Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where James E. M. Watson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by James E. M. Watson.


Nature | 2014

The performance and potential of protected areas

James E. M. Watson; Nigel Dudley; Daniel B. Segan; Marc Hockings

Originally conceived to conserve iconic landscapes and wildlife, protected areas are now expected to achieve an increasingly diverse set of conservation, social and economic objectives. The amount of land and sea designated as formally protected has markedly increased over the past century, but there is still a major shortfall in political commitments to enhance the coverage and effectiveness of protected areas. Financial support for protected areas is dwarfed by the benefits that they provide, but these returns depend on effective management. A step change involving increased recognition, funding, planning and enforcement is urgently needed if protected areas are going to fulfil their potential.


Nature | 2016

Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers

Sean L. Maxwell; Richard A. Fuller; Thomas M. Brooks; James E. M. Watson

DIVERSITY The forgotten women of Antarctic research p.148 EDUCATION Boosting creative teaching in Indias schools p.148 BOOKS Journey through the microbiological jungle within us p.146 climate agreement into action. It is also crucial that the World Conservation Congress delegates — and society in general — ensure that efforts to address climate change do not overshadow more immediate priorities for the survival of the worlds flora and fauna. Since 2001, the categories and criteria of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species — a standard for the evaluation of extinction T here is a growing tendency for media reports about threats to biodiversity to focus on climate change. Here we report an analysis of threat information gathered for more than 8,000 species. These data revealed a contrasting picture. We found that by far the biggest drivers of biodiversity decline are overex-ploitation (the harvesting of species from the wild at rates that cannot be compensated for by reproduction or regrowth) and agriculture (the production of food, fodder, fibre and fuel crops; livestock farming; aquaculture; and the cultivation of trees). Early next month, representatives from government, industry and non-governmental organizations will define future directions for conservation at the World Conservation Congress of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). High on the agenda for political leaders, non-governmental organizations , conservationists and many others will be taking steps to turn the 2015 Paris The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers The threats of old are still the dominant drivers of current species loss, indicates an analysis of IUCN Red List data by Sean Maxwell and colleagues.


PLOS Biology | 2014

Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity.

Oscar Venter; Richard A. Fuller; Daniel B. Segan; Josie Carwardine; Thomas M. Brooks; Stuart H. M. Butchart; Moreno Di Marco; Takuya Iwamura; Liana N. Joseph; Damien O'Grady; Hugh P. Possingham; Carlo Rondinini; Robert J. Smith; Michelle Venter; James E. M. Watson

Meeting international targets for expanding protected areas could simultaneously contribute to species conservation, but only if the distribution of threatened species informs the future establishment of protected areas.


Nature | 2010

Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes

Richard A. Fuller; Eve McDonald-Madden; Kerrie A. Wilson; Josie Carwardine; Hedley S. Grantham; James E. M. Watson; David C. Green; Hugh P. Possingham

Protected areas vary enormously in their contribution to conserving biodiversity, and the inefficiency of protected area systems is widely acknowledged. However, conservation plans focus overwhelmingly on adding new sites to current protected area estates. Here we show that the conservation performance of a protected area system can be radically improved, without extra expenditure, by replacing a small number of protected areas with new ones that achieve more for conservation. Replacing the least cost-effective 1% of Australia’s 6,990 strictly protected areas could increase the number of vegetation types that have 15% or more of their original extent protected from 18 to 54, of a maximum possible of 58. Moreover, it increases markedly the area that can be protected, with no increase in overall spending. This new paradigm for protected area system expansion could yield huge improvements to global conservation at a time when competition for land is increasingly intense.


Science | 2016

The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people

Brett R. Scheffers; Luc De Meester; Tom C. L. Bridge; Ary A. Hoffmann; John M. Pandolfi; Richard T. Corlett; Stuart H. M. Butchart; Paul Pearce-Kelly; Kit M. Kovacs; David Dudgeon; Michela Pacifici; Carlo Rondinini; Wendy B. Foden; Tara G. Martin; Camilo Mora; David Bickford; James E. M. Watson

