James E. Warner
Langley Research Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by James E. Warner.
Structural Health Monitoring-an International Journal | 2017
Patrick E. Leser; Jacob D. Hochhalter; James E. Warner; John A. Newman; William P. Leser; Paul A. Wawrzynek; Fuh-Gwo Yuan
Utilizing inverse uncertainty quantification techniques, structural health monitoring (SHM) can be integrated with damage progression models to form a probabilistic prediction of a structure’s remaining useful life (RUL). However, damage evolution in realistic structures is physically complex. Accurately representing this behavior requires high-fidelity models which are typically computationally prohibitive. In this paper, high-fidelity fatigue crack growth simulation times are reduced by three orders of magnitude using a model based on a set of surrogate models trained via three-dimensional finite element analysis. The developed crack growth modeling approach is experimentally validated using SHM-based damage diagnosis data. A probabilistic prediction of RUL is formed for a metallic, single-edge notch tension specimen with a fatigue crack growing under mixed-mode conditions.
19th AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference | 2017
Patrick E. Leser; James E. Warner
The feed-forward relationship between diagnosis and prognosis is the foundation of both aircraft structural health management and the digital twin concept. Measurements of structural response are obtained either in-situ with mounted sensor networks or offline using more traditional techniques (e.g., nondestructive evaluation). Diagnosis algorithms process this information to detect and quantify damage and then feed this data forward to a prognostic framework. A prognosis of the structures future operational readiness (e.g., remaining useful life or residual strength) is then made and is used to inform mission- critical decision-making. Years of research have been devoted to improving the elements of this process, but the process itself has not changed significantly. Here, a new approach is proposed in which prognosis information is not only fed forward for decision-making, but it is also fed back to the forthcoming diagnosis. In this way, diagnosis algorithms can take advantage of a priori information about the expected state of health, rather than operating in an uninformed condition. As a feasibility test, a diagnosis-prognosis feedback loop of this manner is demonstrated. The approach is applied to a numerical example in which fatigue crack growth is simulated in a simple aluminum alloy test specimen. A prognosis was derived from a set of diagnoses which provided feedback to a subsequent set of diagnoses. Improvements in accuracy and a reduction in uncertainty in the prognosis- informed diagnoses were observed when compared with an uninformed diagnostic approach.
Structural Health Monitoring-an International Journal | 2015
Patrick E. Leser; Jacob D. Hochhalter; John A. Newman; William P. Leser; James E. Warner; Paul A. Wawrzynek; Fuh-Gwo Yuan
Utilizing inverse uncertainty quantification techniques, structural health monitoring data can be integrated with damage progression models to form probabilistic predictions of a structure’s remaining useful life. However, damage evolution in realistic structures is physically complex. Accurately representing this behavior requires high-fidelity models which are typically computationally prohibitive. In this paper, high-fidelity fatigue crack growth simulation times are significantly reduced using a surrogate model trained via finite element analysis. The new approach is applied to experimental damage diagnosis data to form a probabilistic prediction of remaining useful life for a test specimen under mixed-mode conditions. doi: 10.12783/SHM2015/299
International Journal of Fracture | 2016
Brad Lee Boyce; Sharlotte Kramer; T.R. Bosiljevac; Edmundo Corona; John A. Moore; K. Elkhodary; C.H.M. Simha; B. Williams; A.R. Cerrone; A. Nonn; Jacob D. Hochhalter; G.F. Bomarito; James E. Warner; B.J. Carter; D.H. Warner; Anthony R. Ingraffea; T. Zhang; X. Fang; J. Lua; Vincent Chiaruttini; Matthieu Mazière; Sylvia Feld-Payet; Vladislav Yastrebov; Jacques Besson; Jean Louis Chaboche; J. Lian; Y. Di; Bo Wu; Denis Novokshanov; Napat Vajragupta
Archive | 2016
Patrick E. Leser; John A. Newman; James E. Warner; William P. Leser; Jacob D. Hochhalter; Fuh-Gwo Yuan
International Journal of Fracture | 2016
A.R. Cerrone; A. Nonn; Jacob D. Hochhalter; G.F. Bomarito; James E. Warner; B.J. Carter; D.H. Warner; Anthony R. Ingraffea
PHM Society Conference | 2018
James E. Warner; Patrick E. Leser; Jacob D. Hochhalter
PHM Society Conference | 2018
Patrick E. Leser; Jacob D. Hochhalter; James E. Warner; G.F. Bomarito; William P. Leser; Fuh-Gwo Yuan
Life sciences in space research | 2018
James E. Warner; Ryan B. Norman; Steve R. Blattnig
Archive | 2017
Ryan B. Norman; Martha Clowdsley; Tony C. Slaba; L. Heilbronn; C. Zeitlin; Sean P. Kenny; Luis G. Crespo; Daniel P. Giesy; James E. Warner; Natalie A. McGirl; Luis A. Castellanos; Ashwin P. Srikrishna; Matthew Beach; Amir A. Bahadori; Brandon Reddell; Robert C. Singleterry