James B. Butler

Phase III randomized study: Oral pilocarpine versus submandibular salivary gland transfer protocol for the management of radiation-induced xerostomia

Xerostomia is a serious morbidity of radiation treatment in head and neck cancer.

Improving intensity‐modulated radiation therapy using the anatomic beam orientation optimization algorithm

A novel, anatomic beam orientation optimization (A-BOO) algorithm is proposed to significantly improve conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The A-BOO algorithm vectorially analyses polygonal surface mesh data of contoured patient anatomy. Five optimal (5-opt) deliverable beam orientations are selected based on (1) tangential orientation bisecting the target and adjacent organs-at-risk (OARs) to produce precipitous dose gradients between them and (2) parallel incidence with polygon features of the target volume to facilitate conformal coverage. The 5-opt plans were compared to standard five, seven, and nine equiangular-spaced beam plans (5-equi, 7-equi, 9-equi) for: (1) gastric, (2) Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) P-0126 prostate, and (3) RTOG H-0022 oropharyngeal (stage-III, IV) cancer patients. In the gastric case, the noncoplanar 5-opt plan reduced the right kidney V 20 Gy by 32.2%, 23.2%, and 20.6% compared to plans with five, seven, and nine equiangular-spaced beams. In the prostate case, the coplanar 5-opt plan produced similar rectal sparing as the 7-equi and 9-equi plans with a reduction of the V 75, V 70, V 65, and V 60 Gy of 2.4%, 5.3%, 7.0%, and 9.5% compared to the 5-equi plan. In the stage-III and IV oropharyngeal cases, the noncoplanar 5-opt plan substantially reduced the V 30 Gy and mean dose to the contralateral parotid compared to plans with five, seven, and nine equiangular-spaced beams: (stage-III) 7.1%, 5.2%, 6.8%, and 5.1, 3.5, 3.7 Gy and (stage-IV) 10.2%, 10.2%, 9.8% and 7.0, 7.1, 7.2 Gy. The geometry-based A-BOO algorithm has been demonstrated to be robust for application to a variety of IMRT treatment sites. Beam orientations producing significant improvements in OAR sparing over conventional IMRT can be automatically produced in minutes compared to hours with existing dose-based beam orientation optimization methods.

Total Body Irradiation Compared With BEAM: Long-Term Outcomes of Peripheral Blood Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

PURPOSE The optimal preparative regimen for non-Hodgkins lymphoma patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) is unknown. We compared a total body irradiation (TBI)-based regimen with a chemotherapy-alone regimen. METHODS AND MATERIALS A retrospective cohort study was performed at a Canadian cancer center. The TBI regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and TBI 12 Gy in six fractions (CY/E/TBI). The chemotherapy-alone regimen consisted of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM). We compared the acute and long-term toxicities, disease relapse-free survival, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of 73 patients, 26 received CY/E/TBI and 47 received BEAM. The median follow-up for the CY/E/TBI group was 12.0 years and for the BEAM group was 7.3 years. After PBSCT, no differences in acute toxicity were seen between the two groups. The 5-year disease relapse-free survival rate was 50.0% and 50.7% in the CY/E/TBI and BEAM groups, respectively (p = .808). The 5-year OS rate was 53.9% and 63.8% for the CY/E/TBI and BEAM groups, respectivey (p = .492). The univariate analysis results indicated that patients with Stage IV, with chemotherapy-resistant disease, and who had received PBSCT before 2000 had inferior OS. A three-way categorical analysis revealed that transplantation before 2000, rather than the conditioning regimen, was a more important predictive factor of long-term outcome (p = .034). CONCLUSION A 12-Gy TBI-based conditioning regimen for PBSCT for non-Hodgkins lymphoma resulted in disease relapse-free survival and OS similar to that after BEAM. PBSCT before 2000, and not the conditioning regimen, was an important predictor of long-term outcomes. TBI was not associated with more acute toxicity or pneumonitis. We found no indication that the TBI regimen was inferior or superior to BEAM.

Impact of Feeding Tubes on Prospective Functional Outcomes in Patients With Locally-Advanced Head-and-Neck Cancer Undergoing Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE The optimal timing of enteral feeding tube (FT) insertion during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer remains controversial. This study compares prospectively collected functional outcomes for prophylactic versus reactive insertion. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients undergoing primary radiation therapy for stage III-IV head and neck cancer between 2004 and 2009 underwent functional outcome assessment at baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months posttreatment. Instruments included the Royal Brisbane Hospital Outcome Measure for Swallowing, Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients, and modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to determine the impact of FT use on functional outcomes. RESULTS A total of 178 patients were assessed with a median follow-up of 36.4 months. Use of an FT was prophylactic in 92 and reactive in 24; no tube was used in 62 patients. Compared with prophylactic placement, reactive FT use was not associated with worse function for Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Normalcy of Diet for soft foods (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.16, P = .85) or Eating in Public (AOR 1.87, P = .31). Similarly, there were no differences in the Royal Brisbane Hospital Outcome Measure for Swallowing for modified diet (AOR 1.27, P = .7) or FT dependence (AOR 3.01, P = .2). CONCLUSIONS There were no significant differences in long-term swallowing function between patients who received a prophylactic versus reactive FT.