Accumulating impacts Anthropogenic climate change is now in full swing, our global average temperature already having increased by 1°C from preindustrial levels. Many studies have documented individual impacts of the changing climate that are particular to species or regions, but individual impacts are accumulating and being amplified more broadly. Scheffers et al. review the set of impacts that have been observed across genes, species, and ecosystems to reveal a world already undergoing substantial change. Understanding the causes, consequences, and potential mitigation of these changes will be essential as we move forward into a warming world. Science, this issue p. 10.1126/science.aaf7671 BACKGROUND Climate change impacts have now been documented across every ecosystem on Earth, despite an average warming of only ~1°C so far. Here, we describe the full range and scale of climate change effects on global biodiversity that have been observed in natural systems. To do this, we identify a set of core ecological processes (32 in terrestrial and 31 each in marine and freshwater ecosystems) that underpin ecosystem functioning and support services to people. Of the 94 processes considered, 82% show evidence of impact from climate change in the peer-reviewed literature. Examples of observed impacts from meta-analyses and case studies go beyond well-established shifts in species ranges and changes to phenology and population dynamics to include disruptions that scale from the gene to the ecosystem. ADVANCES Species are undergoing evolutionary adaptation to temperature extremes, and climate change has substantial impacts on species physiology that include changes in tolerances to high temperatures, shifts in sex ratios in species with temperature-dependent sex determination, and increased metabolic costs of living in a warmer world. These physiological adjustments have observable impacts on morphology, with many species in both aquatic and terrestrial systems shrinking in body size because large surface-to-volume ratios are generally favored under warmer conditions. Other morphological changes include reductions in melanism to improve thermoregulation, and altered wing and bill length in birds. Broader-scale responses to climate change include changes in the phenology, abundance, and distribution of species. Temperate plants are budding and flowering earlier in spring and later in autumn. Comparable adjustments have been observed in marine and freshwater fish spawning events and in the timing of seasonal migrations of animals worldwide. Changes in the abundance and age structure of populations have also been observed, with widespread evidence of range expansion in warm-adapted species and range contraction in cold-adapted species. As a by-product of species redistributions, novel community interactions have emerged. Tropical and boreal species are increasingly incorporated into temperate and polar communities, respectively, and when possible, lowland species are increasingly assimilating into mountain communities. Multiplicative impacts from gene to community levels scale up to produce ecological regime shifts, in which one ecosystem state shifts to an alternative state. OUTLOOK The many observed impacts of climate change at different levels of biological organization point toward an increasingly unpredictable future for humans. Reduced genetic diversity in crops, inconsistent crop yields, decreased productivity in fisheries from reduced body size, and decreased fruit yields from fewer winter chill events threaten food security. Changes in the distribution of disease vectors alongside the emergence of novel pathogens and pests are a direct threat to human health as well as to crops, timber, and livestock resources. Humanity depends on intact, functioning ecosystems for a range of goods and services. Enhanced understanding of the observed impacts of climate change on core ecological processes is an essential first step to adapting to them and mitigating their influence on biodiversity and ecosystem service provision. Climate change impacts on ecological processes in marine, freshwater, and terrestrial ecosystems. Impacts can be measured on multiple processes at different levels of biological organization within ecosystems. In total, 82% of 94 ecological processes show evidence of being affected by climate change. Within levels of organization, the percentage of processes impacted varies from 60% for genetics to 100% for species distribution. Most ecological processes now show responses to anthropogenic climate change. In terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems, species are changing genetically, physiologically, morphologically, and phenologically and are shifting their distributions, which affects food webs and results in new interactions. Disruptions scale from the gene to the ecosystem and have documented consequences for people, including unpredictable fisheries and crop yields, loss of genetic diversity in wild crop varieties, and increasing impacts of pests and diseases. In addition to the more easily observed changes, such as shifts in flowering phenology, we argue that many hidden dynamics, such as genetic changes, are also taking place. Understanding shifts in ecological processes can guide human adaptation strategies. In addition to reducing greenhouse gases, climate action and policy must therefore focus equally on strategies that safeguard biodiversity and ecosystems.


Nature Communications | 2016

Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation

Oscar Venter; Eric W. Sanderson; Ainhoa Magrach; James R. Allan; Jutta Beher; Kendall R. Jones; Hugh P. Possingham; William F. Laurance; Peter Wood; B M Fekete; Marc A. Levy; James E. M. Watson

Human pressures on the environment are changing spatially and temporally, with profound implications for the planets biodiversity and human economies. Here we use recently available data on infrastructure, land cover and human access into natural areas to construct a globally standardized measure of the cumulative human footprint on the terrestrial environment at 1 km2 resolution from 1993 to 2009. We note that while the human population has increased by 23% and the world economy has grown 153%, the human footprint has increased by just 9%. Still, 75% the planets land surface is experiencing measurable human pressures. Moreover, pressures are perversely intense, widespread and rapidly intensifying in places with high biodiversity. Encouragingly, we discover decreases in environmental pressures in the wealthiest countries and those with strong control of corruption. Clearly the human footprint on Earth is changing, yet there are still opportunities for conservation gains.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2010

A small molecule accelerates neuronal differentiation in the adult rat.

