James Harnett

Metabolic Screening After the American Diabetes Association's Consensus Statement on Antipsychotic Drugs and Diabetes

OBJECTIVE Several second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) drugs have been associated with weight gain, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia. We evaluated whether glucose and lipid testing increased after the American Diabetes Association (ADA) consensus statement recommending metabolic monitoring for SGA-treated patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Laboratory claims for serum glucose and lipid testing were identified for an incident cohort of 18,876 adults initiating SGA drugs in a U.S. commercial health plan (2001–2006) and a control group of 56,522 adults with diabetes not receiving antipsychotics. Interrupted time-series models were used to estimate the effect of ADA recommendations on baseline and annual testing trends after adjusting for differences in age, sex, mental health diagnoses, and cardiovascular risk using propensity score matching. RESULTS Mean baseline testing rates for SGA-treated patients during the study period were 23% (glucose) and 8% (lipids). Among persistent users of SGA medication, annual testing rates were 38% (glucose) and 23% (lipid). Before the ADA statement, screening rates for SGA-treated patients were increasing (glucose: baseline 3.6% per year, annual 7.2% per year; lipid: baseline 1.2% per year, annual 4.8% per year; P < 0.001 for each trend). Increases were similar to background testing trends in control subjects. The ADA statement was not associated with an increase in screening rates. CONCLUSIONS In a commercially insured population, glucose and lipid testing for SGA-treated adults was infrequent. A gradual increase in screening rates occurred over the 6-year period, but the changes were not temporally associated with the ADA statement. More effort is needed to improve diabetes and dyslipidemia screening in these at-risk patients.

Findings of a U.S. National Cardiometabolic Screening Program Among 10,084 Psychiatric Outpatients

OBJECTIVE A national cardiometabolic screening program for patients in a variety of public mental health facilities, group practices, and community behavioral health clinics was funded by Pfizer Inc. between 2005 and 2008. METHODS A one-day, voluntary metabolic health fair in the United States offered patients attending public mental health clinics free cardiometabolic screening and same-day feedback to physicians from a biometrics testing third party that was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. RESULTS This analysis included 10,084 patients at 219 sites; 2,739 patients (27%) reported having fasted for over eight hours. Schizophrenia or bipolar disorder was self-reported by 6,233 (62%) study participants. In the overall sample, the mean waist circumference was 41.1 inches for men and 40.4 inches for women; 27% were overweight (body mass index [BMI] 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2)), 52% were obese (BMI >or=30.0 kg/m(2)), 51% had elevated triglycerides (>or=150 mg/dl), and 51% were hypertensive (>or=130/85 mm Hg). In the fasting sample, 52% had metabolic syndrome, 35% had elevated total cholesterol (>or=200 mg/dl), 59% had low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (<40 mg/dl for men or <50 mg/dl for women), 45% had elevated triglycerides (>or=150 mg/dl), and 33% had elevated fasting glucose (>or=100 mg/dl). Among the 1,359 fasting patients with metabolic syndrome, 60% were not receiving any treatment. Among fasting patients who reported treatment for specific metabolic syndrome components, 33%, 65%, 71%, and 69% continued to have elevated total cholesterol, low levels of high-density lipoprotein, high blood pressure, and elevated glucose levels, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of metabolic syndrome and cardiometabolic risk factors, such as overweight, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and glucose abnormalities, was substantial and frequently untreated in this U.S. national mental health clinic screening program.

Burden of fibromyalgia and comparisons with osteoarthritis in the workforce.

Objectives: To calculate the fibromyalgia (FM) burden of illness (BOI) from the employer perspective and to compare annual prevalence, work output, absence, and health benefit costs of employees with FM versus osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Retrospective regression model analysis comparing objective work output, total health benefit (health care, prescription drug, sick leave, disability, workers’ compensation) costs, and absence days for FM, versus OA and NoFM cohorts, while controlling for differences in patient characteristics. Results: FM prevalence was 0.73%; OA 0.90%. Total health benefit costs for FM were

Identifying Fibromyalgia‐Associated Symptoms and Conditions from a Clinical Perspective: A Step Toward Evaluating Healthcare Resource Utilization in Fibromyalgia

8452 versus

Dose trends for second-generation antipsychotic treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder

11,253 (P < 0.0001) for OA and

Evaluation of Erectile Dysfunction Therapy in Patients Previously Nonadherent to Long-term Medications: A Retrospective Analysis of Prescription Claims

4013 (P < 0.0001) for NoFM, with BOI =

Factors that predict changing the type of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor medication among men in the UK.

4439. Total absence days were 16.8 versus 19.8 (P < 0.0001) and 6.4 (P < 0.0001), respectively. FM had significantly lower annual work output than NoFM (19.5%, P = 0.003) but comparable with OA. Conclusion: FM places a significant cost, absence, and productivity burden on employers.

Real-world evaluation of health-care resource utilization and costs in employees with fibromyalgia treated with pregabalin or duloxetine.

Objective:  The study aims to determine from the physicians perspective, the conditions and symptoms most relevant to the diagnosis of fibromyalgia (FM) for identifying International Classification of Diseases‐diagnosis codes and prescription medications to evaluate FM‐related healthcare resource utilization.

Impact of real-world ziprasidone dosing on treatment discontinuation rates in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND Antipsychotic dosing used in clinical practice can differ from dosing originally recommended in product labeling. This has been reported for olanzapine and quetiapine, where higher doses are commonly used. This may be the case for ziprasidone as well. METHOD To characterize changes over time in dosing for the initial and subsequent prescriptions of first-line second-generation antipsychotics used during treatment episodes for outpatients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, the 2001-2005 Thomson MarketScan Medicaid Database (Medicaid) and the 2001-2006 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (Commercial) were analyzed. Dose trends were evaluated using autoregressive time-series models. RESULTS Data were available for 49180 treatment episodes of schizophrenia (4683 Commercial and 44497 Medicaid) and 83289 treatment episodes of bipolar disorder (57961 Commercial and 25328 Medicaid). The initial prescription mean daily and overall mean daily doses of ziprasidone in schizophrenia episodes significantly increased across the Medicaid and Commercial populations, with similar trends observed for bipolar episodes. The first (May 2001) and last (December 2005) observed 3-month mean daily doses for ziprasidone were 112 mg/d and 138 mg/d for patients with schizophrenia and 93 mg/d and 113 mg/d for those with bipolar disorder in the Medicaid cohort, with similar findings for the Commercial cohort. Consistently significant trends in dose changes were not observed for the other medications, although quetiapine and olanzapine doses generally increased while aripiprazole and risperidone doses generally decreased. CONCLUSIONS There remains a need for controlled randomized clinical trials that test fixed doses of antipsychotics to ascertain the dose-response relationship within the dose range used in contemporary clinical practice.

Real-world evaluation of TNF-inhibitor utilization in rheumatoid arthritis

Erectile dysfunction (ED) can lead to treatment noncompliance in patients taking medications for chronic health conditions. Using the Intelligent Health Repository, NDCHealths longitudinal, United States health care claims database, we examined the impact of treating ED on adherence to long-term therapies in previously nonadherent patients. Male patients ≥18 years of age were identified who received antidepressant (AD), antihypertensive (AH), oral hypoglycemic (OHG), or lipid-lowering (LL) agents and initiated therapy with sildenafil citrate (Viagra) between January and June 2003. Treatment adherence was determined using medication possession ratios (MPRs) for the 12 months before and after the first prescription of sildenafil. Prior to initiation of therapy for ED with sildenafil, 64% of patients with comorbid medications were not adherent (MPR <0.8). Among these patients, 728 (27%) received AD, 2112 (78%) received AH, 984 (18%) received OHG, and 1078 (40%) received LL agents, with 66% of patients receiving multiple therapeutic classes. During the 12-month period after the first sildenafil prescription, patients had a significant increase in medication adherence compared with the 12 months before the first prescription of sildenafil (P < 0.0001). The percentage of patients who became adherent (MPR ≥0.8) with medications after sildenafil treatment was from 22% to 36%. With the exception of the LL group, there was a significant relationship between ≥3 sildenafil prescriptions and change in MPR (P < 0.05). Patients aged ≥65 years had similar improvement in MPR as patients ≤65 years. Treatment of ED with sildenafil improved adherence in patients taking common long-term medications who were previously nonadherent.