Jakob Nilsson

The APC/C maintains the spindle assembly checkpoint by targeting Cdc20 for destruction

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is required to block sister chromatid separation until all chromosomes are properly attached to the mitotic apparatus. The SAC prevents cells from entering anaphase by inhibiting the ubiquitylation of cyclin B1 and securin by the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) ubiquitin ligase. The target of the SAC is the essential APC/C activator Cdc20. It is unclear how the SAC inactivates Cdc20 but most current models suggest that Cdc20 forms a stable complex with the Mad2 checkpoint protein. Here we show that most Cdc20 is not in a complex with Mad2; instead Mad2 is required for Cdc20 to form a complex with another checkpoint protein, BubR1. We further show that during the SAC, the APC/C ubiquitylates Cdc20 to target it for degradation. Thus, ubiquitylation of human Cdc20 is not required to release it from the checkpoint complex, but to degrade it to maintain mitotic arrest.

Regulation of eukaryotic translation by the RACK1 protein: a platform for signalling molecules on the ribosome

The receptor for activated C‐kinase (RACK1) is a scaffold protein that is able to interact simultaneously with several signalling molecules. It binds to protein kinases and membrane‐bound receptors in a regulated fashion. Interestingly, RACK1 is also a constituent of the eukaryotic ribosome, and a recent cryo‐electron microscopy study localized it to the head region of the 40S subunit in the vicinity of the messenger RNA (mRNA) exit channel. RACK1 recruits activated protein kinase C to the ribosome, which leads to the stimulation of translation through the phosphorylation of initiation factor 6 and, potentially, of mRNA‐associated proteins. RACK1 therefore links signal‐transduction pathways directly to the ribosome, which allows translation to be regulated in response to cell stimuli. In addition, the fact that RACK1 associates with membrane‐bound receptors indicates that it promotes the docking of ribosomes at sites where local translation is required, such as focal adhesions.

Identification of the versatile scaffold protein RACK1 on the eukaryotic ribosome by cryo-EM

RACK1 serves as a scaffold protein for a wide range of kinases and membrane-bound receptors. It is a WD-repeat family protein and is predicted to have a β-propeller architecture with seven blades like a Gβ protein. Mass spectrometry studies have identified its association with the small subunit of eukaryotic ribosomes and, most recently, it has been shown to regulate initiation by recruiting protein kinase C to the 40S subunit. Here we present the results of a cryo-EM study of the 80S ribosome that positively locate RACK1 on the head region of the 40S subunit, in the immediate vicinity of the mRNA exit channel. One face of RACK1 exposes the WD-repeats as a platform for interactions with kinases and receptors. Using this platform, RACK1 can recruit other proteins to the ribosome.

Structures of modified eEF2.80S ribosome complexes reveal the role of GTP hydrolysis in translocation.

On the basis of kinetic data on ribosome protein synthesis, the mechanical energy for translocation of the mRNA–tRNA complex is thought to be provided by GTP hydrolysis of an elongation factor (eEF2 in eukaryotes, EF‐G in bacteria). We have obtained cryo‐EM reconstructions of eukaryotic ribosomes complexed with ADP‐ribosylated eEF2 (ADPR‐eEF2), before and after GTP hydrolysis, providing a structural basis for analyzing the GTPase‐coupled mechanism of translocation. Using the ADP‐ribosyl group as a distinct marker, we observe conformational changes of ADPR‐eEF2 that are due strictly to GTP hydrolysis. These movements are likely representative of native eEF2 motions in a physiological context and are sufficient to uncouple the mRNA–tRNA complex from two universally conserved bases in the ribosomal decoding center (A1492 and A1493 in Escherichia coli) during translocation. Interpretation of these data provides a detailed two‐step model of translocation that begins with the eEF2/EF‐G binding‐induced ratcheting motion of the small ribosomal subunit. GTP hydrolysis then uncouples the mRNA–tRNA complex from the decoding center so translocation of the mRNA–tRNA moiety may be completed by a head rotation of the small subunit.

Direct binding between BubR1 and B56–PP2A phosphatase complexes regulate mitotic progression

Summary BubR1 is a central component of the spindle assembly checkpoint that inhibits progression into anaphase in response to improper kinetochore–microtubule interactions. In addition, BubR1 also helps stabilize kinetochore–microtubule interactions by counteracting the Aurora B kinase but the mechanism behind this is not clear. Here we show that BubR1 directly binds to the B56 family of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) regulatory subunits through a conserved motif that is phosphorylated by cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) and polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1). Two highly conserved hydrophobic residues surrounding the serine 670 Cdk1 phosphorylation site are required for B56 binding. Mutation of these residues prevents the establishment of a proper metaphase plate and delays cells in mitosis. Furthermore, we show that phosphorylation of serines 670 and 676 stimulates the binding of B56 to BubR1 and that BubR1 targets a pool of B56 to kinetochores. Our data suggest that BubR1 counteracts Aurora B kinase activity at improperly attached kinetochores by recruiting B56–PP2A phosphatase complexes.

CRM1 Mediates the Export of ADAR1 through a Nuclear Export Signal within the Z-DNA Binding Domain

ABSTRACT RNA editing of specific residues by adenosine deamination is a nuclear process catalyzed by adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADAR). Different promoters in the ADAR1 gene give rise to two forms of the protein: a constitutive promoter expresses a transcript encoding (c)ADAR1, and an interferon-induced promoter expresses a transcript encoding an N-terminally extended form, (i)ADAR1. Here we show that (c)ADAR1 is primarily nuclear whereas (i)ADAR1 encompasses a functional nuclear export signal in the N-terminal part and is a nucleocytoplasmic shuttle protein. Mutation of the nuclear export signal or treatment with the CRM1-specific drug leptomycin B induces nuclear accumulation of (i)ADAR1 fused to the green fluorescent protein and increases the nuclear editing activity. In concurrence, CRM1 and RanGTP interact specifically with the (i)ADAR1 nuclear export signal to form a tripartite export complex in vitro. Furthermore, our data imply that nuclear import of (i)ADAR1 is mediated by at least two nuclear localization sequences. These results suggest that the nuclear editing activity of (i)ADAR1 is modulated by nuclear export.

A synthetic HIV-1 Rev inhibitor interfering with the CRM1-mediated nuclear export

The HIV-1 Rev protein is an essential regulator of the HIV-1 mRNA expression that promotes the export of unspliced and partially spliced mRNA. The export receptor for the leucine-rich nuclear export signal (NES) of Rev has recently been recognized as CRM1. We identified a low molecular weight compound PKF050-638 as an inhibitor of HIV-1 Rev. This drug inhibits in a dose-dependent fashion Rev-dependent mRNA expression in a cellular assay for Rev function. We show that PKF050-638 is an inhibitor of the CRM1-mediated Rev nuclear export. By using a quantitative in vitro CRM1-NES cargo-binding assay, we could demonstrate that PKF050-638 disrupts CRM1-NES interaction. This mode of action is confirmed in cell culture because the drug reversibly interferes with the colocalization of CRM1 and Rev in the nucleolus of the cell. In addition, we prove that the inhibition is through direct interaction of the compound with Cys-539 of CRM1. These effects are similar to those of the known CRM1 inhibitor leptomycin B and suggest that the inhibitory effect of the compound is caused by binding to CRM1 at a similar site. The compound displayed strict structural requirements for its activity, as its enantiomer was inactive in all assays tested. These results show that we identified a drug that interferes with the CRM1-mediated nuclear export of Rev through inhibition of the CRM1-NES complex formation. The reversibility of its binding to CRM1 and its availability through chemical synthesis could make it useful for studying CRM1-mediated export pathways.

DNA damage–inducible SUMOylation of HERC2 promotes RNF8 binding via a novel SUMO-binding Zinc finger

SUMOylation of the ubiquitin ligase HERC2 promotes efficient chromatin licensing in the vicinity of DNA double-strand breaks.

Structure of a Blinkin-BUBR1 Complex Reveals an Interaction Crucial for Kinetochore-Mitotic Checkpoint Regulation via an Unanticipated Binding Site

Summary The maintenance of genomic stability relies on the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which ensures accurate chromosome segregation by delaying the onset of anaphase until all chromosomes are properly bioriented and attached to the mitotic spindle. BUB1 and BUBR1 kinases are central for this process and by interacting with Blinkin, link the SAC with the kinetochore, the macromolecular assembly that connects microtubules with centromeric DNA. Here, we identify the Blinkin motif critical for interaction with BUBR1, define the stoichiometry and affinity of the interaction, and present a 2.2 Å resolution crystal structure of the complex. The structure defines an unanticipated BUBR1 region responsible for the interaction and reveals a novel Blinkin motif that undergoes a disorder-to-order transition upon ligand binding. We also show that substitution of several BUBR1 residues engaged in binding Blinkin leads to defects in the SAC, thus providing the first molecular details of the recognition mechanism underlying kinetochore-SAC signaling.

A minimal number of MELT repeats supports all the functions of KNL1 in chromosome segregation.

ABSTRACT The Bub1–Bub3 and BubR1–Bub3 checkpoint complexes, or the Bubs, contribute to the accurate segregation of chromosomes during mitosis by promoting chromosome bi-orientation and halting exit from mitosis if this fails. The complexes associate with kinetochores during mitosis, which is required for proper chromosome segregation. The outer kinetochore protein KNL1 (also known as CASC5, Blinkin and AF15Q14) is the receptor for Bub proteins, but the exact nature of the functional binding sites on KNL1 are yet to be determined. Here, we show that KNL1 contains multiple binding sites for the Bub proteins, with the Mps1-phosphorylated MELT repeats constituting individual functional docking sites for direct binding of Bub3. Surprisingly, chromosome congression and the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) are still functional when KNL1 is deleted of all but four of its twelve MELT repeats. Systematically reducing the number of MELT repeats to less than four reduced KNL1 functionality. Furthermore, we show that protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) binding to KNL1 during prometaphase reduces the levels of Bub proteins at kinetochores to approximately the level recruited by four active MELT repeats.