James E. Leake
Goddard Space Flight Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by James E. Leake.
Physics of Plasmas | 2013
James E. Leake; Vyacheslav S. Lukin; M. G. Linton
Magnetic reconnection in partially ionized plasmas is a ubiquitous phenomenon spanning the range from laboratory to intergalactic scales, yet it remains poorly understood and relatively little studied. Here, we present results from a self-consistent multi-fluid simulation of magnetic reconnection in a weakly ionized reacting plasma with a particular focus on the parameter regime of the solar chromosphere. The numerical model includes collisional transport, interaction and reactions between the species, and optically thin radiative losses. This model improves upon our previous work in Leake et al. [“Multi-fluid simulations of chromospheric magnetic reconnection in a weakly ionized reacting plasma,” Astrophys. J. 760, 109 (2012)] by considering realistic chromospheric transport coefficients, and by solving a generalized Ohms law that accounts for finite ion-inertia and electron-neutral drag. We find that during the two dimensional reconnection of a Harris current sheet with an initial width larger than the...
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2017
Etienne Pariat; James E. Leake; Gherardo Valori; M. G. Linton; F. P. Zuccarello; K. Dalmasse
Context. The discovery of clear criteria that can deterministically describe the eruptive state of a solar active region would lead to major improvements on space weather predictions. / Aims. Using series of numerical simulations of the emergence of a magnetic flux rope in a magnetized coronal, leading either to eruptions or to stable configurations, we test several global scalar quantities for the ability to discriminate between the eruptive and the non-eruptive simulations. / Methods. From the magnetic field generated by the three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamical simulations, we compute and analyze the evolution of the magnetic flux, of the magnetic energy and its decomposition into potential and free energies, and of the relative magnetic helicity and its decomposition. / Results. Unlike the magnetic flux and magnetic energies, magnetic helicities are able to markedly distinguish the eruptive from the non-eruptive simulations. We find that the ratio of the magnetic helicity of the current-carrying magnetic field to the total relative helicity presents the highest values for the eruptive simulations, in the pre-eruptive phase only. We observe that the eruptive simulations do not possess the highest value of total magnetic helicity. / Conclusions. In the framework of our numerical study, the magnetic energies and the total relative helicity do not correspond to good eruptivity proxies. Our study highlights that the ratio of magnetic helicities diagnoses very clearly the eruptive potential of our parametric simulations. Our study shows that magnetic-helicity-based quantities may be very efficient for the prediction of solar eruptions.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Alexander J. B. Russell; Michaela K. Mooney; James E. Leake; Hugh S. Hudson
Sunquakes are the surface signatures of acoustic waves in the Suns interior that are produced by some but not all flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). This paper explores a mechanism for sunquake generation by the magnetic field changes that occur during flares and CMEs, using MHD simulations with a semiempirical FAL-C atmosphere to demonstrate the generation of acoustic waves in the interior in response to changing magnetic tilt in the corona. We find that Alfven-sound resonance combined with the ponderomotive force produces acoustic waves in the interior with sufficient energy to match sunquake observations when the magnetic field angle changes by the order of 10 degrees in a region where the coronal field strength is a few hundred gauss or more. The most energetic sunquakes are produced when the coronal field is strong, while the variation of magnetic field strength with height and the time scale of the tilt change are of secondary importance.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2017
Aimee A. Norton; E. H. Jones; M. G. Linton; James E. Leake
We quantify the emergence and decay rates of preceder (p) and follower (f) sunspots within ten active regions from 2010-2014 using Space-weather Helioseismic Magnetic Imager Active Region Patch data. The sunspots are small- to mid-sized regions and contain a signed flux within a single polarity sunspot of
The Astrophysical Journal | 2018
Jeffrey W. Reep; Alexander J. B. Russell; Lucas A. Tarr; James E. Leake
(1.1-6.5)\times 10^{21}
The Astrophysical Journal | 2017
Yang Liu; Xudong Sun; Tibor Török; Viacheslav Titov; James E. Leake
Mx. The net unsigned flux within the regions, including plage, ranges from
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Roberto Lionello; Tibor Török; V. S. Titov; James E. Leake; Zoran Mikic; Jon A. Linker; M. G. Linton
(5.1-20)\times 10^{21}
The Astrophysical Journal | 2018
S. Dacie; Tibor Török; P. Démoulin; M. G. Linton; C. Downs; L. van Driel-Gesztelyi; David M. Long; James E. Leake
Mx. Rates are calculated with and without intensity contours to differentiate between sunspot formation and flux emergence. Signed flux emergence rates, calculated with intensity contours, for the p (f) spots average
The Astrophysical Journal | 2018
Luis Linan; Etienne Pariat; Kostas Moraitis; Gherardo Valori; James E. Leake
6.8
The Astrophysical Journal | 2010
James E. Leake; M. G. Linton; Spiro K. Antiochos
(4.9)