James E. Svenson

Hypertension in the ED: still an unrecognized problem

INTRODUCTION Hypertension is prevalent in the general population. Emergency Department (ED) follow-up studies show persistence of blood pressure elevations in up to 50% of patients, and ED screening for hypertension has been recommended. Blood pressure elevations are often ignored or attributed to pain or anxiety. Our purpose was to document the incidence and recognition of hypertension in the ED and to assess its relation to pain scores and age. METHODS This was a retrospective study. Patients presenting to the ED during a 1-month period were included. Age, blood pressure, and pain scores were reviewed. Discharge instructions and diagnoses were assessed as to whether blood pressure was recognized or follow-up was recommended. RESULTS There were 2821 patients. Fifteen percent were less than 18 years old. Twenty-six percent had an elevated blood pressure (40% of pediatric patients). There was no correlation between the distribution of pain scores in either children or adults. There was almost no recognition of the problem. Follow-up for elevated blood pressure was recommended in only 4%. Of these, only 46% actually received follow-up. Twenty-four percent of patients with elevated blood pressure received follow-up for other reasons. Blood pressure was still elevated in 47%. CONCLUSION Hypertension was a common problem in our patient population. Elevated blood pressure readings were almost uniformly ignored or unrecognized, particularly in children. There was no correlation of elevated blood pressure readings and acute pain scores. Elevated blood pressure readings should not be attributed solely to anxiety or acute pain on presentation.

Trauma systems and timing of patient transfer: are we improving?

INTRODUCTION The regionalization of trauma services is based on the premise that injured persons presenting to nontertiary facilities will be stabilized and rapidly transported to a more definitive center. Although trauma systems seem to improve outcomes for urban patients, this same benefit has not been shown for rural patients. There are many factors associated with the decision to transfer injured patients to a regional trauma center, including referral hospital and patient age, for example. The purpose of this study is to examine factors that influence the timing of transfer of trauma patients and specifically to determine if establishing specific trauma systems has led to any changes in transfer timing over time. METHODS The trauma registry at the University of Wisconsin was queried for all patients admitted between July 1, 1999, and June 30, 2005. Patients were included in this study if they had been transferred to the university hospital after evaluation at an outside hospital. The registry variables that were abstracted were age, referring hospital, emergency department (ED) time at referring hospital, injury severity score (ISS), the presence of a head injury, performance of a head computed tomography (CT), mode of transport, and the date of ED evaluation. RESULTS There were 1656 patients with ISS higher than 9 transferred during the period. The mean ED time was 153 +/- 82 minutes. Emergency department time was significantly shorter for those with ISS higher than 25 and for those transported by helicopter. Four hundred ninety-two (30%) patients had a head CT performed at the outside hospital, of which 221 (44%) were repeated at the trauma center. The mean ED time for those in whom a CT was performed was significantly longer than those without CT (179 +/- 81 vs 142 +/- 84 minutes). The ED times were slightly longer for level III hospitals (158 +/- 82 minutes) than for level IV hospitals (137 +/- 74 minutes). Emergency department times were longer for older patients. The times in the ED showed an upward, but not statistically significant, trend. After controlling for all other variables, ED times were not significantly different over the period studied. CONCLUSION Development of a statewide trauma system and outreach education has not significantly affected transfer times from nontrauma centers in our system. Outreach educational efforts should focus on systematic trauma evaluation, prompt transfer, and limitation of nontherapeutic testing.

Prospective evaluation of the ability of clinical scoring systems and physician-determined likelihood of appendicitis to obviate the need for CT

Objective To determine whether clinical scoring systems or physician gestalt can obviate the need for computed tomography (CT) in patients with possible appendicitis. Methods Prospective, observational study of patients with abdominal pain at an academic emergency department (ED) from February 2012 to February 2014. Patients over 11 years old who had a CT ordered for possible appendicitis were eligible. All parameters needed to calculate the scores were recorded on standardised forms prior to CT. Physicians also estimated the likelihood of appendicitis. Test characteristics were calculated using clinical follow-up as the reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn. Results Of the 287 patients (mean age (range), 31 (12–88) years; 60% women), the prevalence of appendicitis was 33%. The Alvarado score had a positive likelihood ratio (LR(+)) (95% CI) of 2.2 (1.7 to 3) and a negative likelihood ratio (LR(−)) of 0.6 (0.4 to 0.7). The modified Alvarado score (MAS) had LR(+) 2.4 (1.6 to 3.4) and LR(−) 0.7 (0.6 to 0.8). The Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) score had LR(+) 1.3 (1.1 to 1.5) and LR(−) 0.5 (0.4 to 0.8). Physician-determined likelihood of appendicitis had LR(+) 1.3 (1.2 to 1.5) and LR(−) 0.3 (0.2 to 0.6). When combined with physician likelihoods, LR(+) and LR(−) was 3.67 and 0.48 (Alvarado), 2.33 and 0.45 (RIPASA), and 3.87 and 0.47 (MAS). The area under the curve was highest for physician-determined likelihood (0.72), but was not statistically significantly different from the clinical scores (RIPASA 0.67, Alvarado 0.72, MAS 0.7). Conclusions Clinical scoring systems performed equally well as physician gestalt in predicting appendicitis. These scores do not obviate the need for imaging for possible appendicitis when a physician deems it necessary.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of MRI to diagnose appendicitis in the general population.

To perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis of all published studies since 2005 that evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the general population presenting to emergency departments.

