Jakub Fischbach

Chromogranin A – unspecific neuroendocrine marker. Clinical utility and potential diagnostic pitfalls

Chromogranin A, despite a number of limitations, is still the most valuable marker of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Granins belong to the family of acidic proteins that constitute a major component of secretory granules of various endocrine and neuroendocrine cells, which are components of both the classical endocrine glands and the diffuse neuroendocrine system. These cells are a potential source of transformation into neuroendocrine tumors. The awareness of potential causes influencing the false results of its concentrations simplifies diagnosis and treatment. One of the disadvantages of this marker is its non-specificity and the existence of a number of pathological processes leading to an increase in its concentration, which often results in confusion and diagnostic difficulties. The molecular structure is characterized by a number of sites susceptible to the proteolytic activity of enzymes, resulting in the formation of a number of biologically active peptides. Presumably they act as precursors of active proteins. Chromogranin expression correlates with the amount of secretory vesicles in neuroendocrine cells. The peptide chain during biochemical changes becomes a precursor of biologically active proteins with a wide range of activities. There are a number of commercially available kits for the determination of chromogranin A, which differ in methodology. We present the evaluation of chromogranin A as a marker of neuroendocrine tumors in clinical practice and the possible factors that may affect the outcome of its concentration.

Familial syndromes associated with neuroendocrine tumours.

Neuroendocrine tumours may be associated with familial syndromes. At least eight inherited syndromes predisposing to endocrine neoplasia have been identified. Two of these are considered to be major factors predisposing to benign and malignant endocrine tumours, designated multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and type 2 (MEN1 and MEN2). Five other autosomal dominant diseases show more heterogeneous clinical patterns, such as the Carney complex, hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumour syndrome, Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHL), neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and tuberous sclerosis. The molecular and cellular interactions underlying the development of most endocrine cells and related organs represent one of the more complex pathways not yet to be deciphered. Almost all endocrine cells are derived from the endoderm and neuroectoderm. It is suggested that within the first few weeks of human development there are complex interactions between, firstly, the major genes involved in the initiation of progenitor-cell differentiation, secondly, factors secreted by the surrounding mesenchyme, and thirdly, a series of genes controlling cell differentiation, proliferation and migration. Together these represent a formula for the harmonious development of endocrine glands and tissue.

Management of the hormonal syndrome of neuroendocrine tumors

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP/NET) are unusual and rare neoplasms that present many clinical challenges. They characteristically synthesize store and secrete a variety of peptides and neuroamines which can lead to the development of distinct clinical syndrome, however many are clinically silent until late presentation with mass effects. Management strategies include surgery cure and cytoreduction with the use of somatostatin analogues. Somatostatin have a broad range of biological actions that include inhibition of exocrine and endocrine secretions, gut motility, cell proliferation, cell survival and angiogenesis. Five somatostatin receptors (SSTR1-SSTR5) have been cloned and characterized. Somatostatin analogues include octreotide and lanreotide are effective medical tools in the treatment and present selectivity for SSTR2 and SSTR5. During treatment is seen disapperance of flushing, normalization of bowel movements and reduction of serotonin and 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5-HIAA) secretion. Telotristat represents a novel approach by specifically inhibiting serotonin synthesis and as such, is a promising potential new treatment for patients with carcinoid syndrome. To pancreatic functionig neuroendocrine tumors belongs insulinoma, gastrinoma, glucagonoma and VIP-oma. Medical management in patients with insulinoma include diazoxide which suppresses insulin release. Also mTOR inhibitors may inhibit insulin secretion. Treatment of gastrinoma include both proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine H2 – receptor antagonists. In patients with glucagonomas hyperglycaemia can be controlled using insulin and oral blood glucose lowering drugs. In malignant glucagonomas smatostatin analogues are effective in controlling necrolytic migratory erythemia. Severe cases of the VIP-oma syndrome require supplementation of fluid losses. Octreotide reduce tumoral VIP secretion and control secretory diarrhoea.

Contemporary methods of therapy and follow-up of neuroendocrine tumours of the gastrointestinal tract and the pancreas.

The growing interest in neuroendocrine tumours is due to the dynamic growth of detection of this type of cancer. Neuroendocrine tumours (neuroendocrine neoplasms – NENs / neuroendocrine tumours – NETs) derive from glands, groups of endocrine cells and diffuse neuroendocrine system cells. Mainly they derive from the gastrointestinal tract (gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumours – GEP-NETs). Currently the modified WHO classification from 2010 is widely used. An important element in the choice of treatment is histological maturity based on mitotic activity and on assessment of proliferation activity (Ki-67). The treatment of choice is surgery. In most cases, complete surgical removal is impossible because of the advanced staging at the time of diagnosis. In well-differentiated neoplasms where the expression of somatostatin receptors is expected, patients are qualified for somatostatin analogues therapy. Poorly differentiated lesions are qualified for chemotherapy. In the guidelines of ENETS (European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society) from 2007 the rules concerning monitoring depending on the WHO classification were specified.

Clinical features of gastroenteropancreatic tumours

Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) endocrine tumours (carcinoids and pancreatic islet cell tumours) are composed of multipotent neuroendocrine cells that exhibit a unique ability to produce, store, and secrete biologically active substances and cause distinct clinical syndromes. The classification of GEP tumours as functioning or non-functioning is based on the presence of symptoms that accompany these syndromes secondary to the secretion of hormones, neuropeptides and/or neurotransmitters (functioning tumours). Non-functioning tumours are considered to be neoplasms of neuroendocrine differentiation that are not associated with obvious symptoms attributed to the hypersecretion of metabolically active substances. However, a number of these tumours are either capable of producing low levels of such substances, which can be detected by immunohistochemistry but are insufficient to cause symptoms related to a clinical syndrome, or alternatively, they may secrete substances that are either metabolically inactive or inappropriately processed. In some cases, GEP tumours are not associated with the production of any hormone or neurotransmitter. Both functioning and non-functioning tumours can also produce symptoms due to mass effects compressing vital surrounding structures. Gastroenteropancreatic tumours are usually classified further according to the anatomic site of origin: foregut (including respiratory tract, thymus, stomach, duodenum, and pancreas), midgut (including small intestine, appendix, and right colon), and hindgut (including transverse colon, sigmoid, and rectum). Within these subgroups the biological and clinical characteristics of the tumours vary considerably, but this classification is still in use because a significant number of previous studies, mainly observational, have used it extensively.

Lack of TSH stimulation in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer - possible causes.

Differentiated thyroid cancer is one of the most common endocrine cancers. Typical standard treatment includes total thyroidectomy with partial lymphadenectomy, then depending on the indications, treatment with iodine isotope 131-I. A prerequisite to conduct the therapy is to obtain endogenic thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) stimulation (TSH > 30 µU/ml). We describe two patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma in whom no rise in serum TSH was observed after withdrawal of thyroxine. In one patient TSH deficiency was due to partial hypopituitarism secondary to a tumor of the pituitary gland. In the second patient the TSH level was suppressed by metabolically active thyroid tissue within bilateral ovarian teratomas. The problems with TSH growth after withdrawal of thyroxine requires additional studies to identify the cause. Above two possible reasons for the lack of TSH stimulation after withdrawal of thyroxine were presented. In the case of non-TSH stimulation due to hypopituitarism both control tests and isotope treatment should be carried out using stimulation by recombinant human TSH (rhTSH).

Hindgut neuroendocrine neoplasms – characteristics and prognosis

Introduction The aim of the study was to analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of hindgut-rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms. Material and methods The study included 38 patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who were treated at the Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland from February 2010 to December 2015. The clinicopathological data were retrospectively reviewed, extracted, analyzed, and patients were followed up to determine their survival status. Follow-up data were available for all 38 patients. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the prognostic factors significantly associated with overall survival. Results The tumors occurred mostly in the middle and lower rectum, and the most typical symptoms experienced by patients were hematochezia and diarrhea. The median distance between the tumors and the anal edges was 4.7 ±1.3 cm, and the median diameter of the tumors was 0.9 ±1.2 cm. The major pathological types were neuroendocrine neoplasm G1 in 31 patients, and neuroendocrine neoplasm G2 in 7 patients. Tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stages I, II, III and IV tumors accounted for 76.3% (29/38), 5.3% (2/38), 7.9% (3/38) and 10.5% (4/38) of patients, respectively. The main treatment method was transanal extended excision or endoscopic resection. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of the whole group of patients were 100%, 83.7%, and 75.3%, respectively. Conclusions Univariate analysis showed that age (p = 0.022), tumor diameter (p < 0.001), histological type (p < 0.001), and TNM stage (p < 0.001) were all prognostic factors.

Pulsatility index in carotid arteries is increased in levothyroxine-treated Hashimoto disease.

The aim of this case-control study was to evaluate carotid hemodynamic variables and traditional cardiovascular risk factors in women with Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT). The study group consisted of 31 females with HT on levothyroxine (L-T4) and 26 euthyroid women with HT without L-T4 matched for age and body mass index (BMI) as controls. Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), carotid extra-media thickness (CEMT), and pulsatility indexes in common carotid artery (PI CCA) and in internal carotid artery (PI ICA) were measured. BMI, waist circumference, lipid profile, fasting glucose and insulin levels, and parameters of thyroid function [TSH, free thyroxine (FT4) and antithyroperoxidase antibodies (TPOAbs)] were assessed. The study and the control groups did not differ in age, BMI, waist circumference, lipid profile, fasting glucose, and insulin levels. Results are expressed as median (IQR). Treated HT group had higher FT4 levels than nontreated [17.13 (5.11) pmol/l vs. 14.7 (2.27) pmol/l; p=0.0011] and similar TSH [1.64 (2.08) IU/ml vs. 2.07 (3.14) IU/ml; p=0.5915]. PI CCA and PI ICA were higher in the study group than in controls (p=0.0224 and p=0.0477, respectively). The difference remained statistically significant for PI ICA and PI CCA after adjustment for other variables (coefficient=0.09487; standard error=0.04438; p=0.037 and coefficient=0.1786; standard error=0.0870; p=0.0449, respectively). CIMT and CEMT were similar in both groups (p=0.8746 and p=0.0712, respectively). Women with HT on L-T4 replacement therapy have increased PI in common and internal carotid arteries than nontreated euthyroid HT patients. Therefore, it seems that hypothyroidism, but not autoimmune thyroiditis per se, influences arterial stiffness.

Purification of pituitary autoantigen by column liquid chromatography and chromatofocusing

Introduction Pituitary autoantibodies can be determined both in patients with pituitary disease as well as patients with autoimmune endocrine diseases. The purpose of the study was to isolate and purify pituitary autoantigen using sera of patients and the microsomal fraction of the pituitary. Material and methods To isolate a pituitary autoantigen, patient sera were used, which showed a strong immune response to pituitary antigens. Pituitary microsomal fractions were prepared from pituitary tissue homogenates. In the study, sera of patients with pituitary disease, Addison and Graves’ disease were used. The initial stages were carried out by affinity chromatography on CN -Br sepharose column whereas purification was continued by column liquid chromatography on AcA54 Ultrogel. Chromatofocusing was performed by Polybuffer exchanger PBE 94. Results 125I-labeled pituitary antigens after isolation appeared in column chromatography in three peaks. The first peak contained 50-70 kDa proteins, the second peak – 17 to 22 kDa proteins and the third peak contains 125-iodides. Three fractions obtained from filtration on Ultrogel were separated in a polyacrylamide gel. In the first peak two bands 67 and 55 kDa appeared. The second peak contained low molecular weight substances, and the third peak contained 125I. The first peak from Ultrogel was isolated by chromatofocusing – the first peak with pH 5.9 and the second one with pH 4.9. Conclusions Isolation and purification of pituitary autoantigen with the use of column liquid chromatography and chromatofocusing resulted in obtainment of two antigenic proteins of specific gravity of 67 and 55 kDa.