Heiko Wurdak; Shoutian Zhu; Kyung-Hoon Min; Lindsey Aimone; Luke L. Lairson; James E. M. Watson; Gregory Chopiuk; James Demas; Bradley D. Charette; Rajkumar Halder; Eranthie Weerapana; Benjamin F. Cravatt; Hollis T. Cline; Eric C. Peters; Jay Zhang; John R. Walker; Chunlei Wu; Jonathan Chang; Tove Tuntland; Charles Y. Cho; Peter G. Schultz

Adult neurogenesis occurs in mammals and provides a mechanism for continuous neural plasticity in the brain. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms regulating hippocampal neural progenitor cells (NPCs) and whether their fate can be pharmacologically modulated to improve neural plasticity and regeneration. Here, we report the characterization of a small molecule (KHS101) that selectively induces a neuronal differentiation phenotype. Mechanism of action studies revealed a link of KHS101 to cell cycle exit and specific binding to the TACC3 protein, whose knockdown in NPCs recapitulates the KHS101-induced phenotype. Upon systemic administration, KHS101 distributed to the brain and resulted in a significant increase in neuronal differentiation in vivo. Our findings indicate that KHS101 accelerates neuronal differentiation by interaction with TACC3 and may provide a basis for pharmacological intervention directed at endogenous NPCs.


Nature Climate Change | 2012

Vulnerability of cloud forest reserves in Mexico to climate change

Rocio Ponce-Reyes; Victor-Hugo Reynoso-Rosales; James E. M. Watson; Jeremy VanDerWal; Richard A. Fuller; Robert L. Pressey; Hugh P. Possingham

Tropical montane cloud forests are among the most vulnerable terrestrial ecosystems to climate change(1-3) owing to their restricted climatic requirements and their narrow and fragmented distribution(4). Although 12% of Mexican cloud forest is protected, it is not known whether reserves will ensure the persistence of the ecosystem and its endemic species under climate change. Here, we show that 68% of Mexicos cloud forest could vanish by 2080 because of climate change and more than 90% of cloud forest that is protected at present will not be climatically suitable for that ecosystem in 2080. Moreover, if we assume unprotected forests are cleared, 99% of the entire ecosystem could be lost through a combination of climate change and habitat loss, resulting in the extinction of about 70% of endemic cloud forest vertebrate species. Immediate action is required to minimize this loss-expansion of the protected-area estate in areas of low climate vulnerability is an urgent priority. Our analysis indicates that one key area for immediate protection is the Sierra de Juarez in Oaxaca. This area supports many endemic species and is expected to retain relatively large fragments of cloud forest despite rapid climate change.


Science | 2015

Protected areas and global conservation of migratory birds

Claire A. Runge; James E. M. Watson; Stuart H. M. Butchart; Jeffrey O. Hanson; Hugh P. Possingham; Richard A. Fuller

Not enough protection for migrating birds Animals that migrate pass through a varying number of regions. Each of these regions contributes to a different component of their life cycles. Runge et al. looked at the degree of protection migratory birds receive, globally, across their breeding and wintering ranges. A remarkably low percentage of migratory birds receive adequate protection across their entire ranges. Given that over half the worlds migratory bird populations are declining, these results emphasize the urgency with which we must act to protect birds across their entire migratory cycle. Science, this issue p. 1255 Few migratory birds are protected across their entire range. Migratory species depend on a suite of interconnected sites. Threats to unprotected links in these chains of sites are driving rapid population declines of migrants around the world, yet the extent to which different parts of the annual cycle are protected remains unknown. We show that just 9% of 1451 migratory birds are adequately covered by protected areas across all stages of their annual cycle, in comparison with 45% of nonmigratory birds. This discrepancy is driven by protected area placement that does not cover the full annual cycle of migratory species, indicating that global efforts toward coordinated conservation planning for migrants are yet to bear fruit. Better-targeted investment and enhanced coordination among countries are needed to conserve migratory species throughout their migratory cycle.


Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment | 2015

Why do we map threats? Linking threat mapping with actions to make better conservation decisions

Vivitskaia J. Tulloch; Ayesha I. T. Tulloch; Piero Visconti; Benjamin S. Halpern; James E. M. Watson; Megan C. Evans; Nancy A. Auerbach; Megan Barnes; Maria Beger; Iadine Chadès; Sylvaine Giakoumi; Eve McDonald-Madden; Nicholas J. Murray; Jeremy Ringma; Hugh P. Possingham

Spatial representations of threatening processes – “threat maps” – can identify where biodiversity is at risk, and are often used to identify priority locations for conservation. In doing so, decision makers are prone to making errors, either by assuming that the level of threat dictates spatial priorities for action or by relying primarily on the location of mapped threats to choose possible actions. We show that threat mapping can be a useful tool when incorporated within a transparent and repeatable structured decision-making (SDM) process. SDM ensures transparent and defendable conservation decisions by linking objectives to biodiversity outcomes, and by considering constraints, consequences of actions, and uncertainty. If used to make conservation decisions, threat maps are best developed with an understanding of how species respond to actions that mitigate threats. This approach will ensure that conservation actions are prioritized where they are most cost-effective or have the greatest impact, rather than where threat levels are highest.

Collaboration


Dive into the James E. M. Watson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Oscar Venter

University of Northern British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martine Maron

University of Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James R. Allan

University of Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Denise R. Cooper

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge