Jakob M. Riedl
Medical University of Graz
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jakob M. Riedl.
OncoImmunology | 2018
Florian Posch; Karina Silina; Sebastian Leibl; Axel Mündlein; Holger Moch; Alexander Siebenhüner; Panagiotis Samaras; Jakob M. Riedl; Michael Stotz; Joanna Szkandera; Martin Pichler; Roger Stupp; Maries van den Broek; Peter Schraml; Armin Gerger; Ulf Petrausch; Thomas Winder
ABSTRACT Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are associated with favorable outcome in non-metastatic colorectal carcinoma (nmCRC), but the dynamics of TLS maturation and its association with effective anti-tumor immune surveillance in nmCRC are unclear. Here, we hypothesized that not only the number of TLS but also their composition harbors information on recurrence risk in nmCRC. In a comprehensive molecular, tissue, laboratory, and clinical analysis of 109 patients with stage II/III nmCRC, we assessed TLS numbers and degree of maturation in surgical specimens by multi-parameter immunofluorescence of follicular dendritic cell (FDC) and germinal center (GC) markers. TLS formed in most tumors and were significantly more prevalent in highly-microsatellite-instable (MSI-H) and/or BRAF-mutant nmCRC. We could distinguish three sequential TLS maturation stages which were characterized by increasing prevalence of FDCs and mature B-cells: [1] Early TLS, composed of dense lymphocytic aggregates without FDCs, [2] Primary follicle-like TLS, having FDCs but no GC reaction, and [3] Secondary follicle-like TLS, having an active GC reaction. A simple integrated TLS immunoscore reflecting these parameters identified a large subgroup of nmCRC patients with a very low risk of recurrence independently of clinical co-variables such as ECOG performance status, age, stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy. We conclude that (1) mismatch repair and BRAF mutation status are associated with the formation of TLS in nmCRC, (2) TLS formation in nmCRC follows sequential maturation steps, culminating in germinal center formation, and (3) this maturation process harbors important prognostic information on the risk of disease recurrence.
Oncotarget | 2017
Jakob M. Riedl; Florian Posch; Florian Moik; Angelika Bezan; Joanna Szkandera; Maria Anna Smolle; Anne-Katrin Kasparek; Martin Pichler; Michael Stotz; Armin Gerger
Introduction Inflammatory biomarkers are useful prognostic tools in cancer patients. However, the prognostic and predictive value of inflammatory biomarkers beyond the 1st-line setting in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is unclear. Results In multivariate analysis 1 standard deviation increase in neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR) was associated with an 8.5% absolute lower objective-response-rate (ORR) in 1st-line (p<0.0001), 3% lower ORR in 2nd-line (p< 0.0001), and 3% lower ORR in 3rd-line (p=0.24), respectively. Regarding progression free survival (PFS), an increase in the NLR was significantly associated with rising hazard-ratios (HR) over all treatment lines (HR=1.30, p= 0.021 1st-line); (HR=1.37, p<0.0001 2nd-line); (HR=1.44, p=0.042 3rd-line). The platelet-lymphocyte-ratio (PLR) was associated with 6-month PFS over all three treatment lines. Higher C-reactive-protein (CRP) predicted for worse PFS in the first two chemotherapy lines and in best supportive care (BSC). (HR=1.49 (p<0.0001 1st-line); HR=1.25 (p=0.007 2nd-line); HR=1.09 (95%CI 0.81–1.48, p=0.552 3rd-line and HR=1.43 (p= 0.002 in BSC)). Methods Two-hundred-fifty-eight patients with mCRC undergoing palliative chemo(immuno-)therapy were retrospectively included. Primary endpoints were 6-month PFS and ORR during 1st-line, 2nd-line, and 3rd-line treatment, and 6-month overall survival during BSC. Conclusion This study shows that inflammatory biomarkers are useful predictors of disease outcome and treatment response over several treatment lines in mCRC patients.
Ejso | 2016
V. Kainhofer; Maria Anna Smolle; Joanna Szkandera; Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger; Werner Maurer-Ertl; Armin Gerger; Jakob M. Riedl; Andreas Leithner
Anticancer Research | 2017
Michael Stotz; Sereina A. Herzog; Martin Pichler; Maria Anna Smolle; Jakob M. Riedl; Christopher Rossmann; Angelika Bezan; Wilfried Renner; Andrea Berghold; Armin Gerger
Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2018
Florian Posch; Richard Partl; Carmen Döller; Jakob M. Riedl; Maria Anna Smolle; Lukas Leitner; Marko Bergovec; Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger; Michael Stotz; Angelika Bezan; Armin Gerger; Martin Pichler; Karin S. Kapp; Andreas Leithner; Joanna Szkandera
BMC Cancer | 2017
Jakob M. Riedl; Florian Posch; Angelika Bezan; Joanna Szkandera; Maria Anna Smolle; Thomas Winder; Christopher Rossmann; Renate Schaberl-Moser; Martin Pichler; Michael Stotz; Armin Gerger
Ejso | 2018
Maria Anna Smolle; Veroniek M. van Praag; Florian Posch; Marko Bergovec; Lukas Leitner; Jörg Friesenbichler; Ronald Heregger; Jakob M. Riedl; Martin Pichler; Armin Gerger; Joanna Szkandera; Freyja-Maria Smolle-Jüttner; Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger; Marta Fiocco; Michiel A. J. van de Sande; Andreas Leithner
Annals of Oncology | 2018
Andreas Leithner; V van Praag; Florian Posch; Marko Bergovec; Lukas Leitner; Jörg Friesenbichler; R Heregger; F-M Smolle-Jüttner; M. Fiocco; M. A. J. van de Sande; Jakob M. Riedl; Martin Pichler; Armin Gerger; Joanna Szkandera; Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger; Maria Anna Smolle
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Florian Moik; Jakob M. Riedl; Thomas Winder; Angelika Bezan; Christopher Rossmann; Joanna Szkandera; Anne-Katrin Kasparek; Renate Schaberl-Moser; Martin Pichler; Michael Stotz; Armin Gerger; Florian Posch
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Florian Posch; Karina Silina; Ulf Petrausch; Sebastian Leibl; Axel Muendlein; Holger Moch; Alexander Rheinhard Siebenhuener; Bernhard C. Pestalozzi; Jakob M. Riedl; Michael Stotz; Joanna Szkandera; Martin Pichler; Roger Stupp; Peter Schraml; Armin Gerger; Thomas Winder