Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where James M. Downey is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by James M. Downey.


Circulation | 1991

Protection against infarction afforded by preconditioning is mediated by A1 adenosine receptors in rabbit heart.

G. S. Liu; Jon D. Thornton; D. M. Van Winkle; A. W. H. Stanley; R. A. Olsson; James M. Downey

BackgroundPreconditioning (5 minutes of ischemia followed by 10 minutes of recovery) renders the heart very resistant to infarction from subsequent ischemia. This study tests whether adenosine receptors might mediate preconditioning protection. Methods and ResultsWe examined the effect on infarct size of pretreatment with either of two adenosine receptor antagonists in both control and preconditioned in situ rabbit hearts. Hearts underwent 30 minutes of regional ischemia plus 3 hours of reperfusion, and infarct size was measured with tetrazolium. Infarct size averaged 39% of the zone at risk in controls but only 8% in preconditioned hearts. Preconditioned and nonpreconditioned hearts receiving either blocker had infarcts not different in size from the controls. A 5-minute intracoronary infusion of adenosine was as effective as 5 minutes of ischemia in protecting parabiotically perfused isolated hearts against infarction from a 45-minute ischemic insult. Similarly, intracoronary infusion of N6-1-(phenyl-2R-isopropyl)adenosine, an A l-selective adenosine receptor agonist, at a dose that delayed conduction but did not dilate the coronary vessels, also limited infarct size. The protection disappeared when we reduced the coronary concentration of drug by intravenous infusion of adenosine, indicating that cardiac rather than peripheral receptors were involved in the protection. ConclusionsWe conclude that adenosine released during the preconditioning occlusion stimulates cardiac A 1 receptors, which leaves the heart protected against infarction even after the adenosine has been withdrawn. (Circulation 1991;84:350–356)


Circulation Research | 2000

Opening of Mitochondrial KATP Channels Triggers the Preconditioned State by Generating Free Radicals

Tilley Pain; Xi-Ming Yang; Stuart D. Critz; Yankun Yue; Atsushi Nakano; Guang S. Liu; G. Heusch; Michael V. Cohen; James M. Downey

The critical time for opening mitochondrial (mito) KATP channels, putative end effectors of ischemic preconditioning (PC), was examined. In isolated rabbit hearts 29±3% of risk zone infarcted after 30 minutes of regional ischemia. Ischemic PC or 5-minute exposure to 10 &mgr;mol/L diazoxide, a mito KATP channel opener, reduced infarction to 3±1% and 8±1%, respectively. The mito KATP channel closer 5-hydroxydecanoate (200 &mgr;mol/L), bracketing either 5-minute PC ischemia or diazoxide infusion, blocked protection (24±3 and 28±6% infarction, respectively). However, 5-hydroxydecanoate starting 5 minutes before long ischemia did not affect protection. Glibenclamide (5 &mgr;mol/L), another KATP channel closer, blocked the protection by PC only when administered early. These data suggest that KATP channel opening triggers protection but is not the final step. Five minutes of diazoxide followed by a 30-minute washout still reduced infarct size (8±3%), implying memory as seen with other PC triggers. The protection by diazoxide was not blocked by 5 &mgr;mol/L chelerythrine, a protein kinase C antagonist, given either to bracket diazoxide infusion or just before the index ischemia. Bracketing preischemic exposure to diazoxide with 50 &mgr;mol/L genistein, a tyrosine kinase antagonist, did not affect infarction, but genistein blocked the protection by diazoxide when administered shortly before the index ischemia. Thus, although it is not protein kinase C-dependent, the protection by diazoxide involves tyrosine kinase. Bracketing diazoxide perfusion with N-(2-mercaptopropionyl) glycine (300 &mgr;mol/L) or Mn(III)tetrakis(4-benzoic acid) porphyrin chloride (7 &mgr;mol/L), each of which is a free radical scavenger, blocked protection, indicating that diazoxide triggers protection through free radicals. Therefore, mito KATP channels are not the end effectors of protection, but rather their opening before ischemia generates free radicals that trigger entrance into a preconditioned state and activation of kinases.


Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology | 1985

Xanthine oxidase as a source of free radical damage in myocardial ischemia.

David E. Chambers; Dale A. Parks; Guy Patterson; Ranjan S. Roy; Joe M. McCord; Shigeo Yoshida; Loren F. Parmley; James M. Downey

Experiments were performed to determine if xanthine oxidase is a source of free radicals during myocardial ischemia. Open chest dogs were subjected to 1 h of total occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by 4 h of reperfusion. Directly after coronary artery occlusion, Ce141 microspheres were injected into the left atrium to mark the ischemic bed. At the end of reperfusion, the hearts were removed and sectioned. Autoradiography determined the ischemic myocardium at risk, and the necrotic zone was determined by triphenyl-tetrazolium staining. Animals were divided into three groups: control, allopurinol (24-h oral pretreatment 400 mg, then 50 mg/kg IV bolus on occlusion); and superoxide dismutase starting with occlusion (15 000 U/kg). The size of the infarct as a percentage of the tissue at risk was: 23.1 +/- 4.1 for the control; 8.7 +/- 1.2 for the allopurinol group; and 5.4 +/- 1.2 for the superoxide dismutase group. The infarcts in the allopurinol and superoxide dismutase groups were significantly smaller than those in the control groups. In a second series of experiments we determined the xanthine oxidase/xanthine dehydrogenase content of dog myocardium. The left anterior descending branch was ligated for 30 min and then biopsies were removed from both the normal and the ischemic regions. Total enzyme content did not differ between the two regions averaging 0.259 U/g protein for the ischemic tissue and 0.225 U/g protein for the normal region. Only 9.8% of the enzyme was in the oxidase form in the normal region while 32.8% was in the oxidase form in the ischemic zone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Circulation Research | 1995

Role of Bradykinin in Protection of Ischemic Preconditioning in Rabbit Hearts

Mahiko Goto; Yongge Liu; Xi-Ming Yang; Jeffrey L. Ardell; Michael V. Cohen; James M. Downey

Bradykinin receptor activation has been proposed to be involved in ischemic preconditioning. In the present study, we further investigated the role of this agent in preconditioning in both isolated and in situ rabbit hearts. All hearts were subjected to 30 minutes of regional ischemia followed by reperfusion for 2 hours (in vitro hearts) and 3 hours (in situ hearts). Infarct size was measured by tetrazolium staining and expressed as a percentage of the size of the risk zone. Preconditioning in situ hearts with 5 minutes of ischemia and 10 minutes of reperfusion significantly reduced infarct size to 10.2 +/- 2.2% of the risk region (P < .0005 versus control infarct size of 36.7 +/- 2.6%). Pretreatment with HOE 140 (26 micrograms/kg), a bradykinin B2 receptor blocker, did not alter infarct size in nonpreconditioned hearts (40.6 +/- 5.3% infarction) but abolished protection from ischemic preconditioning (34.1 +/- 1.6% infarction). However, when HOE 140 was administered during the initial reflow period following 5 minutes of ischemia, protection was no longer abolished (15.6 +/- 3.9% infarction versus 13.3 +/- 3.8% without HOE 140, P = NS). Bradykinin infusion in isolated hearts mimicked preconditioning, and protection was not affected by pretreatment with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester or the prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor indomethacin but could be completely abolished by the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors polymyxin B and staurosporine as well as by HOE 140. HOE 140 could not block the protection of ischemic preconditioning in isolated hearts. That failure was apparently due to the absence of blood-borne kininogens rather than autonomic nerves. When the preconditioning stimulus in the in situ model was amplified with four cycles of 5-minute ischemia/10-minute reperfusion, HOE 140 pretreatment could no longer block protection (infarct size was 10.7 +/- 3.5% versus 6.4 +/- 2.0% without HOE 140, P = NS). We propose that bradykinin receptors protect by coupling to PKC as do adenosine receptors, and blockade of either receptor will diminish the total stimulus of PKC below threshold and prevent protection. A more intense preconditioning ischemic stimulus can overcome bradykinin receptor blockade, however, by simply enhancing the amount of adenosine and possibly other agonists released.


Circulation | 1992

Intravenous pretreatment with A1-selective adenosine analogues protects the heart against infarction.

Jon D. Thornton; Guang-Shung Liu; R. A. Olsson; James M. Downey

BackgroundRecent data from this laboratory indicate that pretreatment with adenosine can protect the heart against infarction via A1-receptors, but because of systemic hypotension, adenosine had to be given into the coronary circulation. Methods and ResultsIn this study, we tested whether that protection could be achieved by intravenous administration of the A1-selective adenosine agonists N6-(phenyl-2R-isopropyl)- adenosine (PIA) and 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA). Nine groups of open-chest anesthetized rabbits were subjected to 30 minutes of regional coronary ischemia and 3 hours of reperfusion. Infarct size was determined by tetrazolium staining. Control hearts receiving no treatment had 38±4% of the risk zone infarcted. Preconditioning with 5 minutes of ischemia and 10 minutes of reperfusion before ischemia limited the infarct to 8±4%. Intravenous PTA 15 minutes before 30-minute ischemia also limited infarct size to 6±2% at the highest dose. CCPA offered similar protection. When the PIA was given at reperfusion, infarct size was 46±6%, indicating that receptor activation must precede ischemia to protect. Pretreatment with CGS 21680, a selective A2-receptor agonist, caused identical hypotension but failed to limit infarct size (43±3%), indicating again that the A1-receptor is involved. When rabbits pretreated with PTA were paced at 220 beats per minute, PIA still limited infarct size (16±4%), indicating that protection was not the result of bradycardia. ConclusionsThese results indicate that stimulation of adenosine A1-receptors causes the heart to become resistant to ischemia and that this protection can be achieved with intravenous administration of A1-selective agents.


Anesthesiology | 1997

Volatile Anesthetics Protect the Ischemic Rabbit Myocardium from Infarction

Doris K. Cope; Keyser W. Impastato; Michael V. Cohen; James M. Downey

Background The influence of anesthetic agents on the infarction process in the ischemic myocardium is unclear. This study evaluated the effects of three intravenous and three inhalational anesthetic agents on myocardial infarction within a quantified ischemic risk zone in rabbit hearts subjected to a standardized regional ischemia‐reperfusion insult. Methods Both in vitro and in situ rabbit models were used to investigate the effects of anesthetic agents on infarct size. In all rabbits the heart was exposed and a coronary artery surrounded with a suture to form a snare for subsequent occlusion. In in situ preparations, both intravenous and inhalational agents were tested, whereas only the latter were used in isolated hearts. Infarct size was determined by triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. To determine whether an adenosine‐mediated protective mechanism was involved, 8‐(p‐sulfophenyl)theophylline, an adenosine receptor blocker, was added to halothane‐treated isolated hearts. Adenosine concentration in the coronary effluent was also measured in isolated hearts exposed to halothane. In other protocols, chelerythrine, a highly selective protein kinase C inhibitor, was administered to both halothane‐treated and untreated isolated hearts. Results Infarcts in the three in situ groups anesthetized with halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane were about one half as large as infarcts in rabbits that underwent anesthesia with pentobarbital, ketamine‐xylazine, or propofol. Volatile anesthetics also protected isolated hearts by a similar amount. Both adenosine receptor blockade and chelerythrine abolished cardioprotection from halothane in isolated hearts. Halothane treatment did not increase adenosine release. Conclusions The volatile anesthetics tested protected the ischemic rabbit heart from infarction, in contrast to the three intravenous agents tested. Protection was independent of the hypotensive effect of the inhalational agents because halothane also protected isolated hearts, in which changing vascular tone is not an issue and coronary perfusion pressure is constant. Cardioprotection by volatile anesthetics depended on both adenosine receptors and protein kinase C, and thus is similar to the mechanism of protection seen with ischemic preconditioning.


Cardiovascular Research | 2001

Signal transduction of ischemic preconditioning

Rainer Schulz; Michael V. Cohen; Matthias Behrends; James M. Downey; G. Heusch

Ischemic preconditioning is a phenomenon in which exposure of the heart to a brief period of ischemia causes it to quickly adapt itself to become resistant to infarction from a subsequent ischemic insult. The mechanism is not fully understood but, at least in the rabbit, it is known to be triggered by occupation of adenosine receptors, opioid receptors, bradykinin receptors and the generation of free radicals during the preconditioning ischemia. All of these are thought to converge on and activate protein kinase C (PKC), which in turn activates a tyrosine kinase. This kinase cascade eventually terminates on some unknown effector, possibly a potassium channel or a cytoskeletal protein, which makes the cells resistant to infarction. If this process can be understood, it should be possible to devise a method for conferring this protection to patients with acute myocardial infarction.


Circulation | 1991

Preconditioning causes improved wall motion as well as smaller infarcts after transient coronary occlusion in rabbits.

Michael V. Cohen; Guang-Shung Liu; James M. Downey

BackgroundA brief coronary occlusion before a more prolonged occlusion results in less myocardial infarction than the longer occlusion alone. However, the effects of this preconditioning on recovery of systolic function after coronary occlusion have not been determined. Methods and ResultsUltrasonic crystals implanted in rabbit myocardium measured segment length in the distribution of a branch of the left coronary artery that was fitted with a snare occluder. Rabbits were randomly allocated to either nonpreconditioned or preconditioned groups. Rabbits in the latter group underwent preconditioning with a 5-minute coronary occlusion followed by 10 minutes of reperfusion. Then the coronary artery was occluded for 20 minutes in all rabbits, after which it was allowed to reperfuse for 90 minutes. The hearts were then excised, and infarct size was measured by staining with triphenyltetrazolium chloride. During coronary occlusion, all hearts except one demonstrated either akinesis or paradoxical bulging. Five minutes after release of the 20-minute occlusion, active shortening had returned in the preconditioned rabbits and averaged 27.9 ± 16.6% of baseline shortening. At the same time, paradoxical lengthening persisted in nonpreconditioned rabbits (−15.5 ± 19.8% of baseline). By the end of the 90-minute reperfusion period, segment shortening averaged 40.1 ± 8.4% of baseline in preconditioned rabbits and only 6.2 ± 12.0% in nonpreconditioned rabbits (p < 0.05). Infarct size as a percentage of risk area was significantly smaller in preconditioned rabbits as well (3.0 ± 1.6% versus 28.8 ± 7.0%, p < 0.002) and likely accounted for the improved shortening. ConclusionsWe conclude that a brief coronary occlusion before a more prolonged occlusion results in not only reduced infarct size but also significantly better recovery of systolic function. (Circulation 1991;84:341–349)


Circulation Research | 1975

Inhibition of coronary blood flow by a vascular waterfall mechanism.

James M. Downey; Edward S. Kirk

The mechanism whereby systole inhibits coronary blood flow was examined. A branch of the left coronary artery was maximally dilated with an adenosine infusion, and the pressure-flow relationship was obtained for beating and arrested states. The pressure-flow curve for the arrested state was linear from below 20 to beyond 200 mm Hg. The curve for the beating state was shifted toward higher pressures and in the range of pressures above peak ventricular pressure was linear and parallel to that for the arrested state. Below this range the curve for the beating state converged toward that for the arrested state and was convex to the pressure axis. These resultswere compared with a model of the coronary vasculature that consisted of numerous parallel channels, each responding to local intramyocardial pressure by forming vascular waterfalls. When intramyocardial pressure in the model was assigned values from zero at the epicardium to peak ventricular pressure at the endocardium, pressure-flow curves similar to the experimental ones resulted. Thus, we conclude that systole inhibits coronary perfusion by the formation of vascular waterfalls and that the intramyocardial pressures responsible for this inhibition do not significantly exceed peak ventricular pressure.


Heart Failure Reviews | 2007

Signaling pathways in ischemic preconditioning

James M. Downey; Amanda M. Davis; Michael V. Cohen

Ischemic preconditioning renders the heart resistant to infarction from ischemia/reperfusion. Over the past two decades a great deal has been learned about preconditioning’s mechanism. Adenosine, bradykinin, and opioids act in parallel to trigger the preconditioned state and do so by activating PKC. While adenosine couples directly to PKC through the phospholipases, bradykinin and opioids do so through a complex pathway that includes in order: phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-kinase), Akt, nitric oxide synthase, guanylyl cyclase, PKG, opening of mitochondrial KATP channels, and activation of PKC by redox signaling. There are even differences between the opioid and bradykinin coupling as the former activates PI3-kinase through transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor while the latter has an unknown coupling mechanism. Protection stems from inhibition of formation of mitochondrial permeability transition pores early in reperfusion through activation of the survival kinases, Akt and ERK. These kinases are activated as a result of PKC somehow promoting signaling from adenosine A2 receptors early in reperfusion. The survival kinases are thought to inhibit pore formation by phosphorylating GSK-3β. The reperfused heart requires the support of the protective signals for only about an hour after which the ischemic injury is repaired and the signals are no longer needed.

Collaboration


Dive into the James M. Downey's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael V. Cohen

University of South Alabama

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xi-Ming Yang

University of South Alabama

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Derek M. Yellon

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Guang S. Liu

University of South Alabama

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lin Cui

University of South Alabama

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stuart D. Critz

University of South Alabama

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tetsuji Miura

Sapporo Medical University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yongge Liu

University of South Alabama

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jon D. Thornton

University of South Alabama

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge