James S. O’Donnell

ABO blood group determines plasma von Willebrand factor levels: a biologic function after all?

For many years, an association between ABO histo‐blood group and risk of thrombosis has been recognized. Blood group non‐O (A, B, and AB) individuals have consistently been found to demonstrate increased incidence of both arterial and venous thrombotic disease, compared to group O individuals. This increased risk is attributable to the fact that ABO blood group influences plasma levels of a coagulation glycoprotein named von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWF levels are 25 percent higher in non‐O compared to group O individuals. The mechanism by which ABO group determines plasma VWF levels has not been determined. ABO(H) carbohydrate antigenic determinants, however, are expressed on the N‐linked glycan chains of circulating plasma VWF. This review will focus on the carbohydrate structures of VWF and recent studies suggesting that subtle variations in these structures (particularly differences in ABO blood group antigen expression) may have clinically significant effects on VWF proteolysis and clearance.

Factor VIII and von Willebrand factor interaction: biological, clinical and therapeutic importance

Summary.  The interaction of factor VIII (FVIII) with von Willebrand Factor (VWF) is of direct clinical significance in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with haemophilia A and von Willebrand disease (VWD). A normal haemostatic response to vascular injury requires both FVIII and VWF. It is well‐established that in addition to its role in mediating platelet to platelet and platelet to matrix binding, VWF has a direct role in thrombin and fibrin generation by acting as a carrier molecule for the cofactor FVIII. Recent studies show that the interaction affects not only the biology of both FVIII and VWF, and the pathology of haemophilia and VWD, but also presents opportunities in the treatment of haemophilia. This review details the mechanisms and the molecular determinants of FVIII interaction with VWF, and the role of FVIII–VWF interaction in modulating FVIII interactions with other proteases, cell types and cellular receptors. The effect of defective interaction of FVIII with VWF as a result of mutations in either protein is discussed.

Platelet von Willebrand factor – structure, function and biological importance

Besides circulating in normal plasma, von Willebrand factor (VWF) is also stored at relatively high concentration within the α‐granules of platelets. This pool of platelet VWF exists distinct from plasma VWF, and is enriched in haemostatically‐active high molecular weight multimers. Interestingly, the glycosylation profile of platelet VWF differs significantly from that of plasma VWF. Total sialic acid and galactose expression are reduced twofold on platelet VWF, and ABO blood group carbohydrate determinants are not present on the N‐linked glycans of platelet VWF. Consequently, in view of the critical role played by VWF glycans in modulating its activity, it is not surprising that the functional properties of platelet VWF differ markedly compared to those of plasma VWF. Nevertheless, animal model studies suggest that both plasma and platelet VWF play important roles in securing primary haemostasis. In addition, platelet VWF antigen and activity levels vary markedly between patients with different types of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Future studies to define the biochemical mechanisms responsible for these differences between plasma and platelet VWF are thus not only of basic scientific interest, but also of direct translational importance.

The endothelial cell protein C receptor: cell surface conductor of cytoprotective coagulation factor signaling

Increasing evidence links blood coagulation proteins with the regulation of acute and chronic inflammatory disease. Of particular interest are vitamin K-dependent proteases, which are generated as a hemostatic response to vascular injury, but can also initiate signal transduction via interactions with vascular receptors. The endothelial cell protein C receptor (EPCR) is a multi-ligand vitamin K-dependent protein receptor for zymogen and activated forms of plasma protein C and factor VII. Although the physiological role of the EPCR-FVII(a) interaction is not well-understood, protein C binding to EPCR facilitates rapid generation of APC in response to excessive thrombin generation, and is a central requirement for the multiple signal-transduction cascades initiated by APC on both vascular endothelial and innate immune cells. Exciting recent studies have highlighted the emerging role of EPCR in modulating the cytoprotective properties of APC in a number of diverse inflammatory disorders. In this review, we describe the structure–function relationships, signal transduction pathways, and cellular interactions that enable EPCR to modulate the anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory properties of its vitamin K-dependent protein ligands, and examine the relevance of EPCR to both thrombotic and inflammation-associated disease.

Low risk of inhibitor formation in haemophilia A patients following en masse switch in treatment to a third generation full length plasma and albumin-free recombinant factor VIII product (ADVATE®).

Summary.  Previous studies have suggested that development of inhibitors in previously treated patients (PTPs) may be attributable to a switch in factor VIII (FVIII) therapeutic product. Consequently, it is widely recognized that inhibitor development must be assessed in PTPs following the introduction of any new FVIII product. Following a national tender process in 2006, all patients with haemophilia A in Ireland changed their FVIII treatment product en masse to a plasma and albumin‐free recombinant full‐length FVIII product (ADVATE®). In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the case records of Irish PTPs to evaluate risk of inhibitor formation following this treatment switch. One hundred and thirteen patients participated in the study. Most patients (89%) had severe haemophilia. Only one of 96 patients with no inhibitor history developed an inhibitor. Prior to the switch in his recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) treatment of choice, this child had only experienced three exposure days (EDs). Consequently, in total he had only received 6 EDs when his inhibitor was first diagnosed. In keeping with this lack of de novo inhibitor development, we observed no evidence of any recurrent inhibitor formation in any of 16 patients with previously documented inhibitors. Similarly, following a previous en masse switch, we have previously reported that changing from a Chinese hamster ovary cell‐produced to a baby hamster kidney cell‐produced rFVIII was also associated with a low risk of inhibitor formation in PTPs. Our cumulative findings from these two studies clearly emphasizes that the risk of inhibitor development for PTPs following changes in commercial rFVIII product is low, at least in the Irish population.

Concentration-dependent roles for heparin in modifying liopolysaccharide-induced activation of mononuclear cells in whole blood

In addition to their anticoagulant activity, unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) have important immunomodulatory properties. However, different studies have reported conflicting pro- and anti-inflammatory effects in association with heparin. Moreover, the molecular basis for these heparin effects on inflammation remains unclear. It was the objective of this study to determine how UFH and LMWH regulate lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced activation of human mononuclear cells in whole blood, and define the role of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) in mediating this effect. Whole blood was pre-treated with UFH or LMWH (0.1-200 IU/ml), prior to stimulation with LPS (10 ng/ml). After six hours, monocyte pro-inflammatory cytokine (interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-alpha) secretion was determined by plasma ELISA. Parallel experiments using THP-1 cell line and primary monocytes were performed under serum-free conditions, in the presence or absence of LBP (50-100 nM). Under serum-free conditions, heparin demonstrated dose-dependent anti-inflammatory effects, significantly reducing secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-alpha) in response to LPS-stimulation of THP-1 cells and primary monocytes. In contrast, in the presence of LBP, both UFH and LMWH demonstrated dose-dependent pro-inflammatory effects at all heparin concentrations. In ex-vivo whole blood experiments, pro-inflammatory effects (increased IL-1beta and IL-8 following LPS-stimulation) of heparin were also observed, but only at supra-therapeutic doses (10-200 IU/ml). Our data demonstrate that in the absence of LBP, the direct effect of heparin on LPS-stimulated monocytes is anti-inflammatory. However in whole blood, the immunomodulatory effects of heparin are significantly more complex, with either pro- or anti-inflammatory effects dependent upon heparin concentration.

Does antithrombotic therapy improve survival in cancer patients

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of malignancy, and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulant therapy, in the form of heparin and warfarin, plays an important role in the prevention of recurrent VTE. Recent studies have demonstrated that long-term therapy with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is more effective than warfarin in patients with cancer. In addition, accumulating clinical evidence suggests that LMWH significantly improves overall survival in cancer patients without VTE. Intriguingly, however, this improved survival cannot simply be explained by a reduction in fatal pulmonary embolism. Furthermore, the beneficial effects persist long after the LMWH has been discontinued, suggesting that LMWH can directly influence tumour cell biology. This hypothesis is entirely plausible, given the complex feedback mechanisms that exist between tumour cells, coagulation proteases, and vascular endothelial cells. Furthermore, an accumulating body of in vitro experimental evidence suggests that both heparin and warfarin have direct antineoplastic effects. Further large randomized controlled trials will be required in order to validate these exciting preliminary data, and to define whether anticoagulant therapy may constitute a useful adjunctive therapy in the management of cancer patients without VTE.

Development of a fluorescent anti-factor Xa assay to monitor unfractionated and low molecular weight heparins.

Fluorogenic assays have many potential advantages over traditional clot-based and chromogenic assays such as the absence of interference from a range of factor deficiencies as well as offering the possibility of assays in platelet rich plasma or whole blood. A fluorogenic anti-factor Xa (anti-FXa) assay has been developed for the determination of unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), namely enoxaparin and tinzaparin, and the synthetic heparinoid danaparoid, in commercial human pooled plasma. The assay was based on the complexation of heparin-spiked plasmas with exogenous FXa at a concentration of 4nM in the presence of 0.9microM of the fluorogenic substrate methylsulfonyl-D-cyclohexylalanyl-glycyl-arginine-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin acetate (Pefafluor FXa). Pooled plasma samples were spiked with concentrations of anticoagulants in the range 0-1.6U/ml. The assay was capable of the measurement of UFH and danaparoid in the range 0-1U/ml, and enoxaparin and tinzaparin in the range 0-0.8 and 0-0.6U/ml, respectively. Correlation coefficients generated by linear regression of the log/lin data analysis were between 0.93 and 0.96 for the anticoagulants tested. Assay percentage coefficients of variation were typically below 7%.

Activated factor X signaling via protease-activated receptor 2 suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokine production from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated myeloid cells

Vitamin K-dependent proteases generated in response to vascular injury and infection enable fibrin clot formation, but also trigger distinct immuno-regulatory signaling pathways on myeloid cells. Factor Xa, a protease crucial for blood coagulation, also induces protease-activated, receptor-dependent cell signaling. Factor Xa can bind both monocytes and macrophages, but whether factor Xa-dependent signaling stimulates or suppresses myeloid cell cytokine production in response to Toll-like receptor activation is not known. In this study, exposure to factor Xa significantly impaired pro-inflammatory cytokine production from lipopolysaccharide-treated peripheral blood mononuclear cells, THP-1 monocytic cells and murine macrophages. Furthermore, factor Xa inhibited nuclear factor-kappa B activation in THP-1 reporter cells, requiring phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase activity for its anti-inflammatory effect. Active-site blockade, γ-carboxyglutamic acid domain truncation and a peptide mimic of the factor Xa inter-epidermal growth factor-like region prevented factor Xa inhibition of lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor-α release. In addition, factor Xa anti-inflammatory activity was markedly attenuated by the presence of an antagonist of protease-activated receptor 2, but not protease-activated receptor 1. The key role of protease-activated receptor 2 in eliciting factor Xa-dependent anti-inflammatory signaling on macrophages was further underscored by the inability of factor Xa to mediate inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 release from murine bone marrow-derived protease-activated receptor 2-deficient macrophages. We also show for the first time that, in addition to protease-activated receptor 2, factor Xa requires a receptor-associated protein-sensitive low-density lipoprotein receptor to inhibit lipopolysaccharide-induced cytokine production. Collectively, the findings of this study support a novel function for factor Xa as an endogenous, receptor-associated protein-sensitive, protease-activated receptor 2-dependent regulator of myeloid cell pro-inflammatory cytokine production.

Thrombin generation in haemophilia A patients with mutations causing factor VIII assay discrepancy

Summary.  Up to 40% of patients with mild haemophilia A have a discrepancy whereby factor VIII (FVIII) measurements by a two‐stage chromogenic assay (FVIII:CCH) are disproportionately reduced compared with the FVIII one‐stage clotting value (FVIII:C). Which assay best reflects the coagulation potential and clinical phenotype in this patient group is of clinical significance, yet remains unclear. We have assessed the global coagulant ability of haemophilia patients with FVIII assay discrepancy using calibrated automated thrombography (CAT). A total of 18 patients with mutations Arg531His/Cys or Arg698Trp causing FVIII discrepancy were investigated, together with 12 haemophilia patients with concordant FVIII values and 15 normal controls. Factor VIII levels in all patients and controls were measured using both one‐stage clotting assay and two‐stage chromogenic assay. Thrombin generation was assessed in platelet‐poor plasma by CAT using a low tissue factor concentration (1 pm). FVIII:CCH values were below normal in all patients, and in the discrepant group were between 1.5‐ and 8‐fold lower than FVIII:C values. CAT parameters were affected in all haemophilia patients. The endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) was reduced to 58–67% of the mean normal value (1301 nm min−1), whereas peak thrombin was further reduced to 27–30% of the mean normal value (178 nm) in both discrepant and concordant patient groups. Analysis of the discrepant patient group showed the most significant correlation between the one‐stage FVIII:C assay and ETP (r2 = 0.44) and peak thrombin parameters (r2 = 0.27).