James D. Fluckey
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by James D. Fluckey.
The Journal of Physiology | 2003
Scott Trappe; Philip M. Gallagher; Matthew P. Harber; John A. Carrithers; James D. Fluckey; Todd A. Trappe
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was an age‐related decline in the isometric and isotonic contractile function of permeabilized slow (MHC I) and fast (MHC IIa) single muscle fibres. Vastus lateralis muscle fibres from six young men (YM; 25 ± 1 years), six young women (YW; 25 ± 1 years), six old men (OM; 80 ± 4 years) and six old women (OW; 78 ± 2 years) were studied at 15 °C for in vitro force‐velocity properties, peak force and contractile velocity. Peak power was 23‐28 % lower (P < 0.05) in MHC I fibres of YW compared to the other three groups. MHC IIa peak power was 25–40 % lower (P < 0.05) in OW compared to the other three groups. No difference was found in MHC I and IIa normalized peak power among any of the groups. Peak force was lower (P < 0.05) in the YW (MHC I fibres) and OW (MHC IIa fibres) compared to the other groups. Differences in peak force with ageing were negated when normalized to cell size. No age‐related differences were observed in single fibre contractile velocity of MHC I and IIa fibres. These data show that YW (MHC I) and OW (MHC IIa) have lower single fibre absolute peak power and peak force compared to men; however, these differences are negated when normalized to cell size. General muscle protein concentrations (i.e. total, sarcoplasmic and myofibrillar) from the same biopsies were lower (4–9 %, P < 0.05) in the OM and OW. However, myosin and actin concentrations were not different (P > 0.05) among the four groups. These data suggest that differences in whole muscle strength and function that are often observed with ageing appear to be regulated by quantitative rather than qualitative parameters of single muscle fibre contractile function.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism | 2001
Todd A. Trappe; James D. Fluckey; Faber White; Charles P. Lambert; William J. Evans
Acta Physiologica Scandinavica | 2002
James D. Fluckey; Esther E. Dupont-Versteegden; D. C. Montague; Micheal Knox; Per A. Tesch; Charlotte A. Peterson; D. Gaddy-Kurten
American Journal of Physiology-endocrinology and Metabolism | 1996
James D. Fluckey; Thomas C. Vary; Leonard S. Jefferson; Peter A. Farrell
Metabolism-clinical and Experimental | 2006
Nicholas P. Hays; Raymond D. Starling; Dennis H. Sullivan; James D. Fluckey; Robert H. Coker; William J. Evans
American Journal of Physiology-endocrinology and Metabolism | 2004
James D. Fluckey; Ronald N. Cortright; Edward B. Tapscott; Timothy R. Koves; Latasha Smith; Steven Pohnert; G. Lynis Dohm
International Journal of Exercise Science: Conference Proceedings | 2017
John W Deaver; Colleen L. OReilly; Stephen F. Crouse; James D. Fluckey
International Journal of Exercise Science: Conference Proceedings | 2017
Jessica M. Cardin; John W Deaver; Colleen L. OReilly; Stephen F. Crouse; James D. Fluckey
International Journal of Exercise Science: Conference Proceedings | 2017
Colleen L. OReilly; J William Deaver; Michael P. Wiggs; Florence Lima; Joshua M. Swift; Elizabeth Greene; Susan A. Bloomfield; James D. Fluckey
Archive | 2016
Per A. Tesch; Charlotte A. Peterson; James D. Fluckey; Micheal Knox; Latasha Smith; Esther E. Dupont-Versteegden