James E. Udelson

2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

Writing committee me tions to which their s ply; see Appendix ACCF/AHATask Fo Surgeons Representa tative. Heart Rhythm ography and Int Echocardiography Re ciety of America Rep resentative. kkACCF/ Task Force member d This document was app Board of Trustees and ordinating Committee gery, American Soc Cardiology, Heart Fa for Cardiovascular A geons approved the d The American Associat as follows: Gersh BJ Naidu SS, Nishimura Bernard J. Gersh, MB, ChB, DPhil, FACC, FAHA, Co-Chair* Barry J. Maron, MD, FACC, CoChair* Robert O. Bonow, MD, MACC, FAHA, Joseph A. Dearani, MD, FACC,§,k Michael A. Fifer, MD, FACC, FAHA,* Mark S. Link, MD, FACC, FHRS,* Srihari S. Naidu, MD, FACC, FSCAI,* Rick A. Nishimura, MD, FACC, FAHA, Steve R. Ommen, MD, FACC, FAHA, Harry Rakowski, MD, FACC, FASE,** Christine E. Seidman, MD, FAHA, Jeffrey A. Towbin, MD, FACC, FAHA, James E. Udelson, MD, FACC, FASNC, and Clyde W. Yancy, MD, FACC, FAHAkk

MYOCARDIAL VIABILITY TESTING AND IMPACT OF REVASCULARIZATION ON PROGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AND LEFT VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION: A META-ANALYSIS

OBJECTIVES This study pools data from published series examining late survival with revascularization versus medical therapy after myocardial viability testing in patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. BACKGROUND Previous observational studies have suggested survival benefit in such patients if they are revascularized when myocardial viability is detected on imaging tests. METHODS A MEDLINE database search returned 24 viability studies reporting patient survival using thallium perfusion imaging, F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose metabolic imaging or dobutamine echocardiography. Annual death rates were extracted, pooled and analyzed with a random effects model. The risk-adjusted relationship between severity of LV dysfunction, presence of viability and survival benefit associated with revascularization was assessed by meta-regression. RESULTS There were 3,088 patients (2,228 men), ejection fraction 32 +/- 8%, followed for 25 +/- 10 months. In patients with viability, revascularization was associated with 79.6% reduction in annual mortality (16% vs. 3.2%, chi-square = 147, p < 0.0001) compared with medical treatment. Patients without viability had intermediate mortality, trending to higher rates with revascularization versus medical therapy (7.7% vs. 6.2%, p = NS). Patients with viability showed a direct relationship between severity of LV dysfunction and magnitude of benefit with revascularization (p < 0.001). There was no measurable performance difference for predicting revascularization benefit between the three testing techniques. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis demonstrates a strong association between myocardial viability on noninvasive testing and improved survival after revascularization in patients with chronic CAD and LV dysfunction. Absence of viability was associated with no significant difference in outcomes, irrespective of treatment strategy.

2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Alice K. Jacobs, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair, 2009–2011; Sidney C. Smith, Jr, MD, FACC, FAHA, Immediate Past Chair, 2006–2008[¶¶][1]; Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair-Elect; Nancy M. Albert, PhD, CCNS, CCRN, FAHA; Christopher E. Buller, MD, FACC[¶¶][1]; Mark A. Creager, MD, FACC, FAHA;

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Effects of Carvedilol in Patients With Moderate to Severe Heart Failure The PRECISE Trial

Background Carvedilol has improved the symptomatic status of patients with moderate to severe heart failure in single-center studies, but its clinical effects have not been evaluated in large, multicenter trials. Methods and Results We enrolled 278 patients with moderate to severe heart failure (6-minute walk distance, 150 to 450 m) and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤0.35 at 31 centers. After an open-label, run-in period, each patient was randomly assigned (double-blind) to either placebo (n=145) or carvedilol (n=133; target dose, 25 to 50 mg BID) for 6 months, while background therapy with digoxin, diuretics, and an ACE inhibitor remained constant. Compared with placebo, patients in the carvedilol group had a greater frequency of symptomatic improvement and lower risk of clinical deterioration, as evaluated by changes in the NYHA functional class (P=.014) or by a global assessment of progress judged either by the patient (P=.002) or by the physician (P<.001). In addition, treatment with carvedilol...

Effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril on the long-term progression of left ventricular dysfunction in patients with heart failure. SOLVD Investigators.

BACKGROUND In patients with heart failure, activation of the renin-angiotensin system is common and has been postulated to provide a stimulus for further left ventricular (LV) structural and functional derangement. We tested the hypothesis that chronic administration of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril prevents or reverses LV dilatation and systolic dysfunction among patients with depressed ejection fraction (EF) and symptomatic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS We examined subsets of patients enrolled in the Treatment Trial of Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Fifty-six patients with mild to moderate heart failure underwent serial radionuclide ventriculograms, and 16 underwent serial left heart catheterizations, before and after randomization to enalapril (2.5-20 mg/day) or placebo. At 1 year, there were significant treatment differences in LV end-diastolic volume (EDV; p less than 0.01), end-systolic volume (ESV; p less than 0.005), and EF (p less than 0.05). These effects resulted from increases in EDV (mean +/- SD, 136 +/- 27 to 151 +/- 38 ml/m2) and ESV (103 +/- 24 to 116 +/- 24 ml/m2) in the placebo group and decreases in EDV (140 +/- 44 to 127 +/- 37 ml/m2) and ESV (106 +/- 42 to 93 +/- 37 ml/m2) in the enalapril group. Mean LVEF increased in enalapril patients from 0.25 +/- 0.07 to 0.29 +/- 0.08 (p less than 0.01). There was a significant treatment difference in LV end-diastolic pressure at 1 year (p less than 0.05), with changes paralleling those of EDV. The time constant of LV relaxation changed only in the placebo group (p less than 0.01 versus enalapril), increasing from 59.2 +/- 8.0 to 67.8 +/- 7.2 msec. Serial radionuclide studies over a period of 33 months showed increases in LV volumes only in the placebo group. Two weeks after withdrawal of enalapril, EDV and ESV increased to baseline levels but not to the higher levels observed with placebo. CONCLUSIONS In patients with heart failure and reduced LVEF, chronic ACE inhibition with enalapril prevents progressive LV dilatation and systolic dysfunction (increased ESV). These effects probably result from a combination of altered remodeling and sustained reduction in preload and afterload.

Assessment of peripheral vascular endothelial function with finger arterial pulse wave amplitude.

BACKGROUND Abnormalities in pulse wave amplitude (PWA) have been described in subjects with atherosclerosis and may be a marker of future cardiac events. We evaluated the relationship between changes in PWA of the finger and peripheral endothelial function. METHODS We performed measurements of PWA with a novel finger plethysmograph (peripheral arterial tonometry [PAT]) and compared the findings with a simultaneous noninvasive measurement of peripheral endothelial function with brachial artery ultrasound scanning (BAUS) in 89 subjects. The PAT hyperemia ratio was defined as the ratio of PWA during reactive hyperemia relative to the baseline. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was defined by BAUS as the ratio of the brachial artery diameter during reactive hyperemia relative to the baseline. Sixty-eight subjects underwent exercise myocardial perfusion imaging (ExMPI). RESULTS Fifty-four men and 35 women were examined. There was a linear relationship between the PAT hyperemia ratio and FMD during the same episode of reactive hyperemia (r = 0.55, P <.0001). Subjects in the lowest FMD quartile had the lowest PAT hyperemia ratio, whereas subjects in the highest FMD quartile had the highest PAT hyperemia ratio (P <.001 for trend). Similar to BAUS, the PAT hyperemia ratio was more impaired in subjects with cardiovascular risk factors and in subjects with ExMPI studies that were indicative of coronary artery disease. CONCLUSIONS Assessment of PWA with PAT demonstrates patterns of abnormality similar to that of BAUS assessment of FMD. PWA during reactive hyperemia is influenced by factors known to affect endothelial function, including cardiovascular risk factors and coronary artery disease. These findings support the concept that analysis of PWA with PAT during reactive hyperemia may be used to study peripheral vascular endothelial function.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Is Predominantly a Disease of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction

Background— Nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has been regarded as the predominant hemodynamic form of the disease on the basis of assessment of outflow gradient under resting conditions. We sought to prospectively define the prevalence, clinical profile, and significance of left ventricular (LV) outflow tract obstruction under resting conditions and with physiological exercise in a large HCM cohort. Methods and Results— We prospectively analyzed 320 consecutive HCM patients (age, 47±17 years), measuring LV outflow gradient at rest, with Valsalva maneuver, and with exercise echocardiography. LV outflow obstruction was present at rest and/or with exercise in 225 patients (70%); 119 had rest gradients ≥50 mm Hg and were not exercised. Of the other 201 patients with gradients <50 mm Hg at rest (average, 4±9 mm Hg), 106 developed mechanical obstruction to LV outflow resulting from mitral valve–septal contact after exercise (80±43 mm Hg), including 76 with marked gradients ≥50 mm Hg and 46 with heart failure symptoms. The remaining 95 patients (30%) had no or small gradients (<30 mm Hg) both at rest and with exercise. Valsalva maneuver underestimated the presence and magnitude of exercise-induced obstruction. Conclusions— Among those patients who come to clinical evaluation, HCM is a predominantly obstructive disease in which LV outflow gradients, frequently associated with heart failure symptoms and often identified only with exercise, are evident in most patients (ie, 70%). Identification of LV outflow obstruction with exercise echocardiography may broaden management options in HCM by identifying symptomatic patients not otherwise regarded as potential candidates for septal reduction therapy. Assessment of subaortic gradients with exercise should be a routine component of the evaluation of HCM patients without outflow obstruction under resting conditions.

Coronary CT Angiography versus Standard Evaluation in Acute Chest Pain

BACKGROUND It is unclear whether an evaluation incorporating coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is more effective than standard evaluation in the emergency department in patients with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndromes. METHODS In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned patients 40 to 74 years of age with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndromes but without ischemic electrocardiographic changes or an initial positive troponin test to early CCTA or to standard evaluation in the emergency department on weekdays during daylight hours between April 2010 and January 2012. The primary end point was length of stay in the hospital. Secondary end points included rates of discharge from the emergency department, major adverse cardiovascular events at 28 days, and cumulative costs. Safety end points were undetected acute coronary syndromes. RESULTS The rate of acute coronary syndromes among 1000 patients with a mean (±SD) age of 54±8 years (47% women) was 8%. After early CCTA, as compared with standard evaluation, the mean length of stay in the hospital was reduced by 7.6 hours (P<0.001) and more patients were discharged directly from the emergency department (47% vs. 12%, P<0.001). There were no undetected acute coronary syndromes and no significant differences in major adverse cardiovascular events at 28 days. After CCTA, there was more downstream testing and higher radiation exposure. The cumulative mean cost of care was similar in the CCTA group and the standard-evaluation group (

Occurrence and Frequency of Arrhythmias in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Relation to Delayed Enhancement on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

4,289 and

Intramyocardial transplantation of autologous CD34+ stem cells for intractable angina : A phase I/IIa double-blind, randomized controlled trial

4,060, respectively; P=0.65). CONCLUSIONS In patients in the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndromes, incorporating CCTA into a triage strategy improved the efficiency of clinical decision making, as compared with a standard evaluation in the emergency department, but it resulted in an increase in downstream testing and radiation exposure with no decrease in the overall costs of care. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; ROMICAT-II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01084239.).