Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where James S. Brown is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by James S. Brown.


Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 1996

Deep circumflex iliac artery free flap with Internal oblique muscle as a new method of Immediate reconstruction of maxillectomy defect

James S. Brown

A wide range of pedicled and free tissue transfer flaps have been described in the reconstruction of the complex maxillofacial defect, but no preferred reconstructive technique has so far emerged. The previous methods described may effectively close the oronasal fistula but reliable support for the cheek and orbit while providing a basis for an implant retained prosthesis is less likely to be achieved.


Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 1997

Functional outcome in soft palate reconstruction using a radial forearm free flap in conjunction with a superiorly based pharyngeal flap

James S. Brown; Annette C. Zuydam; D. Carl Jones; Simon N. Rogers; E. David Vaughan

Speech and swallowing problems due to velopharyngeal incompetence may follow soft palate resection and reconstruction. Over the past 3 years, we have developed the use of a superiorly based pharyngeal flap in conjunction with a radial forearm flap for soft palate reconstruction.


British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery | 2012

Systematic review of the current evidence in the use of postoperative radiotherapy for oral squamous cell carcinoma

James S. Brown; Richard Shaw; Fazilet Bekiroglu; Simon N. Rogers

Improved disease-free survival for oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with the use of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) has to be balanced against the risk of recurrence, the relative morbidity of radiotherapy, reduced options for treatment, and survival with recurrent disease. In the absence of randomised trials, a review of current evidence is timely because of increasing differences in outcome and response to treatment for cancers of the larynx, oropharynx, and oral cavity. From a search of 109 papers, 25 presented relevant data in tabular form, and reported local, regional, and total recurrence, and overall survival. Most data come from non-randomised studies that compared the effects of interventions with previous or historical information. A summary of the results shows local recurrence of 11%, 17%, and 15% for early, late, and all stages after operation alone, compared with 13%, 16%, and 19% after PORT. Regional recurrence is reported as 13%, 12%, and 11% for early, late, and all stages after operation alone compared with 6%, 11%, and 9% after PORT. Overall survival is reported as 76%, 74%, and 77% for operation alone compared with 65%, 62%, and 62% for early, late and all stages of oral SCC, respectively. It is acknowledged that this is a weak level of evidence as patients who have PORT probably have a high pathological-stage of disease. Knowing that PORT increases morbidity and reduces salvage rates and options for treating recurrent disease, this difference in overall survival emphasises the need for randomised studies or a re-evaluation of our current protocols.


Lancet Oncology | 2016

A new classification for mandibular defects after oncological resection

James S. Brown; Conor Barry; Michael Ho; Richard Shaw

No universally accepted classification system exists for mandibular defects after oncological resection. Here, we discuss the scientific literature on classifications for mandibular defects that are sufficiently presented either pictorially or descriptively, and propose a new classification system based on these findings. Of 167 studies included in the data analysis, 49 of these reports sufficiently described the defect for analysis. These reports were analysed for classification, reconstruction, size of defect, number of osteotomies needed, and complications. On the basis of these findings, a new classification is proposed based on the four corners of the mandible (two angles and two canines): class I (lateral), class II (hemimandibulectomy), class III (anterior), and class IV (extensive). Further classes (Ic, IIc, and IVc) include condylectomy. The increasing defect class relates to the size of the defect, osteotomy rate, and functional and aesthetic outcome, and could guide the method of reconstruction.


Oral Oncology | 2012

Accuracy of MRI in prediction of tumour thickness and nodal stage in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Christine T Lwin; Rebecca Hanlon; D. Lowe; James S. Brown; Julia A. Woolgar; Asterios Triantafyllou; Simon N. Rogers; Fazilet Bekiroglu; H. Lewis-Jones; Hulya Wieshmann; Richard Shaw

We aim to compare radiological with histological tumour thickness (RTT with HTT) for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), and the ability of both to predict cervical metastasis. The MRI images and histopathology reports of 102 consecutive OSCC cases were compared and the relationship between RTT and HTT, calculated as a shrinkage factor by the gradient of the best fitting regression line. Most (69%) tumours appeared thicker on MRI than was revealed by histopathology. Shrinkage factor was 0.70 (interquartile range 0.63-0.77, correlation co-efficient 0.63) for all cases, 0.87 (IQR 0.80-0.95, CC 0.88) for tongue and 0.65 (IQR 0.49-0.82, CC 0.45) for floor of mouth sub-sites. RTT did not correlate well with the presence of nodal metastases in any sub-site, i.e. there was no clinically applicable cut-off value of RTT to determine the prescription of elective neck dissection. Although RTT has some predictable relationship with HTT, this varies between sub-sites with tongue the most accurately predicted shrinkage using axial MRI. It is not possible from either the MRI staging of neck or tumour thickness to safely determine the need for neck dissection in OSCC. It is necessary to re-evaluate the benefit of MRI as a staging investigation (particularly for early stage OSCC) and further explore the contribution of molecular biomarkers and ultrasound.


British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery | 2014

Rationale for the use of the implantable Doppler probe based on 7 years' experience

Michael Ho; C. Cassidy; James S. Brown; Richard Shaw; Fazilet Bekiroglu; Simon N. Rogers

In head and neck microvascular reconstruction, a proportion of patients are at a higher risk of flap failure. These include salvage surgery after chemoradiotherapy, reconstruction for osteoradionecrosis and when difficulty is encountered in achieving flap perfusion intraoperatively. Several studies have shown that the Cook-Swartz Doppler (Cook Medical Inc, Bloomington, USA) enabled earlier detection of a compromised flap. We retrospectively reviewed microvascular reconstructions monitored with the Cook-Swartz implantable Doppler (2006-2012) and included patients characteristics, comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade), indication for operation, type of reconstruction, and indication for implantable Doppler. We also included details of surgical exploration, free flap salvage, and outcomes of flap salvage. These outcomes were compared with a group of low-risk patients (2005-2009) whose flaps were monitored clinically. A total of 75 free flaps in 73 patients were monitored with the implantable Doppler: 40 (53%) were in cases which required reconstruction following previous surgery/radiotherapy or flap perfusion difficulties, 10 (13%) buried flaps, 13 (17%) as routine flap monitors and 12 (17%) for other indications. The false negative rate was 5%, sensitivity 67%, the false positive rate was 25%, and specificity was 95%. Higher risk flaps monitored with the doppler had a higher return to theatre rate, 21% compared with 4% (p<0.001) and flap failure rate, 7% compared with 1% (p=0.002). Salvage rates for free flaps were similar in both groups (62% compared with 60%, p=1.0). There is not enough evidence to suggest that the implantable doppler reduces the rate of failed flaps in routine low-risk cases, and its value in monitoring high-risk reconstructions require evaluation in a prospective randomised study.


British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery | 2017

Mandibular reconstruction with vascularised bone flaps: a systematic review over 25 years

James S. Brown; Derek Lowe; A N Kanatas; Andrew Schache

To explore the techniques for mandibular reconstruction with composite free flaps and their outcomes, we systematically reviewed reports published between 1990 and 2015. A total of 9499 mandibular defects were reconstructed with 6178 fibular, 1380 iliac crest, 1127 composite radial, 709 scapular, 63 serratus anterior and rib, 32 metatarsal, and 10 lateral arm flaps including humerus. The failure rate was higher for the iliac crest (6.2%, 66/1059) than for fibular, radial, and scapular flaps combined (3.4%, 202/6018) (p<0.001). We evaluated rates of osteotomy, non-union, and fistulas. Implant-retained prostheses were used most often for rehabilitation after reconstruction with iliac crest (44%, 100/229 compared with 26%, 605/2295 if another flap was used) (p<0.001). There were no apparent changes in the choice of flap or in the complications reported. Although we were able to show some significant differences relating to the types of flap used, we were disappointed to find that fundamental outcomes such as the need for osteotomy, and rates of non-union and fistulas were under-reported. This review shows the need for more comprehensive and consistent reporting of outcomes to enable the comparison of different techniques for similar defects.


Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2017

Postoperative radiotherapy for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma with intermediate risk of recurrence: A case match study

Conor Barry; Daniel Wong; Jonathan R. Clark; Richard Shaw; Ruta Gupta; Patrick Magennis; Asterios Triantafyllou; Kan Gao; James S. Brown

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on recurrence and survival in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) of intermediate recurrence risk.


Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2017

Tailored approach to oromandibular reconstruction in patients with compromised lower limb vessels: Tailored approach to oromandibular reconstruction

Conor Barry; James S. Brown; Rebecca Hanlon; Richard Shaw

The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes for segmental reconstruction of the mandible between patients who underwent reconstruction with a fibula flap (group 1), and those with an alternative osseous free flap in which the fibula flap was unsuitable either for defect reasons (group 2) or in which the fibula flap could not safely be harvested because of compromised leg vessels (group 3).


Clinics in Plastic Surgery | 2016

Liverpool Opinion on Unfavorable Results in Microsurgical Head and Neck Reconstruction: Lessons Learned

James S. Brown; Andrew Schache; Chris Butterworth

This article annotates a philosophy toward achieving best results for the patient with head and neck cancer, in particular relating to oral, mandibular, and maxillary resection. At the same time are highlighted the pitfalls that, if not avoided, are likely to result in a poor outcome even with a successful flap transfer. There is a paucity of evidence to support clinical practice in head and neck reconstruction such that much of the discussion presented is opinion-based rather than evidence-based.

Collaboration


Dive into the James S. Brown's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard Shaw

University of Liverpool

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fazilet Bekiroglu

Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

F. Bekiroglu

University of Liverpool

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Dhanda

University of Liverpool

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Stanbury

University of Liverpool

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. Sibson

University of Liverpool

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge