James R. Sackett
University at Buffalo
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by James R. Sackett.
Temperature (Austin, Tex.) | 2016
Zachary J. Schlader; Suman Sarker; Toby Mündel; Gregory L. Coleman; Christopher L. Chapman; James R. Sackett; Blair D. Johnson
ABSTRACT We tested the hypotheses that thermoregulatory behavior is initiated before changes in blood pressure and that skin blood flow upon the initiation of behavior is reflex mediated. Ten healthy young subjects moved between 40°C and 17°C rooms when they felt ‘too warm’ (W→C) or ‘too cool’ (C→W). Blood pressure, cardiac output, skin and rectal temperatures were measured. Changes in skin blood flow between locations were not different at 2 forearm locations. One was clamped at 34°C ensuring responses were reflex controlled. The temperature of the other was not clamped ensuring responses were potentially local and/or reflex controlled. Relative to pre-test Baseline, skin temperature was not different at C→W (33.5 ± 0.7°C, P = 0.24), but was higher at W→C (36.1 ± 0.5°C, P < 0.01). Rectal temperature was different from Baseline at C→W (−0.2 ± 0.1°C, P < 0.01) and W→C (−0.2 ± 0.1°C, P < 0.01). Blood pressure was different from Baseline at C→W (+7 ± 4 mmHg, P < 0.01) and W→C (−5 ± 5 mmHg, P < 0.01). Cardiac output was not different from Baseline at C→W (−0.1 ± 0.4 L/min, P = 0.56), but higher at W→C (0.4 ± 0.4 L/min, P < 0.01). Skin blood flow between locations was not different from Baseline at C→W (clamped: −6 ± 15 PU, not clamped: −3 ± 6 PU, P = 0.46) or W→C (clamped: +21 ± 23 PU, not clamped: +29 ± 15 PU, P = 0.26). These data indicate that the initiation of thermoregulatory behavior is preceded by moderate changes in blood pressure and that skin blood flow upon the initiation of this behavior is under reflex control.
Experimental Physiology | 2016
Zachary J. Schlader; Gregory L. Coleman; James R. Sackett; Suman Sarker; Christopher L. Chapman; Blair D. Johnson
What is the central question of this study? Do increases in metabolic heat production and sweat rate precede the initiation of thermoregulatory behaviour in resting humans exposed to cool and warm environments? What is the main finding and its importance? Thermoregulatory behaviour at rest in cool and warm environments is preceded by changes in vasomotor tone in glabrous and non‐glabrous skin, but not by acute increases in metabolic heat production or sweat rate. These findings suggest that sweating and shivering are not obligatory for thermal behaviour to be initiated in humans.
American Journal of Physiology-regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology | 2018
Zachary J. Schlader; James R. Sackett; Suman Sarker; Blair D. Johnson
The recruitment of thermoeffectors, including thermoregulatory behavior, relative to changes in body temperature has not been quantified in humans. We tested the hypothesis that changes in skin blood flow, behavior, and sweating or metabolic rate are initiated with increasing changes in mean skin temperature (Tskin) in resting humans. While wearing a water-perfused suit, 12 healthy young adults underwent heat (Heat) and cold stress (Cold) that induced gradual changes in Tskin. Subjects controlled the temperature of their dorsal neck to their perceived thermal comfort. Thus neck skin temperature provided an index of thermoregulatory behavior. Neck skin temperature (Tskin), core temperature (Tcore), metabolic rate, sweat rate, and nonglabrous skin blood flow were measured continually. Data were analyzed using segmental regression analysis, providing an index of thermoeffector activation relative to changes in Tskin. In Heat, increases in skin blood flow were observed with the smallest elevations in Tskin ( P < 0.01). Thermal behavior was initiated with an increase in Tskin of 2.4 ± 1.3°C (mean ± SD, P = 0.04), while sweating was observed with further elevations in Tskin (3.4 ± 0.5°C, P = 0.04), which coincided with increases in Tcore ( P = 0.98). In Cold, reductions in skin blood flow occurred with the smallest decrease in Tskin ( P < 0.01). Thermal behavior was initiated with a Tskin decrease of 1.5 ± 1.3°C, while metabolic rate ( P = 0.10) and Tcore ( P = 0.76) did not change throughout. These data indicate that autonomic and behavioral thermoeffectors are recruited in coordination with one another and likely in an orderly manner relative to the comparative physiological cost.
American Journal of Physiology-regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology | 2017
Blair D. Johnson; James R. Sackett; Suman Sarker; Zachary J. Schlader
A reduction in central blood volume can lead to cardiovascular decompensation (i.e., failure to maintain blood pressure). Cooling the forehead and cheeks using ice water raises blood pressure. Therefore, face cooling (FC) could be used to mitigate decreases in blood pressure during central hypovolemia. We tested the hypothesis that FC during central hypovolemia induced by lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) would increase blood pressure. Ten healthy participants (22 ± 2 yr, three women, seven men) completed two randomized LBNP trials on separate days. Trials began with 30 mmHg of LBNP for 6 min. Then, a 2.5-liter plastic bag of ice water (0 ± 0°C) (LBNP+FC) or thermoneutral water (34 ± 1°C) (LBNP+Sham) was placed on the forehead, eyes, and cheeks during 15 min of LBNP at 30 mmHg. Forehead temperature was lower during LBNP+FC than LBNP+Sham, with the greatest difference at 21 min of LBNP (11.1 ± 1.6 vs. 33.9 ± 1.4°C, P < 0.001). Mean arterial pressure was greater during LBNP+FC than LBNP+Sham, with the greatest difference at 8 min of LBNP (98 ± 15 vs. 80 ± 8 mmHg, P < 0.001). Cardiac output was higher during LBNP+FC than LBNP+Sham with the greatest difference at 18 min of LBNP (5.9 ± 1.4 vs. 4.9 ± 1.0 liter/min, P = 0.005). Forearm cutaneous vascular resistance was greater during LBNP+FC than LBNP+Sham, with the greatest difference at 15 min of LBNP (7.2 ± 3.4 vs. 4.9 ± 2.7 mmHg/perfusion units (PU), P < 0.001). Face cooling during LBNP increases blood pressure through increases in cardiac output and vascular resistance.
American Journal of Physiology-regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology | 2016
Zachary J. Schlader; Gregory L. Coleman; James R. Sackett; Suman Sarker; Blair D. Johnson
We tested the hypothesis that increases in blood pressure are sustained throughout 15 min of face cooling. Two independent trials were carried out. In the Face-Cooling Trial, 10 healthy adults underwent 15 min of face cooling where a 2.5-liter bag of ice water (0 ± 0°C) was placed over their cheeks, eyes, and forehead. The Sham Trial was identical except that the temperature of the water was 34 ± 1°C. Primary dependent variables were forehead temperature, mean arterial pressure, and forearm vascular resistance. The square root of the mean of successive differences in R-R interval (RMSSD) provided an index of cardiac parasympathetic activity. In the Face Cooling Trial, forehead temperature fell from 34.1 ± 0.9°C at baseline to 12.9 ± 3.3°C at the end of face cooling (P < 0.01). Mean arterial pressure increased from 83 ± 9 mmHg at baseline to 106 ± 13 mmHg at the end of face cooling (P < 0.01). RMSSD increased from 61 ± 40 ms at baseline to 165 ± 97 ms during the first 2 min of face cooling (P ≤ 0.05), but returned to baseline levels thereafter (65 ± 49 ms, P ≥ 0.46). Forearm vascular resistance increased from 18.3 ± 4.4 mmHg·ml-1·100 g tissue-1·min at baseline to 26.6 ± 4.0 mmHg·ml-1·100 g tissue-1·min at the end of face cooling (P < 0.01). There were no changes in the Sham Trial. These data indicate that increases in blood pressure are sustained throughout 15 min of face cooling, and face cooling elicits differential time-dependent parasympathetic and likely sympathetic activation.
Physiology & Behavior | 2018
Nicole T. Vargas; Christopher L. Chapman; James R. Sackett; Jabril Abdul-Rashed; Muhamed McBryde; Blair D. Johnson; Rob Gathercole; Zachary J. Schlader
We tested the hypothesis that thermal behavior during the exercise recovery compensates for elevated core temperatures despite autonomic thermoeffector withdrawal. In a thermoneutral environment, 6 females and 6 males (22 ± 1 y) cycled for 60 min (225 ± 46 W metabolic heat production), followed by 60 min passive recovery. Mean skin and core temperatures, skin blood flow, and local sweat rate were measured continually. Subjects controlled the temperature of their dorsal neck to perceived thermal comfort using a custom-made neck device. Neck device temperature provided an index of thermal behavior. Mean body temperature, calculated as the average of mean skin and core temperatures, provided an index of the stimulus for thermal behavior. To isolate the independent effect of exercise on thermal behavior during recovery, data were analyzed post-exercise the exact minute mean body temperature recovered to pre-exercise levels within a subject. Mean body temperature returned to pre-exercise levels 28 ± 20 min into recovery (Pre: 33.5 ± 0.2, Post: 33.5 ± 0.2 °C, P = 0.20), at which point, mean skin temperature had recovered (Pre: 29.6 ± 0.4, Post: 29.5 ± 0.5 °C, P = 0.20) and core temperature (Pre: 37.3 ± 0.2, Post: 37.5 ± 0.3 °C, P = 0.01) remained elevated. Post-exercise, skin blood flow (Pre: 59 ± 78, Post: 26 ± 25 PU, P = 0.10) and local sweat rate (Pre: 0.05 ± 0.25, Post: 0.13 ± 0.14 mg/cm2 min-1, P = 0.09) returned to pre-exercise levels, while neck device temperature was depressed (Pre: 27.4 ± 1.1, Post: 21.6 ± 7.4 °C, P = 0.03). These findings suggest that thermal behavior compensates for autonomic thermoeffector withdrawal in the presence of elevated core temperatures post-exercise.
Experimental Physiology | 2018
Zachary J. Schlader; Morgan C. O'Leary; James R. Sackett; Blair D. Johnson
What is the central question of this study? Does passive heat stress attenuate the increase in cardiac parasympathetic stimulation, vascular resistance and blood pressure evoked by face cooling? What is the main finding and its importance? Passive heat stress attenuates the capacity to increase cardiac parasympathetic activation and impairs the ability to increase vascular resistance during sympathoexcitation, which ultimately results in a relative inability to increase blood pressure. These findings cast doubt on the efficacy of face cooling at augmenting blood pressure during orthostasis while heat stressed.
Physiological Reports | 2017
James R. Sackett; Zachary J. Schlader; Suman Sarker; Christopher L. Chapman; Blair D. Johnson
Carbon dioxide (CO2) retention occurs during water immersion, but it is not known if peripheral chemosensitivity is altered during water immersion, which could contribute to CO2 retention. We tested the hypothesis that peripheral chemosensitivity to hypercapnia and hypoxia is blunted during 2 h of thermoneutral head out water immersion (HOWI) in healthy young adults. Peripheral chemosensitivity was assessed by the ventilatory, heart rate, and blood pressure responses to hypercapnia and hypoxia at baseline, 10, 60, 120 min, and post HOWI and a time‐control visit (control). Subjects inhaled 1 breath of 13% CO2, 21% O2, and 66% N2 to test peripheral chemosensitivity to hypercapnia and 2–6 breaths of 100% N2 to test peripheral chemosensitivity to hypoxia. Each gas was administered four separate times at each time point. Partial pressure of end‐tidal CO2 (PETCO2), arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), ventilation, heart rate, and blood pressure were recorded continuously. Ventilation was higher during HOWI versus control at post (P = 0.037). PETCO2 was higher during HOWI versus control at 10 min (46 ± 2 vs. 44 ± 2 mmHg), 60 min (46 ± 2 vs. 44 ± 2 mmHg), and 120 min (46 ± 3 vs. 43 ± 3 mmHg) (all P < 0.001). Ventilatory (P = 0.898), heart rate (P = 0.760), and blood pressure (P = 0.092) responses to hypercapnia were not different during HOWI versus control at any time point. Ventilatory (P = 0.714), heart rate (P = 0.258), and blood pressure (P = 0.051) responses to hypoxia were not different during HOWI versus control at any time point. These data indicate that CO2 retention occurs during thermoneutral HOWI despite no changes in peripheral chemosensitivity.
Temperature | 2018
Zachary J. Schlader; Gregory L. Coleman; James R. Sackett; Suman Sarker; Christopher L. Chapman; David Hostler; Blair D. Johnson
ABSTRACT We tested the hypotheses that older adults with cardiovascular co-morbidities will demonstrate greater changes in body temperature and exaggerated changes in blood pressure before initiating thermal behavior. We studied twelve healthy younger adults (Younger, 25 ± 4 y) and six older adults (‘At Risk’, 67 ± 4 y) taking prescription medications for at least two of the following conditions: hypertension, type II diabetes, hypercholesterolemia. Subjects underwent a 90-min test in which they voluntarily moved between cool (18.1 ± 1.8°C, RH: 29 ± 5%) and warm (40.2 ± 0.3°C, RH: 20 ± 0%) rooms when they felt ‘too cool’ (C→W) or ‘too warm’ (W→C). Mean skin and intestinal temperatures and blood pressure were measured. Data were analyzed as a change from pretest baseline. Changes in mean skin temperature were not different between groups at C→W (Younger: +0.2 ± 0.8°C, ‘At Risk’: +0.7 ± 1.8°C, P = 0.51) or W→C (Younger: +2.7 ± 0.6°C, ‘At Risk’: +2.9 ± 1.9°C, P = 0.53). Changes in intestinal temperature were not different at C→W (Younger: 0.0 ± 0.1°C, ‘At Risk’: +0.1 ± 0.2, P = 0.11), but differed at W→C (-0.1 ± 0.2°C vs. +0.1 ± 0.3°C, P = 0.02). Systolic pressure at C→W increased (Younger: +10 ± 9 mmHg, ‘At Risk’: +24 ± 17 mmHg) and at W→C decreased (Younger: −4 ± 13 mmHg, ‘At Risk’: -23 ± 19 mmHg) to a greater extent in ‘At Risk’ (P ≤ 0.05). Differences were also apparent for diastolic pressure at C→W (Younger: −2 ± 4 mmHg, ‘At Risk’: +17 ± 23 mmHg, P < 0.01), but not at W→C (Younger Y: +4 ± 13 mmHg, ‘At Risk’: −1 ± 6 mmHg, P = 0.29). Despite little evidence for differential control of thermal behavior, the initiation of behavior in ‘at risk’ older adults is preceded by exaggerated blood pressure responses.
Physiological Reports | 2018
Blair D. Johnson; Morgan C. O'Leary; Muhamed McBryde; James R. Sackett; Zachary J. Schlader; John J. Leddy
We tested the hypothesis that concussed college athletes (CA) have attenuated parasympathetic and sympathetic responses to face cooling (FC). Eleven symptomatic CA (age: 20 ± 2 years, 5 women) who were within 10 days of concussion diagnosis and 10 healthy controls (HC; age: 24 ± 4 years, 5 women) participated. During FC, a plastic bag filled with ice water (~0°C) was placed on the forehead, eyes, and cheeks for 3 min. Heart rate (ECG) and blood pressure (photoplethysmography) were averaged at baseline and every 60 sec during FC. High‐frequency (HF) power was obtained from spectral analysis of the R‐R interval. Data are presented as a change from baseline. Baseline heart rate (HC: 61 ± 12, CA: 57 ± 12 bpm; P = 0.69), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (HC: 94 ± 10, CA: 96 ± 13 mmHg; P = 0.74), and HF (HC: 2294 ± 2314, CA: 2459 ± 2058 msec2; P = 0.86) were not different between groups. Heart rate in HC decreased at 2 min (−7 ± 11 bpm; P = 0.02) but did not change in CA (P > 0.43). MAP increased at 1 min (HC: 12 ± 6, CA: 6 ± 6 mmHg), 2 min (HC: 21 ± 7, CA: 11 ± 7 mmHg), and 3 min (HC: 20 ± 6, CA: 13 ± 7 mmHg) in both groups (P < 0.01 for all) but the increase was greater at each interval in HC (P < 0.02). HF increased at 1 min (12354 ± 11489 msec2; P < 0.01) and 2 min (5832 ± 8002 msec2; P = 0.02) in HC but did not change in CA (P > 0.58). The increase in HF at 1 min was greater in HC versus CA (P < 0.01). These data indicate that symptomatic concussed patients have impaired cardiac parasympathetic and sympathetic activation.