James D. McCurry
Agilent Technologies
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by James D. McCurry.
Journal of Chromatography A | 2012
John V. Seeley; Carly T. Bates; James D. McCurry; Stacy K. Seeley
The GC×GC solvation parameter model has been used to identify effective stationary phases for the separation of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) from petroleum hydrocarbons. This simple mathematical model was used to screen the 1225 different combinations of 50 stationary phases. The most promising pairs combined a poly(methyltrifluoropropylsiloxane) stationary phase with a poly(dimethyldiphenylsiloxane) stationary phase. The theoretical results were experimentally tested by equipping a GC×GC instrument with a DB-210 primary stationary phase and an HP-50+ secondary stationary phase. This instrument was used to analyze trace levels of FAMEs in kerosene. The FAMEs were fully separated from the petroleum hydrocarbons on the secondary dimension of the 2-D chromatogram. The resulting GC×GC method was shown to be capable of accurately quantifying FAME levels as low as 2 ppm (w/w). These results demonstrate the utility of the solvation parameter model for identifying optimal stationary phases for high resolution GC×GC separations. Furthermore, this work presents an effective method for determining the level of biodiesel contamination in aviation fuel and other petroleum-based fuels.
Journal of Separation Science | 2008
John V. Seeley; Elise M. Libby; Stacy K. Seeley; James D. McCurry
A comprehensive 2-D GC (GC x GC) instrument equipped with a flow-switching modulator was used to determine the concentration of ethanol and eight other alcohols in a retail pump sample of E85 fuel. E85 is a mixture of ethanol and gasoline where the ethanol concentration can range from 70 to 85 vol%. The increased peak capacity and selectivity generated by GC x GC analysis allowed the alcohols to be fully resolved from the gasoline hydrocarbons. GC x GC analysis was compared to the performance obtained with the standard analytical method for determining ethanol in fuel ethanol (ASTM D5501) and the standard method for determining oxygenate concentrations in gasoline (ASTM D4815). The GC x GC analysis required 14 min while the combined ASTM D5501 and ASTM D4815 analyses required more than 60 min. The ethanol concentration obtained by GC x GC was in excellent agreement with the value obtained by the D5501 method. Poorer agreement was observed between the GC x GC and D4815 concentrations for the other alcohols present in E85. In all cases, the differences could be attributed to deficiencies in the D4815 method that led to coelutions between the alcohols and gasoline hydrocarbons.
Journal of Chromatography A | 2018
Matthew Giardina; James D. McCurry; Pascal Cardinael; Gaëlle Semard-Jousset; Chiara Cordero; Carlo Bicchi
The development of the reversed fill/flush modulator represents a significant advancement in flow-modulated, comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC). Compared to the forward flush/fill modulator, the reversed-flow modulator is less susceptible to baseline anomalies and peak tailing as a result of modulator channel overfilling or insufficient purging of high concentration analytes. Flow reversal requires the addition of a bleed capillary not present in the forward-flow modulator. Selecting the appropriate restriction of the bleed capillary is critical. If the bleed capillary is too restrictive, eluate from the first-dimension column can split between the modulator channel and second-dimension column, which also results in baseline artifacts. To gain a better understanding of the reversed-flow modulator, a comprehensive pneumatic model was developed. The model was validated by comparing calculated and measured hold-up times. The errors in calculated hold-up times were less than 1% of the measured values. The model can be used to predict first-dimension eluate splitting and determine the optimal bleed capillary dimensions to prevent its occurrence. Calculation of the modulator hold-up time can be used to determine the maximum collection time to ensure comprehensive analysis and optimal flush times for partial fill operation.
Analytical Chemistry | 2007
John V. Seeley; Nicole J. Micyus; Steven V. Bandurski; Stacy K. Seeley; James D. McCurry
Journal of Chromatographic Science | 2007
John V. Seeley; Stacy K. Seeley; Elise K. Libby; James D. McCurry
American Laboratory | 2006
John V. Seeley; Nicole J. Micyus; James D. McCurry; Stacy K. Seeley
Journal of Chromatography A | 2005
Nicole J. Micyus; James D. McCurry; John V. Seeley
Journal of Chromatographic Science | 2007
Stacy K. Seeley; Steven V. Bandurski; Robert G. Brown; James D. McCurry; John V. Seeley
Archive | 2006
James D. McCurry; John V. Seeley
Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining | 2009
James D. McCurry; Wesley Miles Norman