James K. Russell

Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial of 150-J Biphasic Shocks Compared With 200- to 360-J Monophasic Shocks in the Resuscitation of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Victims

BackgroundIn the present study, we compared an automatic external defibrillator (AED) that delivers 150-J biphasic shocks with traditional high-energy (200- to 360-J) monophasic AEDs. Methods and ResultsAEDs were prospectively randomized according to defibrillation waveform on a daily basis in 4 emergency medical services systems. Defibrillation efficacy, survival to hospital admission and discharge, return of spontaneous circulation, and neurological status at discharge (cerebral performance category) were compared. Of 338 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 115 had a cardiac etiology, presented with ventricular fibrillation, and were shocked with an AED. The time from the emergency call to the first shock was 8.9±3.0 (mean±SD) minutes. ConclusionsThe 150-J biphasic waveform defibrillated at higher rates, resulting in more patients who achieved a return of spontaneous circulation. Although survival rates to hospital admission and discharge did not differ, discharged patients who had been resuscitated with biphasic shocks were more likely to have good cerebral performance.

Refibrillation, resuscitation and survival in out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest victims treated with biphasic automated external defibrillators

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE Defibrillation is essential for victims of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) with ventricular fibrillation (VF), yet it does not terminate the underlying causes of VF. Prior to more definitive interventions, these same causes may result in recurrence of VF following defibrillation (refibrillation). The incidence and course of refibrillation, and its relation to patient outcomes, has not been previously described in the context of treatment of out-of-hospital SCA with biphasic waveform automated external defibrillators (AEDs). MATERIALS AND METHODS ECGs were recovered from all shocks delivered with biphasic AEDs by Basic Life Support (BLS) first responders, primarily police, in witnessed cardiac arrests occurring from December 1996 to December 2001 in the Rochester, MN public service area. Only events prior to administration of cardio-active medications were considered. Frequency and time to occurrence of refibrillation were compared in patients in relation to the progress of their resuscitation and survival. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS One hundred and sixteen of 128 shocks delivered under BLS care to 49 patients with witnessed cardiac arrests presenting with VF terminated VF. Most patients (61%) refibrillated while under BLS care, many (35%) more than once. Occurrence of and time to refibrillation were unrelated to achievement of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) under BLS care (BLS ROSC), to survival to hospital discharge and to neurologically intact survival.

AED use in businesses, public facilities and homes by minimally trained first responders

BACKGROUND Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) have become increasingly available outside of the Emergency Medical Systems (EMS) community to treat sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). We sought to study the use of AEDs in the home, businesses and other public settings by minimally trained first responders. The frequency of AED use, type of training offered to first responders, and outcomes of AED use were investigated. In addition, minimally trained responders were asked if they had encountered any safety problems associated with the AED. METHODS We conducted a telephone survey of businesses and public facilities (2683) and homes (145) owning at least one AED for at least 12 months. Use was defined as an AED taken to a medical emergency thought to be a SCA, regardless of whether the AED was applied to the patient or identified a shockable rhythm. RESULTS Of owners that participated in the survey, 13% (209/1581) of businesses and 5% (4/73) of homes had responded with the AED to a suspected cardiac arrest. Ninety-five percent of the businesses/public facilities offered training that specifically covered AED use. The rate of use for the AEDs was highest in residential buildings, public places, malls and recreational facilities with an overall usage rate of 11.6% per year. In-depth interviews were conducted with lay responders who had used the AED in a suspected cardiac arrest. In the four cases where the AED was used solely by a lay responder, all four patients survived to hospital admission and two were known to be discharged from the hospital. There were no reports of injury or harm. CONCLUSIONS This survey demonstrates that AEDs purchased by businesses and homes were frequently taken to suspected cardiac arrests. Lay responders were able to successfully use the AEDs in emergency situations. Further, there were no reports of harm or injury to the operators, bystanders or patients from lay responder use of the AEDs.

A high peak current 150-J fixed-energy defibrillation protocol treats recurrent ventricular fibrillation (VF) as effectively as initial VF

OBJECTIVE We tested the hypothesis that the frequency of shock success differs between initial and recurrent episodes of ventricular fibrillation (VF). METHODS Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients presenting with VF from December 1996 to February 2007 defibrillated using an AED with a fixed-energy protocol (150 J) (Philips Medical Systems, Seattle, WA) were included for analysis. We defined shock success as termination of VF within 5s post-shock (either asystole or organized rhythm). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis was used to adjust for the interrelatedness of shocks within each patient. RESULTS One hundred and three events occurred during the study period. Patient characteristics included: mean age 64.4 years, 82.5% male, and 81.6% bystander witnessed. Synchronized call-to-shock time was 6.4+/-2.3 min (mean+/-S.D.). VF recurred in 64 (62.1%) patients. Two hundred and fifty-seven shocks delivered for initial (101) or recurrent (156) VF were available for analysis. Initial shocks terminated VF in 93/101 (92.1%); subsequent shocks terminated recurrent VF in 140/156 (89.7%). GEE odds ratio for shock type (initial versus refibrillation) was 1.10 (95% CI 0.37-3.24, p=0.87). After adjusting for potential confounders, shock type remained insignificant (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.41-3.2, p=0.80). We observed no significant difference in ROSC (34.4% versus 46.2%, p=0.23) or survival (37.5% versus 41.0%, p=0.72) between those with and without VF recurrence. CONCLUSIONS We observed no significant difference in the frequency of shock success between initial and recurrent episodes of VF using this AED with a 150 J fixed-energy protocol. VF recurrence is common and does not adversely affect shock success, ROSC or survival.

A user-friendly integrated monitor-adhesive patch for long-term ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring.

BACKGROUND Compliance to long-term ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring is important for diagnosis in patients with cardiac arrhythmia. This requires a system with a minimal impact on daily activities. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate if a lightweight integrated adhesive monitor for long-term use without unacceptable adverse effects is feasible. METHODS The participants wore either a prototype lightweight monitor or a control system for a total of up to 30 days, changing patches once (investigational device) or twice (control) weekly. Comfort, skin irritation, and impact on quality of life were recorded. RESULTS The new monitor can be worn by most participants for periods of at least 6 days. Skin irritation and comfort rating were comparable, and impact on the quality of life was low compared with the control. Patients considered the device comfortable. CONCLUSION An integrated adhesive monitor that can be worn on the skin up to 7 days with minimal side effects is feasible.

Reliability and accuracy of the thoracic impedance signal for measuring cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality metrics

AIM To determine the accuracy and reliability of the thoracic impedance (TI) signal to assess cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality metrics. METHODS A dataset of 63 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest episodes containing the compression depth (CD), capnography and TI signals was used. We developed a chest compression (CC) and ventilation detector based on the TI signal. TI shows fluctuations due to CCs and ventilations. A decision algorithm classified the local maxima as CCs or ventilations. Seven CPR quality metrics were computed: mean CC-rate, fraction of minutes with inadequate CC-rate, chest compression fraction, mean ventilation rate, fraction of minutes with hyperventilation, instantaneous CC-rate and instantaneous ventilation rate. The CD and capnography signals were accepted as the gold standard for CC and ventilation detection respectively. The accuracy of the detector was evaluated in terms of sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Distributions for each metric computed from the TI and from the gold standard were calculated and tested for normality using one sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. For normal and not normal distributions, two sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U test respectively were applied to test for equal means and medians respectively. Bland-Altman plots were represented for each metric to analyze the level of agreement between values obtained from the TI and gold standard. RESULTS The CC/ventilation detector had a median sensitivity/PPV of 97.2%/97.7% for CCs and 92.2%/81.0% for ventilations respectively. Distributions for all the metrics showed equal means or medians, and agreements >95% between metrics and gold standard was achieved for most of the episodes in the test set, except for the instantaneous ventilation rate. CONCLUSION With our data, the TI can be reliably used to measure all the CPR quality metrics proposed in this study, except for the instantaneous ventilation rate.

Can thoracic impedance monitor the depth of chest compressions during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

AIM To analyze the relationship between the depth of the chest compressions and the fluctuation caused in the thoracic impedance (TI) signal in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The ultimate goal was to evaluate whether it is possible to identify compressions with inadequate depth using information of the TI waveform. METHODS 60 OHCA episodes were extracted, one per patient, containing both compression depth (CD) and TI signals. Every 5s the mean value of the maxima of the CD, Dmax, and three features characterizing the fluctuations caused by the compressions in the TI waveform (peak-to-peak amplitude, area and curve length) were computed. The linear relationship between Dmax and the TI features was tested using Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and univariate linear regression for the whole population, for each patient independently, and for series of compressions provided by a single rescuer. The power of the three TI features to classify each 5s-epoch as shallow/non-shallow was evaluated in terms of area under the curve, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS The r was 0.34, 0.36 and 0.37 for peak-to-peak amplitude, area and curve length respectively when the whole population was analyzed. Within patients the median r was 0.40, 0.43 and 0.47, respectively. The analysis of the series of compressions yielded a median r of 0.81 between Dmax and the peak-to-peak amplitude, but it decreased to 0.47 when all the series were considered jointly. The classifier based on the TI features showed 90.0%/37.1% and 86.2%/43.5% sensitivity/specificity values, and an area under the curve of 0.75 and 0.71 for the training and test set respectively. CONCLUSION Low linearity between CD and TI was noted in OHCA episodes involving multiple rescuers. Our findings suggest that TI is unreliable as a predictor of Dmax and inaccurate in detecting shallow compressions.

The effects of phase duration on defibrillation success of dual time constant biphasic waveforms

AIM OF STUDY The effects of first and second phase duration of biphasic waveforms on defibrillation success were evaluated in a guinea pig model of ventricular fibrillation (VF). We hypothesized that waveform duration, and especially the first phase duration, played a main role on defibrillation efficacy in comparison to energy, current and voltage, when a dual time constant biphasic shock was employed. METHODS VF was induced and untreated for 5s in 30 male guinea pigs, prior to attempting a single defibrillatory shock with one of 5 defibrillation waveforms which had different durations of the first and second phase. A five step up-down protocol was utilized for determining the defibrillation efficacy. After a 3-min interval, the procedure was repeated. A total of 25 cardiac arrest events and defibrillations were investigated for each animal. RESULTS The defibrillation waveforms with an intermediate first phase of 5 ms, yielded the highest defibrillation success (p<0.05). These waveforms also presented significantly lower energy, current and voltage in comparison to waveforms with shorter or longer first phase durations (p<0.001). However, no differences on defibrillation success were observed among waveforms with different second phase durations varying from 1.5 ms to 3.5 ms. CONCLUSIONS For dual time constant biphasic waveforms, the first phase duration played a main role on defibrillation success. The intermediate first phase duration of 5 ms, yielded the best defibrillation efficacy compared with shorter or longer first phase durations. While the second phase duration did not affect defibrillation outcomes.

Minimal interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a single shock as mandated by automated external defibrillations does not compromise outcomes in a porcine model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation.

Objectives:Current automated external defibrillations require interruptions in chest compressions to avoid artifacts during electrocardiographic analyses and to minimize the risk of accidental delivery of an electric shock to the rescuer. The earlier three-shock algorithm, with prolonged interruptions of chest compressions, compromised outcomes and increased severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction. In the present study, we investigated the effect of timing of minimal automated external defibrillation-mandated interruptions of chest compressions on cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes, using a single-shock algorithm. We hypothesized that an 8-sec interruption of chest compressions for a single shock, as mandated by automated external defibrillations, would not impair initial resuscitation and outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Design:Randomized prospective animal study. Setting:University affiliated research laboratory. Subjects:Domestic pigs. Measurements and Main Results:In 24 domestic male pigs weighing 41 ± 2 kg, ventricular fibrillation was induced by left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion and untreated for 7 min. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, including chest compressions and ventilation with oxygen, was then performed for an interval of 2 min before attempted defibrillation. Animals were randomized into three groups: A) interruption immediately before defibrillation; B) interruption after 1 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation; or C) no interruption. Chest compressions were delivered with the aid of a mechanical chest compressor at a rate of 100 compressions/min and compression/ventilation ratio of 30:2. Defibrillation was attempted with a single biphasic 150-J shock. Each animal was successfully resuscitated and survived for >72 hr. No differences in the number of shocks before return of spontaneous circulation, frequency of recurrent ventricular fibrillation, duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction were observed. Conclusions:In this experimental model of cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, minimal automated external defibrillation-mandated interruption of chest compressions for a single-shock algorithm did not have adverse effects on postresuscitation myocardial or neurologic function. All animals, whether subjected to cardiopulmonary resuscitation interruptions or not, survived.

Analysis of the ventricular fibrillation waveform in refibrillation.

Objectives:Frustrating outcomes are driving investigation of alternative resuscitation protocols. Previous analysis of the ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform has focused on guiding whether to shock immediately or to delay for delivery of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the case of presenting VF. The same issues emerge in the case of refibrillation. Measurements and Main Results:All cases of witnessed VF cardiac arrest in the Rochester, MN, area in a 9-yr period were analyzed. Rochester rescuers employed an early defibrillation protocol during the study period. A summary measure of the VF waveform before the shock delivered in 35 incidents of refibrillation was compared with the time elapsed from the initial shock, the intervening electrocardiographic rhythm, ambulance response time, and call-to-shock time for prediction of early return of spontaneous circulation and of neurologically intact survival. VF waveform analysis separated patients with good outcomes when treated with early defibrillation of refibrillation from those without good outcomes more clearly than other predictors. Conclusions:Analysis of VF waveform offers promise for real-time guidance of resuscitation efforts on the basis of individual patient characteristics, in refibrillation and in the initial shock. It has advantages over guidance based on individual or aggregate system response times.