Obtundation in the elderly patient: Presentation of a drug overdose

The case of an obtunded elderly woman is presented. The patient initially was thought to have suffered a cardiovascular accident but was discovered to have taken an overdose of flurazepam hydrochloride. Depression is a common and under-recognized problem in the geriatric population. As a consequence, suicide rates are highest in the elderly. Over- and underdosing of both prescription and nonprescription drugs are common means available to the suicidal elderly patient. These overdoses are often attributed to unintentional patient errors and overlooked for what they are, attempted suicides, or they are missed entirely as a cause of the patients presentation. This case illustrates the need to consider drug overdose in the obtunded elderly patient.

The Impact of an Emergency Department Front-End Redesign on Patient-Reported Satisfaction Survey Results

Introduction For emergency department (ED) patients, delays in care are associated with decreased satisfaction. Our department focused on implementing a front-end vertical patient flow model aimed to decrease delays in care, especially care initiation. The physical space for this new model was termed the Flexible Care Area (FCA). The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of this intervention on patient satisfaction. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients discharged from our academic ED over a one-year period (7/1/2013–6/30/2014). Of the 34,083 patients discharged during that period, 14,075 were sent a Press-Ganey survey and 2,358 (16.8%) returned the survey. We subsequently compared these survey responses with clinical information available through our electronic health record (EHR). Responses from the Press-Ganey surveys were dichotomized as being “Very Good” (VG, the highest rating) or “Other” (for all other ratings). Data abstracted from the EHR included demographic information (age, gender) and operational information (e.g. – emergency severity index, length of stay, whether care was delivered entirely in the FCA, utilization of labs or radiology testing, or administration of opioid pain medications). We used Fisher’s exact test to calculate statistical differences in proportions, while the Mantel-Haenszel method was used to report odds ratios. Results Of the returned surveys, 62% rated overall care for the visit as VG. However, fewer patients reported their care as VG if they were seen in FCA (53.4% versus 63.2%, p=0.027). Patients seen in FCA were less likely to have advanced imaging performed (12% versus 23.8%, p=0.001) or labs drawn (24.8% vs. 59.1%, p=0.001). Length of stay (FCA mean 159 ±103.5 minutes versus non-FCA 223 ±117 minutes) and acuity were lower for FCA patients than non-FCA patients (p=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between patient-reported ratings of physicians or nurses when comparing patients seen in FCA vs. those not seen in FCA. Conclusion Patients seen through the FCA reported a lower overall rating of care compared to patients not seen in the FCA. This occurred despite a shorter overall length of stay for these patients, suggesting that other factors have a meaningful impact on patient satisfaction.

Using Chief Complaint in Addition to Diagnosis Codes to Identify Falls in the Emergency Department

To compare incidence of falls in an emergency department (ED) cohort using a traditional International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD‐9) code–based scheme and an expanded definition that included chief complaint information and to examine the clinical characteristics of visits “missed” in the ICD‐9‐based scheme.

Anemia is not a risk factor for developing pulmonary embolism

Objective: Our aim was to validate the previously published claim of a positive relationship between low blood hemoglobin level (anemia) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing cross‐sectional imaging to evaluate for PE at an academic medical center. Patients were identified using billing records for charges attributed to either magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomography angiography of the chest from 2008 to 2013. The main outcome measure was mean hemoglobin levels among those with and without PE. Our reference standard for PE status included index imaging results and a 6‐month clinical follow‐up for the presence of interval venous thromboembolism, conducted via review of the electronic medical record. Secondarily, we performed a subgroup analysis of only those patients who were seen in the emergency department. Finally, we again compared mean hemoglobin levels when limiting our control population to an age‐ and sex‐matched cohort of the included cases. Results: There were 1294 potentially eligible patients identified, of whom 121 were excluded. Of the remaining 1173 patients, 921 had hemoglobin levels analyzed within 24 hours of their index scan and thus were included in the main analysis. Of those 921 patients, 107 (11.6%; 107/921) were positive for PE. We found no significant difference in mean hemoglobin level between those with and without PE regardless of the control group used (12.4 ± 2.1 g/dL and 12.3 ± 2.0 g/dL [P = .85], respectively). Conclusions: Our data demonstrated no relationship between anemia and PE.

Using the Hendrich II Inpatient Fall Risk Screen to Predict Outpatient Falls After Emergency Department Visits: Do Hendrich II Scores Predict Outpatient Falls?

To evaluate the utility of routinely collected Hendrich II fall scores in predicting returns to the emergency department (ED) for falls within 6 months.

Improved cookstoves and their effect on carbon monoxide levels in San Lucas Tolimán, Guatemala

Abstract Introduction: Installation of ventilated cookstoves has been shown to improve 24-h carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate exposure in the Guatemalan highlands. However, a survey of villagers around San Lucas Tolimán found much higher than expected CO levels. Our purpose is to evaluate the effects of improved cookstoves on CO levels in these villagers. Methods: This is cross sectional observational study in six rural communities. Blood carboxyhemoglobin (SpCO) was measured at three different times during the day. Stove type and location, as well as any respiratory, eye, or general symptoms reported were recorded. Results: 122 patients were included. CO levels were much higher than would be expected in a non-smoking population, with an average level of 4.6 ± 2.3 percent. There was no significant correlation in CO level and stove type or in CO level and time of day. Reported frequency of respiratory and eye symptoms (dyspnea, p = 0.03; cough, p = 0.01; burning eyes, p = 0.001; and excessive tearing, p = 0.001) did vary significantly between improved and unimproved stove groups. Conclusion: This study found high average SpCO levels in all villagers. This suggests that some contributor other than cookstoves may be an additional driver of individual CO exposure in this area.