James O’Connor

Risk factors for post-traumatic pneumonia in patients with retained haemothorax: Results of a prospective, observational AAST study

INTRODUCTION Retained haemothorax (RH) is a problematic sequela of thoracic trauma, reported in up to 20% of patients following chest injury. RH is associated with a higher severity of thoracic trauma and may portend the onset of other serious post-traumatic complications, including pneumonia. The development of pneumonia has previously been reported to be as high as 19.5% in the setting of traumatic RH. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of pneumonia as a complication in RH. METHODS We utilized the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Post-Traumatic Retained Haemothorax database. Patients with post-traumatic RH were prospectively enrolled from 2009 to 2011. Inclusion criteria were placement of a thoracostomy tube within 24h of admission for the evacuation of pneumothorax or haemothorax and subsequent chest computed tomography scan chest showing RH. Patients treated with thoracotomy before placement of tube thoracostomy were excluded. For univariate analysis, the Chi-square test with Yates correction was used for comparison of categorical risk factors and the Students t-test or the Mann-Whitney test for comparison of continuous risk factors. To identify independent risk factors for the development of pneumonia, variables from the univariate analysis significant at p<0.2 were entered into a forward logistic regression model. Adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived. RESULTS 328 patients with post-traumatic RH from 20 United States centres were enrolled. After stepwise regression analysis, ISS>25 (adjusted OR: 7.1; 95% CI: 3.1, 16.4; p<0.001), blunt mechanism of injury (adjusted OR: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.7, 7.2; p=0.001), and failure to administer peri-procedural antibiotics on the initial thoracostomy tube placement (adjusted OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.30, 5.4; p=0.01) were found to be independent predictors of the pneumonia in patients with post-traumatic RH. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, our current study is the largest attempt to identify the independent predictors for pneumonia in this population. Our data show that elevated ISS, blunt thoracic trauma, and failure to administer peri-procedural antibiotics on tube thoracostomy placement are the statistically significant independent risk factors.

Post-traumatic empyema: aetiology, surgery and outcome in 125 consecutive patients.

INTRODUCTION Empyema remains a potentially serious condition with multiple etiologies including post-pneumonic, post-resection, and post-traumatic. There are few studies describing the latter. We reviewed our experience at a high volume trauma centre in injured patients with empyema, examining pre-operative status, surgical procedures, pathogens and outcome. METHODS Retrospective trauma registry review, from 9/01 to 4/10. Empyema was defined as culture positive pleural fluid or purulence at operation. Data collected included demographics, injury mechanism, thoracic injuries, organ dysfunction, pathogens isolated, surgical procedures, outcomes and follow up. RESULTS One hundred twenty-five consecutive patients with empyema were identified. Average injury severity score and age were 27.3 and 37.2 years respectively; 89.6% were male, 63.2% sustained blunt chest trauma. Time from injury to diagnosis averaged 12.1 days. All underwent decortication; 80% by thoracotomy, the remainder thoracoscopically. At operation over half were mechanically ventilated and 13.6% required vasoactive infusions. Monomicrobial cultures with Gram positive cocci predominating were obtained in 44%, 48% had polymicrobial cultures and 18.4% had a ruptured lung abscess. There were five deaths (4%); two occurring after a ruptured lung abscess. Recurrent empyema occurred in 6.4%, all successfully treated by re-operation or catheter drainage. Intensive care and hospital stays were 18.1 and 30.6 days respectively. All survivors achieved resolution of empyema. CONCLUSIONS Trauma patients with empyema represent a subset of severely injured critically ill patients with diverse pathogens and polymicrobial flora. Appropriate surgical management and specific antibiotic therapy yields excellent results with acceptable risk. A ruptured lung abscess may be the aetiology of the post-traumatic empyema in a subset of patients and may represent an increased operative risk.

The lung rescue unit—Does a dedicated intensive care unit for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation improve survival to discharge?

BACKGROUND The use of venovenous extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) for acute respiratory failure (ARF)/acute respiratory (ARDS) has increased since 2009. Specialized units for patients requiring VV ECMO are not standard and patients are often cohorted with other critically ill patients. The purpose of this study was to report the outcome of adult patients admitted in 2015 to the lung rescue unit, which, to our knowledge, is the first intensive care unit in the United States that has been specifically created to provide care for patients requiring VV ECMO. METHODS Data were collected on all patients admitted to the lung rescue unit on VV ECMO between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2015. Demographics, medical history, pre-ECMO data, indication for VV ECMO as well as duration of ECMO and survival to decannulation and discharge were recorded. Means (± standard deviation) and medians (interquartile range [IQR]) were reported when appropriate. RESULTS Forty-nine patients were enrolled. Median age was 48 years (IQR, 32–57). Median PaO2/FIO2 ratio before cannulation was 66 (IQR, 53–86). Median ventilator days before cannulation was 2 (IQR, 1–4). Median time on VV ECMO for all patients was 311 hours (IQR, 203–461). Thirty-eight (78%) patients were successfully decannulated with 35 (71%) patients surviving to hospital discharge. CONCLUSION The use of VV ECMO for ARF/ARDS is increasing. We have demonstrated that a dedicated multidisciplinary intensive care unit for the purpose of providing standardized care with specialized trained providers can improve survival to discharge for patients that require VV ECMO for ARF/ARDS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, level V.

Incidence of Cannula-associated Deep Vein Thrombosis After Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Limited literature regarding the incidence of cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis (CaDVT) after veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) exists. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of post decannulation CaDVT and identify any associated risk factors. Forty-eight patients were admitted between August 2014 and January 2016 to the Lung Rescue Unit were included in the study. Protocolized anticoagulation levels (partial thromboplastin time [PTT] 45-55 seconds) and routine post decannulation DVT screening were in place during the study period. Forty-one (85.4%) patients had CaDVT. Of those with CaDVT, 31 (76%) patients were treated with full anti-coagulation therapy. Thirty-four (76%) patients with right internal jugular (RIJ) cannulation had CaDVT at cannula site. Twenty-five (61%) patients had CaDVT in the lower extremity (18 associated right femoral vein cannulation and 7 left femoral vein cannulation). Eighteen (44%) patients had both upper and lower extremity CaDVT. Overall, patients with CaDVT tended to be older, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and on ECMO longer (p = NS). Mean PTT during time on ECMO between patients that did and did not have CaDVT did not differ. No clinical evidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) was seen.Limited literature regarding the incidence of cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis (CaDVT) after veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) exists. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of post decannulation CaDVT and identify any associated risk factors. Forty-eight patients were admitted between August 2014 and January 2016 to the Lung Rescue Unit were included in the study. Protocolized anticoagulation levels (partial thromboplastin time [PTT] 45–55 seconds) and routine post decannulation DVT screening were in place during the study period. Forty-one (85.4%) patients had CaDVT. Of those with CaDVT, 31 (76%) patients were treated with full anti-coagulation therapy. Thirty-four (76%) patients with right internal jugular (RIJ) cannulation had CaDVT at cannula site. Twenty-five (61%) patients had CaDVT in the lower extremity (18 associated right femoral vein cannulation and 7 left femoral vein cannulation). Eighteen (44%) patients had both upper and lower extremity CaDVT. Overall, patients with CaDVT tended to be older, have a higher body mass index (BMI), and on ECMO longer (p = NS). Mean PTT during time on ECMO between patients that did and did not have CaDVT did not differ. No clinical evidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) was seen.

General Management of the Gunshot Victim With Musculoskeletal Injury

Summary: Gunshot wounds to the extremities are rarely lethal, but often morbid injury. As with all trauma patients, evaluation and stabilization of the A-B-Cs is essential and exsanguination must be rapidly controlled. The nonbony injuries that are sustained after penetrating extremity trauma include primarily vascular and soft tissue injury. Vascular injury obviously can lead to hemorrhage and disruption of blood flow leading to ischemia and limb loss if untreated. This article reviews some of the modalities available for diagnosis, as well as the treatment options used for vascular repair. The management of soft tissue injuries is similarly described. Compartment syndrome secondary to ischemia, hemorrhage, or limb edema is an extremely morbid sequelae of penetrating injuries to the extremities. Early diagnosis is essential and requires a high index of suspicion from vigilant clinicians. Indications for both prophylactic and therapeutic fasciotomy are reviewed. Complications after gunshot wounds to the extremities, such as thromboses, infections, and rhabdomyolysis, are also discussed.