James G. Zimmer

A randomized controlled study of a home health care team.

This report describes the findings of a randomized study of a new team approach to home care for homebound chronically or terminally ill elderly. The team includes a physician, nurse practitioner, and social worker delivering primary health care in the patients home, including physician house calls. Weekly team conferences assure coordination of patient care. The team is available for emergency consultation through a 24-hour telephone service. The team physician attends to the patient during necessary hospitalizations. This approach was evaluated in a randomized experimental design study measuring its impact on health care utilization, functional changes in patients, and patient and caretaker satisfaction. The team patients had fewer hospitalizations, nursing home admissions, and outpatient visits than the controls. They were more often able to die at home, if this was their wish. As expected, they used more in-home services, measured in weighted cost figures; their overall cost was lower than their controls, but the difference was not statistically significant. Their functional abilities did not change differently from the controls, but they, and especially their informal caretakers in the home, expressed significantly higher satisfaction with the care received.

Systemic Antibiotic Use in Nursing Homes: A Quality Assessment

In this evaluation of the prevalence and quality of systemic antibiotic use in nursing homes, 42 skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and their 11 attached intermediate care facilities (ICFs) were surveyed. A random sample of 2238 patients (51%) from the total of 4378 beds was selected and of these, 7.7% of the total (8.6% of the SNF and 4.5% of the ICF) patients were on systemic antibiotics on the day of the survey. The most common suspected sites of infection were urinary tract (58.4%), lower respiratory tract (19.1%), and skin or subcutaneous tissue (4.6%). Criteria for appropriateness of initiating systemic antibiotics, for adequacy of initial diagnostic workup, and for appropriate specific antibiotics were developed by the authors, with input from a group of medical directors of nursing homes, based on Centers for Disease Control and Federal Drug Administration guidelines. Evidence to start an antibiotic was judged adequate in 62.4% of cases. Workups were considered inadequate in a high proportion of cases. For example, urinalysis was ordered in only 23.8% and urine culture in 57.4% of suspected urinary tract infections; chest x‐ray was ordered in 24.2% and sputum culture in 3.0% of suspected lower respiratory infections. Recommendations are made as to minimum adequate workup for suspected infections and appropriate evidence to justify start of a systemic antibiotic, recognizing the limitations in diagnostic modalities in the nursing home setting and the special problems of their resident populations.

How Does the Team Approach to Outpatient Geriatric Evaluation Compare with Traditional Care: A Report of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Although team‐oriented geriatric assessment clinics are growing throughout the country, little documentation exists regarding their clinical efficacy, cost‐effectiveness, or impact on patient functioning and well‐being. This report describes a randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a team‐oriented geriatric assessment approach compared to traditional care. One hundred‐seventeen subjects 65 years of age and over, meeting eligibility criteria to target frail older persons with changing medical and social needs, were randomly assigned to receive a comprehensive geriatric assessment by a multidisciplinary team (treatment) or by one of a panel of community internists who were reimbursed according to their usual and customary fee (controls). Extensive analysis of baseline information failed to identify any significant differences between groups. Over the 1‐year follow‐up period, treatment participants experienced 26 hospital admissions and used 670 hospital days compared with 23 admissions and 1113 days for controls (a 39.8% difference). Annual hospital costs averaged

Rates, patterns, causes, and costs of hospitalization of nursing home residents: a population-based study.

4297 for treatment subjects and

Nursing Homes as Acute Care Providers A Pilot Study of Incentives to Reduce Hospitalizations

7018 for controls. Overall institutional costs including hospital and nursing home care revealed an average saving of

Use of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Urinary Incontinence Guideline in nursing homes

2189 per person for treatment subjects compared with controls, a 25% reduction. A small proportion of subjects accounted for this difference. No significant differences were noted in patient or caregiver satisfaction with the evaluation process, functional ability, or health status. These findings suggest that team‐oriented outpatient geriatric assessment provides a promising way to deliver high‐quality, satisfying care to older persons without increasing (and possibly decreasing) health care costs.

