motor signs in the STN‐DBS patients and fewer adverse events in the GPi‐DBS group.

Penetrance of FMR1 premutation associated pathologies in fragile X syndrome families

Within the past few years, there has been a significant change in identifying and characterizing the FMR1 premutation associated phenotypes. The premutation has been associated with elevated FMR1 mRNA levels and slight to moderate reductions in FMRP levels. Furthermore, it has been established that ∼20% of female premutation carriers present primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) and that fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) occurs in one-third of all male premutation carriers older than 50 years. Besides POI and FXTAS, new disorders have recently been described among individuals (especially females) with the FMR1 premutation. Those pathologies include thyroid disease, hypertension, seizures, peripheral neuropathy, and fibromyalgia. However there are few reports related to FXTAS penetrance among female premutation carriers or regarding these disorders recently associated to the FMR1 premutation. Therefore, we have evaluated 398 fragile X syndrome (FXS) families in an attempt to provide an estimation of the premutation associated phenotypes penetrance. Our results show that signs of FXTAS are detected in 16.5% of female premutation carriers and in 45.5% of premutated males older than 50 years. Furthermore, among females with the FMR1 premutation, penetrance of POI, thyroid disease and chronic muscle pain is 18.6, 15.9 and 24.4%, respectively. The knowledge of this data might be useful for accurate genetic counselling as well as for a better characterization of the clinical phenotypes of FMR1 premutation carriers.

Parkinson's disease-cognitive rating scale: a new cognitive scale specific for Parkinson's disease.

Cognitive defects associated with cortical pathology may be a marker of dementia in Parkinsons disease (PD). There is a need to improve the diagnostic criteria of PD dementia (PDD) and to clarify the cognitive impairment patterns associated with PD. Current neuropsychological batteries designed for PD are focused on fronto‐subcortical deficits but are not sensitive for cortical dysfunction. We developed a new scale, the Parkinsons Disease‐Cognitive Rating Scale (PD‐CRS), that was designed to cover the full spectrum of cognitive defects associated with PD. We prospectively studied 92 PD patients [30 cognitively intact (CogInt), 30 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 32 PDD] and 61 matched controls who completed the PD‐CRS and neuropsychological tests assessing the cognitive domains included in the PD‐CRS. Acceptability, construct validity, reliability, and the discriminative properties of the PD‐CRS were examined. The PD‐CRS included items assessing fronto‐subcortical defects and items assessing cortical dysfunction. Construct validity, test‐retest and inter‐rater reliability of PD‐CRS total scores showed an intraclass correlation coefficient >0.70. The PD‐CRS showed an excellent test accuracy to diagnose PDD (sensitivity 94%, specificity 94%). The PD‐CRS total scores and confrontation naming item scores‐assessing “cortical” dysfunction—independently differentiated PDD from non‐demented PD. Alternating verbal fluency and delayed verbal memory independently differentiated the MCI group from both controls and CogInt. The PD‐CRS appeared to be a reliable and valid PD‐specific battery that accurately diagnosed PDD and detected subtle fronto‐subcortical deficits. Performance on the PD‐CRS showed that PDD is characterized by the addition of cortical dysfunction upon a predominant and progressive fronto‐subcortical impairment.

Role of dopamine in learning and memory: implications for the treatment of cognitive dysfunction in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Along with dementia, Parkinson’s disease (PD) is associated with subtle but widespread cognitive impairment even in the absence of clinically apparent cognitive decline. Many of the deficits are reminiscent of those observed in patients with lesions of the prefrontal cortex, that is, failure in executive function that involves skills required for anticipation, planning, initiation and monitoring of goal-directed behaviours. This paper reviews the dopaminergic brain circuitry, and preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the regulation of prefrontal cortex activity by dopamine, and the role of dopamine in cognitive impairment in patients with PD. It addresses the need to integrate these facts and the findings of positive, neutral or detrimental frontal cognitive response to dopaminergic drugs in PD which should be viewed mainly in the context of methodological differences for subject selection.The cognitive effect of levodopa does not much depend on a neuropsychological specificity of the drug, the years of evolution of the disease or the severity of the motor signs. Instead, it may be a function of the level of dopamine depletion in different parts of the basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex. Consequently, dopaminergic agents may enhance cognitive functions in some patients and impair them in others. De novo patients tend to improve during the first year of treatment; stable responders to oral levodopa tend to show no changes; and wearing-off responders tend to deteriorate with acute levodopa challenge. Enhancement and impairment of cognitive function with dopaminergic treatment is incomplete and task-specific, suggesting the need to integrate the above dopamine facts with other neurotransmitter systems findings in PD. Meanwhile, such cognitive dissociation can be useful in refining the definition of the cognitive deficit in PD patients without dementia and emphasising the need to develop new and specific strategies for treatment.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder associated with brain lesions Clinical phenomenology, cognitive function, and anatomic correlates

We studied the behavioral, cognitive, and neuroimaging characteristics of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in 13 patients with focal brain lesions (acquired OCD) and compared their clinical features and the severity of obsessive and compulsive (OC) symptoms with patients with idiopathic OCD. Both OCD groups were further compared with matched normal controls on a series of neuropsychological tests. Patients with acquired OCD had a negative familial history and later age at onset of OCD symptoms than patients with idiopathic OCD. The two OCD groups showed relatively similar clinical phenomenology, severity of OC symptoms, and profile of neuropsychological deficits. Compared with normal control subjects, both OCD groups showed cognitive deficits affecting attention, intellectual function, memory, word retrieval, and motor and executive functions. Eight of the 13 patients with acquired OCD had abnormal neurologic examinations, whereas only 3 of the 13 patients with idiopathic OCD had abnormal neurologic examinations. Neuroimaging in the acquired OCD group disclosed a variety of lesions involving exclusively the cerebral cortex (frontal, temporal, or cingulate regions), the basal ganglia, or both. These results suggest that acquired and idiopathic OCDs may share a common pathophysiologic mechanism, and that structural damage to specific frontal-limbic-subcortical circuits plays an important role in the pathogenesis of acquired OCD. NEUROLOGY 1996;47: 353-361

Apathy in Parkinson's disease: clinical features, neural substrates, diagnosis, and treatment

Normal maintenance of human motivation depends on the integrity of subcortical structures that link the prefrontal cortex with the limbic system. Structural and functional disruption of different networks within these circuits alters the maintenance of spontaneous mental activity and the capacity of affected individuals to associate emotions with complex stimuli. The clinical manifestations of these changes include a continuum of abnormalities in goal-oriented behaviours known as apathy. Apathy is highly prevalent in Parkinsons disease (and across many neurodegenerative disorders) and can severely affect the quality of life of both patients and caregivers. Differentiation of apathy from depression, and discrimination of its cognitive, emotional, and auto-activation components could guide an individualised approach to the treatment of symptoms. The opportunity to manipulate dopaminergic treatment in Parkinsons disease allows researchers to study a continuous range of motivational states, from apathy to impulse control disorders. Parkinsons disease can thus be viewed as a model that provides insight into the neural substrates of apathy.