James Giglio

Environmental factors and their association with emergency department hand hygiene compliance: an observational study

Objectives Hand hygiene is effective in preventing healthcare-associated infections. Environmental conditions in the emergency department (ED), including crowding and the use of non-traditional patient care areas (ie, hallways), may pose barriers to hand hygiene compliance. We examined the relationship between these environmental conditions and proper hand hygiene. Methods This was a single-site, observational study. From October 2013 to January 2014, trained observers recorded hand hygiene compliance among staff in the ED according to the World Health Organization ‘My 5 Moments for Hand Hygiene’. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse the relationship between environmental conditions and hand hygiene compliance, while controlling for important covariates (eg, hand hygiene indication, glove use, shift, etc). Results A total of 1673 hand hygiene opportunities were observed. In multivariable analyses, hand hygiene compliance was significantly lower when the ED was at its highest level of crowding than when the ED was not crowded and lower among hallway care areas than semiprivate care areas (OR=0.39, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.55; OR=0.73, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.97). Conclusions Unique environmental conditions pose barriers to hand hygiene compliance in the ED setting and should be considered by ED hand hygiene improvement efforts. Further study is needed to evaluate the impact of these environmental conditions on actual rates of infection transmission.

Design of a comprehensive chest pain initiative in an academic urban hospital.

We describe the development and institution of an initiative based on a clinical diagnostic algorithm and treatment pathways, facilitated by cardiac nurse practitioners, for the treatment of the diverse group of patients with chest pain who seek treatment at our urban-based institution. We believe that our chest pain initiative incorporates previous strategies of rapid emergency department management with inpatient-based care while providing a framework for outpatient follow-up and secondary prevention. These strategies allow our hospital to meet its goals of providing chest pain patients with standardized, high-quality, and expeditious care, given the challenges faced by an academic urban hospital.

Updating the chest pain algorithm: incorporating new evidence.

In 2003, we published our chest pain protocol for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) and acute myocardial infarction. Our algorithm was specifically designed for our institution, which was primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for all ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) and a preferred invasive approach for non-STEMIs. Since 2003, there have been numerous changes in the adjunctive pharmacotherapeutic armamentarium for PCI in both the STEMI and non-STEMI ACS context. We present our updated chest pain algorithm with a brief review of the rapidly evolving changes in adjunctive pharmacotherapy for PCI and provide a rationale for the changes that we have made to our institutional protocol. Clinical pathways need to be consistently updated and revises by incorporating new evidence from clinical trials in order to maintain clinical relevance.

Updating an institutional chest pain algorithm: incorporating new evidence on emerging pharmacotherapy.

Clinical treatment pathways are useful to ensure that evidence-based medicine is consistently applied in hospital systems and have been shown to improve patient outcomes. Such pathways need to be regularly updated and revised by incorporating new evidence from clinical trials to ensure optimal clinical care. In 2011, we published the Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital - Clinical Pathways for Acute Coronary Syndromes and Chest Pain. This algorithm includes primary percutaneous coronary intervention for all patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and an early invasive approach for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Since our last chest pain algorithm update, the novel antiplatelet agent ticagrelor has been introduced in the United States, resulting in an important revision of our acute coronary syndrome clinical pathways. Herein, we present our updated chest pain algorithm and provide rationale for the changes that we have made to our protocol.

A rapid-response alphanumeric paging design decreases door-to-balloon times in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction.

INTRODUCTION In acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), rapid reperfusion of the infarcted artery improves cardiovascular outcomes; however, many hospitals have difficulty achieving recommended times. We hypothesized that a Rapid-Response Alphanumeric Paging Design (RAPiD) would reduce door-to-balloon time for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in STEMI. METHODS A chest pain algorithm and interdisciplinary team was established in December 2000. In August 2002, RAPiD was instituted to transmit the diagnosis and location of a STEMI to the chest pain team through a speed-dial button. All patients presenting to our emergency department from February 2002 through July 2003 with STEMI were included. Exclusion criteria included lack of chest pain, cardiopulmonary arrest before PCI, and catheterization or PCI not performed. Outside-referral STEMI, in-patient STEMI, and failed thrombolysis patients were excluded. Data was obtained from medical records. Log transform of door-to-balloon (DTB) times was performed. RESULTS Forty-seven events satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria with 32 occurring after RAPiD (post-RAPiD). Fifteen events occurred during on-hours (8 am to 7 pm on weekdays). Mean untransformed DTB times pre- and post-RAPiD were 162 +/- 137 (standard deviation) minutes and 112 +/- 41 minutes. The main effects analysis of variance model showed a significant reduction in post-RAPiD DTB time (P = 0.03) with a mean reduction of 26% during off-hours and 20% during on-hours. The post-RAPiD estimate of mean DTB time, derived from the antilog of the log transform, was 96.7 minutes (95% confidence interval, 83.7-111.7). CONCLUSIONS The institution of RAPiD in a hospital with a preexisting chest pain algorithm significantly decreases DTB times so as to satisfy current ACC/AHA guidelines.

Updating the chest pain algorithm: incorporating new evidence on emerging antiplatelet agents.

In 2008, we published our chest pain protocol for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and acute myocardial infarction. Our algorithm was specifically designed for our institution, which includes primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) for all ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) and a preferred invasive approach for non-STEMIs. Since 2008, there have been changes in the adjunctive pharmacotherapeutic armamentarium for PCI in both the STEMI and non-STEMI ACS context. In particular, recent data on the novel antiplatelet agent prasugrel, dosing of clopidogrel after PCI, and interactions with clopidogrel and other medicines and substrates, which can lead to decreased platelet response to clopidogrel, have led us to update our ACS clinical pathway. We present our updated chest pain algorithm with a brief review of the rapidly evolving changes in adjunctive pharmacotherapy for PCI, and provide rationale for the changes that we have made to our institutional protocol. Clinical pathways need to be regularly updated and revised by incorporating new evidence from clinical trials to ensure optimal clinical care.

Positive impact of an interdisciplinary chest pain initiative on traditionally underserved populations.

BACKGROUND We assessed the clinical impact of an interdisciplinary, cardiac nurse practitioner-facilitated chest pain (CP) initiative that stresses an early invasive approach for patients with CP with acute coronary syndromes in traditionally underserved patient populations, including females, blacks, Hispanics, and patients older than 60 years. METHODS Two groups of patients were identified: Pre-CP initiative (December 1999-February 2000) and post-CP initiative (December 2000-February 2001). RESULTS Analysis of 714 patients revealed significantly more cardiac diagnoses post-CP initiative (61% pre-CP initiative vs. 73% post-CP initiative, P = 0.002), including in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) who were older than 60 years, females, and Hispanics. There was a significant increase in rates of cardiac catheterizations within 1 week of admission (10.5% vs. 20.4%, P <0.001), including in Hispanics. For rates of coronary artery stenting and/or bypass grafting (CABG), there was also a significant increase post-CP initiative (2.5% vs. 10.1%, P = 0.0005), as well as for Hispanics. Length of stay was significantly reduced for patients older than 60 years (8.3 vs. 5.8 days, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION Establishment of an interdisciplinary, cardiac nurse practitioner-facilitated CP initiative is associated with improvement in several clinical processes and outcomes: increased cardiac disease diagnosis in females, Hispanics, and patients older than 60 years; increased rates of cardiac catheterizations in Hispanic patients, increased rates of coronary artery stenting and/or CABG, particularly in Hispanic patients; and decreased length of stay in patients older than 60 years. These data support a targeted interdisciplinary CP initiative as a strategy to systematically enhance access to cardiovascular diagnosis in underserved patient populations.