Geriatric Consultation Teams in Acute Hospitals: Impact on Back‐up of Elderly Patients

OBJECTIVES Hospitalization of nursing home residents is a growing, poorly defined problem. The purposes of this study were to define rates, patterns, costs, and outcomes of hospitalizations from nursing homes and to consider implications for reducing this problem as part of health care reform. METHODS Communitywide nursing home utilization review and hospital discharge data were used to define retrospectively a cohort of 2120 patients newly admitted to nursing homes; these patients were followed for 2 years to identify all hospitalizations. Resident characteristics were analyzed for predictors of hospitalization. Charges and outcomes were compared with hospitalization of community-dwelling elders. RESULTS Hospitalization rates were strikingly higher for intermediate vs skilled levels of care (566 and 346 per 1000 resident years, respectively). Approximately 40% of all hospitalizations occurred within 3 months of admission. No strong predictors were identified. Length of stay, charges, and mortality rates were higher than for hospitalizations from the community. CONCLUSIONS Hospitalizations from nursing homes are not easily predicted but may in large part be prevented through health care reforms that integrate acute and longterm care.

Effects of a Physician‐led Home Care Team on Terminal Care

This program was designed to encourage treatment of episodes of acute illness in skilled nursing facilities in order to avoid costly and potentially traumatic admission to hospital. It is part of the Monroe County Long Term Care Program, Inc, system of case management and Medicare and Medicaid waivers, and consists of financial incentives, paid by Medicare, to facilities and to responsible physicians to evaluate and care for acutely ill patients in the SNFs when medically safe and feasible. A retrospective evaluation using a physician assessment committee concluded that among the first 112 patients in the program, 76% were very probably saved hospitalization or at least an emergency room visit. Acute bacterial infection was the most common category of episode, occurring in 46% of cases. Considerable savings to both Medicare and Medicaid were estimated to have resulted.

Nursing Home‐Acquired Pneumonia: Avoiding the Hospital

The objective of this study was to assess the use of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (now called the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) Urinary Incontinence (UI) Guideline (1996) in nursing homes (NHs) using retrospective chart review and nursing assistant screening interviews. The study was conducted in a nonrandom sample of 52 NHs in upstate New York. Two hundred residents developing new UI or newly admitted with UI on the dayshift and who met criteria for evaluation and treatment/management were evaluated in the 12 weeks after onset of or admission with UI. Fifteen percent of newly admitted residents needed evaluation. Of residents already in NHs, 2.3 per 100 beds developed new UI over the 12 weeks. Aspects of UI evaluation rarely done were rectal examination (15%), digital examination of prostate (15%), and pelvic examination (2%). Sixty‐eight percent had a culture/sensitivity, 56% a urinalysis, and 6% a postvoid residual. Eighty‐one percent had a reversible cause at the time of onset, but only 34% had all addressed. Few (2%) needed urologist evaluation. Treatment was rare (3%), but management using toileting and absorbent products were common. Only 6% achieved resolution of UI. These results suggest that assessment and treatment of UI is manageable (a total of 4.2 new cases per 100 beds per 12 weeks) but quality is not adequate. On average, only 20% of the standards applicable were met, due primarily to lack of awareness of new UI and lack of familiarity with the guideline. Thus, improvements are needed. Recommendations for guideline revision are made.

Individual versus Team Case Management in Optimizing Community Care for Chronically Ill Patients with Dementia

Back‐up of elderly patients in hospital awaiting long‐term placement has become a major problem in some areas of the United States and elsewhere. In 1982, geriatric consultation teams (physician, nurse, and social worker) were introduced into six acute hospitals in Monroe County, New York, to help alleviate the problem through more attention to restoration of patient function and comprehensive discharge planning. Over a six‐month period, 4,328 newly hospitalized patients aged 70 or older were screened, and geriatric consultations were provided for 366 (8.5 per cent) who were judged to be at risk of requiring prolonged hospital stays. During this period, the mean monthly census of elderly patients backed up in hospital declined 21 per cent, a reversal of previous rises that could not be explained by any other identifiable factors. The impact was on length of stay on back‐up status rather than rate of entry to that status. A variety of medical, rehabilitative, and social interventions accounted for this outcome. A number of health care system barriers to expeditious rehabilitation and discharge of hospitalized elderly patients were identified. Geriatric consultation was deemed useful for implementation in acute hospitals in other settings.