James Q. Rose

Dose dependent pharmacokinetics of prednisone and prednisolone in man

Six healthy male volunteers were given 5, 20, and 50 mg of oral prednisone and 5, 20, and 40 mg doses of intravenous prednisolone. Plasma and urine concentrations of prednisone and prednisolone were determined by HPLC, and the binding of prednisolone to plasma proteins was measured by radioisotopic and equilibrium dialysis techniques. The pharmacokinetics of both oral prednisone and intravenous prednisolone were dose-dependent. The mean oral dose plasma clearances of prednisone ranged from 572 ml/min/ 1.73 m2for the 5mg dose to 2271 ml/min/1.73 m2for the 50 mg dose. Changes in prednisone half-life were insignificant, but increases in the half-life of its metabolite were dose-dependent. The systemic plasma clearance of i.v. prednisolone was dose-dependent and increased from 111 to 194 ml/min/1.73 m2over the 5 to 40 mg i.v. dosage range. The steady-state volume of distribution also increased, but little change in mean transit time and half-life was found. The binding of prednisolone to plasma proteins was markedly concentration-dependent, and a two compartment, nonlinear equation was used to characterize the effective binding of prednisolone to transcortin and albumin. The apparent pharmacokinetic parameters of protein-free and transcortin-free prednisolone were relatively constant with dose. The interconversion of prednisone and prednisolone varied with time and dose, although prednisolone concentrations dominated by 4-to 10-fold over prednisone. In urine, 2–5% of either administered drug was excreted as prednisone and 11–24% as prednisolone. The apparent renal clearances of both steroids were also nonlinear and unrelated to protein binding. These studies indicate that the pharmacokinetics of prednisone and prednisolone are dose-dependent and that protein binding does not fully explain their apparent nonlinear distribution and disposition.

Corticosteroid analysis in biological fluids by high-performance liquid chromatography.

A sensitive, specific, and reproducible high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for the simultaneous determination of prednisone, prednisolone and cortisol in biological fluids was developed with dexamethasone as the internal standard. Samples are extracted with methylene chloride, washed with sodium hydroxide and then water, and chromatographed on a microparticulate silica gel column with UV detection at 254 nm. Sensitivity was greater than 15 ng for all four steroids. Specificity was supported by use of dual wave-length UV detection and/or radioimmunoassay. The assay has been applied in pharmacokinetic studies and a typical plasma concentration--time profile for the three steroids is presented for one subject who received 50 mg of prednisone.

Monitoring prednisone and prednisolone.

Their common clinical use, frequency of adverse effects, serious therapeutic indications, treatment failures, and availability of sensitive assays make corticosteroids such as prednisone and prednisolone candidates for therapeutic drug monitoring. Complicating the interpretation of plasma drug concentrations are the first-pass metabolism of inactive prednisone to active prednisolone and reconversion. Also, the volume of distribution, metabolic clearance, and renal clearance of prednisolone increase with dose. This is due partly to saturable binding of prednisolone to transcortin in plasma, which provides more unbound drug at higher plasma concentrations of steroid. This effect plus the probable uptake of only unbound drug into intracellular receptor sites provides the rationale for measuring free prednisolone in plasma. Drug interactions between prednisolone and anticonvulsants are common. Liver and kidney disease have only limited effects on prednisolone disposition. Changes in clinical efficacy and appearance of side effects have been related to altered prednisolone clearance. Plasma concentrations may be used to determine disease and drug interactions, bioavailability, and patient compliance. The role of pharmacokinetic factors in governing the indirect and variable pharmacodynamic response to corticosteroids at various tissue sites and in disease states currently needs clarification.

Effect of smoking on prednisone, prednisolone, and dexamethasone pharmacokinetics

The pharmacokinetics of oral prednisone and oral dexamethasone were examined in 18 healthy male adults. Eight subjects also received intravenous prednisolone and intravenous dexamethasone. Half of each group were cigarette smokers as confirmed by plasma thiocyanate concentrations. Plasma and urine concentrations of prednisone and prednisolone were assayed by high performance liquid chromatography, while plasma dexamethasone was measured by radioimmunoassay. There were no statistically significant differences between smokers and nonsmokers in the systemic availability of prednisolone (75 versus 84%), oral dose clearance of prednisone (29 versus 27 ml/min/kg), systemic prednisolone clearance (2.8 versus 2.9 ml/min/kg), or in the interconversion rates, volumes of distribution, or urinary recoveries of prednisone and prednisolone. Similarly, the pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone were unaffected by smoking. A limited correlation (r=0.55) was found between the high oral dose clearances of prednisone and the lower values of dexamethasone (6.73 and 5.71 ml/min/kg in smokers and nonsmokers). A two- to threefold variability occurred in oral dose clearances of each steroid with partial intrasubject covariance. Unlike the anticonvulsants, which markedly induce corticosteroid metabolism, smoking has no effect on their pharmacokinetics and should not complicate therapy with these drugs.

Ethosuximide pharmacokinetics in a pregnant patient and her newborn.

Ethosuximide concentration in serum was monitored during the last trimester of pregnancy in a patient. After delivery, the decline in serum concentration of ethosuximide was observed in the nonnursing neonate. The half‐life of elimination of transplacentally acquired ethosuximide in this neonate was 41.3 hr. The ratio of breast milk to maternal serum concentration of ethosuximide was approximately 1. A total daily exposure to ethosuximide of 12.8 to 38.4 mg (3.6 to 11.0 mg/kg) as a result of nursing was predicted.

Prednisolone disposition in steroid-dependent asthmatics

A 40-mg intravenous dose of prednisolone was given as prednisolone phosphate to seven severe steroid-dependent asthmatics and to 13 healthy volunteers to determine if the large prednisone requirements of these patients were a function of the disease, cellular response, or rapid clearance of prednisolone. Plasma concentrations of prednisolone, prednisone, and cortisol were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography over an 8-hr test period. Circulating eosinophil concentrations were monitored concurrently. The apparent half-lifes of prednisolone in the asthmatics and normals were 3.33 +/- 0.71 and 3.25 +/- 0.58 hr (mean +/- SD). The apparent plasma clearances of prednisolone were 201 +/- 54 and 198 +/- 38 ml/min/1.73 m2 and the apparent volumes of distribution were 50.8 +/- 11.7 and 53.5 +/- 13.5 L/1.73 m2 for the asthmatic and normal groups, respectively. When the concentration-dependent binding of prednisolone to plasma protein was examined, no differences in the apparent clearances of unbound drug were found between the two groups. The eosinopenic response to prednisolone was similar in the steroid-dependent asthmatics and healthy normal volunteers. These studies indicate that binding, distribution, and clearance of prednisolone are not responsible for the large prednisone requirement of some steroid-dependent asthmatics. Differences in steroid-receptor sensitivity or in severity or pathophysiology of the disease state more likely account for the need for large prednisone dosages in these patients.

Effect of charcoal and sorbitol-charcoal suspension on the elimination of intravenous phenobarbital

The effects of two different oral charcoal suspensions on the elimination of a 200 mg/70 kg, 1 h intravenous (i.v.) infusion of phenobarbital and the tolerances of the two regimens were determined in a randomized crossover study in six healthy male volunteers. Phenobarbital was given i.v. alone or together with 105 g of oral activated charcoal suspension or with 105 g of a commercially available sorbitol-charcoal suspension over a 36-h period. A 13–34% decrease in the area under the serum concentration time curve (AUC) for 0–60 h occurred with the administration of the activated charcoal, and a 19–52% decrease occurred with the commercial sorbitol-charcoal regimen. The mean apparent systemic clearance of total phenobarbital increased from 0.089 ± 0.019 ml/min/kg to 0.141 ± 0.029 and 0.146 ± 0.036 ml/min/kg with the charcoal and sorbitol-charcoal treatments, respectively. No significant change in the fraction of phenobarbital bound to protein was detected. The charcoal regimen caused constipation in one subject. All subjects taking the sorbitol-charcoal preparation experienced diarrhea: there were no changes in electrolytes with either charcoal suspension. All subjects preferred the sorbitol-charcoal preparation.