Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where James W. King is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by James W. King.


Journal of applied communications | 1990

Documenting Illustrations; To Justify or Not to Justify ; Public Communication Campaigns; The Public Understanding of Science; Communicate!

Carol Sanders Reiner; Joyce Patterson; James W. King

Rreview of Documenting nIustrations, by Mary C. Hester, Jacquelyn L. Monday. and John I. Snead ; To Justify or Not to Justify, by Allan Haley; Public Communication Campaigns (Second Edition), edited by Ronald E. Rice and Charles K. Atkin; The Public Understanding of Science, by J.R. Durnat, G.A. Evans, and G.P. Thomas; Communicate!, by the Philippine Association of Communication Educators. Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License. This review is available in Journal of Applied Communications: http://newprairiepress.org/jac/vol74/iss1/8


Journal of applied communications | 1986

Single-Concept Publications for Teaching Cassava Production Practices

David J. Miller; James W. King

Single-concept publications can have a great impact in teaching agricultural and home economics practices even though the reading level of the audience may be low. This research is available in Journal of Applied Communications: https://newprairiepress.org/jac/vol69/iss4/5 Single-Concept Publications for Teaching Cassava Production Practices David J. Miller and James W. King Single-concept publications can have a great impact in teaching agricultural and home economics practices even though the reading level of the audience may be low. Used purposefully. these publications can summarize main points, help to recall discussion, reinforce learning, and serve as a reference after training. These functions help to improve communication in the teaching situation, especially in developing countries. In this article we describe single-concept publications, and then provide an example of their development and use in an international development project. Single-Concept Publications: The Background During the past 20 years, the single-concept publication has been widely used in the United States, both as a stand-alone handout and as part of a loose-leaf reference handbook on many agricultural and home economics subjects. Examples are Nebraskas Neb-Guide and the Missouri Agricultural Guide. The format has been popular in the U.S. for several reasons. Single-concept publications can be combined into a handbook and be made available as a reference for field staff and the publications are easy and inexpensive to produce. For the extension agent, it is more to the point to hand a onepage publication on soybean cyst-nematode to a farmer than to give (or sell) him a 75-page publication on soybean producDavid Miller is Director, Training and Outreach, USAID, Kinshasa, Zaire. He has been an ACE member for 1 year_ James King is Extension Communication Specialist, University of Nebraska~lIncoln . He has been an ACE member 5 years. 27 1 Miller and King: Single-Concept Publications for Teaching Cassava Production Pract Published by New Prairie Press, 2017 tion; it allows the extension specialist who develops the single-concept publication to be more concise. Perhaps the best case for using single-concept publications is often ignored-the potential for use in educational program development. Single-concept publications put solid principles of education into practice. For example, research tells us that adults learn best when the learning comes in small steps, logically sequenced. This principle is especially important with low-educational-Ievel audiences as well as audiences who will, in turn, teach these steps to others. The single-concept publication can form a practical base for a training module to which can be added visuals , handouts, worksheets, a lesson plan, teaching techniques that allow hands-on experience in the field, reinforcement such as field trips to see results, etc. Single-Concept Modules Production of the publication is not the first task in module development. While steps may vary depending on the approach of the training developers, standard processes in the design and development of single-concept modules to be used in teaching are: audience analysis-where audience characteristics and needs guide selection of subject matter; development of educational objectives specific enough to help in selecting exact content for teaching and to give a basis for selection. A lesson plan or leaders guide can then be developed to outline the facets of the concept and form a rough draft for the base publication. Central to the entire development process of the singleconcept publication is the analysis of the concept. Working closely with the content specialist, the training designer must go through these steps: 1. Listing the attributes critical to the concept 2. Determining whether the identified attributes are both necessary and sufficient to reliably distinguish examples of the concept from non examples (better done with naive learners) 3. Considering whether other attributes or a small set would be sufficient to define the concept. Media, active teaching techniques, and relevant technologies can now be chosen to teach to each objective under each concept. Based on the concept analysis process, 28 2 Journal of Applied Communications, Vol. 69, Iss. 4 [1986], Art. 5 https://newprairiepress.org/jac/vol69/iss4/5 DOI: 10.4148/1051-0834.1626 sequencing of the examples and definitions of the concept can be using inductive or deductive approaches. A combined approach is very useful in situations where learners are not likely to understand the initial definition. In this approach examples are provided first. From the examples, a rule-a definition of set of attributes-is derived. Then the rule is applied to further examples. Simple pretesting strategies can be designed to test the appropriateness of these choices. Taking into account the audience, objectives, specific content, and teaching techniques, support materials including the base publication can now be put into final form. Single-Concept Publications: An Example Single-concept publications have been used to advantage in training collectivity agronomies in cassava production in the Bandundu region of Zaire. (In Zaire, several villages are organized into a larger collectivity and agronomies are appOinted at the collectivity level.) To increase use of a new variety of cassava in the region and encourage adoption of several new production practices, the agronomic research and outreach project (RAV), an umbrella project for national commodity research programs in cassava, maize, and legume crops in Zaire, developed training for collectivity agronomies in the area around the Kiyaka research station. Training decisions were based on both needs analysis and audience analysis. Then the RAV outreach specialist and the training specialist chose seven concepts for training the collectivity agronomies in cassava production: site selection; planning for cassava production; selecting varieties and planting material ; land preparation; field maintenance; harvesting; processing and storage. Seven publications were written for each concept. Each of these publications formed the basic information for a training module. Every module could stand alone or be incorporated with others to provide a longer period of training as well as an enlarged content pool. Each single-concept publication included new or innovative practices. Combined, they formed the nucleus of a package of agricultural practices backed up by research in regional cassava production. 29 3 Miller and King: Single-Concept Publications for Teaching Cassava Production Pract Published by New Prairie Press, 2017 Interview Process Used To develop the single-concept publication, the RAV used an interview process. The training specialist interviewed the outreach specialist, and then wrote a rough draft of the seven publications. Each interview took about one and a half hours and was an in-depth definition of the attributes of a single concept of cassava production. The interview technique for development of short publications was easier than asking the specialist to take the time to write a large (and many times less useful) publication on his own initiative. This interview process also helped bring out aspects of the concept that might have been missed otherwise. After the interview, the training specialist wrote a draft of each publication in English (his native language) and then corrected and refined the draft as necessary with the outreach specialist (whose native language was also English). The English draft was written at a suitable reading level, 7-9 years of schooling, for the audience. The next step was translation into French, the official language used by the agronomies. As a pretest measure, this translation was then reviewed by the outreach specialist, training specialist, and a Zairian scientist working with the RAV program. In some cases the wording was changed or simplified as indicated by the pretest data. English and French Needed This process of translation was difficult because there was a continuous risk of increasing the reading level. Where possible, it would be better to write in the language of the final publication. However, in the Zairian case there was a need for both English and French versions. Single-concept publications need not be expensive or sophisticated to be useful. The RAV publications were typed and photocopied. Line drawings or simple illustrations were added easily. After the single-concept publications were completed, teaching techniques and other support material were designed. In the RAV training program, the collectivity agronomies work with villages to organize multiplication fields using the new practices. While the agronomies take the responsibility to work with the villages, the project outreach 30 4 Journal of Applied Communications, Vol. 69, Iss. 4 [1986], Art. 5 https://newprairiepress.org/jac/vol69/iss4/5 DOI: 10.4148/1051-0834.1626 specialist monitors them and continues to advise where necessary. RAVs training program in cassava production is now in its second year of operation. The outreach specialist estimates 50-70 percent success with the targeted audiences in following the agricultural practices advocated during the one-week training session. The specialist believes these results are realistic and satisfactory at this stage. Reactions to the singleconcept publications have been positive among the cOllectivily agronomies. There is evidence that the agronomies continue to use the publications and keep them after the training.


Journal of applied communications | 1995

Marketing Public Relations: the Hows That Make It Work

Robert G. Hays; James W. King; Jerry Rostad

A book review of Marketing Public Relations: the Hows That Make It Work, by Rene A. Henry Jr. Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License. This review is available in Journal of Applied Communications: http://newprairiepress.org/jac/vol79/iss2/5 Reviews M,~eUng P<obllc Rcl.UOn5; Ill. How


Journal of applied communications | 1994

Questioning Technology: Tool, Toy or Tyrant?

James W. King

T~I Mah I, Work, try Re A. Henr, J r, low. Sto le Univers~y ~ .. , Am.,.. 1995. (ISBI! 0 ·6138 ·2203·40 .) 336 pp. h.,<lcove S29 . 9~, Tho , ,, ........ ., ,,, >k _ _ h;, tuO;«t ,,,,~ pubI, .. I.ollon, ~. oomJ- .1·<o<om~ .. log, .w, .. _ .. ond Normation PI> c~ dl,«Iod I m ... o>«l.o y oudi«>« ,,, ,, /, ..... < ioc ... >«l ...... or OM 01 on ,gonl· ,,,,,,,,,, ..,.-.. -,,~<. Put mo,. ~mpIy, ~ ,,klng .boo, .... blOc ~I.. <fIott. d<~ed wo<lf~ • .,y to .. 11 Iog , ....... ,n <nO .. ,.,. to <_to or m, • f .. O/oe imo .. , Although ,,,. ...... ~vo u .. 01 bI>< .. 1_ tK.;,,,. __ ••• cOOOwnooPQduch if .... ..... y ...... , .... Ide. po.ot>IOc .tion> COfI bo .n m porton, • ....,. of ,,,. og mi . ........ n . ,.,..... k>r • - ti_, r . ~ 0,,,,,, • • II<~ to Harold Bu.. _._IJ<, ,,y found« ..-ho . , ,.. r,.,.,d to th;, _ . 10 that _ toGoy .... • .,;.,It to «,nvnrt m<>n<y 0 _ .. I .ct ~,, . ~ _ 1ogIc y .... ,g ,I< ,oOo6ons ;, .. .. , .poe; oegmenl 01 .... br-.J p.,bI fidd. W. . W ... w. m.y root ,,< k,,,, ~, I, U-.. en to .,rum .... pub/>< ,d .. prK1I<:. <mployed , .. II pm . .. . m,, dIH 1<, .... ,~ 1>1< .. otion. «< .... . ,fdrk<lIng IItbIlo R<r....,.... , .. tho ,. ;, mud, dill ... ., 8<.,._ .... «hi ....... , . ,., .. blt I .... .,. lor ooyo<>< ., N ,,_ .. ,,,,,,,, ... . pub/ Otion , • .,.,.,.10;1<1< Tho -_ . ........ , <0 thrwg lh< book moi< • • ~ k: to ..... . 01 , .. ,,<:t>. ,,, to ...... b_, to .. .pool .. .. ,, .... to .... , <:,. ,_, , 0<1 1>0-00 .......... ,....Its.r< _ .. bomplo • . 0... eN OOVti> . _ .,...m •. Spec,, ..... . 1>0, ..... . 0< publ .. ,.,, ._. .I>lI< ,.,.....,,,>e,,.. ~.It-.. ... ,..,. •• . H. orr. .. !ko<lOd ..... pI .. 01 .poe;1 .. 0>0, _ , . 0<1 • I ... .. _ No ..od;. ,ov;dor: •• ....,pIo .~, ....... , .. 1o<m and <Mcklio .. ., tI,.,.,..I,., •• ~ QUid< 10 , pl. n<>i.-.g .r><t ,.;,;, . Tho d>ockJ 1 It, do~n -om {b«! _ m,,, , ... _dJ dota ll, .. making ... , . tho laW nklo.,,, ,<MI>«f oil, 1 Hays et al.: Marketing Public Relations: the Hows That Make It Work Published by New Prairie Press, 2017 The ,,, c~.p ..... VOI ,. ,,>0<>0 of 11 to. ~ ..,.. .><1 .. , J>«h... kI< ............ _ ., Outllo<. F.,.. .......... 1>0 _ V-e _ .• in<lud ... cwoe 01_, .. .... ,;g w~ .... we .. , The boOk 0><1_, 1~ chOplet> ...... .,.. ..... to 0 spe<ltIc . to· topic, _ ... .......... Roi>crt Hays University or Ill inois 2 Journal of Applied Communications, Vol. 79 [1995], Iss. 2, Art. 5 http://newprairiepress.org/jac/vol79/iss2/5 DOI: 10.4148/1051-0834.1374


Journal of applied communications | 1988

Reactions to an Initial Attempt At Implementing Interactive Videodisc in Extension

S. Kay Rockwell; James W. King

A review of Questioning Technology: Tool, Toy or Tyrant?, edited by John Zerran and Alice Carnes. This review is available in Journal of Applied Communications: https://newprairiepress.org/jac/vol78/iss1/7 Questioning Technology: Tool. Toy or Tyrant ? Edited by John Zerzan and Ali ce C arnes . New Sodety Pub lishers. Phil ade lp hia PA, 199 1. ( ISBN 0-86571,205·0).


Journal of applied communications | 1988

A Mnemonic Based on Arranging Words on Visual Patterns; Performance Improvement Quarterly; The Cooperative Extension Service; Instant Health Information: Serving Needs of Rural Residents

Debrah Jefferson; James W. King; Greg Nolting; Jim Shaner

1 2.95. Technology and technologkal decisions structure our minds and , in doing so. our relaUons with each ot her and with the natural world. Whether we use tools to control or tnh&nce. a ll our rela1lons arc shape<I as much by the tools themselves as by any other set of cultural assumptiOns or soc::lal structures. With this charge, Questio11it1g TechnCXO!JY takes us on an ,c hle· r at i ng intellech.1al joumey. From television to computer. modern communication and information technologies have l>e n fus-ed into seemingly every comer of our lives. As we debate these technolo• gies and their effects. this collection of 35 poper, will enrich and deep.en our conve~tion.s. The .selections range from the clossic-s of ~wis Mumford ( .. Authoritarian and Democrat ic Technics from Technology ond Culture) ond Jo(ques Ellul (The Te(hno logical Society) to the <On temporary La ngdon Win ner eMythinformotion) and Jerry Mander (Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television). The three sections of Questioning Technology envelop the t«:hoo• logical front: lht history of technology and its impact on our future, computers and Informed individuals, and an analysis of technology ond meanings. The Jul.hors explore i,sues


Journal of applied communications | 1987

Publish: The How-to Magazine of Desktop Publishing; Personal Publishing: The Magazine for Desktop Publishers; PC Publishing:The Desktop Publishing Magazine for IBM & Compatible PC Users

Jim Shaner; James W. King; Darcy Meeker

uch as the development or encroachment of technology. the computer ond the printing pre.ss as comp.erable te<:hnologles, and the evolution or technologies as new orde r. Each ou t hor questions basic O


Journal of applied communications | 1987

Extension's Partnership with the Future; "To Educate a People"; "The Extension Organization of the Future"; Prairie Schooner Nebraska: The Individual Voice.

Jim Shaner; James W. King


Journal of applied communications | 1986

The Training Component in Tropical Agriculture: A Management Perspective

James W. King

umptions with well reosoned and provocative arguments. Many of the articles ore, in fact. classics of the litcroture of tc(hnok>gy. They include James Gormons M.an, Bytes, Dog end Solly Georhorts An End to Technology. Severo! writers even d ispute the sacred concept of modem learn• ing technology, interc1cllon. They (hallenge how and what people learn from technology and its affect on human reltHtOn.ships. Several critics scrutinize the notions of l11form.,tlon and communicalion, <losing with the ((>ntroversy, Is technology ,1eultatr Queslloning Technologys aim, of (oursc. is to e,ccite readers and force them


Journal of applied communications | 1985

Handbook of Nonsexist Writing for Writers, Editors and Speakers; Marketing to Women ; Microcomputer Primer (First Edition): A Layman's Guide for Selection and Use of Microcomputers in Developing Countries

Dennis Hinkamp; Joe Courson; James W. King

Cr iously to renect on technolog)•. The editors want to •re,tngage our hearts ond minds in the search for tru ly appropriate and accountable technologies . Although most of the books questions and Issues are beyond the control of the nocmal commun icator. they make us confront still .Jour1t•I of Applr«I Comm11nk,illOIIJ.. Vol. 78. No. 1. 1994 / 43 1 King: Questioning Technology: Tool, Toy or Tyrant? Published by New Prairie Press, 2017 basic c:oneerns over the appltcat!Qn Qf te<:hnc,!ogy. The books major limitation. an(;! b somewhot irtitating one. is its l ac k of the great supp<>rte.rs of technology

Collaboration


Dive into the James W. King's collaboration.

Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge