Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where James A. Overton is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by James A. Overton.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2015

The immune epitope database (IEDB) 3.0

Randi Vita; James A. Overton; Jason Greenbaum; Julia V. Ponomarenko; Jason D. Clark; Jason R. Cantrell; Daniel K. Wheeler; Joseph L. Gabbard; Deborah Hix; Alessandro Sette; Bjoern Peters

The IEDB, www.iedb.org, contains information on immune epitopes—the molecular targets of adaptive immune responses—curated from the published literature and submitted by National Institutes of Health funded epitope discovery efforts. From 2004 to 2012 the IEDB curation of journal articles published since 1960 has caught up to the present day, with >95% of relevant published literature manually curated amounting to more than 15 000 journal articles and more than 704 000 experiments to date. The revised curation target since 2012 has been to make recent research findings quickly available in the IEDB and thereby ensure that it continues to be an up-to-date resource. Having gathered a comprehensive dataset in the IEDB, a complete redesign of the query and reporting interface has been performed in the IEDB 3.0 release to improve how end users can access this information in an intuitive and biologically accurate manner. We here present this most recent release of the IEDB and describe the user testing procedures as well as the use of external ontologies that have enabled it.


PLOS ONE | 2016

The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations

Anita Bandrowski; Ryan R. Brinkman; Mathias Brochhausen; Matthew H. Brush; Bill Bug; Marcus C. Chibucos; Kevin Clancy; Mélanie Courtot; Dirk Derom; Michel Dumontier; Liju Fan; Jennifer Fostel; Gilberto Fragoso; Frank Gibson; Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran; Melissa Haendel; Yongqun He; Mervi Heiskanen; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Mark Jensen; Yu Lin; Allyson L. Lister; Phillip Lord; James P. Malone; Elisabetta Manduchi; Monnie McGee; Norman Morrison; James A. Overton; Helen Parkinson; Bjoern Peters

The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI) is an ontology that provides terms with precisely defined meanings to describe all aspects of how investigations in the biological and medical domains are conducted. OBI re-uses ontologies that provide a representation of biomedical knowledge from the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) project and adds the ability to describe how this knowledge was derived. We here describe the state of OBI and several applications that are using it, such as adding semantic expressivity to existing databases, building data entry forms, and enabling interoperability between knowledge resources. OBI covers all phases of the investigation process, such as planning, execution and reporting. It represents information and material entities that participate in these processes, as well as roles and functions. Prior to OBI, it was not possible to use a single internally consistent resource that could be applied to multiple types of experiments for these applications. OBI has made this possible by creating terms for entities involved in biological and medical investigations and by importing parts of other biomedical ontologies such as GO, Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) and Phenotype Attribute and Trait Ontology (PATO) without altering their meaning. OBI is being used in a wide range of projects covering genomics, multi-omics, immunology, and catalogs of services. OBI has also spawned other ontologies (Information Artifact Ontology) and methods for importing parts of ontologies (Minimum information to reference an external ontology term (MIREOT)). The OBI project is an open cross-disciplinary collaborative effort, encompassing multiple research communities from around the globe. To date, OBI has created 2366 classes and 40 relations along with textual and formal definitions. The OBI Consortium maintains a web resource (http://obi-ontology.org) providing details on the people, policies, and issues being addressed in association with OBI. The current release of OBI is available at http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/obi.owl.


Journal of Biomedical Semantics | 2016

An ontology for major histocompatibility restriction

Randi Vita; James A. Overton; Emily Seymour; John Sidney; Jim Kaufman; Rebecca L. Tallmadge; Shirley A. Ellis; John A. Hammond; Geoff W. Butcher; Alessandro Sette; Bjoern Peters

BackgroundMHC molecules are a highly diverse family of proteins that play a key role in cellular immune recognition. Over time, different techniques and terminologies have been developed to identify the specific type(s) of MHC molecule involved in a specific immune recognition context. No consistent nomenclature exists across different vertebrate species.PurposeTo correctly represent MHC related data in The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB), we built upon a previously established MHC ontology and created an ontology to represent MHC molecules as they relate to immunological experiments.DescriptionThis ontology models MHC protein chains from 16 species, deals with different approaches used to identify MHC, such as direct sequencing verses serotyping, relates engineered MHC molecules to naturally occurring ones, connects genetic loci, alleles, protein chains and multi-chain proteins, and establishes evidence codes for MHC restriction. Where available, this work is based on existing ontologies from the OBO foundry.ConclusionsOverall, representing MHC molecules provides a challenging and practically important test case for ontology building, and could serve as an example of how to integrate other ontology building efforts into web resources.


Journal of Biomedical Semantics | 2013

Query enhancement through the practical application of ontology: the IEDB and OBI.

Randi Vita; James A. Overton; Jason Greenbaum; Alessandro Sette; Bjoern Peters

Ontologies categorize entities, express relationships between them, and provide standardized definitions. Thus, they can be used to present and enforce the specific relationships between database components. The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB, http://www.iedb.org) utilizes the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI) and several additional ontologies to represent immune epitope mapping experiments. Here, we describe our experiences utilizing this representation in order to provide enhanced database search functionality. We applied a simple approach to incorporate the benefits of the information captured in a formal ontology directly into the user web interface, resulting in an improved user experience with minimal changes to the database itself. The integration is easy to maintain, provides standardized terms and definitions, and allows for subsumption queries. In addition to these immediate benefits, our long-term goal is to enable true semantic integration of data and knowledge in the biomedical domain. We describe our progress towards that goal and what we perceive as the main obstacles.


Journal of Biomedical Informatics | 2017

Developing the Quantitative Histopathology Image Ontology (QHIO)

Metin N. Gurcan; John E. Tomaszewski; James A. Overton; Scott Doyle; Alan Ruttenberg; Barry Smith

Interoperability across data sets is a key challenge for quantitative histopathological imaging. There is a need for an ontology that can support effective merging of pathological image data with associated clinical and demographic data. To foster organized, cross-disciplinary, information-driven collaborations in the pathological imaging field, we propose to develop an ontology to represent imaging data and methods used in pathological imaging and analysis, and call it Quantitative Histopathological Imaging Ontology - QHIO. We apply QHIO to breast cancer hot-spot detection with the goal of enhancing reliability of detection by promoting the sharing of data between image analysts.


Database | 2017

Better living through ontologies at the Immune Epitope Database

Randi Vita; James A. Overton; Alessandro Sette; Bjoern Peters

Abstract The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) project incorporates independently developed ontologies and controlled vocabularies into its curation and search interface. This simplifies curation practices, improves the user query experience and facilitates interoperability between the IEDB and other resources. While the use of independently developed ontologies has long been recommended as a best practice, there continues to be a significant number of projects that develop their own vocabularies instead, or that do not fully utilize the power of ontologies that they are using. We describe how we use ontologies in the IEDB, providing a concrete example of the benefits of ontologies in practice. Database URL: www.iedb.org


Nucleic Acids Research | 2018

The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB): 2018 update

Randi Vita; Swapnil Mahajan; James A. Overton; Sandeep Kumar Dhanda; Sheridan R Martini; Jason R. Cantrell; Daniel K. Wheeler; Alessandro Sette; Bjoern Peters

Abstract The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB, iedb.org) captures experimental data confined in figures, text and tables of the scientific literature, making it freely available and easily searchable to the public. The scope of the IEDB extends across immune epitope data related to all species studied and includes antibody, T cell, and MHC binding contexts associated with infectious, allergic, autoimmune, and transplant related diseases. Having been publicly accessible for >10 years, the recent focus of the IEDB has been improved query and reporting functionality to meet the needs of our users to access and summarize data that continues to grow in quantity and complexity. Here we present an update on our current efforts and future goals.


Database | 2018

FAIR principles and the IEDB: short-term improvements and a long-term vision of OBO-foundry mediated machine-actionable interoperability

Randi Vita; James A. Overton; Christopher J. Mungall; Alessandro Sette; Bjoern Peters

Abstract The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB), at www.iedb.org, has the mission to make published experimental data relating to the recognition of immune epitopes easily available to the scientific public. By presenting curated data in a searchable database, we have liberated it from the tables and figures of journal articles, making it more accessible and usable by immunologists. Recently, the principles of Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability have been formulated as goals that data repositories should meet to enhance the usefulness of their data holdings. We here examine how the IEDB complies with these principles and identify broad areas of success, but also areas for improvement. We describe short-term improvements to the IEDB that are being implemented now, as well as a long-term vision of true ‘machine-actionable interoperability’, which we believe will require community agreement on standardization of knowledge representation that can be built on top of the shared use of ontologies.


Database | 2018

Identification of errors in the IEDB using ontologies

Randi Vita; James A. Overton; Bjoern Peters

Abstract The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) is a free online resource that has manually curated over 18 500 references from the scientific literature. Our database presents experimental data relating to the recognition of immune epitopes by the adaptive immune system in a structured, searchable manner. In order to be consistent and accurate in our data representation across many different journals, authors and curators, we have implemented several quality control measures, such as curation rules, controlled vocabularies and links to external ontologies and other resources. Ontologies and other resources have greatly benefited the IEDB through improved search interfaces, easier curation practices, interoperability between the IEDB and other databases and the identification of errors within our dataset. Here, we will elaborate on how ontology mapping and usage can be used to find and correct errors in a manually curated database. Database URL: www.iedb.org


Journal of Pathology Informatics | 2015

Biomedical imaging ontologies: A survey and proposal for future work

Barry Smith; Sivaram Arabandi; Mathias Brochhausen; Michael Calhoun; Paolo Ciccarese; Scott Doyle; Bernard Gibaud; Ilya G. Goldberg; Charles E. Kahn; James A. Overton; John E. Tomaszewski; Metin N. Gurcan

Collaboration


Dive into the James A. Overton's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bjoern Peters

La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Randi Vita

La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alessandro Sette

La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chris Mungall

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jason Greenbaum

La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Osumi-Sutherland

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge