James N. Yang

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for management of spinal metastases in patients without spinal cord compression: a phase 1-2 trial

BACKGROUNDnSpinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to manage spinal metastases, yet the techniques effectiveness in controlling the symptom burden of spinal metastases has not been well described. We investigated the clinical benefit of SBRT for managing spinal metastases and reducing cancer-related symptoms.nnnMETHODSn149 patients with mechanically stable, non-cord-compressing spinal metastases (166 lesions) were given SBRT in a phase 1-2 study. Patients received a total dose of 27-30 Gy, typically in three fractions. Symptoms were measured before SBRT and at several time points up to 6 months after treatment, by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the M D Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI). The primary endpoint was frequency and duration of complete pain relief. The study is completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00508443.nnnFINDINGSnMedian follow-up was 15·9 months (IQR 9·5-30·3). The number of patients reporting no pain from bone metastases, as measured by the BPI, increased from 39 of 149 (26%) before SBRT to 55 of 102 (54%) 6 months after SBRT (p<0·0001). BPI-reported pain reduction from baseline to 4 weeks after SBRT was clinically meaningful (mean 3·4 [SD 2·9] on the BPI pain-at-its-worst item at baseline, 2·1 [2·4] at 4 weeks; effect size 0·47, p=0·00076). These improvements were accompanied by significant reduction in opioid use during the first 6 months after SBRT (43 [28·9%] of 149 patients with strong opioid use at baseline vs 20 [20·0%] of 100 at 6 months; p=0·011). Ordinal regression modelling showed that patients reported significant pain reduction according to the MDASI during the first 6 months after SBRT (p=0·00003), and significant reductions in a composite score of the six MDASI symptom interference with daily life items (p=0·0066). Only a few instances of non-neurological grade 3 toxicities occurred: nausea (one event), vomiting (one), diarrhoea (one), fatigue (one), dysphagia (one), neck pain (one), and diaphoresis (one); pain associated with severe tongue oedema and trismus occurred twice; and non-cardiac chest pain was reported three times. No grade 4 toxicities occurred. Progression-free survival after SBRT was 80·5% (95% CI 72·9-86·1) at 1 year and 72·4% (63·1-79·7) at 2 years.nnnINTERPRETATIONnSBRT is an effective primary or salvage treatment for mechanically stable spinal metastasis. Significant reductions in patient-reported pain and other symptoms were evident 6 months after SBRT, along with satisfactory progression-free survival and no late spinal cord toxicities.nnnFUNDINGnNational Cancer Institute of the US National Institutes of Health.

Post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery versus observation for completely resected brain metastases: a single-centre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

SUMMARY Background After brain metastasis resection, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) decreases local recurrence but may cause cognitive decline. We performed this study to determine if stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the surgical cavity improved local tumor tumor-free recurrence rates compared to surgical resection alone as an alternative to the need for immediate WBRT. Methods The main entry criteria for the study included patients >3 years of age, with a Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 70, who were able to undergo an MRI scan and who had a complete resection of 1–3 brain metastases (the maximum diameter of the resection cavity had to be ≤4cm). Patients were assigned randomly to either SRS treatment of the resection cavity (within 30 days of surgery) or observation (OBS). Patients were stratified by histology, tumor size, and number of metastases. Patients were recruited at a single tertiary cancer center. The primary endpoint was time to local recurrence in the resection cavity assessed by blinded central review of brain MRI scans in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Trial NCT00950001, status: closed to new participants). Findings Between 8/13/2009 and 2/16/2016, 132 patients were randomized to OBS (N=68) or SRS (N=64), with 128 patients available for analysis. We stratified by metastasis size (maximum diameter of ≥3 cm vs. <3 cm), histology (melanoma vs. other), and number of metastases (one vs. two or three). The 12-month local tumor recurrence-free rate was 43% (OBS) (95% CI 31%–59%) and 72% (SRS) (95% CI 60%–87%) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24–0.88, p=0.015). Interpretation This prospective randomized trial of patients undergoing surgical resection for 1–3 brain metastases indicates that SRS administered to the resection cavity significantly lowers local recurrence compared to observation alone. Thus, the use of SRS after brain metastasis resection is an alternative to WBRT.BACKGROUNDnAfter brain metastasis resection, whole brain radiotherapy decreases local recurrence, but might cause cognitive decline. We did this study to determine if stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the surgical cavity improved time to local recurrence compared with that for surgical resection alone.nnnMETHODSnIn this randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients at a single tertiary cancer centre in the USA. Eligible patients were older than 3 years, had a Karnofsky Performance Score of 70 or higher, were able to have an MRI scan, and had a complete resection of one to three brain metastases (with a maximum diameter of the resection cavity ≤4 cm). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a block size of four to either SRS of the resection cavity (within 30 days of surgery) or observation. Patients were stratified by histology of the primary tumour, metastatic tumour size, and number of metastases. The primary endpoint was time to local recurrence in the resection cavity, assessed by blinded central review of brain MRI scans by the study neuroradiologist in the modified intention-to-treat population that analysed patients by randomised allocation but excluded patients found ineligible after randomisation. Participants and other members of the treatment team (excluding the neuroradiologist) were not masked to treatment allocation. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00950001, and is closed to new participants.nnnFINDINGSnBetween Aug 13, 2009, and Feb 16, 2016, 132 patients were randomly assigned to the observation group (n=68) or SRS group (n=64), with 128 patients available for analysis; four patients were ineligible (three from the SRS group and one from the observation group). Median follow-up was 11·1 months (IQR 4·8-20·4). 12-month freedom from local recurrence was 43% (95% CI 31-59) in the observation group and 72% (60-87) in the SRS group (hazard ratio 0·46 [95% CI 0·24-0·88]; p=0·015). There were no adverse events or treatment-related deaths in either group.nnnINTERPRETATIONnSRS of the surgical cavity in patients who have had complete resection of one, two, or three brain metastases significantly lowers local recurrence compared with that noted for observation alone. Thus, the use of SRS after brain metastasis resection could be an alternative to whole-brain radiotherapy.nnnFUNDINGnNational Institutes of Health.

A robust Hough transform algorithm for determining the radiation centers of circular and rectangular fields with subpixel accuracy

Uncertainty in localizing the radiation field center is among the major components that contribute to the overall positional error and thus must be minimized. In this study, we developed a Hough transform (HT)-based computer algorithm to localize the radiation center of a circular or rectangular field with subpixel accuracy. We found that the HT method detected the centers of the test circular fields with an absolute error of 0.037 +/- 0.019 pixels. On a typical electronic portal imager with 0.5 mm image resolution, this mean detection error was translated to 0.02 mm, which was much finer than the image resolution. It is worth noting that the subpixel accuracy described here does not include experimental uncertainties such as linac mechanical instability or room laser inaccuracy. The HT method was more accurate and more robust to image noise and artifacts than the traditional center-of-mass method. Application of the HT method in Winston-Lutz tests was demonstrated to measure the ball-radiation center alignment with subpixel accuracy. Finally, the method was applied to quantitative evaluation of the radiation center wobble during collimator rotation.

Single-fraction versus multifraction spinal stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases from renal cell carcinoma: secondary analysis of Phase I/II trials.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare fractionation schemes and outcomes of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated in institutional prospective spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) trials who did not previously undergo radiation treatment at the site of the SSRS. METHODS Patients enrolled in 2 separate institutional prospective protocols and treated with SSRS between 2002 and 2011 were included. A secondary analysis was performed on patients with previously nonirradiated RCC spinal metastases treated with either single-fraction (SF) or multifraction (MF) SSRS. RESULTS SSRS was performed in 47 spinal sites on 43 patients. The median age of the patients was 62 years (range 38-75 years). The most common histological subtype was clear cell (n = 30). Fifteen sites underwent surgery prior to the SSRS, with laminectomy the most common procedure performed (n = 10). All SF SSRS was delivered to a dose of 24 Gy (n = 21) while MF regiments were either 27 Gy in 3 fractions (n = 20) or 30 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 6). The median overall survival duration for the entire cohort was 22.8 months. The median local control (LC) for the entire cohort was 80.6 months with 1-year and 2-year actuarial LC rates of 82% and 68%, respectively. Single-fraction SSRS correlated with improved 1- and 2-year actuarial LC relative to MF SSRS (95% vs 71% and 86% vs 55%, respectively; p = 0.009). On competing risk analysis, SF SSRS showed superior LC to MF SSRS (subhazard ratio [SHR] 6.57, p = 0.014). On multivariate analysis for LC with tumor volume (p = 0.272), number of treated levels (p = 0.819), gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage (p = 0.225), and GTV minimum point dose (p = 0.97) as covariates, MF SSRS remained inferior to SF SSRS (SHR 5.26, p = 0.033) CONCLUSIONS SSRS offers durable LC for spinal metastases from RCC. Single-fraction SSRS is associated with improved LC over MF SSRS for previously nonirradiated RCC spinal metastases.

Verification procedure for isocentric alignment of proton beams

We present a technique—based on the Lutz, Winston, and Maleki test used in stereotactic linear accelerator radiosurgery—for verifying whether proton beams are being delivered within the required spatial coincidence with the gantry mechanical isocenter. Our procedure uses a proton beam that is collimated by a circular aperture at its central axis and is then intercepted by a small steel sphere rigidly supported by the patient couch. A laser tracker measurement system and a correction algorithm for couch position assures precise positioning of the steel sphere at the mechanical isocenter of the gantry. A film‐based radiation dosimetry technique, chosen for the good spatial resolution it achieves, records the proton dose distribution for optical image analysis. The optical image obtained presents a circular high‐dose region surrounding a lower‐dose area corresponding to the proton beam absorption by the steel sphere, thereby providing a measure of the beam alignment with the mechanical isocenter. We found the self‐developing Gafchromic EBT film (International Specialty Products, Wayne, NJ) and commercial Epson 10000 XL flatbed scanner (Epson America, Long Beach, CA) to be accurate and efficient tools. The positions of the gantry mechanical and proton beam isocenters, as recorded on film, were clearly identifiable within the scanning resolution used for routine alignment testing (0.17 mm per pixel). The mean displacement of the collimated proton beam from the gantry mechanical isocenter was 0.22±0.1u2009mm for the gantry positions tested, which was well within the maximum deviation of 0.50 mm accepted at the Proton Therapy Center in Houston. PACS numbers: 87.53.Xd, 87.53.Oc, 87.56.‐v, 87.66.‐a, 87.56.Fc

Generalizable Class Solutions for Treatment Planning of Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSEnSpinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) continues to emerge as an effective therapeutic approach to spinal metastases; however, treatment planning and delivery remain resource intensive at many centers, which may hamper efficient implementation in clinical practice. We sought to develop a generalizable class solution approach for spinal SBRT treatment planning that would allow confidence that a given plan provides optimal target coverage, reduce integral dose, and maximize planning efficiency.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnWe examined 91 patients treated with spinal SBRT at our institution. Treatment plans were categorized by lesion location, clinical target volume (CTV) configuration, and dose fractionation scheme, and then analyzed to determine the technically achievable dose gradient. A radial cord expansion was subtracted from the CTV to yield a planning CTV (pCTV) construct for plan evaluation. We reviewed the treatment plans with respect to target coverage, dose gradient, integral dose, conformality, and maximum cord dose to select the best plans and develop a set of class solutions.nnnRESULTSnThe class solution technique generated plans that maintained target coverage and improved conformality (1.2-fold increase in the 95% vant Riet Conformation Number describing the conformality of a reference dose to the target) while reducing normal tissue integral dose (1.3-fold decrease in the volume receiving 4 Gy (V(4Gy)) and machine output (19% monitor unit (MU) reduction). In trials of planning efficiency, the class solution technique reduced treatment planning time by 30% to 60% and MUs required by ∼20%: an effect independent of prior planning experience.nnnCONCLUSIONSnWe have developed a set of class solutions for spinal SBRT that incorporate a pCTV metric for plan evaluation while yielding dosimetrically superior treatment plans with increased planning efficiency. Our technique thus allows for efficient, reproducible, and high-quality spinal SBRT treatment planning.

Creation of a Prognostic Index for Spine Metastasis to Stratify Survival in Patients Treated With Spinal Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Secondary Analysis of Mature Prospective Trials.

PURPOSEnThere exists uncertainty in the prognosis of patients following spinal metastasis treatment. We sought to create a scoring system that stratifies patients based on overall survival.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnPatients enrolled in 2 prospective trials investigating stereotactic spine radiation surgery (SSRS) for spinal metastasis with ≥ 3-year follow-up were analyzed. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to create a survival model. Pretreatment variables included were race, sex, age, performance status, tumor histology, extent of vertebrae involvement, previous therapy at the SSRS site, disease burden, and timing of diagnosis and metastasis. Four survival groups were generated based on the model-derived survival score.nnnRESULTSnMedian follow-up in the 206 patients included in this analysis was 70 months (range: 37-133 months). Seven variables were selected: female sex (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.7, P=.02), Karnofsky performance score (HR = 0.8 per 10-point increase above 60, P = .007), previous surgery at the SSRS site (HR = 0.7, P=.02), previous radiation at the SSRS site (HR = 1.8, P=.001), the SSRS site as the only site of metastatic disease (HR = 0.5, P=.01), number of organ systems involved outside of bone (HR = 1.4 per involved system, P<.001), and >5 year interval from initial diagnosis to detection of spine metastasis (HR = 0.5, P < .001). The median survival among all patients was 25.5 months and was significantly different among survival groups (in group 1 [excellent prognosis], median survival was not reached; group 2 reached 32.4 months; group 3 reached 22.2 months; and group 4 [poor prognosis] reached 9.1 months; P < .001). Pretreatment symptom burden was significantly higher in the patient group with poor survival than in the group with excellent survival (all metrics, P < .05).nnnCONCLUSIONSnWe developed the prognostic index for spinal metastases (PRISM) model, a new model that identified patient subgroups with poor and excellent prognoses.

A quality assurance procedure to evaluate cone-beam CT image center congruence with the radiation isocenter of a linear accelerator.

A quality assurance (QA) procedure was developed to evaluate the congruence between the cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) image center and the radiation isocenter on a Varian Trilogy linac. In contrast to the published QA procedures, this method did not require a ball bearing (BB) phantom to be placed exactly at the radiation isocenter through precalibrated room lasers or light field crosshairs. The only requirement was that the BB phantom be in a stationary position near the radiation isocenter during the image acquisition process. The radiation isocenter was determined with respect to the center of the BB using a Winston‐Lutz test. The CBCT image center was found to have excellent short‐term positional reproducibility (i.e., less than 0.1 mm of wobble in each of the x (lateral), y (vertical), and z (longitudinal) directions) in 10 consecutive acquisitions. Measured over a seven‐month period, the CBCT image center deviated from the radiation isocenter by 0.40±0.12mm(x),0.43±0.04mm(y), and 0.34±0.14mm(z). The z displacement of the 3D CBCT image center was highly correlated (ρ=0.997) with that of the 2D kV portal image center. The correlation coefficients in the x and y directions were poor (ρ=0.66 and ‐0.35, respectively). Systematic discrepancies were found between the CBCT image center and the 2D MV, kV portal image centers. For the linear accelerator studied, we detected a 0.8 mm discrepancy between the CBCT image center and the MV EPID image center in the anterior‐posterior direction. This discrepancy was demonstrated in a clinical case study where the patient was positioned with CBCT followed by MV portal verification. The results from the new QA procedure are useful for guiding high‐precision patient positioning in stereotactic body radiation therapy. PACS number: 87.55.Qr

Effect of spine hardware on small spinal stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry.

Monte Carlo (MC) modeling of a 6 MV photon beam was used to study the dose perturbation from a titanium rod 5xa0mm in diameter in various small fields range from 2xa0×xa02 to 5xa0×xa05xa0cm(2). The results showed that the rod increased the dose to water by ∼6% at the water-rod interface because of electron backscattering and decreased the dose by ∼7% in the shadow of the rod because of photon attenuation. The Pinnacle(3)xa0treatment planning system calculations matched the MC results at the depths more than 1xa0cm past the rod when the correct titanium density of 4.5xa0gxa0cm(-3)xa0was used, but significantly underestimated the backscattering dose at the water-rod interface. A CT-density table with a top density of 1.82xa0gxa0cm(-3)xa0(cortical bone) is a practical way to reduce the dosimetric error from the artifacts by preventing high density assignment to them, but can underestimates the attenuation by the titanium rod by 6%. However, when multi-beam with intensity modulation is used in actual patient spinal stereotactic radiosurgery treatment, the dosimetric effect of assigning 4.5 instead of 1.82xa0gxa0cm(-3)xa0to titanium implants is complicated. It ranged from minimal effect to 2% dose difference affecting 15% target volume in the study. When hardware is in the beam path, density override to the titanium hardware is recommended.

Improved setup and positioning accuracy using a three-point customized cushion/mask/bite-block immobilization system for stereotactic reirradiation of head and neck cancer

The purpose of this study was to investigate the setup and positioning uncertainty of a custom cushion/mask/bite-block (CMB) immobilization system and determine PTV margin for image-guided head and neck stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (HN-SABR). We analyzed 105 treatment sessions among 21 patients treated with HN-SABR for recurrent head and neck cancers using a custom CMB immobilization system. Initial patient setup was performed using the ExacTrac infrared (IR) tracking system and initial setup errors were based on comparison of ExacTrac IR tracking system to corrected online ExacTrac X-rays images registered to treatment plans. Residual setup errors were determined using repeat verification X-ray. The online ExacTrac corrections were compared to cone-beam CT (CBCT) before treatment to assess agreement. Intrafractional positioning errors were determined using prebeam X-rays. The systematic and random errors were analyzed. The initial translational setup errors were -0.8±1.3u2009mm, -0.8±1.6u2009mm, and 0.3±1.9u2009mm in AP, CC, and LR directions, respectively, with a three-dimensional (3D) vector of 2.7±1.4u2009mm. The initial rotational errors were up to 2.4° if 6D couch is not available. CBCT agreed with ExacTrac X-ray images to within 2 mm and 2.5°. The intrafractional uncertainties were 0.1±0.6u2009mm, 0.1±0.6u2009mm, and 0.2±0.5u2009mm in AP, CC, and LR directions, respectively, and 0.0∘±0.5°, 0.0∘±0.6°, and -0.1∘±0.4∘ in yaw, roll, and pitch direction, respectively. The translational vector was 0.9±0.6u2009mm. The calculated PTV margins mPTV(90,95) were within 1.6 mm when using image guidance for online setup correction. The use of image guidance for online setup correction, in combination with our customized CMB device, highly restricted target motion during treatments and provided robust immobilization to ensure minimum dose of 95% to target volume with 2.0 mm PTV margin for HN-SABR. PACS number(s): 87.55.ne.The purpose of this study was to investigate the setup and positioning uncertainty of a custom cushion/mask/bite‐block (CMB) immobilization system and determine PTV margin for image‐guided head and neck stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (HN‐SABR). We analyzed 105 treatment sessions among 21 patients treated with HN‐SABR for recurrent head and neck cancers using a custom CMB immobilization system. Initial patient setup was performed using the ExacTrac infrared (IR) tracking system and initial setup errors were based on comparison of ExacTrac IR tracking system to corrected online ExacTrac X‐rays images registered to treatment plans. Residual setup errors were determined using repeat verification X‐ray. The online ExacTrac corrections were compared to cone‐beam CT (CBCT) before treatment to assess agreement. Intrafractional positioning errors were determined using prebeam X‐rays. The systematic and random errors were analyzed. The initial translational setup errors were −0.8±1.3u2009mm, −0.8±1.6u2009mm, and 0.3±1.9u2009mm in AP, CC, and LR directions, respectively, with a three‐dimensional (3D) vector of 2.7±1.4u2009mm. The initial rotational errors were up to 2.4° if 6D couch is not available. CBCT agreed with ExacTrac X‐ray images to within 2 mm and 2.5°. The intrafractional uncertainties were 0.1±0.6u2009mm, 0.1±0.6u2009mm, and 0.2±0.5u2009mm in AP, CC, and LR directions, respectively, and 0.0∘±0.5°, 0.0∘±0.6°, and −0.1∘±0.4∘ in yaw, roll, and pitch direction, respectively. The translational vector was 0.9±0.6u2009mm. The calculated PTV margins mPTV(90,95) were within 1.6 mm when using image guidance for online setup correction. The use of image guidance for online setup correction, in combination with our customized CMB device, highly restricted target motion during treatments and provided robust immobilization to ensure minimum dose of 95% to target volume with 2.0 mm PTV margin for HN‐SABR. PACS number(s): 87.55.ne