James Aird
University of Cambridge
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by James Aird.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2015
F. Stanley; C. M. Harrison; D. M. Alexander; A. M. Swinbank; James Aird; A. Del Moro; R. C. Hickox; J. R. Mullaney
In this study, we investigate the relationship between the star formation rate (SFR) and AGN luminosity (LAGNLAGN) for ∼2000 X-ray detected AGN. The AGN span over three orders of magnitude in X-ray luminosity (1042<L2−8keV<1045.5ergs−11042<L2−8keV<1045.5ergs−1) and are in the redshift range z = 0.2–2.5. Using infrared (IR) photometry (8–500 μmμm), including deblended Spitzer and Herschel images and taking into account photometric upper limits, we decompose the IR spectral energy distributions into AGN and star formation components. Using the IR luminosities due to star formation, we investigate the average SFRs as a function of redshift and AGN luminosity. In agreement with previous studies, we find a strong evolution of the average SFR with redshift, tracking the observed evolution of the overall star-forming galaxy population. However, we find that the relationship between the average SFR and AGN luminosity is broadly flat at all redshifts and across all the AGN luminosities investigated; in comparison to previous studies, we find less scatter amongst the average SFRs across the wide range of AGN luminosities investigated. By comparing to empirical models, we argue that the observed flat relationship is due to short time-scale variations in AGN luminosity, driven by changes in the mass accretion rate, which wash out any underlying correlations between SFR and LAGNLAGN. Furthermore, we show that the exact form of the predicted relationship between SFR and AGN luminosity (and its normalization) is highly sensitive to the assumed intrinsic Eddington ratio distribution.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2015
A. Georgakakis; James Aird; Johannes Buchner; M. Salvato; Marie-Luise Menzel; W. N. Brandt; Ian D. McGreer; Tom Dwelly; G. Mountrichas; C. Koki; I. Georgantopoulos; Li-Ting Hsu; Andrea Merloni; Z. Liu; Kirpal Nandra; Nicholas P. Ross
We combine deep X-ray survey data from the Chandra observatory and the wide-area/shallow XMM-XXL field to estimate the AGN X-ray luminosity function in the redshift range z=3-5. The sample consists of nearly 340 sources with either photometric (212) or spectroscopic (128) redshift in the above range. The combination of deep and shallow survey fields provides a luminosity baseline of three orders of magnitude, Lx(2-10keV)~1e43-1e46erg/s at z>3. We follow a Bayesian approach to determine the binned AGN space density and explore their evolution in a model-independent way. Our methodology accounts for Poisson errors in the determination of X-ray fluxes and uncertainties in photometric redshift estimates. We demonstrate that the latter is essential for unbiased measurement of space densities. We find that the AGN X-ray luminosity function evolves strongly between the redshift intervals z=3-4 and z=4-5. There is also suggestive evidence that the amplitude of this evolution is luminosity dependent. The space density of AGN with Lx 1e45erg/s. The faint-end slope of UV/optical luminosity functions however, is steeper than for X-ray selected AGN. This implies that the type-I AGN fraction increases with decreasing luminosity at z>3, opposite to trends established at lower redshift. We also assess the significance of AGN in keeping the hydrogen ionised at high redshift. Our X-ray luminosity function yields ionising photon rate densities that are insufficient to keep the Universe ionised at redshift z>4. A source of uncertainty in this calculation is the escape fraction of UV photons for X-ray selected AGN.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
G. B. Lansbury; P. Gandhi; D. M. Alexander; Roberto J. Assef; James Aird; A. Annuar; D. R. Ballantyne; M. Baloković; F. E. Bauer; S. E. Boggs; W. N. Brandt; M. Brightman; Finn Erland Christensen; F. Civano; A. Comastri; William W. Craig; A. Del Moro; Brian W. Grefenstette; Charles J. Hailey; Fiona A. Harrison; R. C. Hickox; M. Koss; Stephanie M. LaMassa; Birong Luo; S. Puccetti; D. Stern; Ezequiel Treister; C. Vignali; L. Zappacosta; William W. Zhang
The intrinsic column density (N_H) distribution of quasars is poorly known. At the high obscuration end of the quasar population and for redshifts z 1.5 × 10^(24) cm^(−2)) type 2 quasars (CTQSO2s); five new NuSTAR observations are reported herein, and four have been previously published. The candidate CTQSO2s lie at z < 0.5, have observed [O III] luminosities in the range 8.4 < log(L_([O III])/L⊙) < 9.6, and show evidence for extreme, Compton-thick absorption when indirect absorption diagnostics are considered. Among the nine candidate CTQSO2s, five are detected by NuSTAR in the high-energy (8–24 keV) band: two are weakly detected at the ≈3σ confidence level and three are strongly detected with sufficient counts for spectral modeling (≳90 net source counts at 8–24 keV). For these NuSTAR-detected sources direct (i.e., X-ray spectral) constraints on the intrinsic active galactic nucleus properties are feasible, and we measure column densities ≈2.5–1600 times higher and intrinsic (unabsorbed) X-ray luminosities ≈10–70 times higher than pre-NuSTAR constraints from Chandra and XMM-Newton. Assuming the NuSTAR-detected type 2 quasars are representative of other Compton-thick candidates, we make a correction to the N_H distribution for optically selected type 2 quasars as measured by Chandra and XMM-Newton for 39 objects. With this approach, we predict a Compton-thick fraction of f_(CT) = 36^(+14)_(-12)%, although higher fractions (up to 76%) are possible if indirect absorption diagnostics are assumed to be reliable.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
Mojegan Azadi; James Aird; Alison L. Coil; John Moustakas; Alexander J. Mendez; Michael R. Blanton; Richard Jacob Cool; Daniel J. Eisenstein; Kenneth C. Wong; Guangtun Zhu
We study the evidence for a connection between active galactic nuclei (AGN) fueling and star formation by investigating the relationship between the X-ray luminosities of AGN and the star formation rates (SFRs) of their host galaxies. We identify a sample of 309 AGN with
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
Dale D. Kocevski; M. Brightman; Kirpal Nandra; Anton M. Koekemoer; M. Salvato; James Aird; Eric F. Bell; Li Ting Hsu; J. Kartaltepe; David C. Koo; Jennifer M. Lotz; Daniel H. McIntosh; Mark Mozena; D. Rosario; Jonathan R. Trump
10^{41}<L_\mathrm{X}<10^{44}
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Fiona A. Harrison; James Aird; F. Civano; G. B. Lansbury; J. R. Mullaney; D. R. Ballantyne; D. M. Alexander; D. Stern; M. Ajello; Didier Barret; F. E. Bauer; M. Baloković; W. N. Brandt; M. Brightman; S. E. Boggs; Finn Erland Christensen; A. Comastri; William W. Craig; A. Del Moro; K. Forster; P. Gandhi; Paolo Giommi; Brian W. Grefenstette; Charles J. Hailey; R. C. Hickox; A. Hornstrup; Takao Kitaguchi; Jason E. Koglin; B. Luo; Kristin K. Madsen
erg s
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
James Aird; D. M. Alexander; D. R. Ballantyne; F. Civano; A. Del-Moro; R. C. Hickox; G. B. Lansbury; J. R. Mullaney; F. E. Bauer; W. N. Brandt; A. Comastri; A. C. Fabian; P. Gandhi; Fiona A. Harrison; B. Luo; D. Stern; Ezequiel Treister; L. Zappacosta; M. Ajello; Roberto J. Assef; M. Baloković; S. E. Boggs; M. Brightman; Finn Erland Christensen; William W. Craig; M. Elvis; K. Forster; Brian W. Grefenstette; Charles J. Hailey; Michael Koss
^{-1}
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2016
S. Fotopoulou; Jörg Büchner; I. Georgantopoulos; Guenther Hasinger; M. Salvato; A. Georgakakis; N. Cappelluti; P. Ranalli; Li-Ting Hsu; M. Brusa; A. Comastri; Takamitsu Miyaji; Kirpal Nandra; James Aird; S. Paltani
at
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2015
Mariska Kriek; Alice E. Shapley; Naveen A. Reddy; Brian Siana; Alison L. Coil; Bahram Mobasher; William R. Freeman; Laura de Groot; Sedona H. Price; Ryan L. Sanders; Irene Shivaei; Gabriel B. Brammer; Ivelina Momcheva; Rosalind E. Skelton; Pieter G. van Dokkum; Katherine E. Whitaker; James Aird; Mojegan Azadi; Marc Kassis; James S. Bullock; Charlie Conroy; Romeel Davé; Dušan Kereš; Mark R. Krumholz
0.2 < z < 1.2
The Astrophysical Journal | 2017
G. B. Lansbury; D. Stern; James Aird; D. M. Alexander; C. Fuentes; Fiona A. Harrison; Ezequiel Treister; F. E. Bauer; John A. Tomsick; M. Baloković; A. Del Moro; P. Gandhi; M. Ajello; A. Annuar; D. R. Ballantyne; S. E. Boggs; W. N. Brandt; M. Brightman; Chien-Ting J. Chen; Finn Erland Christensen; F. Civano; A. Comastri; William W. Craig; K. Forster; Brian W. Grefenstette; Charles J. Hailey; R. C. Hickox; B. Jiang; Hyunsung David Jun; Michael Koss
in the PRIMUS redshift survey. We find AGN in galaxies with a wide range of SFR at a given